Top Banner
Assessing the Curriculum Lesson 1 Intended vs. Implemented vs. Achieved Curriculum
31
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Presentation 1

Assessing the Curriculum

Lesson 1Intended vs. Implemented vs. Achieved Curriculum

Page 2: Presentation 1

Purpose of Curriculum AssessmentCurriculum assessment is the process of collecting information for use

in evaluation.

Curriculum assessment may achieve the following purposes:

1. Highlight curriculum expectations.2. Motivate students to learn better.3. Motivate and encourage teachers to meet

the identified needs of students.

Page 3: Presentation 1

4. Provide evidence to tell how well the students have learned.

5. Obtain feedback that helps teachers, students and parents make good decisions to guide instruction.

Page 4: Presentation 1

Intended Curriculum

• Refers to a set of objectives set at the beginning of any curricular plan.

• There are certain indicators to measure intended curriculum. Among the indicators are stated questions which can be answered.

Example of the question are the following:1. Are the objectives achievable within the

learners’ developmental levels?

Page 5: Presentation 1

2. Can the objectives be accomplished within the time frame?

3. Are the resources adequate to accomplish the objectives?

4. Are the objectives specific and clear?5. Are there ways of measuring the outcomes of

the objectives?6. Are the objectives are observable?7. Are the objectives doable?8. Are the objectives relevant?9. Overall, are the objectives SMART?

Page 6: Presentation 1

Implemented Curriculum

• Refers to the various learning activities or experiences of the students in order to achieve the intended curricular outcomes.

To asses the implemented curriculum the following questions can be addressed:

1. Are the learning activities congruent with the stated objectives.

2. Are the materials and methods appropriate for the

Page 7: Presentation 1

3. Does the teacher has the skill to implement the activities or use the strategy?

4. Does the teacher utilize the various ways of doing to complement the learning styles of the students?

5. Are there alternative activities for the learners to do to accomplish the same objectives?

6. Are there activities provided to address individual differences?

7. Do the activities provide the maximum learning experiences?

8. Do the activities motivate the learners to do more and harness their potentials?

9. Do the activities utilize multiple sensory abilities of the learners?

10. Do the activities address multiple intelligences of the learners?

Page 8: Presentation 1

Achieved Curriculum

• Refers to the curriculum outcomes based on the first two types of curriculum, the intended and the implemented.

To measure achieved curriculum the following questions should be addressed:

1. Do the learning outcomes achieved by the learners approximate the level of performance set at the beginning of the curriculum?

Page 9: Presentation 1

2. Are the learning outcomes achieved higher or lower than the objectives set?

3. Do the achieved learning outcomes reflect the knowledge, skills, attitudes and skills intended to be developed?

4. How many percent of the learners in the class perform higher than the level set at the beginning?

5. Do the curricular outcomes reflect the goals and the aspirations of the community where the curriculum was implemented?

Page 10: Presentation 1

Three Kind of Curriculum

CURRICULUM

Inte

nded

Implem

ent

Achieved

Page 11: Presentation 1

From the DepEd BEC primer, the following are the goals of the basic education curriculum

1. To raise the quality of Filipino learners and graduates who will become lifelong learners.

2. To decongest the curriculum in order that the teachers and the learners will be able to contextualize it.

3. To use innovative, interdisciplinary and integrative modes of instructional delivery whenever possible and appropriate.

4. To make values development integral to all learning areas in high school.

5. To increase time for tasks in order to gain mastery of competencies of the basic tool subjects.

Page 12: Presentation 1

LESSON 2 Criteria for Curriculum Assessment

Criteria and objectives a set standards to be followed in assessment. Specifically, as they apply to curriculum, criteria are set of standards upon which the different elements of the curriculum are being tested.

Page 13: Presentation 1

Criteria for Goals and Objectives

• Goals and objectives are statements of curricular expectations. Goals and instructional objectives are formulated and specified for the following purposes:

1. To have focus on curriculum and instruction which give direction to where students need to go.

2. To meet the requirements specified in the policies and standards of curriculum and instruction.

Page 14: Presentation 1

3. To provide the students’ the best possible education and describe the student’s level of performance.

4. To monitor the progress of the students based on the goals set.

5. To motivate students to learn and the teachers to be able to feel a sense of competence when goals are attained.

Page 15: Presentation 1

For goals and objectives to be formulated criteria on certain elements should be include according to Howell and Nolet in 2000.

1. Content- From the objectives, what content should students learn?

2. Behavior- What will students do to indicate that they have learned?

3. Criterion- What level of performance should the students have to master the behavior?

4. Condition- Under what circumstances should the students work in order to master that behavior?

Page 16: Presentation 1

Writing effective goals and objectives should also use the following general criteria

1. Are the objectives syntactically correct?- Syntactic correctness

2. Do the objectives comply with the legal requirements of the course of subjects?- Compliance with legal requirements

3. Do the objectives pass the stranger test?- The “Stranger Test”

4. Do the objectives address both knowledge and behavior?- Both knowledge and behavior are addressed

Page 17: Presentation 1

5. Do they pass the “so what” test?- The “so- what “ Test

6. Are the objectives aligned?- Individualization7. Do they make common sense?- Common

sense

Criteria for assessment of Instruction1. Supplantive Approach2. Generative Approach

Page 18: Presentation 1

A Comparison of Teaching ApproachesAttribute Generative Approach Supplantive Approach

Buzz words used by proponent

Constructivist Direct instruction

Developmental Teacher- directed

Top Down Mastery Learning

Holistic Task analytic

Authentic Competency based

Meaning- based Effective teaching

Page 19: Presentation 1

What proponents call the other

Romantics Reductionist

Fuzzy Drill-and-Kill

Postmodemist Dogmatic

Unrealistic Unauthentic

Underlying beliefs about how learning occurs

Students construct their own under standing

The skills that students need to learn can be derived from an analysis of the social demands place on them.

When learning is contextualized, students will identify what they are ready to learn.

Page 20: Presentation 1

Underlying beliefs about how learning occurs.

Learning is “socially constructed”, students link new information to prior knowledge when provided opportunities to observe or experience.

Learning can be induced through instruction that builds explicit links between new information and prior knowledge.

Underlying beliefs about how to teach

Learning is developmental and occurs much the way early language is acquired.

When learning does not occur, it can be facilitated by building it from the “bottom up” through teaching of prerequisite sub skills.

Page 21: Presentation 1

Teachers take a “hands off” approach and seek to provide a meaningful context in which learning will occur naturally.

Teachers take a “hands on” approach by structuring lessons and providing explicit direction.

Common error made by proponents

Creating interesting classroom activities but failure to link these activities to learning outcomes.

By focusing on specific learning outcomes, they may fail to attend to other equally important interests and topics.

Too much emphasis on larger ideas, not enough emphasis on the components.

Too much emphasis on the components, not enough emphasis on the larger ideas.

Attribute Generative Approach Supplantive approach

Page 22: Presentation 1
Page 23: Presentation 1
Page 24: Presentation 1
Page 25: Presentation 1
Page 26: Presentation 1
Page 27: Presentation 1
Page 28: Presentation 1
Page 29: Presentation 1
Page 30: Presentation 1
Page 31: Presentation 1