Preparing Title I Eligible Students for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman March 23, 2012
Mar 26, 2015
Preparing Title I Eligible Students for the Challenges and Opportunities of the
Common Core State Standards
Willard R. Daggett, Founder and ChairmanMarch 23, 2012
Point of Departure
•Common Core State Standards
Major Changes Impacting Title I Eligible Students
• Fewer Standards
Major ChangesImpacting Title I Eligible Students
• Fewer Standards• Higher Standards
Point of Departure
•Common Core State Standards
•Next Generation Assessments
Major Changes Impacting Title I Eligible Students
• Fewer Standards• Higher Standards• Application Based Assessments
Application Model1. Knowledge in one discipline2. Application within discipline3. Application across disciplines4. Application to real-world predictable
situations5. Application to real-world unpredictable
situations
• Created the Rigor / Relevance Framework®
Point of Reference
• Created the Rigor / Relevance Framework®
• Became framework for CCSS and NGA
Point of Reference
• Created the Rigor / Relevance Framework®
• Became framework for CCSS and NGA• Lexile, Quantile and NESS research is helping
define proficiency in NGA
Point of Reference
• Created the Rigor / Relevance Framework®
• Became framework for CCSS and NGA• Lexile, Quantile and NESS research is helping
define proficiency in NGA• 5-year study with CCSSO and Gates Foundation
Point of Reference
School Improvement
Schools Are Improving
Schools Are Improving
School Improvement
Changing World
Skills Gap
School Improvement
Changing World
Schools Are Improving
School Improvement
Changing World
Schools Are Improving
School
Impro
vement
Changing World
Schools Are Improving
• Created the Rigor / Relevance Framework®
• Became framework for CCSS and NGA• Lexile, Quantile and NESS research is helping
define proficiency in NGA• 5-year study with CCSSO and Gates Foundation• Work with the early implementers (RttT)
Point of Reference
WHY – WHAT - HOW
WHY
Schools Are Improving
School Improvement
Changing World
The Changing Landscape for Title I Eligible Students
• Technology
The Changing Landscape for Title I Eligible Students
• Technology• Globalization
The Changing Landscape for Title I Eligible Students
•Technology• Globalization• Financial
The Changing Landscape for Title I Eligible Students
• Technology• Globalization• Financial• Demographics
why – WHAT - how
Reading Study Summary
600
800
1000
1400
1600
1200
Tex
t L
exil
e M
easu
re (
L)
HighSchool
Literature
CollegeLiterature
HighSchool
Textbooks
CollegeTextbooks
Military PersonalUse
Entry-LevelOccupations
SAT 1,ACT,AP*
* Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics
Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)
PISA 2009
1 Shanghai-China 556
2 Korea 539
3 Finland 536
4 Hong Kong-China 533
5 Singapore 526
6 Canada 524
7 New Zealand 521
8 Japan 520
9 Australia 515
10 Netherlands 508
17 United States 500
20 Germany 497
21 Ireland 496
22 France 496
25 United Kingdom 494
33 Spain 481
43 Russian Federation 459
48 Mexico 425
53 Brazil 412
57 Indonesia 402
Overall Reading
Scale
Significantly Above OECD Average
Not Significantly Different
(OECD Average 493)
Significantly below OECD Average
PISA 2009
Overall Math Scale
Significantly Above OECD Average
Not Significantly Different
(OECD Average 496)
Significantly below OECD Average
1 Shanghai-China 600
2 Singapore 562
3 Hong Kong-China 555
4 Korea 546
6 Finland 541
9 Japan 529
10 Canada 527
11 Netherlands 526
13 New Zealand 519
15 Australia 514
16 Germany 513
22 France 497
28 United Kingdom 492
31 United States 487
32 Ireland 487
34 Spain 483
38Russian Federation
468
51 Mexico 419
57 Brazil 386
61 Indonesia 371
PISA 2009
Overall Science
Scale
Significantly Above OECD Average
Not Significantly Different
(OECD Average 501)
Significantly below OECD Average
1 Shanghai-China 575
2 Finland 554
3 Hong Kong-China 549
4 Singapore 542
5 Japan 539
6 Korea 538
7 New Zealand 532
8 Canada 529
10 Australia 527
11 Netherlands 522
13 Germany 520
16 United Kingdom 514
20 Ireland 508
23 United States 502
27 France 498
36 Spain 488
39 Russian Federation 478
50 Mexico 416
53 Brazil 405
60 Indonesia 383
2005 Proficiency2005 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Mississippi 88 %
Georgia 87 %
North Carolina 82 %
Texas 81 %
Ohio 77 %
New York 71%
Arkansas 53 %
Massachusetts 48 %
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Georgia 87 %
Texas 84 %
Ohio 82 %
Wisconsin 82 %
New York 77 %
North Carolina 69 %
Massachusetts 54 %
Mississippi 52 %
2005 Proficiency2005 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Mississippi 88 % 161
Georgia 87 % 175
North Carolina 82 % 183
Texas 81 % 190
Ohio 77 % 199
New York 71% 207
Arkansas 53 % 217
Massachusetts 48 % 234
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Georgia 87 % 178
Texas 84 % 188
Ohio 82 % 192
Wisconsin 82 % 189
New York 77 % 200
North Carolina 69 % 204
Massachusetts 54 % 234
Mississippi 52 % 210
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Georgia 87 % (0) 178 (+3)
Texas 84 % (+3) 188 (-2)
Ohio 82 % (+5) 192 (-7)
Wisconsin 82 % (-1) 189 (0)
New York 77% (+6) 200 (-7)
North Carolina 69 % (-13) 204 (+21)
Massachusetts 54 % (+6) 234 (0)
Mississippi 52 % (-36) 210 (+49)
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 8 ReadingGrade 8 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Texas 94 % (+11)
201 (-24)
Wisconsin 85 % (-1) 232 (+3)
Georgia 77 % (-6) 209 (-15)
Ohio 72 % (-8) 251 (+10)
New York 68 % (+19)
247 (-21)
Florida 54 % (+10)
262 (-3)
Mississippi 48 % (-10) 254 (+7)
California 48 % (+9) 259 (-3)
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 4 MathematicsGrade 4 Mathematics
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
New York 87 % (0) 207 (0)
North Carolina 81 % (-10) 220 (+17)
Mississippi 58 % (-21) 223 (+17)
Georgia 75 % (0) 218 (+3)
Ohio 78 % (+13)
219 (-14)
Florida 75 % (+12)
225 (-5)
Arkansas 78 % (+25)
216 (-20)
Massachusetts 48 % (+9) 255 (0)
2009 Proficiency2009 ProficiencyGrade 8 MathematicsGrade 8 Mathematics
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Texas 83 % (+22)
254 (-19)
New York 80 % (+12)
249 (-26)
North Carolina 80 % (-4) 253 (+6)
Florida 66 % (+8) 266 (-3)
Ohio 59 % (+8) 269 (-9)
Arkansas 61 % (+27)
267 (-21)
Mississippi 54 % (+1) 264 (+2)
Massachusetts 49 % (+7) 300 (-1)
Common Core State Standards
• Fewer• Clearer• Higher• Different
Application Model1. Knowledge in one discipline2. Application within discipline3. Application across disciplines4. Application to real-world predictable
situations5. Application to real-world unpredictable
situations
Knowledge Taxonomy1. Awareness2. Comprehension 3. Application4. Analysis5. Synthesis 6. Evaluation
1 2 3 4 5
Bloom’sBloom’s
CC DD
AA BB
456
321
ApplicationApplication
Levels
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5
A B
DC
Rigor/Relevance Framework
• Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals.
• Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides.
• Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes.
• Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid.
• Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides.
• Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter.
• Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function.
• Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes.
• Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year.
• Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically.
• Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event.
• Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale.
• Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper.
• Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles.
• Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram
• Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5
A B
DC• Analyze the graphs of the
perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides.
• Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter.
• Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function.
• Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes.
• Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year.
• Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically.
• Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event.
• Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale.
• Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper.
• Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles.
• Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram
• Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.
•Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals.
•Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides.
•Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes.
•Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid.
Rigor/Relevance Framework
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5
A B
DC• Express probabilities as fractions,
percents, or decimals.• Classify triangles according to angle
size and/or length of sides.• Calculate volume of simple three-
dimensional shapes.• Given the coordinates of a
quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid.
• Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides.
• Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter.
• Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function.
• Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes.
• Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year.
• Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically.
• Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event.
• Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale.
• Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper.
• Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles.
• Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram.
• Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.
Rigor/Relevance Framework
1 2 3 4 5
Bloom’sBloom’s
CC DD
AA BB
456
321
ApplicationApplication
Levels
Where Are the JobsNon-Routine
Routine• Rules Driven• Problem Solving• Less Innovation/Creativity
• Results Driven• Decision Making• More Innovation / Creativity
1980 2011
Where Are the Jobs
• Write an Algorithm• Can be Digitized• Can be Outsourced
• Cannot Write an Algorithm• Cannot be Digitized• Cannot be Outsourced
1980 2011
Non-Routine
Routine
Quad DSkills and Knowledge
for Title I Eligible Students
• Decision Making• Innovation/Creativity • Goal Setting/Results Driven• Multi Tasking• Work with Others
Common Core State Standards
• Fewer• Clearer• Higher• Different
RIGOR
RELEVANCE
AA BB
DDCC
Rigor/Relevance Framework
Title I Eligible Title I Eligible Students’ Students’ TEACHERTEACHER
WorksWorks
Title I Eligible Title I Eligible StudentStudentThinksThinks
Title I Eligible Title I Eligible Student Thinks Student Thinks
ANDAND Works Works
Title I Eligible Title I Eligible StudentStudentWorksWorks
High
HighLow
Low
Teacher/Title I Eligible Student Roles
Performance Task drawn from the Ohio Performance Assessment Project.
Performance Task drawn from the Ohio Performance Assessment Project.
Performance Task drawn from the Ohio Performance Assessment Project.
• Interpreting distance-time graphs in a real-world context
• Realizing “to the left” is faster
• Understanding points of intersection in that context (they’re tied at the moment)
• Interpreting the horizontal line segment
• Putting all this together in an explanation
why – what - HOW