Inorganic Environmental Geochemistry Practical Course Report by Simon Müller matriculation number 281614 [email protected]
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 1/13
Inorganic EnvironmentalGeochemistryPractical Course Report
by Simon Müller
matriculation number 281614
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 2/13
- 2 -
Contents 1. Introduction
2. Grain size distribution
3. Sample Preparation
4. pH-Value Determination
5. Electrical Conductivity
6. REE-Analyses with LA-ICP-MS
7. Loss on ignition
8. Fused Disc for XRF
9. Ion-selective Electrode (ISE)
10. Determination of elements in solution (ICP-OES/MS)
11. Sequential Extraction
12. Tl-Species
13. Sulphur measurement
14. Analysis of particulate matter, pressed powder pellet, XRF
15. Analysis of Pb-isotope ratios, data interpretation, acid neutralization capacity
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 3/13
- 3 -
1. Introduction
In the practical course for “Inorganic Environmental Geochemistry” construction material from the
city of Stolberg was investigated geochemically. The following descriptions of the experiments and
their results occur in chronologically sorted succession.
2. Grain size distribution
In order to determine the grain size distribution, the sample was grain sieved after DIN ISO 11464
(DIN-HB 2.4a). As preparation the sample had been dried at 105°C to lose all adsorbed water. At first
non-soil-materials like roots, twigs and anthropogenic substances were sorted out. Then
aggregations of grains were broken up in a small agate mortar and the total sample was weighed.
After that the whole sample was sieved with a sieving tower consisting of individual sieves with
different mesh apertures (Tab. 1). The smallest fraction (<0.063mm) was collected in a bowl. It was
not further separated because it would have required considerable additional expenses. Using
vibration (~10min) the single grain size fractions were separated. Each fraction was weighed
subsequently after some waiting time for the dust to settle. The results are shown in Tab. 1 and as a
grain size distribution curve in Fig. 1.
mesh aperture (mm) residuals - (g) residuals - share (w%)residuals- summed share
(%)
> 4 89 31,90 100,00
4 - 2 42 15,05 68,10
2 - 1,12 52 18,64 53,05
1,12 - 0,63 36 12,90 34,41
0,63 - 0,25 36 12,90 21,51
0,25 - 0,112 13 4,66 8,60
0,112 - 0,063 5 1,79 3,94
< 0,063 6 2,15 2,15
total 279 100 0
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 4/13
- 4 -
3. Sample Preparation
The fraction <2mm was now prepared for further investigation. To get representative results the
fraction was milled in a rotating disc mill. Before that the mill was cleaned with laboratory grade sea
sand (SiO2) and water. To accelerate the drying procedure, ethanol was used.
As mill material of choice wolfram-carbide and agate were available. Wolfram carbide would have
increased the values of the milled sample of e.g. wolfram, carbon and also cobalt and tantal. In an
investigation of heavy metals that would have been a disadvantage. Because agate just increases the
SiO2 content, it was chosen. In respect to the brittleness of agate only 7g at once (ca.10g in total) of
the fraction of <2mm was milled for not longer than 30sec until its rigidity was flour-like.
A ceramic crucible was roasted at 1000°C for 10min in a muffle furnace. The roasted crucible was
kept in an exsiccator. The cooled down crucible was then weighed (19.8272g).
Following this, the sample was dried at 105°C for 24h to lose the adsorptive bound water. At a higher
temperature also the water structurally bound to clay minerals would have been lost. The crucible
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
s u m m e d s h a r e ( % )
Mesh Aperture (mm)
Sieving Line Diagramm
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 5/13
- 5 -
cooled down again in an exsiccator until it reached room temperature. The weight of the crucible
with the sample inside was determined.
4. pH-Value Determination
The pH-value of the soil-sample was determined after DIN 19 684 part 1. At first a 0.01 M CaCl2
solution was prepared by mixing 0.147 g CaCl2 with 100ml of distilled water. Then 10g of air dried
sample was admixed with 25ml of the solution. The mixture was stirred intensively and then left to
stand for one hour. Before the measurement the solution was stirred again and then filtrated. The
same procedure was conducted for a solution without the sample to detect the blank value. The
measuring itself was carried out on the filtrate with a calibrated single-rod measuring cell. The resultswere as followed:
. pH at 25°C
Blank Value 5.85
Sample 5.37
5. Electrical Conductivity
The electrical Conductivity measurement was conducted after DIN ISO 11265. Therefore 20g of the
air dried sample were mixed with 100ml of distilled water (conductivity <0.2 mS/m) in a 250ml bottle
and then stirred with a horizontal-shaker with 180 movements per minute for half an hour. After that
the suspension was filtrated and the conductivity measured. Once more a blank value was
determined after the same procedure that was subtracted from the sample value to get the real
conductivity (Sample corrected) of the soil:
. Conductivity (µS/cm) Temperature
Blank Value 14.2 18.1
Sample 162.1 18.2
Sample corrected 147.9
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 6/13
- 6 -
6. REE-Analyses with LA-ICP-MS
Rare earth element contents in general and gadolinium contents in particulary of 3 different samples
were measured. The first sample (UP) was a urine sample taken after ingesting a Gd-DTPA-complex,
the second a sinter of dust containing tap water from the Bergbaugebäude (LW) and the third
sample a sinter from the Landesbad Quelle (LB).
The measurements were conducted with LA-ICP-MS (laser inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometry). Thereby the sample becomes ionized in a plasma. The plasma consists of argon,
electrons and argon ions and has a temperature of about 10,000 K. The sample injected into this
plasma evaporates and its solved solids vaporize and break up into their atoms, which get ionized.
These ions are extracted out of the plasma into a mass spectrometer, in our case a quadrupole.
Based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) the ions are detected proportionally to theirconcentration. Light masses are detected earlier than heavy masses. Before and after the samples a
standard (SRM 614) was measured. Following values where measured:
Previously by the calcutaion of the values the underground was subtracted. This underground could
be estimated too high, so some values are negative. These values have to be equalized to zero.
These values where normalized to the values of chondrites from McDonough & Sun (1995), and then
again normalized to the Ce-value of the sample LB1.
La Ce Nd Pr Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Lu Y
UP 1 0,143 0,197 0,470 0,027 440,771 0,002 11834,335 0,091 0,001 < 0,001 0,337 0,008
UP 2 0,198 0,223 0,185 0,026 482,068 0,016 11549,072 0,132 -0,361 0,003 0,279 0,011
LW1 0,133 0,224 0,144 0,018 0,019 0,001 0,090 0,022 0,096 0,013 0,001 0,823
LW2 0,164 0,180 0,201 0,047 0,060 0,015 31,021 0,016 0,021 0,030 0,001 0,827
LW3 0,115 0,146 0,170 -0,062 0,087 0,011 2,204 -0,086 -0,315 0,009 0,006 0,962
LB1 0,047 0,176 0,160 0,019 0,043 0,012 1,833 0,012 0,005 0,004 -0,145 0,155
LB2 0,045 0,056 0,056 0,007 0,013 0,036 -0,427 0,014 0,083 0,007 -0,117 0,118
La Ce Nd Pr Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Lu Y
UP1 normalized to
chondrites0,604 0,321 1,028 0,295 2978,183 0,035 59469,018 2,522 0,005 0,018 13,688 5,187
UP1 normalized to
Ce_LB12,104 1,118 3,582 1,026 10375,186 0,120 207173,998 8,787 0,019 0,064 47,686 18,070
UP2 normalized to
chondrites 0,834 0,364 0,404 0,280 3257,214 0,286 58035,537 3,657 0,000 0,055 11,352 6,728
UP2 normalized to
Ce_LB12,904 1,268 1,408 0,975 11347,254 0,997 202180,138 12,741 0,000 0,191 39,547 23,440
LW1 normalized to
chondrites0,562 0,366 0,315 0,189 0,127 0,014 0,451 0,605 0,389 0,235 0,051 524,378
LW 1 normalized to
Ce_LB11,957 1,275 1,098 0,658 0,443 0,048 1,573 2,108 1,354 0,820 0,179 1826,791
LW2 normalized to
chondrites0,693 0,293 0,440 0,501 0,408 0,261 155,884 0,447 0,084 0,553 0,032 527,036
LW2 normalized to
Ce_LB12,415 1,022 1,532 1,746 1,422 0,908 543,057 1,556 0,292 1,927 0,112 1836,051
LW3 normalized to
chondrites0,484 0,239 0,373 0,000 0,588 0,188 11,075 0,000 0,000 0,167 0,252 612,479
LW3 normalized to
Ce_LB11,687 0,832 1,299 0,000 2,049 0,656 38,583 0,000 0,000 0,580 0,878 2133,711
LB1 normalized to
chondrites0,199 0,287 0,349 0,205 0,293 0,217 9,213 0,328 0,019 0,073 0,000 98,942
LB 1 normalized to
Ce_LB1 0,695 1,000 1,216 0,715 1,020 0,757 32,094 1,142 0,068 0,256 0,000 344,688
LB2 normalized to
chondrites 0,189 0,091 0,123 0,080 0,090 0,635 0,000 0,380 0,338 0,125 0,000 74,930
LB2 normalized to
Ce_LB1 0,660 0,316 0,430 0,280 0,314 2,212 0,000 1,325 1,177 0,434 0,000 261,034
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 7/13
- 7 -
As a result we can say how much more or less than Ce is a REE element in our samples enriched in
the samples in comparison to the earth crust. We can see that Gd of course in our urine samples are
much more enriched in comparison to the earth crust than other elements in all the samples. But it is
also 4 times more enriched in comparison to the Ce value of LB1. You can get similar information in
different intensities for all investigated elements from the table above, in comparison to the earth
crust and then as a ratio to Ce.
7. Loss on ignition
The preparation for this experiment is described in the section “Preparation of sample”. Continuing
this proceeding the crucible including the sample is annealed in a muffle furnace for 120min. Thecrucible is cooling down in the deactivated furnace and thereafter in an exsiccator until it reached
room temperature. Then the crucible with the sample is weighed again and the L.O.I. can be
calculated:
. Weight (g)
Crucible empty 19,8272
Sample 3,0415
Crucible + sample dried (Sdried) 22,8687
Crucible + sample ignited (Signited) 22,8256Loss on ignition (LOI) 0,0431
LOI in w% 1,4171
8. Fused Disc for XRF
For the creation of the fused disc 0.5000g of the sample was merged with 5.000g Fluxana (66%
lithiumtetraborat/ 34% lithiummetaborat) as a disintegration agent to a homogenous mass. The
purpose of Fluxana is to make the sample more easily to melt and to attenuate it. The blend was
carried over into a platinum crucible with 1.5mL of a solution of 10% lithiumiodide. The purpose of
this solution is to increase the surface tension. Now the crucible was heated three times for five
minutes at 1240°C in a resistance furnace. In that time the furnace was brandished so the sample
was homogenized. The cooled down disc has to be kept in an exsiccator.
The results of the XRF and the LOI corrected values are following:
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 8/13
- 8 -
.
Concentration of total
(%)Deviation (%)
LOI corrected concentration
(%)
Na2O 1,773 0,047 1,748
MgO 1,136 0,015 1,120
Al2O3 5,703 0,043 5,622
SiO2 63,28 0,12 62,381
P2O5 0,527 0,018 0,520
SO3 0,3482 0,0031 0,343
K2O 0,9569 0,0035 0,943
CaO 6,315 0,008 6,225
TiO2 0,6001 0,002 0,592
V2O5 0,0089 0 0,009
Cr2O3 0,3521 0,0008 0,347
MnO 0,2343 0,0005 0,231
Fe2O3 15,78 0,03 15,556
97,0145
9. Ion-selective Electrode (ISE)
A waste water sample (no excreta) was taken from the basement of the laboratory. Organo-leptic
(odor, color, cloudiness and depth of visibility) and physico-chemical examinations (temperature,
conductivity) were undertaken. The sample was odorless and colorless. The depth of visibility lasted
to the ground (42cm) and the water had a very weak cloudiness. A content of ions of 286mg/l, a
temperature of 13.6°C and a conductivity of 424 µS/cm were detected.
At first the electrode was calibrated with 10, 30 and 50ppm Cl in 100ml.
Then 1ml of ISA (Ionic Strength Adjuster) was put to 25ml of the sample. The ISA (natriumnitrate) is
added to maintain a constant ionic strength, such that the total ionic strength is independent of the
of the analyte (in our case Cl) concentration.
In the sample a concentration of 42.5 mg/l of Cl was measured. Chloride is the most abundant ion
and in relation to the conductivity a higher content was expected. Therefore other ions like most
likely nitrate had to be present. Nitrate is common in waste waters with organic content.
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 9/13
- 9 -
10. Determination of elements in solution (ICP-OES/MS)
The fused disc was now solved and transferred to a graduated flask with a volume of 500ml. The flask
was then filled up to 500ml with 0.5 M HNO3. So 0.5g of initial sample weight were thinned to 500ml
of sample preparation volume. After filtration about 10ml were filled into a polystyrene tube. With
this ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry) measurements were
undertaken.
ICP is explained in the section “LA-ICP-MS, REE-Analyses”. The gas the plasma is created with was
argon. It has a temperature of 10,000°C and a current of 15l/min. 1.5ml/min of the sample are
injected. When the molecules of the sample are broken up into their atoms which lose electrons and
recombine again with them, they give off radiation at characteristic wavelength (color) of the
elements involved. The intensities of the light of different wavelengths are measured within a opticalchamber. These intensities are compared to preciously measured intensities of known
concentrations of the elements. Therefore a 1ppm, a 5ppm and a 10ppm standard is measured
ahead of the sample to construct a calibration line. The elements measured were As, Cu, Cd, Ni, Pb
and Zn. In the following results the blank value is already subtracted from the mean corrected
intensities.
.
Mean Corrected
Intensity
As -9,2
Cu 1702234,2
Cd 893
Ni 22220,7
Pb 8251,1
Zn 339082,9
11. Sequential Extraction
In the following the corrected results of the sequential extraction are seen, of every of the 6
fractions.
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 10/13
- 10 -
12. Tl-Species
Measurements for receiving the contents of the toxic thallium isotopes205
Tl and203
Tl were
conducted on the ICP-MS, as well as for other cations like Li, K, Rb and Na. Of these, Na is the one
with the by far highest peak, followed by K. The K peak though is superposed by the steady intensity
signal of Argon, that forms the plasma of the ICP-MS. 205Tl and 203Tl both form two peaks each at
which205
Tl has the bigger peak and is therefore more abundant. The peak of Li is higher than the
peak for Rb.
13. Sulphur measurement
For the sulphur measurements a LECO S-200 microprocessor was used. It is about an induction
furnace. Its core is an induction coil. For this analysis a ceramic crucible is filled with iron chips, 0.1g
sample material and Lecocel II flux.
As Cu Cd Ni Pb Zn Fe Tl Co Cr
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/LSample A I-II
corrected 0,58 0,83 0,02 0,11 34,77 21,19 18,93 0 0,05 0,02
Sample B I-II
corrected 0,57 0,47 -0,01 0,09 84,02 32,97 29,3 0 0,049 -0,01
Sample A III-IV
corrected 0,27 0,46 0 0 20,34 13,75 26,2 0 0,019 0
Sample B III-IV
corrected 0,28 0,56 0 0 18,42 21,12 39,46 0 0,019 0
Sample A V-VI
corrected 0,76 0,51 0,00 0,15 9,32 12,34 49,99 0,00 0,04 0,23
Sample B V-VI
corrected 0,66 0,26 0 0,12 14,24 9 32,9 0 0,039 0,17
resid. F A KWA
corrected 5,23 6,14 0,17 1,58 308,8 511,46 109,88 0 0,749 3,41
resid F B KWA
corrected 5,79 4,47 0,18 1,69 394,3 514,92 116,09 0 0,719 3,01
Sample A total KWA
corrected 19,86 37,24 0,72 19,1 946,7 1145,94 2512,91 0 2,749 10,08
Sample B total KWA
corrected 18,45 47,80 0,69 6,10 959,70 1104,97 2462,93 0,00 3,00 9,66
ST A1 24-26
corrected 0 4,56 0 0,32 1,08 13,21 162,3 0 0,11 3,02
ST B1 24-26
corrected 0 4,47 0 0,39 1,02 12,59 151,11 0 0,09 2,67
ST A2 24-26
corrected 0 5,55 0 0,4 1,16 14,38 161,89 0 0,11 3,14
ST B2 24-26
corrected 0,02 3,58 0 0,28 0,88 11,81 147,74 0 0,08 2,19
ST A3 63 corrected 0,01 2,74 0 0,26 0,96 11,9 169,99 0 0,09 3,26
ST B3 63 corrected 0,03 3,73 0,00 0,30 1,19 9,36 139,94 0,00 0,09 2,64
Nr.Probenbezeichn
ung
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 11/13
- 11 -
Oxygen is running through the oven and the analyst. After the cleaning of the incoming oxygen it is
conducted onto the ceramic crucible. During the process of combustion the atmospheric gases CO
and SO2 are formed. The CO is converted into CO2 and the SO2 attains to a cellulose sink. During the
process of combustion the sulphur components are oxidized to form SO2. The infrared cell is a
chrome nickel wire which is heated to 850°C. The IR- source produces visible energy and detects the
wavelength of the passing gases.
The sulphur content was 1,396%.
14. Analysis of particulate matter, pressed powder pellet, XRF
Particulate matter was taken from the orange filter in the Süsterfeldstraße 22 that draws in dustfrom outside. 0.1g particulate matter was thinned with 9.9g quartz in a small mortar until they are
combined to a homogenous mass. This 1:100 attenuation was necessary because the heavy metal
content would have been too high for the detection device.
The thinned sample was combined with 2ml of adhesive. The adhesive consists of a 5% elvacite
solution in which the elvacite is solved in acetone. The sample and the adhesive were mixed until all
the acetone had escaped and the mixture was a powder again. The powder was filled into an
aluminium cup and covered with a Mylar-sheet. This is important to ensure an even surface for the
pressed powder pellet and to prevent contamination. The powder was no compressed with a
pressure of 15t for 30sec to a pellet. At such a high pressure the adhesive precipitates and the
powder becomes solid. The XRF measurements were now done with a SpectroX-LAB 2000 device.
In Tab. the results of the XRF measurements, the calculated undiluted values and the corresponding
EF values pictured in a color-code are listed.
Sample A2 V Cr Co Ni Cu Zn
1:100 diluted (ppm) < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 350
undiluted (ppm) 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 35000
Chondrite (from
Mcdonough & Sun
(1995) (ppm) 56 2650 500 10500 120 310
Enrichment Factor EF 22,0669688 0,46632085 2,47150051 0,1176905 10,2979188 69,760095
As Rb Sr Zr Sn Sb Pb Al
< 10 < 10 < 10 < 20 < 10 < 20 < 20
1000 1000 1000 2000 1000 2000 2000 13918,67
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 12/13
- 12 -
1,85 2,3 7,25 3,82 1650 140 2470 8600
333,986555 268,64136 85,2241555 323,494831 0,37446977 8,82678753 0,50030375 1
EF
< 2 deficiency to minimal enrichment
2 - 5 moderate enrichment
5 - 20 significant enrichment
20 - 40 very high enrichment
> 40 extremely high enrichment
It can be seen that Zn, As, Rb, Sr and Zr are extremely high enriched in the investigated particulate
matter. A major source of Zn in the cities is the abrasion of tires which consist for 1 w% of Zn. The
enrichment of As can derive from incineration processes. A possible source of the very high enriched
V is the firing of oil. The still significant enriched Cu can come from the soot of diesel vehicles and SB
from the abrasion of brakes. All these enrichments indicate road traffic. Co, Cr, Ni, Sn and Pb are only
moderately to minimally enriched.
15. Analysis of Pb-isotope ratios, data interpretation, acid neutralization capacity
Two different Pb-samples (Sample A and Sample B) were investigated via ICP-MS for their Pb-isotope
ratios to find out whether they come from the same source or not. Therefore their corrected
207/206 ratio with its error margin is calculated and compared to each other for overlaps. As
preparation the lead was solved in 0.5 M HNO3.
The measurement of a sample as well as the blank value is encircled with the measurements of the
standard for calculating the correction factor. As standard NBS 981 was used which has a known
207/206 ratio of 0,914.
. NBS 981 Sample A NBS 9812 Sample B NBS 9813 Blank Value NBS 9814
207/206 0,913 0,891 0,914 0,86 0,914 0,883 0,916
8/13/2019 Praktikumsprotokoll IEG 2013 Mueller281614
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/praktikumsprotokoll-ieg-2013-mueller281614 13/13
- 13 -
Relative
Standard
Deviation RSD
(%)
0,293 0,138 4,096
correction
factor0,914/0,913 0,914/0,9135 0,914/0,914 0,914/0,914 0,914/0,914 0,914/0,915 0,914/0,916
correction
factor1,00109529 1,00054735 1 1 1 0,998907104 0,99781659
207/206corrected 0,891 ±
0,003
0,86 ±
0,0010,882 ± 0,036
As can be seen the corrected isotope ratios of sample A and B don’t overlap, so it is certain that the
lead does not originate from the same source.