Top Banner
Telepresence Interoperability is Here! Bob Dixon, Ohio Academic Resources Network (OARnet)_ Internet2 Fall member Meeting October 7, 2009 San Antonio, Texas
21
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: ppt

Telepresence Interoperability is Here!

Bob Dixon, Ohio Academic Resources Network (OARnet)_

Internet2 Fall member MeetingOctober 7, 2009

San Antonio, Texas

Page 2: ppt

Schedule of Events

• Introduction of Speakers• Overview of Video Conferencing Interoperability• Description of Yesterday’s Live Demos• Playback of Recordings from the Demos• Presentations by the Speakers

2

Page 3: ppt

Our Presenters

• Stefan Karapetkov - Polycom• Bill Rippon - IBM Research• Jim Goodyear - LifeSize• Gabe Moulton - Ohio State University• Robbie Noble - Ohio State University

3

Page 4: ppt

• Web Conferencing– PC and small camera – Collaboration tools such as Skype, Elluminate, WebX.... – Fair quality

• Standard H.323 Video Conferencing– Most common type today– Good quality

• High-Definition H.323 Video Conferencing – Like HDTV– Excellent quality

• Telepresence– HD, plus appearance of being in the same room

*Note there are a few other systems that do not fit into these categories

The Four Levels of Videoconferencing

Page 5: ppt

Telepresence Systems Generalities

• Most telepresence systems are expensive. – Typically $250K and up, per room.

• Some are proprietary or do not use the standard H.323 protocol, and hence are not interoperable with other telepresence systems.– HP, Cisco.

• Some require special or vendor-managed networks. • Some are H.323 standards-based and can become fully

interoperable with one another.– Polycom– Tandberg– LifeSize

5

Page 6: ppt

Typical Telepresence Systems

• For reasons of brevity, I will illustrate only one typical model of telepresence equipment from each vendor.

– They all have other models also.

• Photos are from the company web sites.

6

Page 7: ppt

Tandberg Telepresence

7

Page 8: ppt

Polycom Telepresence

8

Page 9: ppt

LifeSize Telepresence

9

Page 10: ppt

Who Uses Telepresence?• Typically corporate execs, for whom cost is less important.• So far little used in education. A recent poll shows <10 in

USA.• Reasons for little education use:

– High cost, including purchase, installation and operation.– Typically not suitable for more than a few people at once, such as classrooms.– Incompatibility with each other, and existing video conf equipment.– Will not dedicate a room to something that is rarely used.– High bandwidth and network quality required.– Requires multiple rooms.

• Standard high-definition video conferencing can do many of the things that telepresence does, with less cost and complexity.

10

Page 11: ppt

Videoconferencing Interoperability by Level

11

• Web Conferencing– Very little interoperability, with each other or with industry

standard.– A few now provide interoperability with standard H.323. (Elluminate

VCS, RADVision Scopia Desktop, Vidyo…)– Skype/H.323 gateway being evaluated by Internet2.

• Standard H.323 Videoconferencing– Complete interoperability.

• High-definition Standard H.323 Videoconferencing– Complete Interoperability.

• Telepresence• Few vendors claim interoperability.• Tandberg and Polycom can interoperate thru their MCUs.

Page 12: ppt

Desktop Collaboration Tools

Collaboration tools have traditionally had stone walls between each other.

Page 13: ppt

Standard Video ConferencingHigh-Definition Standard Video Conferencing

Desktop Collaboration Tools

Collaboration tools have traditionally had a stone wall between themselves and industry standard video conferencing.

Page 14: ppt

Standard Video ConferencingHigh-Definition Standard Video Conferencing

Desktop Collaboration Tools

Standard definition and high definition video conferencing work well together.

Page 15: ppt

Standard Video ConferencingHigh-Definition Standard Video Conferencing

Desktop Collaboration Tools

Some collaboration tools have now blasted a hole thru the wall separating them from industry standard video conferencing.And they have begun to penetrate the walls between themselves.

Page 16: ppt

Standard Video ConferencingHigh-Definition Standard Video Conferencing

Desktop Collaboration Tools

We are now seeing interoperability between some collaboration tools and industry standard video conferencing

Page 17: ppt

Tele Presence

Telepresence systems have had stone walls between each other.

Page 18: ppt

Standard Video ConferencingHigh-Definition Standard Video Conferencing

Tele Presence

Some telepresence systems have had gaps in the wall between themselves and industry standard video conferencing.

Page 19: ppt

Standard Video ConferencingHigh-Definition Standard Video Conferencing

Tele Presence

Most telepresence systems now interoperate with industry standard video conferencing. And they have reluctantly begun to penetrate the walls between themselves.

Page 20: ppt

Standard Video ConferencingHigh-Definition Standard Video Conferencing

Tele Presence

Desktop Collaboration Tools

UNIVERSAL INTEROPERABILITY !

Page 21: ppt

Polycom TPX 3-screen TP San Antonio, TX

LifeSize Room1003-screen TP At OARNetColumbus, OH

Telepresence Interoperability Demo for Internet2 ConferenceOct 6, 2009. San Antonio, Texas (updated 2 Oct 09)

Polycom RPX2-screen TPAt Iformata Dayton, OH

Tandberg T33-screen TPLisbon,Portugal

Polycom RPX4-screen TPAt IBM ResearchArmonk, NY

Tandberg T33-screen TP atTandberg, viaIBM ResearchLocation TBD

Polycom RSSRecorder inBerrein Springs, MI

Bob Dixon

Tandberg T33-screen TPOporto,Portugal

Cisco CTS3000 3-screen TP atIBM ResearchHawthorne, NY

Either/Or

Either/Or

TandbergRecorder atIBM ResearchAlmaden, CF

Polycom TPX3-screen TPAndover, MA

Tandberg TP Server(MCU) at IBMYorktown Heights, NY

Polycom RMXMCU at OSUColumbus, OH

Polycom Simulated3-screen TPat IBM RsrchYorktown, NY