Page 1
Personal Injury Claims for Uber and Lyft
Accidents: Navigating Complex Liability and
Insurance Coverage Issues
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 1.
TUESDAY, MAY 28, 2019
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Jeanine D. Clark, Partner, Margolis Edelstein, Mount Laurel, N.J.
Stan M. Doerrer, Owner, Law Office of Stan M. Doerrer, Alexandria,Va.
Page 2
Tips for Optimal Quality
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-866-869-6667 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address
the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Page 3
Continuing Education Credits
In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your
participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance
Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar.
A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email
that you will receive immediately following the program.
For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926
ext. 2.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Page 4
Program Materials
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the ^ symbol next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides for today's program.
• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Page 5
Personal Injury Clams
Involving Rideshare
Services
Jeanine D. Clark, Esquire Stan M. Doerrer, Esquire
Margolis Edelstein
[email protected] [email protected]
Page 6
Rental Cars
Zip Cars, Car2Go,
Enterprise
Uber, Lyft, Via
Uber Eats, Grub Hub, emerging
services
Rideshare concepts.
6
Page 7
Services versus Products
How the Apps Work and what the Ride Share Services are Actually
Selling.
Software companies selling use of an APP (licensing) that links
service provider and client for a fee.
Technology Companies versus Transportation Services and Rental
The economy continues to be driven by technology aimed at
market disruption.
Partnerships with product manufacturers and other services
7
Page 8
Quick tutorial on how it all
works
Electronic Dispatcher?
Traditional Dispatcher
Conflict between old and new….
Different types of services
Ancillary services
Product partnerships and additional PRP’s and coverage issues.
8
Page 9
Rental Service
Driver
Renter
Passenger
Member
Third Parties
The Parties
9
Page 10
Contractual Relationship
Between the Parties.
Independent Contractors?
Uber “Partnership Agreement.”
EULA’s, Joint Ventures. 10
Page 11
Vicarious Liability: Employer-
Employee Relationship
Doe v. Uber Techs., Inc. 184 F. Supp. 3d 774 (N.D. Cal. May 4, 2016)
Sexual assault by Uber driver
This is MTD opinion allows respondeat superior claims to proceed
Case ultimately settled
O’Connor v. Uber Techs., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54608 (N.D. Cal. March 19, 2019)
Alleging misclassification of Uber drivers (Series of opinions);
Class action certified on behalf of California and Mass drivers for whom there is no agreement to arbitrate-- for monetary damages and other relief;
Razak v. Uber Techs., Inc., 2018 WL 1744467 (E.D. Pa. April 11, 2018)
Grants Def SJ– Pl has not shown employer/employee relationship
Other cases pending nationwide!
Lousiana, Pennsylvania, where else?
11
Page 12
Vicarious Liability: Acts Within
Scope of Relationship
Phillips v. Uber Techs., Inc. 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94979 (S.D.N.Y. June
14, 2017)
In NY, assault is outside the scope of relationship as a matter of law.
Search v. Uber Techs., Inc., 128 F. Supp. 3d 222 (D.D.C. September
10, 2015)
Denies Def MTD– employer/employee relationship; apparent agency
12
Page 13
Agency and Apparent Agency
Cordero v. Christ Hospital, 403 N.J. Super. (App. Div. 2008).
13
Page 14
Direct allegations of negligence
against the rideshare company.
Negligent Hiring, Entrustment and Training
Background Investigations
Driver Qualifications
Prior accidents and violations
Distracting Devices/Apps
14
Page 15
App Off
App On, no client
App On, en route to client
App On, passenger getting in or out
App On, Passenger in vehicle.
Personal Insurance (Exclusions, Minimums?) >>>>>>
Rideshare Insurance (Exclusions, Limits)
15
Page 16
Uber info, available athttps://www.uber.com/drive/insurance/ (May 2019)
Pip/Medpay—
Yes, if required by state
State by state basis
Exclusion:
Uberblack, Ubersuv, UberTaxi
Professional drivers; they have their local/state requirements covering them directly.
Goes through the commercial policy that is in place. 16
Page 17
Lyft info, available athttps://help.lyft.com/hc/en-us/articles/115013080548-
Insurance-Policy (May 2019)
Period 1
“Contingent Liability” protects you if your personal coverage doesn’t.
Period 2
If driver has commercial policy, this may be additional coverage
UIM varies by state;
Pip/Medpay—
Varies by state17
Page 18
Personal Auto Policy
Commercial Auto Policy
Hybrid, Gap and Specialized
Policies
Excess or Umbrella
Driver Insurance Products
18
Page 19
Limits
When they apply
Exceptions/Exclusions
Rideshare Policies
19
Page 20
App not on. App On no fare
and en route sub limits.
Personal auto exclusions for
ride share.
Gaps
20
Page 21
Like all auto cases–investigate investigate investigate!
Factual investigation
Insurance Coverage investigation
Driver’s Lost wages--Medical providers should mention Lyft/Uber
Common carrier Liability?
21
Page 22
Other and emerging coverage
issues.
Public Policy,
UM,
vary by state
22
Page 23
Ancillary services
Food
Transportation
Delivery of goods
23
Page 24
Regulatory Issues
PUC registration may still need to be necessary for rideshare
services although not typically as rigorous as taxi cabs, etc. Lyft,
Inc., v. Pa. PUC, 145 A.3d 1235 (2015). PUC approval required to
operate at the Lyft, Inc. level and trip data is not proprietary.
24
Page 25
Product Liability
Products, contractual relationship versus tort liability
25
Page 26
Autonomous driving,
delivery drones, and the
technological horizon.
26
Page 27
Disruption to the Market
Disrupters
27
Page 28
Wage issues and Strikes
Crime and Bad Press
Falling Profits
Greener Alternatives?
28
Page 29
Questions?
Please contact us directly; Our emails are below.
29
Jeanine D. Clark, Esquire Stan M. Doerrer, Esquire
Margolis Edelstein
[email protected] [email protected]