Top Banner
Performance Indicators Presentation October 2012
41

Performance Indicators Presentation

Jan 23, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Performance Indicators Presentation

Performance Indicators Presentation October 2012

Page 2: Performance Indicators Presentation

  Increase academic achievement of each significant subgroup on CST, API, and AYP Data

  Increase percentage of students making annual progress and attaining English fluency as measured by CELDT

  Increase percentage of kindergarteners who master phoneme segmentation on DIBELS assessment

  Increase the percentage of students in grades 1-3 reading at grade level on Fountas and Pinnell reading assessment

Performance Indicators 2011-2012

Page 3: Performance Indicators Presentation

  Increase percentage of students proficient in Algebra 1 on CST

  Increase percentage of 10th graders passing CAHSEE

  Increase percentage of students meeting A-G requirements

  Increase Advanced Placement qualifying rate

  Increase number of students on track for PACE Promise

Performance Indicators 2011-2012

Page 4: Performance Indicators Presentation

K – 12 Indicators Increase academic achievement of each significant subgroup

District Subgroups (100 or more students with valid scores)

  White 41%

  Hispanic/Latino 46%

  Asian 5%

  Black/African American 3%

  Filipino 3%

  English Learners 35%

  Economically Disadvantaged 44%

  Students with Disabilities 15%

  Two or More Races 1%

Page 5: Performance Indicators Presentation

Purpose, Report and Target for…

CST California Standards

Test

•  State Requirement

•  Assess Students on CA Content Standards

•  5 Performance Levels

API Academic

Performance Index

•  State Accountability

•  All Pupils Improving

•  Scale from 200 to 1000

AYP Adequate Yearly

Progress

•  Federal Accountability

•  All You Proficient

•  Criteria Met/Not Met -Participation rate

Page 6: Performance Indicators Presentation

2012 CST Performance Comparison with County and State

Page 7: Performance Indicators Presentation

Unified School Districts 2002-2014 AYP Targets

Page 8: Performance Indicators Presentation

AYP Percent Proficient English Language Arts Performance by Ethnicity

2007 2011 2012

All Stu 54.0% 73.0% 73.2%

White 72.0% 85.0% 85.9%

Hisp/Latino 35.0% 58.0% 58.9%

Asian 79.0% 92.0% 90.2%

Black/Afr Amer 53.0% 70.0% 71.7%

Filipino 76.0% 89.0% 88.6%

2 or More Races 0.0% 77.6% 83.9%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

1 Yr Change

5 Yr Change

+0.5 +15.1

+0.8 +9.4

+0.6 +20.2

-1.8 +9.5

+1.5 +13.5

-0.6 +8.5

+6.3

Page 9: Performance Indicators Presentation

AYP Percent Proficient English Language Arts Performance by Program

1 Yr Change

5 Yr Change

+.5 +15.1

‐1.9 +20.3

+1.7 +22.7

‐.2 +14.5

Page 10: Performance Indicators Presentation

AYP Percent Proficient Mathematics Performance by Ethnicity

1 Yr Change

5 Yr Change

‐.1 +14.9+1.4 +12.6

‐1.0 +17.2

‐3.2 +9.8

+.7 +9.9

+.2 +11.1

+8.1

Page 11: Performance Indicators Presentation

AYP Percent Proficient Mathematics Performance by Program

1 Yr Change

5 Yr Change

‐.1 +14.9

‐3.0 +16.7

‐.1 +19.3

‐1.2 +15.5

Page 12: Performance Indicators Presentation

2012 SMUSD English Language Arts AYP Performance

Page 13: Performance Indicators Presentation

2012 SMUSD Mathematics AYP Performance

Page 14: Performance Indicators Presentation

Safe Harbor: an alternative means to meet AYP.

If the number of students who are not proficient decreases by 10% of the number from the previous year, safe harbor may be applied.

Example: 100 students in the subgroup   60% of these students (60 students) were not

proficient in 2008-2009   If 10% of the 60 students (6 students) reached

proficient in 2009-10, safe harbor is applied.

Page 15: Performance Indicators Presentation

30 of 42 Targets Met STAR Part. Rate

STAR Proficient and Advanced

API Graduation Rate

Goal 95% ELA/Math

ELA 78.0%

Math 78.2%

740 or Growth of >

1 Point

90%

All 100/100 73.2% 74.6% 868 (+2) 94.22%

White 100/99 85.9% 86.1% 96.4%

Hispanic 100/100 58.9% 61.7% 92.02%

African Am. 99/99 71.7% (SH) 70.2%

Filipino 100/100 88.6% 90.6%

Asian 100/100 90.2% 91.7%

Econ. Dis. 100/100 58.5% 61.8% 92.49%

EL 100/100 52.5% 57.8% 88.68%

Students w/Disabilities 99/99 41.4% 44.6% 82.72%

Two or More Races 100/100 83.9% 83.1%

Adequate Yearly Progress Targets 2011-12

Page 16: Performance Indicators Presentation

Program Improvement Status

22 of the 40 Districts in San Diego County Receiving Title I Funds

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Continuing Year 3 Poway Unified Escondido Union

High

National Elementary

Ramona City Unified

Statewide Benefit Charter-High Tech High

San Diego County Office of Education

San Dieguito Union High

Cajon Valley Union Elem. Escondido Union Elem. Fallbrook Union Elem. Fallbrook Union High Grossmont Union High Jamul-Dulzura Union El. LaMesa Spring Valley El. Lemon Grove Elementary Mountain Empire Elem. Oceanside Unified San Diego Unified San Ysidro Elementary South Bay Union Elem. Sweetwater Union High Vista Unified

Page 17: Performance Indicators Presentation

Academic Performance Index (API)

Page 18: Performance Indicators Presentation

2012 API Comparison

Page 19: Performance Indicators Presentation

2010 API Results - County Context

Only 4 out of 12 Unified School Districts in San Diego County have an API over 850.

  Coronado Unified 894   Poway Unified 892   Carlsbad Unified 881

  San Marcos Unified 868

--------------------------------------------------------------------   Valley Center-Pauma Unified 822   Ramona City Unified 820

Page 20: Performance Indicators Presentation

Surrounding North County District APIs

  San Dieguito Union High 892   Carlsbad 881   SAN MARCOS UNIFIED 868   Valley CenterUnified 822   Ramona City Unified 820   Vista 798   Oceanside 788   Escondido Union Elem 759   Escondido Union High 746

Page 21: Performance Indicators Presentation

API 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2011-12 Growth

ALL STUDENTS 786 810 833 854 866 868 +2

WHITE 858 874 897 913 920 924 +4

HISPANIC 710 741 764 789 804 806 +2 AF. AMER. 780 805 825 838 844 852 +8

ASIAN 892 915 944 953 961 953 -8

FILIPINO 876 895 916 932 947 949 +2

ECON. DIS. 698 732 753 785 799 806 +7

ENG. LRN. 683 720 733 767 789 778 -11

DISABIL. 589 619 614 670 683 686 +3

District API Increase Academic Achievement of each Significant Subgroup

Page 22: Performance Indicators Presentation

API Coronado Poway Carlsbad San Marcos

All Students 894 892 881 868

WHITE 73% 899 54% 896 58% 909 41% 924

HISPANIC 17% 862 13% 812 26% 793 46% 806

AF. AMER. 2% 911 3% 803 2% 801 3% 852

ASIAN 3% 933 19% 953 7% 959 5% 953

FILIPINO 2% 896 7% 885 1% 929 3% 949

ECON. DIS. 5% 874 14% 795 21% 779 44% 806

ENG. LRN. 5% 834 20% 838 14% 748 35% 778

DISABIL. 11% 735 10% 703 10% 678 15% 686

Subgroup API Comparison: % of STAR Population and API

Page 23: Performance Indicators Presentation

The CELDT  Assesses Listening, Speaking, Reading and Writing.  Reports five levels: Beginning, Early Intermediate,

Intermediate, Early Advanced, Advanced

For NCLB there are 3 Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs), or targets, for the CELDT:

 AMAO 1: The percentage of students making annual progress in learning English.

 AMAO 2: The percentage of students attaining English Proficiency (Level 4 or 5 on CELDT).

 AMAO 3: Adequate yearly progress for English Learner subgroup.

K – 12 Indicators Increase English Acquisition rates for English Learners California English Language Development Test (CELDT)

Page 24: Performance Indicators Presentation

CELDT AMAO 1- % of Students Making Annual Progress in Learning English

AMAO 2 - % of Students Attaining English Proficiency

56.0%

20.1%

45.1%

Page 25: Performance Indicators Presentation

Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Segmenting single syllable words into their components

Example: cat = c/a/t

One of the top predictors of future reading success

Proficiency based upon number of sounds segmented in 60 seconds

K Indicator Increase Percentage of Kindergartners who Master Phonemes Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)

Page 26: Performance Indicators Presentation

DIBELS Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills

Page 27: Performance Indicators Presentation

Fountas and Pinnell

Increase the percentage of students in grades 1–3 reading at grade level

Fountas & Pinnell is a reading assessment that measures decoding, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension skills

The information from this assessment enables teachers to:

• Determine students’ independent and instructional reading level

• Group students for reading instruction

• Select texts that will be productive for a student’s instruction

• Identify students who need intervention and extra help

• Document student progress across a school year and across grade

levels

Page 28: Performance Indicators Presentation

Fountas & Pinnell Percent of Students Reading at Grade Level

Page 29: Performance Indicators Presentation

Algebra I Percent of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced

28%

34%

44%

51% 54%

58%

52%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Page 30: Performance Indicators Presentation

  In 1999, state law authorized the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE).

  Students in California public schools must pass CAHSEE in order to earn a High School diploma.

  Only 10th grade pass rate is calculated in AYP. Pass rate for 10th-12th is included in API calculation.

9 – 12 Indicators Increase Percentage of 10th Graders Passing the CAHSEE

Page 31: Performance Indicators Presentation

Percent of 10th Graders Passing California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)

Page 32: Performance Indicators Presentation

A – G Students meeting UC / CSU entrance requirements.

These requirements are greater than those needed for graduation.

9 – 12 Indicators Increase Percentage of Students Meeting A – G Requirements

Page 33: Performance Indicators Presentation

Students Meeting A-G Requirements

Page 34: Performance Indicators Presentation

  Qualifying Rate:

9 – 12 Indicators Increase Advanced Placement (AP) Test Qualifying Rate

Number of AP Exams Passed (Score of 3 or better on a 5 point scale)

11th and 12th Grade Enrollment

Page 35: Performance Indicators Presentation

Advanced Placement (AP) Test Qualifying Rate

Page 36: Performance Indicators Presentation

PACE Promise Scholars San Marcos Unified School District CSUSM Enrollees by Semester

Term Newly Enrolled

PACE Eligible

Fall 2012 134 77 freshmen + 130 continuing = 207

Fall 2011 143 68 freshmen + 88 continuing = 156

Fall 2010 125 64 freshmen + 46 continuing = 110

Fall 2009 121 47

Fall 2008 104 29

Fall 2007 77 25

Fall 2006 48 18

Page 37: Performance Indicators Presentation

SMUSD System-Wide Priorities

DeepImplementationof…

 Standards-Based Instruction Common Core

 The Essential Elements of Instruction and Strategies to Accelerate the Academic

Achievement of ELs

 A Culture of Collaboration and Inquiry

Page 38: Performance Indicators Presentation

  Focus on Essential Standards/Common Pacing Guides   Test Score Analysis and Goal Setting   Ongoing Monitoring-Common Interim Assessments   Disaggregated Data: “Know Students by Name and Need”   Targeted, Focused and Timely Intervention Programs   District-wide Articulation: Teacher Leaders (EEI,

Technology), Secondary Curriculum Council, Elementary Team Leaders, Web-based Conferences

  Structured Teacher Planning/Collaboration Time   Instructional Leaders as Administrators/Feedback Focused

on Standards and EEI   Continued Professional Development including One-to-One

Pilot

Continuous Improvement Strategies

Page 39: Performance Indicators Presentation

Students benefit from the collaborative efforts of the San Marcos Team!

Page 40: Performance Indicators Presentation

  Increase academic achievement of each significant subgroup on -CST, API, and AYP Data

  Increase percentage of students making annual progress and attaining English fluency as measured by CELDT

  Increase percentage of kindergarteners who master phoneme segmentation on DIBELS assessment

  Increase the percentage of students in grades 1-3 reading at grade level on Fountas and Pinnell reading assessment

Performance Indicators 2012-2013

Page 41: Performance Indicators Presentation

  Increase percentage of students proficient in Algebra 1 on CST

  - Increase percentage of 10th graders passing CAHSEE

  + Increase freshman passing rates – an indictor for students

meeting A-G requirements

  Increase percentage of students meeting A-G requirements

  Increase Advanced Placement qualifying rate

  Increase number of students on track for PACE Promise

Performance Indicators 2012-2013