Top Banner
PARTICLE DETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February 2008 1
39

Particle Detectors

Jan 19, 2016

Download

Documents

peggy

Particle Detectors. Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February 2008. Particle physics experiments. “seeing an object” = detecting light that has been reflected off the object's surface light = electromagnetic wave; “visible light”= those electromagnetic waves that our eyes can detect - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Particle Detectors

1

PARTICLE DETECTORS

Mojtaba Mohammadi

IPM-CMPP- February 2008

Page 2: Particle Detectors

2

“seeing an object” = detecting light that has been reflected off the object's

surface light = electromagnetic wave; “visible light”= those electromagnetic waves that our eyes can

detect

generalize meaning of seeing:

seeing is to detect effect due to the presence of an object this method is used in electron microscope, as well as in

“scattering experiments” in nuclear and particle physics

PARTICLE PHYSICS EXPERIMENTS

Page 3: Particle Detectors

3

Introduction (Physics Motivations)

The Standard Model of particle physics describes the electroweakand strong interaction precisely and no significant deviation has been observed. BUT the SM leaves several unexplained questions.

-Find Higgs particle or exclude its existence in the region allowed by theory (< 1 TeV).

-Search for new particle in the mass region of ~50 GeV to ~5 TeV.

-Test the new theories like SUSY and the discovery of SUSY particles.

-Look for any deviation from Standard Model and precision measurement.

LHC as an accelerator and collider produces scattering events and DETECTORS are our electronic eyes which are used to record and identify the useful events to answer our questions about fundamental particles and their interactions.

Page 4: Particle Detectors

4

Introduction

Particles are detected via their interactions with matter.

A modern multi-purpose detector like CMS and ATLAS at the LHC typically consists of :

1- Tracker

2- Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL)

3- Hadronic Calorimeter (HCAL)

4- Muon System

A simplified layout

Page 5: Particle Detectors

5

What do the elementary particles in SM look like in Detectors?The elementary particles in the SM consists ofquarks, leptons and gauge bosons.Some of them cannot be observed directly in thedetector.Heavy particles like top quark , W-boson and Z-bosonDecay promptly to lighter particles with a lifetime of10^{-25} seconds. But other quarks except for top quark will fragmentinto colour singlet hadrons due to QCD confinementwith a time scale of 10^{-24} seconds.

Page 6: Particle Detectors

6

What do the elementary particles in SM look like in Detectors?

Some particles are seen like neutrinosand LSP (no EM or HD int.).

LSP

Page 7: Particle Detectors

7

Detector Requirements

The fact that we do not know what we will find at the LHC means that our detectorsshould be ready anything. For Example, suppose that Higgs particle exists but we do not know exactly its mass. However, we know for any mass how it will decay:

► If Higgs is light (Higgs Mass < 150 GeV/c^{2}): One of the good ways to detect its present is through its decay to two photons (H +g g) The detector should have an excellent Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) to detect and extract this signal.

► If Higgs is heavy: One of the promising channels to detect Higgs is via its decay to two Z-bosons with the subsequent decay of Z-bosons to Muon-AntiMuon (H ZZ4µ). Therefore, the detector should be able to detect muons properties precisely and a Muon System with high quality is needed.

Page 8: Particle Detectors

8

Detector Requirements

► For SUSY , one of the best signatures is missing energy in the detector (LSP). Any imbalance in the momentum and energy of the all final particles is considered as Missing Energy which is coming from LSP or Neutrinos. So a full Coverage on space is needed to detect all particles (or hermetic detector is required) .

► To measure the momenta of Charged particles and reconstruct vertices and also to differentiate between Photons and Electrons a high quality tracker is needed. ► Excellent vertex position measurement.

► Fast Response ( around ns). Since the bunch crossing at the LHC occurs each 25 ns.

Page 9: Particle Detectors

9

Detector Requirements

Page 10: Particle Detectors

10

Detector RequirementsExcellent Vertex Position Measurement is Necessary For B-jet and Tau Identification. e.g. for Top (BR(tWb)~0.99) study.

For a b-jet of 60 GeV, the decay length:

mml 2.6

Page 11: Particle Detectors

11

DETECTOR REQUIREMENTS: RADIATION LEVEL

Page 12: Particle Detectors

12

x

y

zq

p

protonproton

Some definitions

)2tan(lnln2

1,sin22

z

zyxT pE

pEpppp

Barrel

Endcap

Page 13: Particle Detectors

13

Reaction Rate

Page 14: Particle Detectors

14

Trigger

Trigger of interesting events at the LHC is much more complicated than at e+e- machines

interaction rate: ≈ 109 events/s max. record rate: ≈ 100 events/s event size ≈ 1 MByte 1000 TByte/year of data ~ 1.5 million CDs

Þ trigger rejection ≈ 107

collision rate is 25 ns trigger decision takes ≈ a few µs

store massive amount of data in front-end pipelines while special trigger processors perform calculations

Trigger = device making decision on whether to record an event

Trigger has to decide fast which events not to record, without rejecting the “good events”

Page 15: Particle Detectors

15

Trigger Design

There are several means to design a trigger such as: particle identification,Multiplicity, Kinematics, Event Topology ….

Modern detectors can trigger on: Muons by muon system, electron/photon asElectromagnetic objects, Jets and Missing Energy as Hadronic objects and aCombination of them.

Trigger Conditions are dependent on the Collider Phenomenology. according to collider phenomenology we know that what particle may be detected in what kinematical region.

Modern detectors like ATLAS and CMS at theLHC have three levels of trigger: Level-1 : Event rate 10^{9} Hz to ~ 10^{5} HzLevel-2 : ~10^{3} HzLevel-3 : 10^{2} Hz

Page 16: Particle Detectors

16

Momentum Measurement, Magnet

The momentum measurement of charged particles in the detector is based on the bending of their trajectories.

Page 17: Particle Detectors

17

Momentum Measurement

Consider a charged particle in solenoidal magnetic field, the radius of the curvature:

The curvature of the trajectory (s):

Tp

LBrrs

8

3.0cos

2

The charge of particle is also measurable.

Resolution:

2LB

p

s

s

p

p T

T

T

Hence, the momentum resolution degrade linearly with increasing Pt.Improvement for higher magnetic field and L.The effect of multiple scattering should be considered.

Page 18: Particle Detectors

18

ATLAS and CMS

ATLAS CMS

length 46 m 22 m

diameter 25 m 15 m

weight 7000 t 12000 t

Page 19: Particle Detectors

19

CMS detector momentum resolution

Page 20: Particle Detectors

20

A little about Calorimetry

Page 21: Particle Detectors

21

Introduction

Page 22: Particle Detectors

22

The main principle of particle detection: Interaction with matter.

Introduction

Page 23: Particle Detectors

23

Introduction

When a high energy electron or photon strikes on a thick absorber (such as Lead), a cascade of secondary electrons and photons via Bremsstrahlung and pair production , respectively, is initiated.

With increasing the depth

The number of secondary particles is increased

The mean energy of particles decreased

This multiplication continues until the energy of particles fall below the critical energy, after this Photons and Electrons start the Ionization and Excitation processes.Need to be familiar with e/photon interactions with matter.

Page 24: Particle Detectors

24

Showering

Page 25: Particle Detectors

25

The dominant process of energy loss by an electronabove ~1 GeV when passing through matter is:Bremsstrahlung or Braking Radiation.(a free electron can not radiate a photon)

The energy loss per unit of distance:

Charged particle interaction

It is very small for Muons w.r.t Electrons

Below ~1 GeV: Excitation, Ionization, Vibration

Page 26: Particle Detectors

26

Charged particle interaction

Page 27: Particle Detectors

27

Charged particle interaction

Transverse shower development:

RM

X0

Page 28: Particle Detectors

28

Study of these properties are helpful to choose the detector material.

Page 29: Particle Detectors

29

Photon interaction with matter

Page 30: Particle Detectors

30

Photon interaction with matter

Page 31: Particle Detectors

31

Summary of photon interaction with matter

Page 32: Particle Detectors

32

Z (Al) = 13 Z (Fe) = 26Z (Pb) = 82

For higher Z-material multiplication continues due to the smallercritical energy.

Page 33: Particle Detectors

33

Page 34: Particle Detectors

34

A Simple Model for EM Shower

Page 35: Particle Detectors

35

Page 36: Particle Detectors

36

Energy Resolution of a Calorimeter

Page 37: Particle Detectors

37

Energy Resolution of CMS ECAL

Page 38: Particle Detectors

38

Page 39: Particle Detectors

39

No slide

Thanks for your attention