Parametric Optimization of Single Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) Plasma Actuators * Alexey V. Kozlov, Flint O. Thomas † 20th Aerospace and Mechanical.

Parametric Optimization of Single Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD)

Plasma Actuators*

Alexey V. Kozlov, Flint O. Thomas †

20th Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Graduate Student ConferenceNotre Dame, Indiana 19 October 2006

•Supported by NASA Langley NAG1-03076by NASA Langley Research Center

†Advisor

Motivation and Objectives

• There has been growing interest in flow control using dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators in recent years. However, studies regarding optimization of plasma actuators are relatively scarce.

• The Center for Flow Physics and Control at Notre Dame is involved in the development of single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators (SDBD) for several aerodynamic applications of active separation control.

• Flow control experiments show that the performance of present-day plasma actuators at high freestream velocities (high Reynolds numbers) is not enough.

• A primary objective is to optimize single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator toward growing demands of the flow control science.

.

Overview of SDBD Plasma Actuators

• DBD discharge consists of numerous short-time small-scale microdischarges (streamers) distributed randomly in time and in surrounding air volume

• Plasma volume charge in the presence of an electric field, E*, results in a body force, Fb.

• Plasma formation is accompanied by a coupling of directed momentum to the surrounding air.

h

induced air flow

bFE , + + vq + + +

exposed electrode

AC voltage dielectric

substrat

plasma

insulated electrode

Dielectric barrier dischage

Uniform glow Filamentary form

Plasma body force, power dissipation and maximum induced velocity estimation

surface. dielectric thealongtly significannot vary does

plasmain strengthfieldelectricthethatAssume

30...25airdryforstrenght field electric Maximum cmkVE

smmkg

mFmVEV

EV

air

air 82.1

1085.81030

22 3

1250

20

2

m

Nm

m

V

m

FhEEqF vb 08.01010301085.8 3

25122

0

cmkVEdE

fUW 10...5,

3

20

0

300

0

0layerplasmaofLengthE

UL

The Plasma Generation Circuit

• Anti noise filter suppresses radio frequency electromagnetic noise radiation from high voltage wires. Accurate hot-wire measurements in the vicinity of the plasma discharge are now possible.

• High voltage for the excitation of the plasma actuators is obtained from the secondary coil of the transformer.

Schematic of the experimental setup for thrust measurement

Power dissipation versus applied voltagedielectric material: quartz glass (dielectric constant 3.7)

dielectric thickness 1/4”, encapsulated electrode width 2”

Thrust versus applied voltage

Thrust versus power dissipation

X/D = 10, y/D =2

Relation between voltage, optimal frequency and thrust

20 40 60 80 100Voltage pkpk, kV

2

4

6

8

10

lamit

pO

ycne

uqer

F,

zHk

2 4 6 8 10Frequency, kHz

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

mu

mixaM

tsur

hT

,Nm

Voltage waveform comparison

Thrust vs. voltage for ramp (sawtooth) and sinusoidal waveforms

Pitot probe velocity measurements

Plasma induced velocity profile

Multiple actuators

f =48 Hz

Thrust vs. applied voltage Plasma induced velocity profile

Summary & Focus of Current Work

• Optimize plasma actuator design by consideration of:

(1) Increase of dielectric thickness and applied voltage and using optimal frequency greatly improve plasma actuator performance.

(2) Experiments clearly show the benefit of using ramp (sawtooth) waveform.

(3) Multiple actuators (plasma array) significantly increase the body force and plasma induced velocity.

• Additional measurements to investigate the influence of the dielectric thickness on the optimal frequency and body force are planned.