P3s9Ô/ & 4. Minutes of Discussions · 4. Minutes of Discussions ¯/ / P3s9Ô/ & # 4. Minutes of Discussions ¯/ / P3s9Ô/ & # 4. Minutes of Discussions \r \r This page is closed

$Page 1: P3s9Ô/ & 4. Minutes of Discussions · 4. Minutes of Discussions ¯/ / P3s9Ô/ & # 4. Minutes of Discussions ¯/ / P3s9Ô/ & # 4. Minutes of Discussions \r \r This page is closed$
4. Minutes of Discussions












H70310

テキストボックス

This page is closed due to the confidentiality

H70310

テキストボックス

Appendix 5 Application for an EIA

License（NPA MEWR）

5. Application for an EIA License （NPA→MEWR）

A-5-1

Appendix 6 Letter for submission of

Environmental Checklist

and Monitoring Plan

(NPA JICA)

6. Letter for submission of Environmental Checklist and Monitoring Plan (NPA→JICA)

A-6-1

Appendix 7 Environmental Checklist

and Monitoring Plan

7. Environmental Checklist and Monitoring Plan

A-7-1


A-7-2


A-7-3


A-7-4

Cat

egor

yE

nviro

nmen

tal

Item

Mai

n C

heck

Item

sS

tatu

sC

onfir

mat

ion

of E

nviro

nmen

tal C

onsi

dera

tions

(Rea

sons

, Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res)

(1)

EIA

and

Env

ironm

enta

lP

erm

its

(a)

Hav

e E

IA r

epor

ts b

een

alre

ady

prep

ared

in o

ffici

al p

roce

ss?

(b)

Hav

e E

IA r

epor

ts b

een

appr

oved

by

auth

oriti

es o

f the

hos

t cou

ntry

'sgo

vern

men

t?(c

) H

ave

EIA

rep

orts

bee

n un

cond

ition

ally

app

rove

d? If

con

ditio

ns a

reim

pose

d on

the

appr

oval

of E

IA r

epor

ts, a

re th

e co

nditi

ons

satis

fied?

(d)

In a

dditi

on to

the

abov

e ap

prov

als,

hav

e ot

her

requ

ired

envi

ronm

enta

lpe

rmits

bee

n ob

tain

ed fr

om th

e ap

prop

riate

reg

ulat

ory

auth

oriti

es o

f the

host

cou

ntry

's g

over

nmen

t?

(a)

Yes

(b)

Yes

(c)

No

(d)

Unr

elat

ed

(a)

Dur

ing

the

mis

sion

of D

BD

in M

ay 2

011,

NP

A s

ubm

it th

e do

cum

ents

for

EIA

lice

nse

appl

icat

ion

to S

LEA

PA

.(b

) O

n 24

th J

une,

201

1, S

LEP

A r

eplie

d by

the

offic

ial l

ette

r to

NP

A th

atth

is P

roje

ct d

id n

ot n

eed,

but

nee

ded

to s

ubm

it th

e E

nviro

nmen

tal a

ndS

ocia

l Man

agem

ent P

lan

(ES

MP

). N

PA

sub

mitt

ed E

SM

P to

SLE

PA

.(c

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(d)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t

(2)

Exp

lana

tion

toth

e Lo

cal

Sta

keho

lder

s

(a)

Hav

e co

nten

ts o

f the

pro

ject

and

the

pote

ntia

l im

pact

s be

enad

equa

tely

exp

lain

ed to

the

Loca

l sta

keho

lder

s ba

sed

on a

ppro

pria

tepr

oced

ures

, inc

ludi

ng in

form

atio

n di

sclo

sure

? Is

und

erst

andi

ng o

btai

ned

from

the

Loca

l sta

keho

lder

s?(b

) H

ave

the

com

men

t fro

m th

e st

akeh

olde

rs (

such

as

loca

l res

iden

ts)

been

ref

lect

ed to

the

proj

ect d

esig

n?

(a)

Und

er p

repa

ratio

n(b

) U

nder

pre

para

tion

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(b

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(3)

Exa

min

atio

nof

Alte

rnat

ives

(a)

Hav

e al

tern

ativ

e pl

ans

of th

e pr

ojec

t bee

n ex

amin

ed w

ith s

ocia

l and

envi

ronm

enta

l con

side

ratio

ns?

(a)

Yes

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t

2 P

ollu

tion

Con

trol

(1)

Wat

er Q

ualit

y

(a)

Is th

ere

any

poss

ibili

ty th

at s

oil r

unof

f fro

m th

e ba

re la

nds

resu

lting

from

ear

thm

ovin

g ac

tiviti

es, s

uch

as c

uttin

g an

d fil

ling

will

cau

se w

ater

qual

ity d

egra

datio

n in

dow

nstr

eam

wat

er a

reas

? If

the

wat

er q

ualit

yde

grad

atio

n is

ant

icip

ated

, are

ade

quat

e m

easu

res

cons

ider

ed?

(a)

No

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t

(1)

Pro

tect

edA

reas

(a)

Is th

e pr

ojec

t site

loca

ted

in p

rote

cted

are

as d

esig

nate

d by

the

coun

try’

s la

ws

or in

tern

atio

nal t

reat

ies

and

conv

entio

ns?

Is th

ere

a po

ssib

ility

that

the

proj

ect w

ill a

ffect

the

prot

ecte

d ar

eas?

(a)

No

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t

(2)

Eco

syst

em

(a)

Doe

s th

e pr

ojec

t site

enc

ompa

ss p

rimev

al fo

rest

s, tr

opic

al r

ain

fore

sts,

ecol

ogic

ally

val

uabl

e ha

bita

ts (

e.g.

, cor

al r

eefs

, man

grov

es, o

r tid

al fl

ats)

?(b

) D

oes

the

proj

ect s

ite e

ncom

pass

the

prot

ecte

d ha

bita

ts o

f end

ange

red

spec

ies

desi

gnat

ed b

y th

e co

untr

y’s

law

s or

inte

rnat

iona

l tre

atie

s an

dco

nven

tions

?(c

) If

sign

ifica

nt e

colo

gica

l im

pact

s ar

e an

ticip

ated

, are

ade

quat

epr

otec

tion

mea

sure

s ta

ken

to r

educ

e th

e im

pact

s on

the

ecos

yste

m?

(d)

Are

ade

quat

e m

easu

res

take

n to

pre

vent

dis

rupt

ion

of m

igra

tion

rout

esan

d ha

bita

t fra

gmen

tatio

n of

wild

life

and

lives

tock

?(e

) Is

ther

e an

y po

ssib

ility

that

the

proj

ect w

ill c

ause

the

nega

tive

impa

cts,

such

as

dest

ruct

ion

of fo

rest

, poa

chin

g, d

eser

tific

atio

n, r

educ

tion

inw

etla

nd a

reas

, and

dis

turb

ance

of e

cosy

stem

due

to in

trod

uctio

n of

exo

tic(n

on-n

ativ

e in

vasi

ve)

spec

ies

and

pest

s? A

re a

dequ

ate

mea

sure

s fo

rpr

even

ting

such

impa

cts

cons

ider

ed?

(f)

In c

ases

whe

re th

e pr

ojec

t site

is lo

cate

d in

und

evel

oped

are

as, i

s th

ere

any

poss

ibili

ty th

at th

e ne

w d

evel

opm

ent w

ill r

esul

t in

exte

nsiv

e lo

ss o

fna

tura

l env

ironm

ents

?

(a)

No

(b)

No

(c)

No

(d)

No

(e)

No

(f)

No

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(b

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(c)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(d

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(e)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(f

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

Sup

plem

ent t

o A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

At t

he s

tage

of D

raft

Fin

al R

epor

t, th

e pr

ogre

ss is

con

firm

ed a

s fo

llow

s;

1 P

erm

its a

ndE

xpla

natio

n

3 N

atur

alE

nviro

nmen

t


A-7-5

Cat

egor

yE

nviro

nmen

tal

Item

Mai

n C

heck

Item

sS

tatu

sC

onfir

mat

ion

of E

nviro

nmen

tal C

onsi

dera

tions

(Rea

sons

, Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res)

3 N

atur

alE

nviro

nmen

t(3

) T

opog

raph

yan

d G

eolo

gy

(a)

Is th

ere

any

soft

grou

nd o

n th

e ro

ute

of p

ower

tran

smis

sion

and

dist

ribut

ion

lines

that

may

cau

se s

lope

failu

res

or la

ndsl

ides

? A

read

equa

te m

easu

res

cons

ider

ed to

pre

vent

slo

pe fa

ilure

s or

land

slid

es,

whe

re n

eede

d?(b

) Is

ther

e an

y po

ssib

ility

that

civ

il w

orks

, suc

h as

cut

ting

and

fillin

g w

illca

use

slop

e fa

ilure

s or

land

slid

es?

Are

ade

quat

e m

easu

res

cons

ider

ed to

prev

ent s

lope

failu

res

or la

ndsl

ides

?(c

) Is

ther

e a

poss

ibili

ty th

at s

oil r

unof

f will

res

ult f

rom

cut

and

fill

area

s,w

aste

soi

l dis

posa

l site

s, a

nd b

orro

w s

ites?

Are

ade

quat

e m

easu

res

take

nto

pre

vent

soi

l run

off?

(a)

No

(b)

No

(c)

No

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(b

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(c)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t

(1)

Res

ettle

men

t

(a)

Is in

volu

ntar

y re

settl

emen

t cau

sed

by p

roje

ct im

plem

enta

tion?

Ifin

volu

ntar

y re

settl

emen

t is

caus

ed, a

re e

ffort

s m

ade

to m

inim

ize

the

impa

cts

caus

ed b

y th

e re

settl

emen

t?(b

) Is

ade

quat

e ex

plan

atio

n on

com

pens

atio

n an

d re

settl

emen

t ass

ista

nce

give

n to

affe

cted

peo

ple

prio

r to

res

ettle

men

t?(c

) Is

the

rese

ttlem

ent p

lan,

incl

udin

g co

mpe

nsat

ion

with

full

repl

acem

ent

cost

s, r

esto

ratio

n of

live

lihoo

ds a

nd li

ving

sta

ndar

ds d

evel

oped

bas

ed o

nso

cioe

cono

mic

stu

dies

on

rese

ttlem

ent?

(d)

Are

the

com

pens

atio

ns g

oing

to b

e pa

id p

rior

to th

e re

settl

emen

t?(e

) A

re th

e co

mpe

nsat

ion

polic

ies

prep

ared

in d

ocum

ent?

(f)

Doe

s th

e re

settl

emen

t pla

n pa

y pa

rtic

ular

atte

ntio

n to

vul

nera

ble

grou

psor

peo

ple,

incl

udin

g w

omen

, chi

ldre

n, th

e el

derly

, peo

ple

belo

w th

epo

vert

y lin

e, e

thni

c m

inor

ities

, and

indi

geno

us p

eopl

es?

(g)

Are

agr

eem

ents

with

the

affe

cted

peo

ple

obta

ined

prio

r to

rese

ttlem

ent?

(h)

Is th

e or

gani

zatio

nal f

ram

ewor

k es

tabl

ishe

d to

pro

perly

impl

emen

tre

settl

emen

t? A

re th

e ca

paci

ty a

nd b

udge

t sec

ured

to im

plem

ent t

hepl

an?

(i) A

re a

ny p

lans

dev

elop

ed to

mon

itor

the

impa

cts

of r

eset

tlem

ent?

(j) Is

the

grie

vanc

e re

dres

s m

echa

nism

est

ablis

hed?

(a)

Yes

(b)

Und

er p

repa

ratio

n

(c)

Und

er p

repa

ratio

n(d

) Y

es(e

) U

nder

pre

para

tion

(f)

Yes

(g)

Und

er p

repa

ratio

n(h

) Y

es(i)

Yes

(j) Y

es

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(b

) D

urin

g th

e pr

epar

atio

n of

the

sim

ple

Res

setle

men

t Act

ion

Pla

n (R

AP

),N

PA

foun

d th

at th

ey n

eed

the

supp

ort f

rom

Min

istr

y of

Ene

rgy

and

Wat

erR

esou

rces

(M

EW

R).

. The

refo

re, N

PA

issu

ed th

e le

tter

to M

EW

R o

n th

ere

ques

t of c

oope

ratio

n on

18t

h Ju

ly, 2

011.

By

the

com

men

cem

ent o

f the

Pro

ject

, NP

A w

ill c

ompl

ete

the

ress

etle

men

t with

ME

WR

.(c

) N

PA

is p

repa

ring

the

sim

ple

RA

P w

ith M

EW

R.

(d)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(e

) N

PA

is p

repa

ring

the

sim

ple

RA

P w

ith M

EW

R.

(f)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(g

) N

PA

is p

repa

ring

the

sim

ple

RA

P w

ith M

EW

R.

(h)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(i)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(j)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t

(2)

Livi

ng a

ndLi

velih

ood

(a)

Is th

ere

a po

ssib

ility

that

the

proj

ect w

ill a

dver

sely

affe

ct th

e liv

ing

cond

ition

s of

inha

bita

nts?

Are

ade

quat

e m

easu

res

cons

ider

ed to

red

uce

the

impa

cts,

if n

eces

sary

?(b

) Is

ther

e a

poss

ibili

ty th

at d

isea

ses,

incl

udin

g in

fect

ious

dis

ease

s, s

uch

as H

IV w

ill b

e br

ough

t due

to im

mig

ratio

n of

wor

kers

ass

ocia

ted

with

the

proj

ect?

Are

ade

quat

e co

nsid

erat

ions

giv

en to

pub

lic h

ealth

, if

nece

ssar

y?(c

) Is

ther

e an

y po

ssib

ility

that

inst

alla

tion

of s

truc

ture

s, s

uch

as p

ower

line

tow

ers

will

cau

se a

rad

io in

terf

eren

ce?

If a

ny s

igni

fican

t rad

io in

terf

eren

ceis

ant

icip

ated

, are

ade

quat

e m

easu

res

cons

ider

ed?

(d)

Are

the

com

pens

atio

ns fo

r tr

ansm

issi

on w

ires

give

n in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

dom

estic

law

?

(a)

Yes

(b)

No

(c)

No

(d)

Unr

elat

ed

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(b

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(c)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(d

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

4 S

ocia

lE

nviro

nmen

t


A-7-6

Cat

egor

yE

nviro

nmen

tal

Item

Mai

n C

heck

Item

sS

tatu

sC

onfir

mat

ion

of E

nviro

nmen

tal C

onsi

dera

tions

(Rea

sons

, Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res)

(3)

Her

itage

(a)

Is th

ere

a po

ssib

ility

that

the

proj

ect w

ill d

amag

e th

e lo

cal

arch

eolo

gica

l, hi

stor

ical

, cul

tura

l, an

d re

ligio

us h

erita

ge?

Are

ade

quat

em

easu

res

cons

ider

ed to

pro

tect

thes

e si

tes

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith th

eco

untr

y’s

law

s?

(a)

No

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t

(4)

Land

scap

e(a

) Is

ther

e a

poss

ibili

ty th

at th

e pr

ojec

t will

adv

erse

ly a

ffect

the

loca

lla

ndsc

ape?

Are

nec

essa

ry m

easu

res

take

n?(a

) N

o(a

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(5)

Eth

nic

Min

oriti

es a

ndIn

dige

nous

Peo

ples

(a)

Are

con

side

ratio

ns g

iven

to r

educ

e im

pact

s on

the

cultu

re a

nd li

fest

yle

of e

thni

c m

inor

ities

and

indi

geno

us p

eopl

es?

(b)

Are

all

of th

e rig

hts

of e

thni

c m

inor

ities

and

indi

geno

us p

eopl

es in

rela

tion

to la

nd a

nd r

esou

rces

res

pect

ed?

(a)

Unr

elat

ed(b

) U

nrel

ated

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(b

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(6)

Wor

king

Con

ditio

ns

(a)

Is th

e pr

ojec

t pro

pone

nt n

ot v

iola

ting

any

law

s an

d or

dina

nces

asso

ciat

ed w

ith th

e w

orki

ng c

ondi

tions

of t

he c

ount

ry w

hich

the

proj

ect

prop

onen

t sho

uld

obse

rve

in th

e pr

ojec

t?(b

) A

re ta

ngib

le s

afet

y co

nsid

erat

ions

in p

lace

for

indi

vidu

als

invo

lved

inth

e pr

ojec

t, su

ch a

s th

e in

stal

latio

n of

saf

ety

equi

pmen

t whi

ch p

reve

nts

indu

stria

l acc

iden

ts, a

nd m

anag

emen

t of h

azar

dous

mat

eria

ls?

(c)

Are

inta

ngib

le m

easu

res

bein

g pl

anne

d an

d im

plem

ente

d fo

rin

divi

dual

s in

volv

ed in

the

proj

ect,

such

as

the

esta

blis

hmen

t of a

saf

ety

and

heal

th p

rogr

am, a

nd s

afet

y tr

aini

ng (

incl

udin

g tr

affic

saf

ety

and

publ

iche

alth

) fo

r w

orke

rs e

tc.?

(d)

Are

app

ropr

iate

mea

sure

s ta

ken

to e

nsur

e th

at s

ecur

ity g

uard

sin

volv

ed in

the

proj

ect n

ot to

vio

late

saf

ety

of o

ther

indi

vidu

als

invo

lved

, or

loca

l res

iden

ts?

(a)

Yes

(b)

Und

er p

repa

ratio

n(c

) U

nder

pre

para

tion

(d)

Und

er p

repa

ratio

n

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(b

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(c)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(d

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(1)

Impa

cts

durin

gC

onst

ruct

ion

(a)

Are

ade

quat

e m

easu

res

cons

ider

ed to

red

uce

impa

cts

durin

gco

nstr

uctio

n (e

.g.,

nois

e, v

ibra

tions

, tur

bid

wat

er, d

ust,

exha

ust g

ases

, and

was

tes)

?(b

) If

cons

truc

tion

activ

ities

adv

erse

ly a

ffect

the

natu

ral e

nviro

nmen

t(e

cosy

stem

), a

re a

dequ

ate

mea

sure

s co

nsid

ered

to r

educ

e im

pact

s?(c

) If

cons

truc

tion

activ

ities

adv

erse

ly a

ffect

the

soci

al e

nviro

nmen

t, ar

e

(a)

Und

er p

repa

ratio

n(b

) N

o(c

) U

nder

pre

para

tion

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(b

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(c)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t

(2)

Mon

itorin

g

(a)

Doe

s th

e pr

opon

ent d

evel

op a

nd im

plem

ent m

onito

ring

prog

ram

for

the

envi

ronm

enta

l ite

ms

that

are

con

side

red

to h

ave

pote

ntia

l im

pact

s?(b

) W

hat a

re th

e ite

ms,

met

hods

and

freq

uenc

ies

of th

e m

onito

ring

prog

ram

?(c

) D

oes

the

prop

onen

t est

ablis

h an

ade

quat

e m

onito

ring

fram

ewor

k(o

rgan

izat

ion,

per

sonn

el, e

quip

men

t, an

d ad

equa

te b

udge

t to

sust

ain

the

mon

itorin

g fr

amew

ork)

?(d

) A

re a

ny r

egul

ator

y re

quire

men

ts p

erta

inin

g to

the

mon

itorin

g re

port

syst

em id

entif

ied,

suc

h as

the

form

at a

nd fr

eque

ncy

of r

epor

ts fr

om th

epr

opon

ent t

o th

e re

gula

tory

aut

horit

ies?

(a)

Und

er p

repa

ratio

n(b

) U

nder

pre

para

tion

(c)

Und

er p

repa

ratio

n(d

) Y

es

(a)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(b

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

(c)

Sam

e as

Atta

chm

ent 1

Env

ironm

enta

l Che

cklis

t(d

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

6 N

ote

Not

e on

Usi

ngE

nviro

nmen

tal

Che

cklis

t

(a)

If ne

cess

ary,

the

impa

cts

to tr

ansb

ound

ary

or g

loba

l iss

ues

shou

ld b

eco

nfirm

ed, (

e.g.

, the

pro

ject

incl

udes

fact

ors

that

may

cau

se p

robl

ems,

such

as

tran

sbou

ndar

y w

aste

trea

tmen

t, ac

id r

ain,

des

truc

tion

of th

eoz

one

laye

r, o

r gl

obal

war

min

g).

(a)

Unr

elat

ed(a

) S

ame

as A

ttach

men

t 1 E

nviro

nmen

tal C

heck

list

1) R

egar

ding

the

term

“C

ount

ry’s

Sta

ndar

ds”

men

tione

d in

the

abov

e ta

ble,

in th

e ev

ent t

hat e

nviro

nmen

tal s

tand

ards

in th

e co

untr

y w

here

the

proj

ect i

s lo

cate

d di

verg

e si

gnifi

cant

ly fr

om in

tern

atio

nal s

tand

ard

appr

opria

te e

nviro

nmen

tal c

onsi

dera

tions

are

req

uire

d to

be

mad

e.

In c

ases

whe

re lo

cal e

nviro

nmen

tal r

egul

atio

ns a

re y

et to

be

esta

blis

hed

in s

ome

area

s, c

onsi

dera

tions

sho

uld

be m

ade

base

d on

com

paris

ons

with

app

ropr

iate

sta

ndar

ds o

f oth

er c

ount

ri (

incl

udin

g Ja

pan'

s ex

perie

nce)

2) E

nviro

nmen

tal c

heck

list p

rovi

des

gene

ral e

nviro

nmen

tal i

tem

s to

be

chec

ked.

It m

ay b

e ne

cess

ary

to a

dd o

r de

lete

an

item

taki

ng in

to a

ccou

nt th

e ch

arac

teris

tics

of th

e pr

ojec

t and

the

part

icul

ar c

ircum

stan

ces

of t

coun

try

and

loca

lity

in w

hich

it is

loca

ted

5 O

ther

s

4 S

ocia

lE

nviro

nmen

t


A-7-7


A-7-8


A-7-9


A-7-10


A-7-11

Appendix 8 Approval Letter for usage of

Land for Goderich Substation

（SLBC MEWR）

SIERRA LEONE BROADCASTING CORPORATION. NEW ENGLAND VILLE, FREETOWN. '.

23rd December 2010

The Permanent Secretary Ministry ofEnergy and Water Resources . El~ctricity House Siaka Stevens .Street Freetowll..

REOUEST FOR THE RELEASE OF A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SLBC SITE IN GODERICH FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 33/11KV DISTRIBUTION

: SUBSTATION.

With reference to the above, I write to inform you that the Board of Trustees of the SLBC has given approval for the SLBC to release the parcel of land located at

i! the SLBC site in Goderich that has been identified by NPA for the construction of a 33/11KV distribution Substation.

As Partners in development, we consider your plan a good venture for the development of energy in Sierra Leone.

E. Gbanabom Hallowell Director General

cc: The Chainnan, Board ofTrustees, SLBC The Minister ofEnergy & Water Resources The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Lands, Country Planning & the Environment The General Manager, NPA The Deputy General Manager, NPA

Website: www.slbc.sl 'YOV~'VOICE !M'Yo/OICE. Email: [email protected]

8. Approval Letter for usage of Land for Goderich Substation （SLBC→MEWR）

A-8-1

mailto:[email protected]

Appendix 9 Letter for procedure to

complete the EIA requirements

（EPA→MEWR）

9. Letter for procedure to complete the EIA requirements（EPA→MEWR）

A-9-1


A-9-2

H70310

長方形


A-9-3

Appendix 10 Approval Letter for

issuance of EIA License

（EPA→MEWR）

10. Approval Letter for issuance of EIA License （EPA→MEWR）

A-10-1

10. Approval Letter for issuance of EIA License （EPA→MEWR）

A-10-2

P3s9Ô/ & 4. Minutes of Discussions · 4. Minutes of Discussions ¯/ / P3s9Ô/ & # 4. Minutes of Discussions ¯/ / P3s9Ô/ & # 4. Minutes of Discussions \r \r This page is closed

Documents