OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED CODE OF PRACTICE FOR COMPETITION IN THE PROVISION OF TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES IDA PUBLIC FORUM Singapore International Convention and Exhibition Centre 15 May 2000 Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.
Dec 15, 2015
OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED CODE OF PRACTICE FOR COMPETITION
IN THE PROVISION OF TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES
IDA PUBLIC FORUM
Singapore International Convention and Exhibition Centre
15 May 2000
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 2
SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY ADVISORY TEAM
ANTONY CORELSS&D Hong [email protected]
JACK NADLERSS&D [email protected]
202-626-6838
THOMAS RAMSEYSS&D Brussels
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 3
OVERVIEW
Integrated CodeRegulatory frameworkConsumer protection rulesInterconnection regimeSector-specific competition rulesEnforcement mechanism
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 4
OVERVIEW
Ten Sections Introduction (Section 1)
GoalsScopeRegulatory principlesLegal authority
Classification of Licensees (Section 2) Duty to End-Users (Section 3)
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 5
OVERVIEW
Interconnection Regime (Sections 4-6)Duties of all facilities-based LicenseesDuties of Dominant LicenseesInfrastructure sharing
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 6
OVERVIEW
Sector-specific Competition Regime (Section 7-9)Abuse of position by Dominant LicenseesAgreements that unreasonably restrict competitionConsolidations
Enforcement (Section 10)
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 7
INTRODUCTION
Goals of the CodeFoster competition and industry self-regulationEncourage investment in telecom infrastructureEnsure wide-spread, affordable access to quality
telecom servicesPromote Info-Communication sectorSecure Singapore's position as a regulatory and
market leader
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 8
INTRODUCTION
Scope of the CodeAll provisions apply to facilities-based Licensees,
regardless of technologyInterconnection regime does not apply to service-
based Licensees, such as resellersValue-added service providers may seek carrier-to-
carrier interconnection or obtain end-user connection
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 9
INTRODUCTION
Regulatory PrinciplesReliance on market forces and voluntary
agreements, where feasibleRegulation when needed, but only to the extent
necessaryPlatform neutralityOpen and reasoned decision-making
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 10
INTRODUCTION
Legal AuthorityTelecom Act 26 - authority to promulgate Codes
of PracticeIDA Act 7(1) - authority to take “advantageous,
necessary or convenient” actions to discharge statutory functions, including promoting competition
IDA Licenses obligates Licensees to comply with Codes and Regulations
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 11
CLASSIFICATION OF LICENSEES
Each Licensee Classified as “Dominant” or “Non-dominant”Differing regulatory obligations based on extent to
which Licensee is constrained by market forcesInitial presumptions
Singtel SCV 1-Net
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 12
CLASSIFICATION OF LICENSEES
Service-specificRevisions as competition develops
IDA initiated Licensee-initiated
Economics-based analytic framework
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 13
CLASSIFICATION OF LICENSEES
RationaleMinimises market distortionsTargets administrative resourcesConsistent with international “best practices”
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 14
CONSUMER PROTECTION
All Licensees Must Modify Customer Contracts to ProvidePeriodic, accurate and timely billsProtection against a “slamming” and “cramming”Dispute resolution proceduresProtection of customer information
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 15
CONSUMER PROTECTION
Additional Duties of Dominant LicenseesCost-oriented pricingTariff filingNon-discriminationUnbundlingNo excessive early termination liability
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 16
INTERCONNECTION
Non-Dominant Classification Dominant
YES VoluntaryAgreement
AgreementMeeting
MinimumRequirements
IDAReview
IDAReview
IDADispute
Resolution
NO YES NOVoluntaryAgreement
Ability toNegotiate with
DominantLicensee
AgreementMeeting
MinimumRequirements
AgreedTerms Plus
DefaultTerms
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 17
INTERCONNECTION
Non-dominant LicenseesDuty to provide direct or indirect interconnection;
any agreement must meet minimum terms Non-discriminatory quality Number portability Technical standards Access to towers, poles, ducts and rights-of-
way
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 18
INTERCONNECTION
Limited IDA role Reliance on market forces to foster agreements Confirm that agreements meet minimum
requirements Mediation Private enforcement
Option to seek interconnection with Dominant Licensee
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 19
INTERCONNECTION
Dominant LicenseesMust publish a “Reference Interconnection Offer”Must negotiate in good faith with any Licensee
requesting interconnectionLicensees may agree on any terms that:
meet minimum requirements are non-discriminatory
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 20
INTERCONNECTION
If the Licensees do not agree, the Requesting Licensee may seek IDA dispute resolution
To the extent the Licensees have not agreed, IDA will impose default terms, such as: interconnection at any technically feasible
location provision of unbundled loops (or equivalent) physical co-location
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 21
INTERCONNECTION
Infrastructure SharingLicensee may request right to share “essential”
infrastructure necessary to provide a service cannot efficiently be replicated sharing technically and economically feasible
Voluntary negotiations, supplemented by IDA dispute resolution procedure
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 22
COMPETITION REGIME
Over-viewSector-specific rulesBased on economic principles and international
best practicesEmphasis on ex post enforcementImportance will increase a competition takes root
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 23
COMPETITION REGIME
Abuse of Dominant PositionPricing abuses
Predatory pricing Price squeezes
Monopoly leveraging Cross-subsidisation Discrimination
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 24
COMPETITION REGIME
Agreements Between Licensees That Unreason-ably Restrict CompetitionSome agreements prohibited under any
circumstance Price fixing Bid rigging Customer allocation Group boycotts
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 25
COMPETITION REGIME
Permissibility of most agreements based on competition effects Joint ventures among competing licenses “Vertical” non-price agreements
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 26
COMPETITION REGIME
ConsolidationsIDA approval required for assignments and
transfers of control of licensesIDA actions based on economic assessment of the
likely impact of the consolidation on competitionIDA may approve, deny or grant subject to
conditions
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 27
ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS
IDA Enforcement ActionsNotice and opportunity to respondRemedies
Warning Cease and desist order Monetary sanctions, proportionate to the
contravention
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 28
ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS
Private Requests for EnforcementProvide facts that, if proven, demonstrate a
contraventionSupport allegationPropose remedyIDA retains full enforcement discretion
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P. (2000)
Slide No. 29
ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS
Requests for Advisory GuidanceInquiry regarding rights and duties in specific
situationsIDA guidance non-binding