Open Data and Collaborative Governance: Perspectives and Research Challenges Yannis Charalabidis Assistant Professor, University of the Aegean Head of Research, Greek Interoperability Centre University of Washington, Seattle, 3 rd December 2012
Nov 19, 2014
Open Data and Collaborative Governance: Perspectives and Research Challenges
Yannis CharalabidisAssistant Professor, University of the AegeanHead of Research, Greek Interoperability Centre
University of Washington, Seattle, 3rd December 2012
Your speaker for the dayStudied computer engineering, at the National Technical University of Athens. PhD in complex information systems, NTUA
7 years a researcher in RTD projects for businesses and governments
7 years in the software industry (Greece, Netherlands, Germany Poland). Managing director of Baan-Singular ERP company
Already 5 years in University of the Aegean and the Greek Interoperability centre, teaching and researching on eGovernance. The next 7 years ?
My aim for the day: to give you food for thought.
Hold on …
Activities Research in Greece and European Union
(FP7/ICT, CIP/PSP, e-Infrastructures, REGPOT, LIFE, INTERREG, Greek CSF/RTD programmes)
Industry-Academia programmes and projects (Student practice, industry-oriented theses, PhD research, targeted research)
High-level, innovation-oriented consulting for Governments, and Businesses worldwide (typically in partnership with industry and other institutions)
Scientific global-scale events organisation (WeGov Awards, The Samos Summit, Aegean Start-Ups)
Dissemination and Training activities
Areas of Expertise1. Unified Process and Data Modelling methodologies with
emphasis in collaborative process modelling, advanced CCTS-based XML modelling, business process management, simulation methods and tools
2. Interoperability Standardisation and Application Frameworks, including National Standardisation Frameworks for businesses and governments, interoperability testing and demonstration platforms
3. Service-Oriented Information Systems for Businesses and Governments in Local, National and European level, including Electronic Services Portals, eGIS, eSCM, Service Registries and middleware components
4. Web 2.0 technologies for participative services, including mashups, social networking applications, enterprise 2.0 applications
5. Electronic Governance models and systems with the use of ontological representation and federated repositories for policy modelling, argumentation support, knowledge visualisation, legislation management
6. Skill management and educational material development for public / private sector training on eBusiness, eGovernment, SOA and Interoperability
SINTEF
FhG-FOKUS
NCC
TELIN
EPFLBoC
ALBANY Univ, US
USC, US
GIC
Collaborating Centres of Excellence in eGovernment & eBusiness
Countries with user organisations
NIST, US
VUBI-VLAB
GIC International Network
CNR
SyriaIsraelPalestine
UNINOVA
UPV
SAP
An exerciseThere is a photo of the class in
Can you retrieve it ?(search for #UWopendata or @yannisc)
Then, you can post online questions in twitter using #UWopendata
ON OPEN DATA
Open data is the idea that certain data should be freely available to everyone to use and republish as they wish, without restrictions from copyright,patents or other mechanisms of control. The goals of the open data movement are similar to those of other "Open" movements such as open source,open content, and open access … (wikipedia)
Why is Open Data important ?Organises public knowledgeLeads to better, new servicesFights against corruptionSupports transparency Can motivate citizens Can contribute to better democracy Gives data to other sciences Gives ideas for start-ups
Can you give us some good examples ?
Organises public knowledge : data.gov (UK)Leads to better, new services : data.gov (US)Supports transparency: diavgeia.gr (GR)Can motivate citizens: toronto.ca (CA)Fights against corruption :
ipaidabribe.com (IN)Can contribute to better democracy:
opengov (GR) Gives ideas for start-ups:
Open Data Institute (UK)Provides data to science for solving complex
problems of the society: ENGAGE (EU)
The ENGAGE EU project on Open DataA European e-Infrastructure, for advancing
open data provision across countries and scientific communities, to solve complex societal problems
To provide state of the art methods and tools for data gathering, curation, publication, maintenance
A public-private partnership of research (Greek Interoperability Centre University Aegean, TU Delft, Fraunhofer FOKUS) industry (Microsoft, IBM, Intrasoft intl) and administrations from 5 EU countries
www.engage-project.eu
The ENGAGE “Two-way” Open Data Usage Scenarios
Delivering Public Sector Data to Researchers and Citizens
Delivering Open Data Needs and guidelines to Public Sector Organisations
An Open Data Platform generic architecture
User Interface
Application Interface
(for systems)
Various Apps(PC &
mobile)
Data Curation
(annotation, linking, formats)
Data Visualisation Data Linking
Data Acquisition
UI
Data Acquisition
API
Directories of sourcesAcquisition
Processing
Provision
Open Data Platform architecture
Providing PSI to research communities and citizens in a personalised manner
Curating, Annotating, Harmonising , Visualising
Gathering data from governmental organisations and systems (the Gov Cloud)
Data LinkingData Linking Semantic AnnotationSemantic Annotation AnonymisationAnonymisation HarmonisationHarmonisation
Visualisation - Analytics
Visualisation - Analytics
Search and Navigation tools
Search and Navigation tools
Social sciencesSocial
sciences
Data Service Provision Infrastructure
Data Curation Infrastructure
Public Sector Information Sources
Tailored data services
Research and Industry Research and Industry Governance and
policy makingGovernance and
policy makingCitizens and education
Citizens and education
Data analytics
Data analytics
Knowledge / Data Mining Knowledge / Data Mining Directory services
and direct linking to data archives
Directory services and direct linking to
data archives
ICTICTCitizensCitizens
Natural Sciences and Engineering
Natural Sciences and Engineering GovernanceGovernance
User groups
Collaboration / Communities
Collaboration / Communities
PersonalisationPersonalisation
Single point of Access
Single point of Access
Data QualityData Quality Knowledge MappingKnowledge Mapping
Public Organisations, Repositories, Databases
LawLawPolicy
Modelling Policy
Modelling
Automatic curation algorithmsAutomatic curation algorithms
The Global reach of ENGAGE
Challenges for Open Data PlatformsMetadata schemas “2.0”: automated filling &
self classification, multiple levels of abstraction for different user groups
Develop auto-calculating new, metrics for open datasets: semantic closeness / distance, linking possibility, data quality will allow for automatically linking open data (A-LOD)
Full API and SaaS operation: automated input and publication of open data “from the source”
Novel ways of visualisation for open / linked data
Build ecosystems around open data, for sharing and usage that can make our lives better, for real
ON METADATAThe term metadata is ambiguous, as it is used for two fundamentally different concepts (types). Although the expression "data about data" is often used, it does not apply to both in the same way. Structural metadata, the design and specification of data structures, cannot be about data, because at design time the application contains no data. In this case the correct description would be "data about the containers of data". Descriptive metadata, on the other hand, is about individual instances of application data, the data content.
Unlocking the Open Data Vault:The “Key” is Metadata
Metadata provides the means for discovery of relevant datasets
Metadata provides the context for understanding the datasetMetadata provides the restrictions on use of the dataset:
rights, possibly costsMetadata provides the access to the datasetMetadata can assist in the further processing of the dataset(s)
by providing information on data syntax (type, structure) and semantics (meaning)
Metadata can record provenance (what has been done to the dataset)
Metadata can record information for digital preservation to assure the future existence of the dataset
Metadata can record user reaction to datasets: quality, utility
PSI Metadata IssuesConventional metadata for PSI
(data.gov.xx) is:• Flat (lacking structure)• Inadequate for describing the context of
the dataset• Inadequate for software processing of the
dataset• Inadequate for scientific use of open data• Inadequate for automating linking• Inadequate for automating visualisation
• But ... suitable for initial discovery
PSI Metadata• In ENGAGE we shall provide:
• Much more detailed metadata• With formal syntax (structure) and declared
semantics (meaning)• From the world of research information• Congruent with the EC e-infrastructure and
associated projects
• Within an architecture allowing the end-user to• Use conventional PSI browsing and query
• Semantic web / linked open data /Simple metadata• Access to datasets and limited processing / visualisation
• Or use information system query, reporting, analysis, visualisation, simulation• Rich metadata / Full range of relational processing
We will try in the next slides to show you what is the level of expectation
from metadata handling from a 2nd generation open data system
Imagine you are in front of the ENGAGE system, and you have your URI from a dataset, somewhere in the
cloud,(copied as string in the clipboard)
And begin …
Prescreening: User only gives URI of the dataset
Enter (paste) the URI of your dataset
_
(then for 30 seconds you see this screen, changing)
Progress of ENGAGE Resource Prescreening:
( 45% ) of jobs completed
Managed to :
Identify xls file
Autofill, provisionally: Title
Autofill, provisionally: Creator
Create unique ENGAGE URI
Calculate keywords
Autofill, provisionally: keywords
…
…
(When finishing import, the report)
Report
ENGAGE managed to automatically, provisionally fill in ( 21 ) of 43 metadata attributes for your dataset.
Your current validity is at ( 45% )
For your dataset to be inserted in the database, you need to continue filling in ( 5 ) mandatory attributes.
Your dataset will then be inserted with validity ( 55% )
If all ( 17 ) non-mandatory attributes are filled in, validity will be maximum, at 70% / limit of the insertion phase.
Please select next action: Continue Park Cancel
After import …
… and then, we enter the metadata insertion page with
pre-filled data, etc.When we finish, we get a similar
final report.
When all metadata fields are filled-in, we can ask all types of queries for open data, at an international
scale
As a conclusion on open data …
Open data, collaborative governance and ICT will be key pillars of the new, value-based administration in this century
Open data and applications can play an important role for entrepreneurship and development
European Union member states, having already adopted a collaborative governance example, can now partner and work together with Gov 2.0 initiatives internationally
In the Greek Interoperability Centre and the University of AEGEAN we can leverage on European experiences and best practices, delivering them worldwide
ON COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCECollaborative governance is a process and a form of governance in which participants (parties, agencies, stakeholders) representing different interests are collectively empowered to make a policy decision or make recommendations to a final decision-maker who will not substantially change consensus recommendations from the group
Society: increasingly interconnected, flexible, fast-evolving, unpredictable
Governance: often silos-based, linear, obscure, hierarchical, over-simplified
Policies, Disciplines and Actors are isolated
The Problem: Gap between Society and Governance
Policies Health R&D Social
Disciplines Economics Mathematics ICT
Actors Government Citizens Industry
"The problems that we have created cannot be solved at the level of thinking
that created them"
Albert Einstein
So ?
We need three axes to move along:
More people involved (collaborative governance)
More accurate and analytical, modeling and simulation tools
More data available (open data)
2020
2010
We need to formalise ICT research for governance, and pursue major pillars (the Grand Challenges)
Web Technologies
Social Informatics
Systems & Services Technologies
Management Tools
We need multidisciplinarity: the 4 domains that need to
converge
Web 2.0Argument Visualization
Mixed Reality Pattern Recognition
Serious Games
Electronic ParticipationTranslation Systems
Social Networks
Behavioral ModellingSocietal ModellingSocial Simulation
Public Sector Service Systems Workflow Systems
Enterprise Resource ManagementCloud computing
PS Knowledge ManagementLegal Structures Management
Business IntelligenceData & Opinion Mining
SimulationForecasting - Backcasting
OptimizationSystems Dynamics
Adaptive Models
“Hard”
“Soft”
Society Administration
The eGovernance Research Hype Curve
Service Delivery Platforms
Mobile Government
Online Opinion Mining
Instant, proactive Service Delivery for all services
eVoting
(Automated) Argument Visualisation
Federated eID
Gov Cloud (SaaS)
Science Basefor ICT-enabled Governance
Gov Cloud (PaaS)
Social Media in Policy Making
Semantic Interoperability
Agent-based Societal Simulation
eParticipation
Model-Based Decision Making
Visibility
Inflated Expectations Disillusionment Productivity
Linked Data
Visual Analytics
Legal Informatics
Service Co-creation / Web Services for all basic services
Open data
ICT-enabled historiography
Gov Cloud (IaaS)
Technical Interoperability
Organisational Interoperability
Web Services /SOA in core registries
Governance Model Composability & Reuse
(Seamless) Identity management & trust mechanisms
Internal, Static Workflow Mgt
Dynamic, External Workflow Mgt
Available for application
Should be around, soon
Will take many years
Government Service Utility
Serious Games for Governance
Participatory Sensing / IoT
Open Source Software forService Mgt
MunicipalityERP
Readiness, over time
Back to reality: Our current projects on ICT-enabled Governance
PADGETS: Policy Making through Social Media Interoperability www.padgets.eu
ENGAGE: Open, Linked Governmental Data for scientists and citizens www.engage-project.eu
NOMAD: Non-moderated opinion mining (the opinion web) www.nomad-project.eu
CROSSOVER: New horizons in ICT-enabled governance www.crossover-project.eu
As a conclusion
We need a totally different set of tools for evidence-based decision making by governments
Societal Simulation, Data and Opinion Mining, Service Co-creation will be the next “big things” for governments that wish to make a difference
We need to go beyond pure ICT approaches and embark in a multi-disciplinary journey. That’s why we need a science base for ICT-enabled Governance
But most importantly …
Stay tuned at:
Mail: [email protected]
Twitter: @yannisc
Blog: t-government.blogspot.com
Site: charalabidis.gr
eGovernance Research is about our children’s future:
It is not enough to “do the things right” … we have to “do the right things”