ONETECH Testing & Eval. Lab. VERIFICATION20report/%b9%cc%bb%e7%bf%eb/Netsafe... · 2011-10-13 · The equipment complies with the regulation; FCC Part 15 Subpart B, Class A (Verification).

ONETECH Testing & Eval. Lab.

VERIFICATION

FCC RULES PARTS 2 & 15 CLASS A DIGITAL DEVICE

for

PRODUCT: VIDEO CODEC

“MODEL NAME: NetSafe-VC3001”

AUTHORIZED

Win4NET Co., Ltd.

KOLON Digital Tower 1301, 222-7, Kuro-Dong, Kuro-Gu, Seoul, 152-848, Korea

December 27, 2005

SUMMARY

The above equipment complies with the applicable technical standards as indicated in the measurement report

and was tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in ANSI C63.4: 2003.

This is only valid in connection with Test Report: E05DR-053

Detail description of test facility was submitted to the Federal Communications Commission on April 04, 2003.

(Registration Number: 340658)

Page 1 of 23

Report No.: E05DR-053

It should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of ONETECH. FCC-004 (Rev.0) HEAD OFFICE : #505 SK APT. Factory 223-28, Sangdaewon 1 Dong, Jungwon-Gu, Seongnam-City, Kyunggi-Do, 462-705, Korea (TEL: +82-31-746-8500, FAX: +82-31-746-8700) EMC Testing Dept : 307-51 Daessangryung-Ri, Chowol-Eup, Kwangju-City, Kyunggi-Do 464-860 Korea. (TEL: +82-31-765-8289, FAX: +82-31-766-2904)

Testing & Evaluation Lab.

ELECTROMAGNETIC EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE REPORT

FOR FCC CLASS A VERIFICATION

Test Report No. : E05DR-053

Applicant : Win4NET Co., Ltd.

Address : KOLON Digital Tower 1301, 222-7, Kuro-Dong, Kuro-Gu, Seoul, 152-848, Korea

Manufacturer : Win4NET Co., Ltd.

Address : KOLON Digital Tower 1301, 222-7, Kuro-Dong, Kuro-Gu, Seoul, 152-848, Korea

Type of Equipment : Video Codec

Model Name : NetSafe-VC3001

Serial number : N/A

Total page of Report : 23 pages (including this page)

Date of Incoming : December 16, 2005

Date of Issuing : December 27, 2005

SUMMARY The equipment complies with the regulation; FCC Part 15 Subpart B, Class A (Verification). This test report contains only the results of a single test of the sample supplied for the examination.

It is not a general valid assessment of the features of the respective products of the mass-production.

Prepared by: Approved by: Seung-Hyun, Nam / Project Engineer Gea-Won, Lee / Chief Engineer EMC Dept. EMC Dept. ONETECH Corp. ONETECH Corp.

Page 2 of 23




CONTENTS PAGE

1. VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE............................................................................................................................3

2. GENERAL INFORMATION...........................................................................................................................................4

2.1 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................................................................4

2.2 MODEL DIFFERENCES: ..................................................................................................................................................4

2.3 RELATED SUBMITTAL(S) / GRANT(S) ............................................................................................................................4

2.4 TEST SYSTEM DETAILS ..................................................................................................................................................4

2.5 TEST METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................................5

2.6 TEST FACILITY ...............................................................................................................................................................5

3. SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION..............................................................................................................................5

3.1 JUSTIFICATION ...............................................................................................................................................................5

3.2 EUT EXERCISE SOFTWARE............................................................................................................................................5

3.3 CABLE DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................................................................................6

3.4 NOISE SUPPRESSION PARTS ON CABLE .........................................................................................................................6

3.5 EQUIPMENT MODIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................................7

3.6 CONFIGURATION OF TEST SYSTEM ...............................................................................................................................7

4. PRELIMINARY TEST.....................................................................................................................................................7

4.1 AC POWER LINE CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST ............................................................................................................7

4.2 RADIATED EMISSION TEST ............................................................................................................................................7

5. FINAL RESULT OF MEASURMENT...........................................................................................................................8

5.1 CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST.........................................................................................................................................8

5.2 RADIATED EMISSION TEST ............................................................................................................................................9

6. FIELD STRENGTH CALCULATION.........................................................................................................................10

7. LIST OF TEST EQUIPMENT.......................................................................................................................................11

APPENDIX I - CONDUCTED EMISSION GRAPH TEST DATA ...............................................................................12

APPENDIX II - TEST SET-UP PHOTOS (CONDUCTED EMISSION)......................................................................13

APPENDIX III - TEST SET-UP PHOTOS (RADIATED EMISSION).........................................................................14

APPENDIX IV - IDENTIFICATION LABEL .................................................................................................................15

APPENDIX V - PHOTOGRAPHS REPORT...................................................................................................................16

APPENDIX VI – INFORMATION TO THE USER IN USER’S MANUAL ................................................................23

Page 3 of 23




1. VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE

APPLICANT : Win4NET Co., Ltd.

ADDRESS : KOLON Digital Tower 1301, 222-7, Kuro-Dong, Kuro-Gu, Seoul, 152-848, Korea

CONTACT PERSON : Mr. Sung-Dae, Kim / Research Engineer

TELEPHONE NO : +82-2-2103-5600

MODEL NAME : NetSafe-VC3001

SERIAL NUMBER : N/A

DATE : December 27, 2005

DEVICE TYPE CLASS A DIGITAL DEVICE - UNINTENTIONAL RADIATOR

E.U.T. DESCRIPTION Video Codec

THIS REPORT CONCERNS ORIGINAL GRANT

MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES ANSI C63.4: 2003

TYPE OF EQUIPMENT TESTED PRE-PRODUCTION

KIND OF EQUIPMENT AUTHORIZATION REQUESTED VERIFICATION

EQUIPMENT WILL BE OPERATED UNDER FCC RULES PART(S) FCC PART 15 (CLASS A)

MODIFICATIONS ON THE EQUIPMENT TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE No

FINAL TEST WAS CONDUCTED ON 10 METER OPEN AREA TEST SITE

-. This device has shown compliance with the conducted emissions limits in 15.107 adopted under FCC 02-107 (ET

Docket 98-80). The device may be marketed after July 11, 2005 affected by the 15.37(j) transition provisions.

-. The above equipment was tested by ONETECH Corp. for compliance with the requirement set forth in the FCC Rules

and Regulations. This said equipment in the configuration described in this report, shows the maximum emission levels

emanating from equipment are within the compliance requirements.

Page 4 of 23




2. GENERAL INFORMATION

2.1 Product Description The Win4NET Co., Ltd., Model NetSafe-VC3001 (referred to as the EUT in this report) is a Video Codec. Product

specification described herein was obtained from product data sheet or user’s manual.

CHASSIS TYPE Metal

LIST OF EACH OSC. OR

CRY. FREQ.(FREQ.>=1MHz)

CPU Board: 32.768 KHz, 24 MHz, 25 MHz, 33.333 MHz

MPEG Board : 2.048 MHz, 27 MHz, 28.75 MHz

NUMBER OF LAYERS 4 Layers : MPEG Board, 6 Layers : CPU Board

ELECTRICAL RATING DC 5V, 2.4A

EXTERNAL CONNECTOR DC Inlet, RJ45, RS485, Video Out, Audio In/Out, RS232, S-Video, USB

2.2 Model Differences:

-. None

2.3 Related Submittal(s) / Grant(s) Original submittal only

2.4 Test System Details The model numbers for all the equipments which were used in the tested system is:

Model Manufacturer FCC ID Description Connected to

NetSafe-VC3001 Win4NET Co., Ltd. N/A Video Codec (EUT) -

DSA-0151D-05 DeeVan Enterprise Co., Ltd. N/A Adapter (for EUT) EUT

PM-K5 IKEGAMI N/A CCTV Monitor EUT

N/A N/A N/A CCD Camera 4CH Video Server

N/A N/A N/A HUB EUT

AD-071AB Outstanding Electronics N/A Adapter HUB

SMS-015N Sungil Precision Co., Ltd. N/A Speaker EUT

PP01L DELL Computer Corp. DoC Notebook PC HUB

ADP-70EB Delta Electronics N/A Adapter Notebook PC

2225C HP DSI6XU2225 Printer Notebook PC

N/A Win4NET Co., Ltd. N/A 4CH Video Server HUB

DSA-0421S DVE N/A Adapter 4CH Video Server

Page 5 of 23




2.5 Test Methodology Both conducted and radiated testing was performed according to the procedures in ANSI C63.4: 2003. Radiated testing

was performed at a distance of 10 meters from EUT to the antenna.

2.6 Test Facility The open area test site and conducted measurement facilities are located on at 307-51 Daessangryung-Ri, Chowol-Eup,

Kwangju-City, Kyounggi-Do, 464-860, Korea. Description details of test facilities were submitted to the Commission on

April 04, 2003. (Registration Number: 340658)

3. SYSTEM TEST CONFIGURATION

3.1 Justification This device was configured for testing in a typical way as a normal customer is supposed to be used. During the test, the

following components were installed inside of the EUT.

DEVICE TYPE MANUFACTURER MODEL/PART NUMBER FCC ID

Main Board N/A WSV-2000 Rev 3.0 N/A

MPEG Board N/A WSVS-1000-MPEG Rev 0.2 N/A

Power Board (Adapter) N/A N/A N/A

3.2 EUT exercise Software -. After connecting the camera to the 4CH Video Server, the captured images were continuously displayed on the screen of

the Notebook PC and CCTV monitors. Notebook PC was connected to the EUT in order to the ping test via the HUB

from remote location. And other terminals of the EUT are connected to proper peripherals and cables.

Page 6 of 23




3.3 Cable Description

Power Cord

Shielded (Y/N)

I/O cable Shielded

(Y/N)

Length (M)

Video Codec (EUT) N Y 1.5(P), 1.2(D)

Adaptor (for EUT) N Y 1.8(P), 1.0(D)

CCTV MONITOR N Y 1.5(P), 1.2(D)

CCD CAMERA N Y 1.5(P), 1.2(D)

HUB N N 1.5(P), 1.2(D)

Adaptor (for HUB) N Y 1.8(P), 1.0(D)

Speaker N/A Y 1.2(D)

Notebook PC N Y 1.8(P)

Adapter (for Notebook PC) N Y 1.8(P), 1.0(D)

Printer N Y 1.5(P), 1.5(D)

4CH Video Server N Y 1.5 (P), 1.2 (D)

Adapter (for 4CH Video Server) N Y 1.8(P), 1.0(D)

* The marked “(P)” means the Power Cable and “(D)’ means Signal Cable.

3.4 Noise Suppression Parts on Cable

Ferrite Bead

(Y/N)

Location Metal Hood

(Y/N)

Location

Video Codec (EUT) N N/A Y BOTH END

Adaptor (for EUT) Y EUT END Y EUT END

CCTV MONITOR N N/A Y BOTH END

CCD CAMERA N N/A Y BOTH END

HUB N N/A N N/A

Adaptor (for HUB) Y HUB END Y HUB END

Speaker N N/A Y EUT END

Notebook PC N N/A - -

Adapter (for Notebook PC) Y Notebook PC END Y Notebook PC END

Printer N N/A Y BOTH END

4CH Video Server N N/A Y BOTH END

Adapter (for 4CH Video Server) Y 4CH Video Server END Y 4CH Video Server END

Page 7 of 23




3.5 Equipment Modifications

-. None

3.6 Configuration of Test System Line Conducted Test : The power cord of the EUT was connected to LISN. All supporting equipments were

connected to another LISN. Preliminary Power lines Conducted Emission test were

performed by using the procedure in ANSI C63.4: 2003 7.2.3 to determine the worse

operating conditions.

Radiated Emission Test : Preliminary radiated emission test was conducted using the procedure in ANSI C63.4:

2003 8.3.1.1 to determine the worse operating conditions. Final radiated emission test

was conducted at 10 meters open area test site.

4. PRELIMINARY TEST

4.1 AC Power line Conducted Emission Test During Preliminary Test, the following operating mode was investigated

Operation Mode The Worse operating condition (Please check one only)

The captured images were displayed continuously on the

screen of the Notebook PC and CCTV monitor. X

4.2 Radiated Emission Test During Preliminary Test, the following operating mode was investigated

Operation Mode The Worse operating condition (Please check one only)

The captured images were displayed continuously on the

screen of the Notebook PC and CCTV monitor. X

Page 8 of 23




5. FINAL RESULT OF MEASURMENT

Preliminary test was done in normal operation mode. And the final measurement was selected for the maximized emission

level.

5.1 Conducted Emission Test Humidity Level : 39 % Temperature : 22 °C

Limits apply to : FCC CFR 47, PART 15, SUBPART B, SECTION 15.107(b)

Type of Test : CLASS A

Result : PASSED BY –27.18 dB at 0.15 MHz

EUT : Video Codec Date: December 21, 2005

Operating Condition : The captured images were displayed continuously on the screen of the Notebook PC and CCTV monitor.

Detector : CISPR Quasi-Peak (6 dB Bandwidth: 9 kHz)

Frequency Line Peak (dBuV) Margin (MHz) Emission level Q.P Limits (dB)

0.15 N 51.82 79.00 -27.18

0.84 N 38.79 73.00 -34.21

4.81 H 44.05 73.00 -28.95

4.83 N 43.54 73.00 -29.46

23.13 N 38.63 73.00 -34.37

27.00 N 41.85 73.00 -31.15

Frequency Line Average (dBuV) Margin (MHz) Emission level Limits (dB)

-

-

Line Conducted Emissions Tabulated Data

Remark : “H”: Hot Line, “N”: Neutral line

Average modes were not measured, because the peak emission levels were under the average limit.

See Appendix I for an overview sweep performed with peak detector.

Tested by: Dong-Yub, Lee / Test Engineer

Page 9 of 23




5.2 Radiated Emission Test The following table shows the highest levels of radiated emission on both polarizations of horizontal and vertical. Humidity Level : 40 % Temperature : 21 °C Limits apply to : FCC CFR 47, PART 15, SUBPART B, SECTION 15.109(b) Type of Test : CLASS A Result : PASSED BY –3.70 dB at 748.80 MHZ

EUT : Video Codec Date: December 19, 2005 Operating Condition : The captured images were displayed continuously on the screen of the Notebook PC and CCTV monitor. Frequency Range : 30MHz – 1000MHz Detector : CISPR Quasi-Peak (6 dB Bandwidth: 120 kHz) Distance : 10 Meter

Radiated Emission Ant Correction Factors Total FCC CLASS A Freq.

(MHz) Amp.

(dBuV)

Pol. Ant.

(dBuV/m) Cable (dB)

Amp. (dBuV/m)

Limit (dBuV/m)

Margin (dB)

54.00 23.10 V 9.33 1.42 33.85 39.08 -5.23

70.75 19.40 V 5.61 1.52 26.53 39.08 -12.55

81.00 21.20 H 6.93 1.72 29.85 39.08 -9.23

161.00 10.80 H 15.34 2.40 28.54 43.52 -14.98

198.92 15.80 H 15.88 2.80 34.48 43.52 -9.04

215.80 16.50 H 16.34 2.93 35.77 43.52 -7.75

270.00 14.80 H 17.76 3.48 36.04 46.44 -10.40

350.00 22.70 H 14.34 4.20 41.24 46.44 -5.20

377.40 16.40 H 14.95 4.31 35.66 46.44 -10.78

450.00 10.50 H 16.77 4.50 31.77 46.44 -14.67

748.80 14.60 H 21.25 6.89 42.74 46.44 -3.70

804.00 4.90 V 20.55 7.19 32.64 46.44 -13.80

920.00 5.30 H 22.79 7.54 35.63 46.44 -10.81

Radiated Emission Tabulated Data Remark: “H”: Horizontal, “V”: Vertical

Tested by: Dong-Yub, Lee / Test Engineer

Page 10 of 23




6. FIELD STRENGTH CALCULATION

Meter readings are compared to the specification limit correcting for antenna and cable losses

+ Meter reading (dBuV)

+ Cable Loss (dB)

+ Antenna Factor (Loss) (dB/meter)

= Corrected Reading (dBuV/meter)

- Specification Limit (dBuV/meter)

= dB Relative to Spec (+/- dB)

Page 11 of 23




7. LIST OF TEST EQUIPMENT

No. EQUIPMENTS MFR. MODEL SER. NO. LAST CAL DUE CAL USE

1. Test receiver R/S ESVS 10 827864/005 DEC/05 12MONTH

2. Test receiver R/S ESHS 10 834467/007 MAY/05 12MONTH

3. Spectrum analyzer HP 8566B 3407A08547 JUL/05 12MONTH

4. Spectrum analyzer HP 85680B 3001A04955 APR/05 12MONTH

5. RF preselector HP 85685A 3107A01268 APR/05 12MONTH

6. Quasi-Peak Adapter HP 8574B 2811A01432 APR/05 12MONTH

7. TRILOG Broadband

Antenna

Schwarzbeck VULB9163 VULB9163 166 APR/05 12MONTH

8. Biconical antenna EMCO 3110 9003-1121 FEB/05 12MONTH

Schwarzbeck VHA9103 91031852 JAN/05

9109-3213 FEB/05 EMCO 3146

9109-3217 MAY/04

9. Log Periodic antenna

Schwarzbeck 9108-A(494) 62281001 FEB/05

12MONTH

9109-1867 JUL/05 EMCO 3825/2

9109-1869 JUL/05

10. LISN

Schwarzbeck NSLK 8126 8126-404 JUN/05

12MONTH

11. Position Controller HP GmbH HD100 N/A N/A N/A

12. Turn Table HP GmbH DS420S N/A N/A N/A

13. Antenna Master HP GmbH MA240 N/A N/A N/A

Page 12 of 23




APPENDIX I - Conducted Emission Graph Test Data

HOT LINE

NEUTRAL LINE

Page 13 of 23




APPENDIX II - TEST SET-UP PHOTOS (Conducted emission)

Page 14 of 23




APPENDIX III - TEST SET-UP PHOTOS (Radiated emission)

Page 15 of 23




APPENDIX IV - IDENTIFICATION LABEL

SUGGESTED LABEL FORMAT FOR EQUIPMENT SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION MAY 1995

All devices subject to verification are required to have an identification label pursuant to Section 2.954 of the Rules.

Additional labeling requirements may be specified in the particular sections of the FCC rules governing the specific class

of equipment.

Under NO circumstances shall verified equipment be labeled with a FCC Identifier (FCC ID), or in any manner which implies that such equipment has been approved by the FCC.

The label showing the equipment identification data may be combined with a label showing other information (serial

numbers, other governments requirements, etc.), if desired. Compliance statements, when required, may be shown on the

same label or a separate label. See the "Check sheet" for additional information concerning

compliance statements.

* Country of origin - U.S. Customs and the Federal Trade Commission regulations require all equipment produced in

foreign countries to be marked with the country of origin. Questions concerning marking of equipment with the country of

origin should be directed to these agencies.

PROPOSED FCC LABEL (Part 15 sec. 15.19)

The label included following statement will be attached on product or the compliance statement can be observed in

a prominent location in the instruction manual.

Model name: NetSafe-VC3001 Win4NET Co., Ltd. This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operations. Made in Korea

Model No. 123 Company name or trade nameCountry of origin *

Page 16 of 23




APPENDIX V - PHOTOGRAPHS REPORT

“ATTACHMENT”

Page 17 of 23




Page 18 of 23




Page 19 of 23




Page 20 of 23




Page 21 of 23




Page 22 of 23




Page 23 of 23




APPENDIX VI – INFORMATION TO THE USER IN USER’S MANUAL

The instructions furnished the user shall include the following or similar statement, placed in

a prominent location in the text of the manual.

INFORMATION TO THE USER

This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense.

WARNING

Any changes or modifications not expressly approved by the manufacturer could void the user’s authority to operate the equipment.

ONETECH Testing & Eval. Lab. VERIFICATION20report/%b9%cc%bb%e7%bf%eb/Netsafe... · 2011-10-13 · The equipment complies with the regulation; FCC Part 15 Subpart B, Class A (Verification).

Documents