October 21, 2008 Provide accurate and honest information Listen to and respond to what people want to know Hear ideas and suggestions of what should.

October 21, 2008

Provide accurate and honest information

Listen to and respond to what people want to know

Hear ideas and suggestions of what should be done next

Give people an idea of what they can do to help bring this to a positive resolution

Three informational presentations:

1.History and Background on the Current Use Agreement—John Hamstra

2.Prop 39--Dina Hoffman3.Facility Alternatives---Ken Cole

Write down questions Ideas/SolutionsWhat you are willing/motivated to do

Please always write clearly and write your name on each card

Pass them to the front or the ends of the aisles

John HamstraPCS Facilities Chair from 2000-2006

Constructive discussions with superintendent Roy Nelson began in the fall of 2002

The discussion continued with succeeding superintendent, Keith Parkhurst

SCCS planned to offer 8 classrooms at B-40 Junior High

PCS suggested 2 classrooms at Westlake Agreement was quickly reached on the

Westlake arrangement

SCCS Board grapples with elementary re-alignment in fall and winter, 03-04

District acts to close Natural Bridges and B-40 Elementary, January 2004

Throughout this time, PCS engaged in constructive discussion with superintendent Alan Pagano

District board members participated in formal and informal discussions

PCS was interested in the B-40 Elementary site – not available

Swift St. had potential to provide adequate instructional space, and a cap on enrollment

The discussion, while long, was collaborative

Parties negotiated a multi-year agreement

PCS sought 5+5, District offered 5 + 3

The Use Agreement recognizes a special set of circumstances

The Use Agreement recognizes the Prop 39 obligation

The Option to Renew was to be guided by relevant law and statewide practice

PCS attempted contact with SCCS administration and board in spring 2007

PCS attempted contact with SCCS administration and board in fall 2007

Parties met once, in February, 2008 All subsequent communication came

from district counsel PCS made a second offer, at $200,000 Now, as then, county superintendent

Watkins offers to help bring parties to the table

PCS Facilities Committee Member

In November 2000, Proposition 39 amended Education Code Section 47614 to require each school district to provide all of a charter school’s in-district students with school facilities which are “reasonably equivalent” to those in which the students would be accommodated if they were attending other public schools in the district.

The intent of the law “is that public school facilities should be shared fairly among all public school pupils, including those in charter schools.”

Education Code Section 47614(a)

Each school district shall make available, to each charter school operating in the school district, facilities sufficient for the charter school to accommodate all of the charter school’s in-district students in conditions reasonably equivalent to those in which the students would be accommodated if they were attending other public schools of the district. [Education Code Section 47614(a)]

Facilities provided shall be contiguous, furnished and equipped…The school district shall make reasonable efforts to provide the charter school with facilities near to where the charter school wishes to locate, and shall not move the charter school unnecessarily.

[Education Code Section 47614(b)]

The school district may charge the charter school a pro rata share (based on the ratio of space allocated by the school district to the charter school divided by the total space of the district) of those school district facilities costs which the school district pays for with unrestricted general fund revenues. [Education Code Section 47614(b)(1)]

The Santa Cruz City Schools District is not obligated to provide space to our students who are not in-district students.

The District may only charge their “facilities costs” for the space used by in-district students, and can charge PCS “fair market value” rent for the out-of-district students.

Average facilities costs charged other California charter schools run from $0.44 to $1.00 per square foot per year; average fair market value rental costs for schools run from $12 to $14 per square foot per year.

We will need more information from the district to calculate their actual facilities costs, but we have reason to believe that the rental amount we have been paying (an average of $200,000 per year) probably exceeds the amount we would have to pay under Proposition 39 for in-district students even including payment of fair market rental value for out-of-district students.

PCS is obligated to remain within the boundaries of the Santa Cruz City School District because it originally applied for a charter from the Santa Cruz City School District. Education Code Section 47605((j)(1) requires a charter school who appeals such a rejection and is approved by the County Office of Education, as PCS did, to remain within the boundaries of the original rejecting district.

If maximizing funds is important to the District, to deny space to the out-of-district students is adverse to their financial interest, but they have no obligation to rent PCS space for these students.

November 1: Charter notifies district of need for upcoming year. PCS has submitted its Proposition 39 Request for Facilities.

December 1: District raises concerns or objections, if any January 2: Charter must respond to objections by

modifying or reaffirming original request February 1: District provides written preliminary facilities

proposal March 1: Charter responds in writing to preliminary offer,

expressing concerns or making counterproposal April 1: District must provide detailed, final facilities

proposal May 1 (or 30 days after final facility proposal): Charter

notifies district of intent to occupy facility 

At any time both sides can sit down to discuss going forward; absent that, the above dates are the last dates for the actions indicated as set forth in the regulations implementing the provisions of Proposition 39.

Ken Cole PCS Facilities Chair

Current Location255 Swift Street Multi-YearImprovements negotiated

Prop 39 FacilitiesLocal High SchoolRequested annuallyOther space leased nearby as needed

Leased spaceNew non-SCCS siteMulti or Single year approach

“Failsafe Mode”

Long term lease/purchase or purchase land/build

Capital Campaign and Charter School financing

Permanent home“Dream Mode”

Check the PCS Website for more information in the days and weeks ahead:

www.pacficcollegiate.com