Top Banner
Overview of the Role of the Regulatory Agencies and of Regulations in Product Development for Pharma Remit of EMA/FDA
36

Objectives/Agenda

Jan 13, 2016

Download

Documents

moshe

Overview of the Role of the Regulatory Agencies and of Regulations in Product Development for Pharma Remit of EMA/FDA. Objectives/Agenda. The role of regulation History of regulation Control points Control of clinical trials NDA/MAA submission Comparison of pharma and device controls. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Objectives/Agenda

Overview of the Role of the Regulatory Agencies and of

Regulations in Product Development for Pharma

Remit of EMA/FDA

Page 2: Objectives/Agenda

Objectives/Agenda

• The role of regulation

• History of regulation

• Control points

• Control of clinical trials

• NDA/MAA submission

• Comparison of pharma and device controls

Page 3: Objectives/Agenda

Objectives/Agenda, contd

• Review of FDA and EMEA

• ICH

• Post marketing surveillance

• Health technology and comparative efficacy

Page 4: Objectives/Agenda

Role of Regulation

• Consumer protection (consumer = a patient)

• Controls the placing on the market (a European Term)

• Post marketing surveillance

Page 5: Objectives/Agenda

Extended Controls

• Manufacturing• Clinical trials• Life cycle management• Post marketing surveillance• Advertising

Page 6: Objectives/Agenda

History of Regulation

• Pharmacopoeias (quality standards) London Pharmacopoeia 1618 B.P. 1853

• 1906 FDA• 1914 Health Select Committee• 1950’s therapeutic substances• 1960’s thalidomide tragedy – the real trigger

for the modern regulatory environment

Page 7: Objectives/Agenda

History of Regulation, contd

• 1965 first EU Directive 65/65• 1968 UK Medicines Act• 1995 EMEA established; Centralised

procedure• 1995 EU Device regulations introduced• 1998-2001 Extended to medical

diagnostics

Page 8: Objectives/Agenda

Clinical Trial Controls

• Phases I to IV, • Clinical Trials Applications (Europe) • Marketing Authorisation (Europe)• Investigational New Drugs Program

(US)• New Drug Applications (US)

Page 9: Objectives/Agenda

Application Dossier

• Pharma NDA/MAA• Full dossier covers:• safety• efficacy• quality• Determination of Risk/Benefit• Output:• authorisation/licence• SmPC/labelling• conditional approval

Page 10: Objectives/Agenda

The FDA Route

• The results of the testing program are codified in an FDA-approved public document that is called the product label, package insert or Full Prescribing Information.

• The prescribing information is widely available on the web, from the FDA drug manufacturers, and frequently inserted into drug packages.

Page 11: Objectives/Agenda

The FDA Route

• The main purpose of a drug label is to provide healthcare providers with adequate information and directions for the safe use of the drug.

Page 12: Objectives/Agenda

The FDA Route

• The documentation required in an NDA is supposed to tell the drug’s whole story, including what happened during the clinical tests, what the ingredients of the drug formulation are, the results of the animal studies, how the drug behaves in the body, and how it is manufactured, processed and packaged.

Page 13: Objectives/Agenda

The FDA Route

• Once approval of an NDA is obtained, the new drug can be legally marketed starting that day in the U.S.

• Of original NDAs submitted in 2009, 94 out of 131 (72%) were in eCTD format.

Page 14: Objectives/Agenda

The European Route

• Before any medicines can be used in the Europe they have to be licensed. Drugs are licensed for use in the Europe with a European licence through the European medicines Agency

Page 15: Objectives/Agenda

The European Route

• The EMEA co-ordinate drug licence applications within the European Union (EU). There are 6 committees within the EMEA. Each committee looks at a particular area.

• There is a Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CHMP) who are responsible for medicines for human use

Page 16: Objectives/Agenda

The European Route

• There are different systems within the EMEA that pharmaceutical companies can use to license drugs.

• The first is called the ‘centralised system’. Any drugs for AIDS, cancer, neuro-degenerative conditions, diabetes or orphan drugs have to be licensed this way.

Page 17: Objectives/Agenda

The European Route

• The committee that reviews drugs for human use (the CHMP) assess the application, and then recommend whether a drug should have ‘marketing authorisation’ (a licence) or not.

Page 18: Objectives/Agenda

The European Route

• The other ways that pharmaceutical companies apply for a license is either the ‘decentralised system’ or the mutual recognition system. They will use these systems for medicines that don't fit into the categories within centralised system.

Page 19: Objectives/Agenda

The European Route

• With the decentralised system the company applies to several member states at the same time. One member state assesses the application (this is the MHRA in the UK).

• If they recommend that the drug be licensed, the other member states then either agree or object. If everyone agrees, the drug is given marketing approval. If someone objects, the CPMP will step in and decide.

• They then advise the EU Commission whether to license the drug or not.

Page 20: Objectives/Agenda

The European Route

• Once a drug has EU marketing authorisation, it is ‘licensed’, ‘registered’ or ‘approved’. All these terms mean the same thing. This means the company can market the drug in any EU country - but they don’t have to. For one reason or another, they may choose to market the drug in some countries but not others.

Page 21: Objectives/Agenda

The European Route

• When a drug has marketing authorisation, it is not available straight away. The company first have to apply to market their product in each individual country. In the UK, they will apply to the MHRA. When this last small step is done, the product is ‘launched’, and doctors can prescribe it.

Page 22: Objectives/Agenda

EMA? MHRA?

• These bodies follow the usual European Structure.

• The European Marketing Agency is the European Body

• Each state ahs a competent authority – in the U.K. this is the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Products Regulatory Authority (MHRA)

Page 23: Objectives/Agenda

Line Extensions

• Life cycle management• Abridged/abbreviated files

-new indications, new dosage forms-variations

• Generic applications• OTC products

Page 24: Objectives/Agenda

Post Marketing Surveillance

• Spontaneous reporting systems– Yellow card reports– Vigilance reporting– User reporting

• Structured data bases– Data mining/signal detection

Page 25: Objectives/Agenda

Post- Marketing

• Risk management plans (Europe)

• REMS (FDA)

Page 26: Objectives/Agenda

FDA

• Structure

• Commission

• Advisory panels

• Fees

• Independence

Page 27: Objectives/Agenda

EU

• National agencies – MHRA, AFSSAPS, MPA

• EMA role– Centralised procedure, CHMP– Decentralised procedure– Mutual Recognition Procedure– CMD(h)

• EU Commission grants the MAA

Page 28: Objectives/Agenda

International Harmonisation

• ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation)

• GHTF (Global Harmonisation Task Force) Devices

• ICDRA (International Conference Drug Regulatory Authorities)

• ISO and EN, BSI standards

• Pharmacopeias (EP, VSP, BP, JP)

Page 29: Objectives/Agenda

Health Technology Assessment (HTA)

• NICE

• Requirements for comparative efficacy

• Quality of life data

• Role of the payers

Page 30: Objectives/Agenda

HTA Development

• Comparative effectiveness

• Cost effectiveness

• Value based pricing

• Pricing for risk

Page 31: Objectives/Agenda

Japanese Regulatory Authorities

Roles and Responsibilities

• Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare (MHLW)– makes all final decisions based on

recommendations of PMDA

Page 32: Objectives/Agenda

• The PMDA (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency) was established in April 2004

• Incorporated Administrative Agency of the MHLW

Page 33: Objectives/Agenda

PMDA

• Integrated Regulatory Agency

• Pharmaceutical Affairs Law

• GMP inspections collaboration with the prefecture administrations

Page 34: Objectives/Agenda

Chief Executive

Auditor

Director, Centre for Product Evaluation

Office of General AffairsOffice of Planning &Co-ordinationOffice of Relief Funds

Office of Review Administration

Executive Director

SeniorCouncillor

Chief Safety Officer

AssociateCentre Directors

Office of R&D Promotion

Office of Compliance Standards

Office of New Drug II

Office of New Drug 1

Office of Safety Division

Office of Conformity

Office of Medical Devices

Office of OTCs / GenericEvaluation

Office of Biologics

Office of New Drug III

Priority Review

Director

PMDA Structure

Page 35: Objectives/Agenda

35

Rest of the World

• Primary evaluation countries/regions:

FDA, EMA, PMDA, Australian, Canada, Switzerland

• Countries requiring local studies a evaluation:

China, South Korea, India, Taiwan

Page 36: Objectives/Agenda

Conclusion

• In this lecture we have looked at the way the FDA and the EU regulate market access

• They are different but broadly achieve the same end

• We have briefly looked at other approaches