www.elections.il.gov STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS STATE OF ILLINOIS 1020 South Spring Street, P.O. Box 4187 BOARD MEMBERS Springfield, Illinois 62708 William M. McGuffage, Chairman 217/782-4141 TTY:217/782-1518 Jesse R. Smart, Vice Chairman Fax: 217/782-5959 Harold D. Byers Betty J. Coffrin James R. Thompson Center Ernest L. Gowen 100 West Randolph, Suite 14-100 Judith C. Rice Chicago, Illinois 60601 Bryan A. Schneider 312/814-6440 TTY: 312/814-6431 Charles W. Scholz Fax: 312/814-6485 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Rupert T. Borgsmiller PUBLIC NOTICE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and STATE OFFICERS ELECTORAL BOARD MEETING The Illinois State Board of Elections will conduct a SPECIAL Board Meeting on Thursday, February 2, 2012. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 11:00 a.m. in the Board’s conference room 14-100 in the James R. Thompson Center, 100 W. Randolph Street, Chicago, IL and via video conference at the Board’s principal office located at 1020 S. Spring St., Springfield, IL. Admittance to the 14th floor of the Thompson Center requires security screening and production of a government issued identification. The State Board of Elections will convene to consider the candidate withdrawal of Alan Nudo - 52 nd Senate District following certification. The State Officers Electoral Board will al so consider the following objections to candidate nominating petitions for the March 20, 2012 General Primary Election: a) Brimm v. Newman, 12SOEBGP102; b) Freeman v. Obama, 12SOEBGP103; c) Jackson v. Obama, 12SOEBGP104; d) Petzel v. Ritter, 12SOEBGP522; e) Rodriguez v. Rutagawibira, 12SOEBGP523; f) Coyle/Bigger v. Miller, 12SOEBGP524; g) Schaeflin/Brezinski v. Cunningham, 12SOEBGP525; h) Billerman/Pettlon v. Harris, 12SOEBGP526; i) Cunningham v. Biggert, 12SOEBGP527; j) Cunningham v. Harris, 12SOEBGP528; k) Sutton v. Baker, et al,. 12SOEBGP501. The State Officers Electoral Board will also consider objections wherein the objection was withdrawn in the matter of Meroni, et al. v. Obama12SOEBGP500. The State Officer’s Electoral Board will recess to the State Board of Elections and may address other matters as needed and/or recess into executive session to consider litigation and/or personnel matters. DATED: January 31, 2012 Rupert T. Borgsmiller, Exe cutive Director
41
Embed
Obama Ballot Challenge Illinois Jackson Hearing Feb. 2
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
8/3/2019 Obama Ballot Challenge Illinois Jackson Hearing Feb. 2
1020 South Spring Street, P.O. Box 4187 BOARD MEMBER
Springfield, Illinois 62708 William M. McGuffage, Chairm
217/782-4141 TTY:217/782-1518 Jesse R. Smart, Vice Chairm
Fax: 217/782-5959 Harold D. Bye
Betty J. Coff
James R. Thompson Center Ernest L. Gow
100 West Randolph, Suite 14-100 Judith C. Ri
Chicago, Illinois 60601 Bryan A. Schneid
312/814-6440 TTY: 312/814-6431 Charles W. Scho
Fax: 312/814-6485
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Rupert T. Borgsmiller
PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONSand
STATE OFFICERS ELECTORAL BOARDMEETING
The Illinois State Board of Elections will conduct a SPECIAL Board Meeting on Thursday, February 2, 2012
The meeting is scheduled to begin at 11:00 a.m. in the Board’s conference room 14-100 in the James RThompson Center, 100 W. Randolph Street, Chicago, IL and via video conference at the Board’s principoffice located at 1020 S. Spring St., Springfield, IL. Admittance to the 14th floor of the Thompson Centrequires security screening and production of a government issued identification.
The State Board of Elections will convene to consider the candidate withdrawal of Alan Nudo - 52 nd SenaDistrict following certification.
The State Officers Electoral Board will also consider the following objections to candidate nominating petitiofor the March 20, 2012 General Primary Election:
a) Brimm v. Newman, 12SOEBGP102;b) Freeman v. Obama , 12SOEBGP103;c) Jackson v. Obama , 12SOEBGP104;d) Petzel v. Ritter, 12SOEBGP522;e) Rodriguez v. Rutagawibira, 12SOEBGP523;f) Coyle/Bigger v. Miller, 12SOEBGP524;g) Schaeflin/Brezinski v. Cunningham, 12SOEBGP525;h) Billerman/Pettlon v. Harris, 12SOEBGP526;i) Cunningham v. Biggert, 12SOEBGP527;
j) Cunningham v. Harris, 12SOEBGP528;k) Sutton v. Baker, et al,. 12SOEBGP501.
The State Officers Electoral Board will also consider objections wherein the objection was withdrawn in thmatter of Meroni, et al. v. Obama 12SOEBGP500.
The State Officer’s Electoral Board will recess to the State Board of Elections and may address other matteas needed and/or recess into executive session to consider litigation and/or personnel matters.
DATED: January 31, 2012
Rupert T. Borgsmiller, Executive Director
8/3/2019 Obama Ballot Challenge Illinois Jackson Hearing Feb. 2
Jackson-2.jpg (JPEG Image, 1986 x 2724 pixels) - Scaled (21%) http://obamaballotchallenge.comlwp-contentiuploads/20 I 210
"Addition<might alway. be mode to the cnuensntp of the United stores Intwo ways: first by birth, and
second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself- for it provides that 'no oetson
except a natural-born citizen or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the
Constitution, sholl be eligible to the office of President,' and that Congress shalt have power 'to establish
a uniform rule of naturottzotion.' Thus new ctttzens may be born orthey may be created by
naturalization.
"The Constitutlon does not, in words, soy who shall be noturat-bom citizens. Resort must be hodelsewhere to ascertain that. A t common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the
Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born ina country of parents who were
its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born
citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens
children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class
there have been doubts, but never as to the first. Forthe purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve
these doubts. It is sufficientfor everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen
parents within thejurisdiction are themselves citizens" (emphasis added).
In addition, supporting case law has been adjudicated by the Ll.S, Supreme Court which confirms and
helps define a Natural Born Citizen. 1. The Venus, 12 U,S. 8 Cranch 253 289 (1814): Justice Livingston,
who wrote the unanimous decision, quoted the entire §212nd paragraph from the French edition of
Vattel: 'The citizens are the members of the civilsociety; bound to this society by certain duties, and
subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those
born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself
but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and
succeed to all their rights." 2. Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S.3 Pet. 242 242 (1830): Justice Story, who gave
the ruling, cites the principle of citizenship enshrined in his definition of a "natural born citizen": ... she
might well be deemed under the circumstances of this case to hold the citizenship of herfather, for
children born ina country, continuing while under age in the family of the father, partake ofhis
national character as a citizen of that country.
In light of these facts it is important to know that on April 27, 2011, Barack Hussein Obama released to
the public his birth certificate and placed it on government servers. It clearly shows Barack Hussein
Obama's father asbeing born in Kenya. Prior to Kenya becoming independent in December 1963, it was
a colony of the commonwealth of Great Britain. Barack Obama Sr., was a British citizen and a subject to
lofl 111112012
8/3/2019 Obama Ballot Challenge Illinois Jackson Hearing Feb. 2