Now or Never 2013-2104: Back Office Current Reality Q1

Now or Never

TM and Comm Current State (1.7. – 31.12.2013)

Intro

In this document you‘ll find current state of Talent Management and Communication functional area of AIESEC in the Czech Republic from 1.7. till 31.12.2013. You‘ll find plan fulfillments of each LC, % of growth compering last year and other interesting data. Enjoy,

Your MC NoN

Recruitments - GIPo

LC Q3 Q4

plan reality Plan fullfillment

plan reality Plan fullfillment

Brno 2 15 750% 26 44 169%

České Budějovice 0 2 N/A 4 0 0

ČZU 0 8 N/A 4 12 300%

Hradec Králové 0 3 N/A 18 16 89%

Karviná 0 0 N/A 2 0 0

Olomouc 6 3 50% 5 20 400%

Ostrava 10 2 20% 30 22 73%

Plzeň 5 1 20% 23 11 48%

Praha 55 39 71% 90 115 128%

Zlín 0 8 N/A 4 15 375%

Total 78 81 104% 206 255 124%

Recruitments - GCDPo

LC Q3 Q4

plan reality Plan fullfillment

plan reality Plan fullfillment

Brno 0 5 N/A 0 27 N/A

České Budějovice 0 1 N/A 0 0 N/A

ČZU 0 6 N/A 20 14 70%

Hradec Králové 0 0 N/A 0 7 N/A

Karviná 0 0 N/A 11 11 100%

Olomouc 0 0 N/A 0 24 N/A

Ostrava 0 2 N/A 4 6 150%

Plzeň 0 1 N/A 0 10 N/A

Praha 9 20 222% 41 35 85%

Zlín 0 2 N/A 6 7 117%

Total 9 37 411% 82 141 172%

Recruitments – Newies

LC

Total plan of newies appl.

Plan Reality Plan fullfillment

Brno 90 86 95.56%

České Budějovice 15 12 80.00%

ČZU 73 54 73.97%

Hradec Králové 24 16 66.67%

Karviná 35 60 171.43%

Olomouc 45 61 135.56%

Ostrava 80 94 117.50%

Plzeň 35 40 114.29%

Praha 155 173 111.61%

Zlín 50 44 88.00%

Total 602 640 106.31%

Comm – Applications in Q3+Q4

(2012 vs. 2013)

118

95

35 30 21 19

161 165

37 25

8

62

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

GEP CEP TTP uknown EIP OTP

2012 2013

• We are missing few app., because they were not added in OG CRM • GEP, EIP= Management GIP, TTP= Technical GIP, OTP= Teaching GIP,

CEP= GCDP

Talent Management

LC No. Of Members (plan

fulfillment) RR 0-6 No. Of TLP (plan

fulfillment)

Brno 65 (100%) 94% 17 (154%)

Č. Budějovice 16 (80%) 67% 8 (200%)

ČZU N/A (plan 44) 84% 9 (30%)

H. Králové 22 (81%) 90% 13 (216%)

Karviná 26 (74%) 42% 17 (77%)

Olomouc 19 (82%) 52% 11 (157%)

Ostrava N/A (plan 56) 61% 15 (166%)

Plzeň 23 (76%) 78% 12 (150%)

Praha N/A (plan 95) 94% 28 (100%)

Zlín N/A (plan 47) 77% 13 (87%)

MC & NST 19 (100%) 100% 19 (100%)

Total N/A (plan 414) Av. 76% 168 (105%)

TM – Number of Members

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

RN ČB ČZU HK KV OL OV PL PA ZL

No. Of members 2012

No. Of members 2013

TM – Retention Rate

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

RN ČB ČZU HK KV OL OV PL PA ZL Average

RR 0-6 2012

RR 0-6 2013

TM – What happened?

Membership pipeline: • RR 0-6: Big LCs have no problem to retain their members and

these people also apply for LDS positions • RR 0-6: Pilsen and Ostrava – Pretty low RR, eventhough they

managed to recruit more people then they planned • Hradec Králové and ČZU Praha managed to retain most of the

fall newies although they recruited less then planned

Leadership pipeline: • We don‘t have really good results • Most LCs have serious problem

with applications for TL positions (HK, Pilsen, Ostrava and Zlín)

Thank you for

awesome 6 months!

Your

Now or Never MC