No Name Matric No....No Name Matric No. 1 Ahmad Mustakim Bin Saari A15MJ0007 2 Aida Syahira Binti Mohd Zain A15MJ0009 3 Alif Azizi Bin Ayub A15MJ0011 4 Alif Omar Bin Elias A15MJ0012

No Name Matric No.

1 Ahmad Mustakim Bin Saari A15MJ0007

2 Aida Syahira Binti Mohd Zain A15MJ0009

3 Alif Azizi Bin Ayub A15MJ0011

4 Alif Omar Bin Elias A15MJ0012

5 Amir Kamilin Bin Onn B16MJ0004

6 Amira Huda Binti Muhd Azmi A15MJ0014

7 Amirul Asyraff Bin Mat Noh A15MJ0223

8 Anati Fatin Binti Md Shahid A15MJ0015

9 Badrul Hikmah Bin Kusdi B16MJ0045

10 Boay Zhen Jie A15MJ0021

11 Choo Tze Eu A15MJ0028

12 Fahzziramika Nadia Binti Ja'afar B16MJ0008

13 Fazleen Yasmin Binti Mansor A15MJ0036

14 Hanif Farhan Bin Roslan A15MJ0038

15 Husni Daim Bin Rosani Tamrin B16MJ0044

16 Ikmal Alif Bin Ahmad Sukri A15MJ0042

17 Ilya Qurratu'ain Binti Kamarul 'Arifin A15MJ0043

18 Kamal Hafiz Bin Khalid B16MJ0040

19 Khairul Rezwan Bin Aliudin A15MJ0225

20 Lee Seng Aik A15MJ0051

21 Lokeswaran A/L Manivannan B16MJ0041

22 Madan Raj A/L Sri Rengan A15MJ0055

23 Madihah Binti Hashim A15MJ0056

24 Mimie Nur Afiqah Binti Ismail Omar A15MJ0060

25 Mohamad Afnan Bin Rosli B16MJ0010

26 Mohamad Asnawi Bin Abdul Rahim A15MJ0230

27 Mohamad Khairul Affandi Bin Mohd Nong A15MJ0063

28 Mohammad Hafizi Bin Hussain A15MJ0068

29 Mohammad Ridwan Bin Mohd Hisham A15MJ0069

30 Mohd 'Adhwa Fu Alif Bin Zoraini A15MJ0070

31 Mohd Luqman Daniel Bin Jamal A15MJ0073

32 Mohd Ridzan Bin Ishak A15MJ0076

33 Mohd Suhayl Azmin Bin Azlan A15MJ0077

34 Mohd Syafiq Azri Bin Abdul Aziz B16MJ0014

35 Mohd Uwais Bin Roslan B16MJ0046

36 Muhamad Safwan Bin Supian A15MJ0079

37 Muhammad Afdhal Arif Bin Rahmat A15MJ0211

38 Muhammad Afiq Bin Md Alier A15MJ0080

39 Muhammad Aliy Bin Mohd Yusof A15MJ0081

40 Muhammad Amin Bin Ahmad Zauti B16MJ0018

41 Muhammad Amin Bin Zamri A15MJ0082

42 Muhammad Amirul Adha Bin Mohd Khalid A15MJ0083

43 Muhammad Azam Bin Mohd Yazid A15MJ0219

44 Muhammad Fadlullah Bin Zaili A15MJ0234

45 Muhammad Fahmi Bin Mohd Tahir A15MJ0086

46 Muhammad Farooq Emir Bin Mohd Zakri A15MJ0088

47 Muhammad Izzuddin Bin Abdul Razak B16MJ0037

48 Muhammad Nashreen Bin Ramli A15MJ0092

49 Muhammad Nubhan Bin Mohd Takiyuddin B16MJ0036

50 Muhammad Saifulnizam Bin Mohd Yunus A15MJ0093

51 Muhammad Shafiq Azhar A15MJ0094

52 Muhammad Shukri Bin Nazri A15MJ0241

53 Naif Syahaizdihar Bin Taufik A15MJ0103

54 Najmi Fitri Bin Shahrum B16MJ0042

55 Najwa Hanis Binti Khalid A15MJ0105

56 Nur Amalin Zahra Binti Mohd Razi A15MJ0130

57 Nur Amira Balqis Binti Mohd Zainuri A15MJ0131

58 Nur Amirah Farhana Binti Rahimin B16MJ0030

59 Nur Atikah Binti Ra'an A15MJ0136

60 Nur Fatihah Binti Nordin A15MJ0140

61 Nur Hafizuddin Bin Adnan A15MJ0141

62 Nur Hidayah Binti Hatmin A15MJ0142

63 Nur Nabila Balqis Binti Zolkifli A15MJ0144

64 Nur Syahieera Binti Haron A15MJ0148

65 Nuratika Shaheera Binti Rahama A15MJ0150

66 Nurazlin Nadhirah Binti Mohd Azmin A15MJ0151

67 Nurul Syafinas Binti Zakaria A15MJ0159

68 Puteri Nor Adilah Binti Husin A15MJ0164

69 Rasyidah Binti Miswan A15MJ0166

70 Shahrul Azhar Bin Jamsari A15MJ0171

71 Sie Leeh Sheng A15MJ0172

72 Siti Aishah Binti Mohamad A15MJ0174

73 Siti Maisarah Binti Abd Aziz A15MJ0176

74 Siti Nur Shakinah As Binti Saad B16MJ0027

75 Siti Shaheeda Binti Aman Shah A15MJ0214

76 Syafreena Ezzany Ismail A15MJ0185

77 Tan Chen Tung A15MJ0188

78 Wong Toong Yang A15MJ0201

79 Yehia Shahour A13MJ3002

80 Yoong Yen Kee A15MJ0207

81 Zulfadhli Bin Rahman A15MJ0208

Supervisor

Ir. Dr. Tan Che Fai

Dr. Nor 'Azizi Othman

Dr. Nur Azmah Nordin

Dr. Jun Ishimatsu

Dr. Wira Jazair Yahya

Prof. Yutaka Asako

Dr. Shahira Liza Kamis

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Aminudin Abu

Dr. Ahmad Muhsin Bin Ithnin

Prof. Yutaka Asako

Prof. Kanao Fukuda




Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Saiful Amri Mazlan

Prof. Kanao Fukuda

Dr. Lee Kee Quen


Dr. Hafizal Yahaya

Dr. Tan Lit Ken

Dr. Sheikh Ahmad Zaki Shaikh Salim

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nor Azwadi Che Sidik


Dr. Mohamed Sukri Mat Ali




Prof. Yutaka Asako

Dr. Zainuddin Abdul Rasid

Ir. Dr. Pauziah Muhamad


Dr. Hafizal Yahaya




Dr. Hafizal Yahaya




Dr. Lim Meng Hee


Dr. Jun Ishimatsu

Dr. Hafizal Yahaya




Dr. Lim Meng Hee







Dr. Lim Meng Hee


Dr. Uswah Khairuddin

Dr. Lee Kee Quen



Dr. Lee Kee Quen




Dr. Uswah Khairuddin


Dr. Lim Meng Hee



Dr. Toh Hoong Thiam

Dr. Lee Kee Quen

Prof. Kanao Fukuda

Dr. Toh Hoong Thiam




Dr. Jun Ishimatsu

Dr. Lim Meng Hee



Prof. Yutaka Asako


Peer Assessment

Examiner’s overall comments/suggestions:

He did not show impressive performance. He was not very clear about his project

The student did a good job

HARDWORKING, RELIABLE, INDEPENDENT AND HELP OTHER MEMBERS

Actively participate his research work, good student

The overall performance of this student is excellent

Good job

The overall performance of this student is excellent

Need to improve on data analysis

The student did a good job

Hard working and creative

I encourage him to be more independent in his lab activities

a very helpful student and easy to cooperate

Quite responsible after conducting the experiment. The tools were placed accordingly. The tools were also prepared well according the standard procedure. Quite hardworking.

The overall performance of this student is good

Overall he is a very hardworking person and fast learner. He can work independently and always make sure things done within the datelines.

1. There is lack of motivations in experiment work.2. He need to be more independent person. Must have his own initiative to study about the experiment device before conduct experiment.

The student did a good job.

Good efforts but requires more hard work and dedication in the future

Can work independently according to the instructions given.

good

Overall, this student did well.

The student shows good attitude and interest towards the FYP

very good

Good

he is good

still working on his simulation to complete

Hardworking , teamwork and helping other members

- Need to learn arranging timetable based on your own pace- A little bit dependent

very good

The student actively participated in order to fullfill the project requirement. Hard work and very good student.

Good student

hardworking and show interest in research

Good job

Student is active and attentive

has shown good performance.

Good

Good student

the results still needing adjustments

1. He is very motivated when doing experiment.2. He need to have more practice on report writing.3. He need to improve his fundamental knowledge on fluid dynamic

She is good in her project overall. She showed steady progress in her project.

A very hardworking student and easy to communicate

good

Supportive member of laboratory

Student is active and attentive

need to test the sound reduction with extra absorption materials

She is clear about her project. She was regular in all sharing sessions

She's a very good, intelligent and excellent student.

Good work but still need to be more focus in the research work

She is hardworking and sincere

NOOR FARHANA BINTI ABDUL RAHIM

Excellent student.

She is overall ok

-Good performances-Need to discuss with others if she don't understand on certain topics.

- Hardworking

Student has good attitude towards her project

Hardworking and very good student

Showed great interest in machine learning exploration.

very good

Occasionally have discussion with other lab members which is good.

This student can achieve more if he participates in group discussion. Other than that, he should also provide helps to other lab mates whenever available.

Good commitment from the study to complete FYP

Technical Paper Poster (Academic Panel)

Examiner’s overall comments/suggestions: Examiner’s overall comments/suggestions:

1) Overall content wise is OK, just a few spelling errors, formating errors (missing full stop, etc.). 2) However, it is recommended that the manuscript be proved-read for sound English writing.3) The acronym in the abstract i.e. MSM should be fully spelled out. 4) Is MSM metal idustries, a specific company name? or is it referring to general metal industries as a whole in Malaysia? If it is a specific company name, it is suggested to add Sdn. Bhd. or Bhd. at the end of the company name. 5) Reference: It is suggested to follow UTM's referencing format i.e. the year should be put right after the authors' names and before the title of the referencing articles.OK

Good

Good

Overall ok

Explain clearly what the simulation does as in the topic

Graphs can be improved - colours for coding not clearly differentiatedTricky since he use different deposition as a condol.

Good research, please add more discussion on results.

Result comparison was not critical enough.Should have more days to compare not only one for one parameter.

Hypothesis ane should not be there.It's been proved before/using the previous statement/study.

Good research. Please add discussion on results.

Good

Introduction- recent study...2010 is not recent The graph was not clear.


Quite responsible after conducting the experiment. The tools were placed accordingly. The tools were also prepared well according the standard procedure. Quite hardworking.

COnfusion over discussion and conclusion, please have this proofread first (lots of grammar mistakes)

No citations showed.Should have statistical analysis.Do not pick few data to present all.

Some minor mistakes in spelling. There is still room for improvement.Good presentation.Need improvement in terms of the poster's content.

References are too old; more than 15 years

OK

Some facts need clear and simple explanation. Good presentation.

GOOD FINDING. EXCELLENT PRESENTATION

EXCELLENT PRESENTATION. EXCELLENT RESEARCH WELL DONE

Figure 2 and its explanations are quite confusing. Good but lack of confidents.

Stats needed to prove the realibility of the results.


Good research. Please add discussion on results, and label axis X and axis Y for the Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Figure 1 shows that the stall seems still happened for all modified airfoil at earlier angle of attack accept VG (same as unmodified). May prepare the explanation during the poster presentation.Good and clear presentation.

Watch out for some grammar mistakes

Good research. Please add discussion on results and label the axis X and axis Y for the Figure 1.

Very good. Should have more references need more confidence during present the poster. poster layout need to be improved

No citation of references in text, watch out for grammar, it is preferable to write in third person form for academic writing, so try to avoid usage of I, me, we etc...

Revise the title. No abstract. Figure/Table is not clear. Data/Result is not well elaborated & interpreted. References are not cited properly.Good presentation.

Revise the title. Good report. Excellent.

Many minor errors. Missing one line in Figure 1. References didn't cited in the text.Moderate presentation.

1)Good presentation.2) Just need to confirm: Figure 1 (3): Time-Displacement peak graph, the red line is 'With TMD Control' or 'Without TMD Control' - same goes to the blue line? Because, based on the figure, it looks like the red line (with TMD control) has greater displacement. May be I am wrong, then leave the figure as it is.OK

Good

Good report but should have more references excellent poster layout and presentation skills. well drive

Some of the sentences need to be rewritten. Need to give reference to some statements. Example current output increases when rotation speed of roller increases.ok

Very good but should have more references good presentation skill. more case studied required for comparison

Revise the title. Sample (staff room) is not enough. However, the report is clear and understandable.Good presentation.

1) Overall content is OK.2) Requested to state all 8 feautures analysed in the study.3) Would be better if the referencing style follow UTM's templateOK

Very Good. Should hv more references

Good research. Please add discussion on results, label the axis X and axis Y for the Figure 2, Figure 3 and add citations that listed in the references.

Can quite understand about the project.

Good research. Please add discussion on results, label the X axis and Y axis for the Figure 1 and rewrite the title to reflect the research conducted.

Very Good. Should hv more references

Formula must be number and explain in the text.

1) Good Presentation2) It is possible to disclose the eight features extracted from the signal?3) It is better to put a statement on how to compute the Overall Result (%) - averaging the Training, Testing and Validation result? or how? 4) Please check if the Referencing Style follow UTM format? i.e. the Year must be located after the author(s) name, etc?OK

Good research. Please add discussion on results and add citation that listed in the references.

Keep Up the good work GOOD!

What do you mean " square and rectangular cylinder"? Graph axes should be clearly labelled.Good presentation.Understand the theory.

Excellent report

Need more detail on methodology. The results need more explanation. Why point #3 has the highest noise.need to explain more on source of noise and vibration

No discussion on the effect of running speed to Vpp value.Lack of references.Should include graph to show the effect of pressure to Upp produce by the device.

Excellent

Methodology section did not include the experiment setup. The two graphs are too small. Can't read their labels. Reference 2, 4 and 5 are not properly cited.Cannot explain the graphs presented.

Methodology is not cleared. Results are not discussed properly. Need to compare with literature.the student cannot defend the result

Good Work GOOD

Need deeper explanation of result good

1) Good Presentation2) Just confused, in the Methodology section (2), you've mentioned 8 features, but in the Result section (3), you've mentioned 32 features?GOOD

Should show picture for the methodology is better

In conclusion: the writer should state that applying felt to kitchen blender will reduce both its sound intensity and sound power level.Very good presentation,overall contents satisfied in longer explaination.

Name the software you use in the research. State your findings, not others in the conclusion section. Figure 1 shows the pressure distributions on both surfaces. How do you conclude that laminar separation bubbles appear on the upper trailing edge of an airfoil?Only one references.Did not solve objective no 2.

Only one reference.

Needs more explanation on the results. good

Check you paper format. Quoted reference number 1 should be in Introduction section; not in Abstract. That will justify the need of water as working fluid. Graphs did not have label. In your abstract you will compare three geometries to find the best heat sink. It was now cover in your result section. Why quote others paper in conclusion section. This section should be your conclusion of the experiment.

-Good performances-Need to discuss with others if she don't understand on certain topics. cannot see the randomness of particle

Relate the thermophysical properties of several hybrid nanofluid to the most stable HNF. Is choi in the reference list?

What is the purpose of place all six blades in one figure? Figure 2 shows the effect of AOA at different Re Numbers for a particular airfoil; which you did not mention.

Inconsistency of grammar used. All should be in past tense.

1) The Conclusion and References sections should be numbered 4 and 5 accordingly2) In your Result section (3), please label the color of your results i.e. Green for Accuracy & Red for Error etc.3) Overall good presentationGOOD

Grammar used should all be in past tense. ok

Why air speed? The formulas are not referred in the text. Not shown relation between air speed with bench and cabin.

Table must be mention in the text. Do you need to mention what is standard for a good thermocouple and type of thermocouple?

You should analyse both graphs in Figure 2 and 3. You can draw other conclusion from the experiment other than "the Campbell diagrams were found to give the right pattern".

Poster (Industry Panel)


suggest to explore material line

Student can speak slower for a clearer presentation.

Student's choice of choosing the surface deposition method as a control material is inacurate for the rest of the other materials .

Data comparison is not standardise.Conclusion that the method is good is not solid.

Hypothesis (i) is not nesessary for his FYP.It is already prove by a previous study/citation.

Graph,Bar chart of meter concentration is not clear(misleading).

No statistical data provided when the FYP is dealing with data analytics.

Need to relate to real world application.

Need to better translate to real world application.

EXCELLENT PRESENTATION. EXCELLENT RESEARCH WELL DONE

The suggestion need to be credible.

No picture of simulation model.Experimental result does not correlate with FE model.

Can improve in related experiment to real world.

good project

No citation of references in text, watch out for grammar, it is preferable to write in third person form for academic writing, so try to avoid usage of I, me, we etc...

Good relevancy to real world.Objective to research to be cleared.

Can improve on data.More data is required.

Improve presentation skills.

very good

good presentation relating to real world application. good understanding on the studies

very good

Good! need to increase more data points.

very good

Good research. Please add discussion on results, label the axis X and axis Y for the Figure 2, Figure 3 and add citations that listed in the references.

Good research. Please add discussion on results, label the X axis and Y axis for the Figure 1 and rewrite the title to reflect the research conducted.

very good but project could not be completed for all samples

Presentation good and poster clearly represent study.

excellent

to benchmark on industry practice and to consult automotive industry/engineer

Good project and brieft presentation.

very good

Some question hardly reply from candidates.

prsentation need to be simplified in term of Jargon used and relate to real life application

good usage of visual aids

Very good presentation,overall contents satisfied in longer explaination.

Inadequate information on presentation.

good understandng of the test. it was thoroughly done. to expand the knowledge learnt from test to real life application

Check you paper format. Quoted reference number 1 should be in Introduction section; not in Abstract. That will justify the need of water as working fluid. Graphs did not have label. In your abstract you will compare three geometries to find the best heat sink. It was now cover in your result section. Why quote others paper in conclusion section. This section should be your conclusion of the experiment.

clear and easy explanation on the subject and test methodology. to elaborate and conclude further from test result

Relate the thermophysical properties of several hybrid nanofluid to the most stable HNF. Is choi in the reference list?

What is the purpose of place all six blades in one figure? Figure 2 shows the effect of AOA at different Re Numbers for a particular airfoil; which you did not mention.

test parameter is to narrow. to elaborate further on test parameter to the outcome of result

to look further into test parameters that contribute to oxide formation

Why air speed? The formulas are not referred in the text. Not shown relation between air speed with bench and cabin.

Table must be mention in the text. Do you need to mention what is standard for a good thermocouple and type of thermocouple?

You should analyse both graphs in Figure 2 and 3. You can draw other conclusion from the experiment other than "the Campbell diagrams were found to give the right pattern".

Report (Non SV)


Student's choice of choosing the surface deposition method as a control material is inacurate for the rest of the other materials .

Good achievement

Well done

significant research on environmental noise pollution should be clarified especially how it influence the resident of kolej siswa jaya

improve literature and methodology parts especially when concerning the idling emission test

good

need to improve on literature review. 6 pages is not enough

All are good

all are good

All are good

No statistical data provided when the FYP is dealing with data analytics.

very good

very good

very good

good

No explanation on results.

Overall good. But need to check the format of citation in text.

Overall good

need's proofreading

Very good

Good

Good

Check format

Good

good presentation relating to real world application. good understanding on the studies

The report is written in a very good way

Need improvement in writing skill and grammar




Student must to discuss with the supervisor on all amendments to be made. Poor grammar caused the misleading statements and made contents unclear

Overall, satisfactory. Need to show amendments and verify some parts before official submission of thesis.

Good study

The idea of moving vehicle using air is good. But the design is not moving the vehicle but just lifting it. Please check the report for corrections.

Overall work is good.

Overall work is up to the FYP standard. But the report needs to be improved.

Overall work is good. Please improve the report as indicated.

Looks like a simple experimental report. Need to describe "why" in the report.




good

No problem statement. Zernike moment not being discuss in introduction (problem, objective,scope etc)

Good

good

The objectives stated about numerical analysis but the work done was an experimental. All graphs does not have units.

The installation of felt should not cover the air ventilation of the blender. This will only make the result obtained unreliable. It is not clear if the result obtained was due to application of felt or due to covered air ventilation.

There are no problems to be solved. Only a good literature will do.

background well developed, good originality and significance, good methodology, appropriate language and styles, need to really follow the utm format.

Need to improve on writing, grammar& writing skillsalignment of texts, no reference in abstract & last paragraph should conclude well, many blank pages, equations not explain well, order of reference to check, results should be discuss not only put in figures. less references

background well developed, good originality and significance, good methodology, appropriate language and styles, however need to enhance on the tested parameters such sweep current, freq and etc not included in abstract. anisotropic only referred to induction of current, this is very normal to the study of MR property

Good

Good

very good

Excellent reporting!

to look further into test parameters that contribute to oxide formation

Satisfaction

Supervisor


A potential research to be further study

Methodology should be explained in simpler way.

very good

very good

Very good

Good achievements within the limited time.

significant research on environmental noise pollution should be clarified especially how it influence the resident of kolej siswa jaya

In abstract each test fuel should be defined clearly

Good student

Good research was done within limited time.

Ok. minor amendments are needed. Number of page is not there.

good

The student skill in research is very good.

formatting issue and unclear problem statement

very good

Overall work is good. Please do the minor corrections.

committed to his project and rinkoh. background well developed, good originality and significance, good methodology, appropriate language and styles, however need to follow the utm format.

committed to his project and rinkoh. background well developed, good originality and significance, good methodology, not appropriate language and styles, need to follow the utm format and figures need to be mentioned in explanation.

very good student

Good

Good

Abstract, objectives and scope should be written in proper manner.

good

Student must to discuss with the supervisor on all amendments to be made. Poor grammar caused the misleading statements and made contents unclear

Overall, satisfactory. Need to show amendments and verify some parts before official submission of thesis.

background well developed. good originality, appropriate style and language, however the references formatting needing amendments.

The idea of moving vehicle using air is good. But the design is not moving the vehicle but just lifting it. Please check the report for corrections.

report is not following the format. Other than that only minor amendment is needed in the content.

Should focus more on the thesis writing

Ok. Minor amendment is required. Please check back the format of reference.

Additive was spelled "Addictive", Scope were not clear, Fuel A1, A2, A3 should have indent in every graph.

committed to his project and rinkoh. background well developed however problems described not clear, good originality and significance, good methodology, appropriate language and styles, however need to follow the utm format.

Good student

No problem statement. Zernike moment not being discuss in introduction (problem, objective,scope etc)

The objectives stated about numerical analysis but the work done was an experimental. All graphs does not have units.



Good. Minor amendment is required. Please check back the reference style. It looks weird.

Good achievements within the limited time.

Need improvement in writing skill and English grammar.

She is good

Overall work is good. Please do the minor corrections indicated in the report.

Good achievement

Good

very good

Overall work is good. Please make the minor corrections as indicated.

committed to his project and rinkoh. background well developed, good originality and significance, good methodology, appropriate language and styles, however need to follow the utm format.


background well developed. good originality, appropriate style and language, however the references formatting needing amendments.

Additive was spelled "Addictive", Scope were not clear, Fuel A1, A2, A3 should have indent in every graph.



No Name Matric No....No Name Matric No. 1 Ahmad Mustakim Bin Saari A15MJ0007 2 Aida Syahira Binti Mohd Zain A15MJ0009 3 Alif Azizi Bin Ayub A15MJ0011 4 Alif Omar Bin Elias A15MJ0012

Documents