New Trends in Curriculum Evaluation ReportREVISED

8/11/2019 New Trends in Curriculum Evaluation ReportREVISED

1/22

By: Arriane T. Sarmiento


2/22

Trends in Curriculum Evaluation

Process or transactional evaluation can

aid ongoing innovative programs. It

focuses on the individuals in a changedsituation by analyzing the organizational

disruption that results from innovations.

Likewise the politics of the curricularsetting are a crucial consideration.


3/22

While an evaluator should stay away from

involvement in political causes, he should

be sensitive to such realities as the use ofevaluation as tactical weapon,

unacknowledged political goals, and

effects on participants.


4/22

Worner (1972) argues that many

principals have failed to convince parents

and boards of the potential of aninstructional program because of vague

and imprecise evaluation data.


5/22

Planning-Programming-Budgeting

Systems

provide the type of data that help

principals in making difficult decisions on

program expansion, program elimination,and program maintainance.


6/22

This approach enhances the knowledge

of key school administrators about the

effectiveness of instructional programsby identifying program strengths, flaws,

and alternatives.


7/22

A speech prepared by:

Rush and other (1972)

reports a systematic attempt to train and

use classroom teachers and

administrators in the operation of a

curriculum evaluation model.


8/22

The data indicate that competent

professionals can indeed be trained to play an

effective role. In turn, their training can be

used as an in service component of an overall

evaluation. This professional group can then

deal with final evaluation reports.


9/22

An expected oppurtunity loss

model is advanced by Tanner (1970) as adecision-making technique. The modelformulates alternatives for decision-

making under uncertanity and weighsthe probable or possible oppurtunityloss. It subjectively ranks coursedaccording to their expected contributionsto the primary objective of the totalprogram.


10/22

Objective data are gained from component

costs, but less emphasis is placed on

these components than in traditionalcost-effectiveness models. The minimum

loss is evaluated as the optimum

decision.


11/22

MO ELS


12/22

1.) Context, Input, Process, Product

Model (CIPP Model)

Daniel L. Stufflebeam (1971)

who chaired the Phi Delta Kappa National

Study Committee on Evaluation,introduced a widely cited model of

evaluation known as the CIPP (context,

input, process and product) model.


13/22

A major aspect of the Stufflebeamsmodel is

centred on decision making or an act of

making up ones mind about the programme

introduced.


14/22


15/22


16/22


17/22

Stakes Countenance Model

The model proposed by Robert Stake(1967) suggests three phases ofcurriculum evaluation: the antecedentphase, the transaction phase and theoutcome phase. The antecedent phase

includes conditions existing prior toinstruction that may relate to outcomes.


18/22

The transaction phase constitutes the

process of instruction while the outcomephase relates to the effects of the

programme.

Stake emphasises two operations;

descriptionsandjudgements.

Descriptions are divided according to

whether they refer to what was intended

or what actually was observed.


19/22

Judgements are separated according to

whether they refer to standards used in

arriving at the judgements or to theactual judgements.


20/22

Eisners Connoisseurship Model

Elliot Eisner, a well known art educator argued

that learning was too complex to be broken

down to a list of objectives and measured

quantitatively to determine whether it has

taken place. He argued that the teaching of

small manageable pieces of information

prohibits students from putting the piecesback together and applying them to new

situations.


21/22

He proposed the Connoisseurship Modelin

which he claimed that a knowledgeable

evaluator can determine whether a curriculum

programme has been successful, using a

combination of skills and experience. The

word connoisseurship comes from the Latin

word cognoscere, meaning to know.


22/22

Thank You andGodbless You!

New Trends in Curriculum Evaluation ReportREVISED

Documents