. - (.e. , '~' ' DEC 1. 9 E9 - - . . . - - ,, ! - . P. A.1torrie, Director, DPL - , _, i'i,AN FOR PP.1: PAP!sT10N OF A ST!J:DAl:DI7.ED REVILi' PLAN . Thic ner.c.ran?.uu i : for the purpor.e of nuhnittle, a proposed ninn for preparation of tht- T.tr.ndr rd '.ev!w Plcn for t% reviev and concurrence e,f the DrL r.enf or s taf f. Cuapicsontal inferrction presented includes: t (1) a lict of term sich in ny opinion rc:; eire definition (Attach- i nent A). (2) a su:rwr4 outline (Attechneat 3). (3) an annoteted outlise of Volume I, Cennt ruction rcrnit Ap-'licatienn. Indicati:m the necerni content of cach n ction cnd guidea for the r.uthors (Attach,cnt C). and ' (4) a r,uide for tha prenaration of check li stn (Attachnent D). "y ,, ne::eral cer.mente on the nr:teri:1 prepared thus for ulll be nut,ittei , ' prri r.rini: a c.a :ple check list T 'l _ later na At tach 2ent E. ^ In cddition,' ,I a: 2 fcr one of the fccility ryste m.(O)- ' t . . - - _ ?t in ny vic r thet concurrence of thc(DPL nenior staf f is needed en the . folle.ii: p. ocintn prior to proceedin.g with any further '<riting on the - - * r::r: cf tic ntaff: (t) et:jgersven of t'm nom.*dard _'aviw Plep. (2) . } gancral orscnizstion and format, (3) the title nnd cenere! centent, in ' prticular the list of fccility syst ms, and (4) the ensinnment_ of i 9e rnor.rel . Only very linited dtncuasions of the proposed plan 1 nve' k' been held to date with the, confer ::.taf f bec.mu9e of the he::vy ense . vor!:! cad in the pant neveral vackq. I have not atte :pted to r se annig r.cnta'at thin tiae, heuever, in ny opinion, the pnrnennel uho ,/ 111 ultinntcly be reaponnible for the infety reviev and ovaluntion unct punera the check list 2, discuss the enfety ic.Tues to be co :nidored :nd doce.ent' the imnin for acceptar.ce. , . s '' * - - . . - . - . . . , , The necpn involved '~in the prcper.ed pinn'are nn folions: ~ , '' - - .. . . ,. . . . 1. Revicu of the propered plan by the nenf or staff c.nd incorporation of ecm?nts ' agreed on. - - .. 2. Anninnnent of crecific technical personoc1 to the tasic of writing the rw t draf t of the docuuent. The prernratiran of e. sche /ule for coapletien based en a specific fraction of cr:ch individual's tic:e. being devoted to urition the document thould be a renuirenent. ~ ,_ ' ' 3. Edit and issue the draft for irnediate internal use and for con . . * current review by DML per.ectrol vnd other DP, divirions.- . g [ * . 6 * 4 . * . - * " % . . - * _ _ , , , . . _ _ . . _ . . . . . . - . . _ , - 4 - - - . 9
14
Embed
nent A). (2) a su:rwr4 outline (Attechneat 3). (3) an ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
. -
(.e.,'~' '
DEC 1. 9 E9-
-
.
.
. - -,,
!
-.
P. A.1torrie, Director, DPL -,_,
i'i,AN FOR PP.1: PAP!sT10N OF A ST!J:DAl:DI7.ED REVILi' PLAN.
Thic ner.c.ran?.uu i : for the purpor.e of nuhnittle, a proposed ninn for
preparation of tht- T.tr.ndr rd '.ev!w Plcn for t% reviev and concurrencee,f the DrL r.enf or s taf f. Cuapicsontal inferrction presented includes:
t (1) a lict of term sich in ny opinion rc:; eire definition (Attach-i nent A). (2) a su:rwr4 outline (Attechneat 3). (3) an annoteted outlise
of Volume I, Cennt ruction rcrnit Ap-'licatienn. Indicati:m the necernicontent of cach n ction cnd guidea for the r.uthors (Attach,cnt C). and
'
(4) a r,uide for tha prenaration of check li stn (Attachnent D). "y,,
ne::eral cer.mente on the nr:teri:1 prepared thus for ulll be nut,ittei,
' prri r.rini: a c.a :ple check list T'l _ later na At tach 2ent E. ^ In cddition,' ,I a:2
fcr one of the fccility ryste m.(O)-'
t
. . - -
_
?t in ny vic r thet concurrence of thc(DPL nenior staf f is needed en the.
folle.ii: p. ocintn prior to proceedin.g with any further '<riting on the --
*
r::r: cf tic ntaff: (t) et:jgersven of t'm nom.*dard _'aviw Plep. (2). } gancral orscnizstion and format, (3) the title nnd cenere! centent, in
'prticular the list of fccility syst ms, and (4) the ensinnment_ of
i 9e rnor.rel . Only very linited dtncuasions of the proposed plan 1 nve'k' been held to date with the, confer ::.taf f bec.mu9e of the he::vy ense .
vor!:! cad in the pant neveral vackq. I have not atte :pted to r se
annig r.cnta'at thin tiae, heuever, in ny opinion, the pnrnennel uho ,/111 ultinntcly be reaponnible for the infety reviev and ovaluntion
unct punera the check list 2, discuss the enfety ic.Tues to be co :nidored:nd doce.ent' the imnin for acceptar.ce.
, .s '' *
- -
.. -
. - . . ., ,
The necpn involved '~in the prcper.ed pinn'are nn folions:~
,
'' - -
... . ,. .. .
1. Revicu of the propered plan by the nenf or staff c.nd incorporationof ecm?nts ' agreed on. -
-..
2. Anninnnent of crecific technical personoc1 to the tasic of writingthe rw t draf t of the docuuent. The prernratiran of e. sche /ule forcoapletien based en a specific fraction of cr:ch individual's tic:e.being devoted to urition the document thould be a renuirenent. ~
,_
' '
3. Edit and issue the draft for irnediate internal use and for con . .
*
current review by DML per.ectrol vnd other DP, divirions.-
4. Initiate work on Volurc II cnd Voltrac III. r. o
S. Incorporate ces,ents of other DP. divisions on Volune.I as neon-
i
J.n<s ccm.cnts are r.ccived and diccuuued. . =- L
- u' -
.
:
| 6. Proceed in the s n o acacer vith Vo.luacs II r.nd III. '..
+ .
' At no":c point it eaay very s:cIl be apprepriate to cor.vene a t::nk forec -~of AEC ..nd ir.dustric.1 peopic to review the pinn, heeever, if this is . 4
!done prior to our ie.plenenting the pinn, I 'eculd venture to' r.ucss that a.
uc will never he.ve a plan. ~ ,
.
~
~Picasn 'ndvise t-e concerning he ticing for, a inecting with the nenior.- }. g
r.teff or' other sug.;ested action you recon:cend. . ." - ". - 5
, , , -.yw .- t . - -.
-
' - , .. .. . ,s'
,
Oriint.1 :. ;.wd by i . . ' , .. |, .;' T. n. Wilsan ^ - - -
. ... .
- j. ,.. ,
1' ~',
~
4.,, . -
.
-.
,i, ,T. R. Wil. son -.. . , . . .
... .
, - Acsist.nnt to the Director, DEL ' - - ';.i. ;
- - ' -
.,. ., j
f pacics:ura r. : -. --
.,
1. Attachment A '/ .-
;..
-~ - *
. .
2. Attachnent B '-' ' '
'
*
. . .m3. Attachnent C - - . .rj - .
-
.
.4 At tach acnt D
. . _. .u. ' - . .u
. .
,. .
F. Sch'roeder, E/ encl ~. .;
*cc: *-
* < . . _ ~-
.,-
- R. S. Boyd,t/cuci -' .
. . A.. f ,_ ,A.
.'. ..s ,
S. I.cvine, U/coci ' . . . - .s . .'
,c..
'': -c U % . ,.', 0 ",; 'q .-R. C. Dcioung, u/enci [-D. J. Skovholt, w/ enc 1 , 1 ; _ . s. . , d p ,4,_. ~ *' E
Dispersion, Dilution, and Travel Times of Accidental n2.4.12' Rel ea s es o f Li qui d Ef fl uents . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . '
17.1 Quality Assurance During Design and Ccastruction......... gr.
17.2 Quality Assurance During the Operations Piuse............ qA
.
/
' .. - . 4
s
*t
.
e-
*=-4.b
/ <
:' 1
. - t'g.. .
.
e
4 |E xiii
- 4
,
1 .
n_
- ..-. . - - _ - . ._ -. . , - . .. . _ - _ _
h ..
L. - _ . .__ - .- - -
I-
_ .,
- . _ . _ _ _ __ . _ _ _ m .
- .. ,,
;. i ;*
|*
& ~ hi' |
.
I
I KEY TO LICENSING BRA'iCH--'
7 . .; (,
! ~ l; } '
L L AAB - Accident Analysis Branch*
CPB - Core Performance Branch ,;
1
r ! .-
'
! CSB - Containment Systcas Branch, ) -
: > ;MEB - Mechanical Zagineering 3canch .'
; *'
i ..
! .MTEB - Materials Engineering Branch ,
| RAB - Radiological Assessment Branch .i
.'
--
,
RSB - Reactor Systems Branch. -
*
,
SAB' - Site Analysis Branch 7, ,
,
SEB - Structural Enh;ineering Branch'
,,
t ^' 1 .
QAB - Quality Assurance Branchi - _
,
[,.
.
i'.-
. '
' ' OSB - Operational Safety Branch ,
I ,
t
'.
ETSB - Effluent Treatment Systems Branch -.
,
, .+ -
. . . .
!. x .
' '
APCS - Auxiliary & Power Conversion Systems Branch'- , ,
, _,
-
, ,
-
;
| 1,. EICS - Electrical, Instrumentation '& Control Systems Brancha ,.
b ISEP - Industrial Sec.urity'and Emergency Planning Branch'
a
,
:-1--
'
' ~ ^
~
OLB - Operator Licensing Branch_
1;
' , ' y - 4
'
h ' y a % g . m -*O. *
,*-- ,,
%., r**' -6,.
' % + 4I
4- u 4 4
.-
* .
6
/_/.
4
*-
., s
I
a
.
: e,
'- N -
' ' *I. ,,s a
h
Q V
Il' .,4.'', _ m
, - .
E
, 1,,
+.
.g'l. *
.
'{a
1
( ar
6,
,.. u.q__ -.
.
! '. ,, _-
,
-
, . ,,
memg r # M*-- * *T- M - __4W.* s e+ -,--3+ .* g' w* *_.= * yw- m y-yr +- . % e- sh + ;.ees gre.*y hw .-
-~ . w g 4>
*'
% .,
i --
,. , r
* .I ^ y_N't .
, ,r &
~} ~,'_
y-p;y;f , #
, . , , . , ., ,
% , , ' - ~ 7 ,A*+ ,
, . J ;- ,e, ,4m. , _ . e ., .,
-
'
* .,
- - - + . ~ + . ,, , n ,, , .s, ,
=
Atj,une ELO~ .
>-.
_- - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - .
~
Um:Tt3D STATES I'IS :
MUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION'
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20S55 i.mP ~ g
'.
No. 75-289 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, f''Contact: Carl Gustin (Mailed - December 22,.1975) ~
Tel. 301/492-7771
%
NRC PUBLISilES STANDARD REVIEW PLAN W1- :.
s
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Of fice of Nuclear 1iReactor Regulation has published a Standard Review Plan for --
the NRC staff's sa fety review of applications to-build and, ,
operate light water-cooled nuclear power reactors.3;' 'dt
The purpose of the plan is to improve the quality," uniformity and predictability of the NRC staf f's review of e==applications to build new nuclear power facilities as well as ppmthe quality and uniformity of information supplied by appli- fCcants as the basis for the staff's review. The plan is a _
n maj or step in advancing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission'sI goal of enhanced consistency and predictability in the-
licensing process.
By providing more specific guidance to applicants on thekinds of safety-related information needed to review applica-tions to build and operate light water-cooled nuclear power 2-
$%^#plants and specific information as to the basis for the staff'sreview, it is intended that there will be a stabilizing effect_ Pon the licensing process that will benefit both the public andthe nucicar industry. -
The Standard Review Plan describes in detail the various #s -
sa fety- related technical areas reviewed by the NRC staf f, the, h,'
basis for the review, the procedures for accomplishing the LW -*
review, and the conclusions which are sought in each area. /y. .The format of the Standard Review Plan is consistent with t'#1 -Revision. 2 of the NRC's Regulatory Guide 1.70 " Standard Format Yand Content of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power M.N;.Plants - Light Water Reactor Edition." g .
The 1,414-page Standard Review Plan comprises 224 sub- hsections that have been made available to the public during e wethe past year in separate groups as they were completed. The MLcomplete plan incorporates some changes to improve clarity Qsp.and incorporate comments received. h.11= %. . .
k,.
-#p
, , e . A
....__3.... 4 :..;':,'iiD 5:.0AW't.5,.*yh.c.?.$...,*%.f.'~, W., s ,%. . . S2V,G. ..,ud|C;G;.R..'-W. .?.;~.',Q_C:::X'.'%.. Y.M./.,3:.L:4.6. 5s s. . s .y_ ., . .; V ", % .* ' J. . ~ . h, g . . a. . m .. ., %.. % .'.Y s % T.' ,, <c . =', , g *h_--* = ., M._. A. 4. _. *ci_. s # * * - w.m. _..s. ~" _4
'm. . . -
_ ._V,*._,
=..*.is.*-__w. _' 'r -s . ',/ " +. ..a#- .. ._-. 4,.|'w- w w ..s ,
_
,, ., _ _ _ . . _ _ , _ _ ,_, __ , , , __
.l..
. - 2- 75-289:%
~
lNM Copies of the Standard Review Plan, which has been iden-
tified as NUREG-75/087, are available from the Natio'nal*
.
ym Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. .
j'R:> The domestic price is $60 and the foreign price $75 includings4 first-year supplements. The domestic price for individual .
Mg sections is $3.50 and the foreign price is $5.00.