Neck Dissection Neck Dissection Jeffrey Buyten, MD Jeffrey Buyten, MD Susan McCammon, MD Susan McCammon, MD Francis B. Quinn, MD Francis B. Quinn, MD University of Texas Medical Branch University of Texas Medical Branch Department of Otolaryngology Department of Otolaryngology Grand Rounds Presentation Grand Rounds Presentation September 2006 September 2006
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Neck DissectionNeck Dissection
Jeffrey Buyten, MDJeffrey Buyten, MD
Susan McCammon, MDSusan McCammon, MD
Francis B. Quinn, MDFrancis B. Quinn, MD
University of Texas Medical BranchUniversity of Texas Medical Branch
Department of OtolaryngologyDepartment of OtolaryngologyGrand Rounds PresentationGrand Rounds Presentation
Metastatic cervical lymph nodesMetastatic cervical lymph nodes– Early 19Early 19thth Century Century incurable disease incurable disease– 2020thth Century Century improved treatment of improved treatment of
neck diseaseneck disease– 2121stst Century Century second worst prognostic second worst prognostic
indicator for head and neck SCCAindicator for head and neck SCCA
1919thth Century Century 1880 1880 Kocher advocates wide margin Kocher advocates wide margin
lymphadenectomylymphadenectomy
1881 1881 Kocher and Packard recommend Kocher and Packard recommend dissection of submandibular dissection of submandibular
triangle triangle for lingual cancerfor lingual cancer
1885 1885 Butlin questions RND for oral N Butlin questions RND for oral N00 diseasedisease
1888 1888 Jawdynski describes en bloc Jawdynski describes en bloc resection with resection of resection with resection of
carotid, carotid, IJV, SCM.IJV, SCM.
Ferlito, A et al. Neck Dissection: past, present and future? J. Laryngol Otol. 2005 (1) 1-6.
2020thth Century Century 1901 1901 Solis-Cohen advocate Solis-Cohen advocate
lymphadenectomy for Nlymphadenectomy for N00 laryngeal laryngeal CACA
1905 -1906 1905 -1906 Crile describes en Crile describes en bloc resection in JAMAbloc resection in JAMA
1926 1926 Bartlett and Callander Bartlett and Callander advocate preservation of XI, IJV, advocate preservation of XI, IJV, SCM, platysma, stylohyoid, digastricSCM, platysma, stylohyoid, digastric
1933 1933 Blair and Brown advocate Blair and Brown advocate removal of removal of XI.XI.
Ferlito, A et al. Neck Dissection: past, present and future? J. Laryngol Otol. 2005 (1) 1-6.
2020thth Century Century 1951 1951 Martin advocates Radical Neck Dissection after anaysis of Martin advocates Radical Neck Dissection after anaysis of
1450 cases1450 cases– Advocated RND for all cases.Advocated RND for all cases.– Standardized the Radical Neck DissectionStandardized the Radical Neck Dissection
1952 – Suarez describes a functional neck dissection1952 – Suarez describes a functional neck dissection– Preservation of SCM, omohyoid, submandibular gland, IJV, XI.Preservation of SCM, omohyoid, submandibular gland, IJV, XI.– Enables protection of carotid.Enables protection of carotid.
1960’s – MD Anderson advocate selective ND of highest risk nodal 1960’s – MD Anderson advocate selective ND of highest risk nodal basinsbasins
1967 - Bocca and Pignataro describe the “functional neck 1967 - Bocca and Pignataro describe the “functional neck dissection”dissection”
1975 – Bocca establishes oncologic safety of the FND compared to 1975 – Bocca establishes oncologic safety of the FND compared to the RNDthe RND
Ferlito, A et al. Neck Dissection: past, present and future? J. Laryngol Otol. 2005 (1) 1-6.
(surgical landmark)(surgical landmark) Junction with IJVJunction with IJV
– ClavicleClavicle
Phrenic NervePhrenic Nerve
Sole nerve supply Sole nerve supply to the diaphragmto the diaphragm
C3-5 C3-5 Anterior surface of Anterior surface of
anterior scaleneanterior scalene Under prevertebral Under prevertebral
fasciafascia Posterolateral to Posterolateral to
carotid sheathcarotid sheath
Thoracic ductThoracic duct Conveys lymph from the Conveys lymph from the
entire body back to the blood entire body back to the blood – Exceptions:Exceptions:
Right side of head and neck, Right side of head and neck, RUE, right lung right heart RUE, right lung right heart and portion of the liverand portion of the liver
– Begins at the cisterna chyliBegins at the cisterna chyli– Enters posterior mediastinum Enters posterior mediastinum
between the azygous vein between the azygous vein and thoracic aortaand thoracic aorta
– Courses to the left into the Courses to the left into the neck anterior to the vertebral neck anterior to the vertebral artery and veinartery and vein
– Enters the junction of the left Enters the junction of the left subclavian and the IJVsubclavian and the IJV
Posterior triangle of neck Posterior triangle of neck – Posterior border of SCMPosterior border of SCM– ClavicleClavicle– Anterior border of Anterior border of
Removal of any structures that are Removal of any structures that are routinely preserved in a neck routinely preserved in a neck dissection.dissection.
Notated by naming the structure(s) Notated by naming the structure(s) removed.removed.
Tumor spreads via lymphatics to a Tumor spreads via lymphatics to a primary node.primary node.
Examination of primary echelon Examination of primary echelon nodes for tumor direct the need for nodes for tumor direct the need for surgical management of the nodal surgical management of the nodal basins.basins.
Sentinel lymph node conceptSentinel lymph node concept Difficulties of lymphatic mapping in head Difficulties of lymphatic mapping in head
and neck (O’Brien).and neck (O’Brien).
1.1. It is difficult to visualize lymphatic channels It is difficult to visualize lymphatic channels using lymphoscintigraphy because of using lymphoscintigraphy because of proximity to the injection site.proximity to the injection site.
2.2. The radiotracer travels fast in the lymphatic The radiotracer travels fast in the lymphatic vessels.vessels.
3.3. If more than one node is visible, it can be If more than one node is visible, it can be difficult to distinguish first echelon nodes from difficult to distinguish first echelon nodes from second-echelon nodes.second-echelon nodes.
4.4. The SLN may be small and not easily The SLN may be small and not easily accessible (eg, in the parotid gland).accessible (eg, in the parotid gland).
NN0 0 NeckNeck
Occult neck diseaseOccult neck disease– Head and neck cancer Head and neck cancer 30% 30%– Oral cavity CA Oral cavity CA 20% to 45% 20% to 45%
Accuracy of diagnostic methods in detecting occult Accuracy of diagnostic methods in detecting occult cervical metastases.cervical metastases.
A new approach to pre-treatment assessment of the N0 neck in oral squamous cell carcinoma: the role of A new approach to pre-treatment assessment of the N0 neck in oral squamous cell carcinoma: the role of sentinel node biopsy and positron emission tomographysentinel node biopsy and positron emission tomography
NN0 0 Neck TreatmentNeck Treatment
T1/T2 N0 oral SCCAT1/T2 N0 oral SCCA– Better 10-year survival in pts who had Better 10-year survival in pts who had
T1/T2 N0 tongue SCCAT1/T2 N0 tongue SCCA– 5-year actuarial benefit for elective neck 5-year actuarial benefit for elective neck
managementmanagement
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and NN0 0 Oral Cavity SCCAOral Cavity SCCA
Multiple small case series display the Multiple small case series display the feasibility of SLNB in oral SCCAfeasibility of SLNB in oral SCCA
Majority of lesions T1/T2Majority of lesions T1/T2
No standardized techniquesNo standardized techniques
All series compare All series compare – Pre op lymphoscintigraphyPre op lymphoscintigraphy– Intra-op localizationIntra-op localization– Post op pathologyPost op pathology
Pre op TechniquePre op Technique TechnetiumTechnetium
– Day before surgeryDay before surgery– Submucosal injectionsSubmucosal injections– 10-30 MBq Tc 99m per 10-30 MBq Tc 99m per
quadrantquadrant– +/- local anesthesia+/- local anesthesia– Avoid spillageAvoid spillage– Rinse mouthRinse mouth
Dosage does not correlate Dosage does not correlate with ability to identify with ability to identify nodesnodes
Pre op TechniquePre op Technique LymphoscintigraphyLymphoscintigraphy
– DynamicDynamic 45 -60 minutes45 -60 minutes Necessary to clearly identify Necessary to clearly identify
sentinel nodessentinel nodes SLNs seen within 15 minutesSLNs seen within 15 minutes
– StaticStatic Confirms dynamic imagesConfirms dynamic images AP / Lateral / ObliqueAP / Lateral / Oblique Delayed images for non Delayed images for non
Injury of VII, XI due to limited Injury of VII, XI due to limited exposureexposure
ResultsResults
Sentinel nodes found in > 90% of Sentinel nodes found in > 90% of cases.cases.– Experience mattersExperience matters– Surgeons with less than 10 cases Surgeons with less than 10 cases 56% 56%
success in SLNBsuccess in SLNB Lymphoscintigraphy revealed Lymphoscintigraphy revealed
unexpected bilateral or contralateral unexpected bilateral or contralateral disease in about 14% of ptsdisease in about 14% of pts
About 2-3 SLN per patientAbout 2-3 SLN per patient
ResultsResults
Up to 46% of SLN harbor metastasesUp to 46% of SLN harbor metastases– Fine section frozen analysisFine section frozen analysis
Increases sensitivity to about 95%Increases sensitivity to about 95%
– 10%10%– Grossly involved nodes less likely to take up Grossly involved nodes less likely to take up
tracertracer Better sensitivity for T1/T2 lesionsBetter sensitivity for T1/T2 lesions
– Most false negative results associated with Most false negative results associated with larger T3 lesionslarger T3 lesions
BibliographyBibliography1.1. Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for 106 Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for 106
Head and Neck Lesions: Contrasts Between Oral Cavity and Head and Neck Lesions: Contrasts Between Oral Cavity and Cutaneous Malignancy Laryngoscope, 116(Suppl. 109):1–15, Cutaneous Malignancy Laryngoscope, 116(Suppl. 109):1–15, 20062006
2.2. Oral Cancer: Correlation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Oral Cancer: Correlation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Selective Neck Dissection Histopathology Selective Neck Dissection Histopathology
3.3. The value of frozen section analysis of the sentinel lymph node The value of frozen section analysis of the sentinel lymph node in clinically N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oralin clinically N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oralcavity and oropharynx LAURENT TSCHOPP, MD, MICHEL cavity and oropharynx LAURENT TSCHOPP, MD, MICHEL NUYENS, MD, EDOUARD STAUFFER, MD, THOMAS KRAUSE, MD, NUYENS, MD, EDOUARD STAUFFER, MD, THOMAS KRAUSE, MD, and PETER ZBÄREN, MD, Bern, Switzerland Otolaryngol Head and PETER ZBÄREN, MD, Bern, Switzerland Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:99-102.Neck Surg 2005;132:99-102.
4.4. A new approach to pre-treatment assessment of the N0 neck in A new approach to pre-treatment assessment of the N0 neck in oral squamous cell carcinoma: the role of sentinel node biopsy oral squamous cell carcinoma: the role of sentinel node biopsy and positron emission tomography N.C. Hydea,*, E. Prvulovichb, and positron emission tomography N.C. Hydea,*, E. Prvulovichb, L. Newmanc, W.A. Waddingtonb, D. Visvikisb, P. Ellb Oral L. Newmanc, W.A. Waddingtonb, D. Visvikisb, P. Ellb Oral Oncology 39 (2003) 350–360Oncology 39 (2003) 350–360
5.5. The Accuracy of Head and Neck Carcinoma Sentinel Lymph The Accuracy of Head and Neck Carcinoma Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Clinically N0 Neck Taimur Shoaib1 CANCER Node Biopsy in the Clinically N0 Neck Taimur Shoaib1 CANCER June 1, 2001 / Volume 91 / Number 11June 1, 2001 / Volume 91 / Number 11