Top Banner
Nature Conservation Drones for Automatic Localization and Counting of Animals Camiel R. Verschoor - @Camiel_V van Gemert, Verschoor, Mettes, Epema, Koh & Wich 6 September 2014
13

Nature Conservation Drones

May 27, 2015

Download

Science

Nature Conservation Drones for Automatic Localization and Counting of Animals
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Nature Conservation Drones

Nature Conservation Drones for Automatic Localization and

Counting of AnimalsCamiel R. Verschoor - @Camiel_Vvan Gemert, Verschoor, Mettes, Epema, Koh & Wich

6 September 2014

Page 2: Nature Conservation Drones

Motivation

Accurate monitoring key ingredient of nature conservation

Animal monitoring involves:

• Animal counting

• Indirect counting of animal signs

Conventional ground surveys can be time consuming

Aerial surveys expensive, not available or unpractical

2

Page 3: Nature Conservation Drones

Conservation Drones

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles are cheap, accessible and autonomous (Jones IV, Pearlstine, Percival, 2006).

Generates numerous photos and videos

3

Page 4: Nature Conservation Drones

Computer Vision

Strong need for automated detection of objects.

• Relatively small

• Skewed vantage point

!

This paper evaluated how current object detection methods scale to drone nature conservation tasks

4

Page 5: Nature Conservation Drones

Related work

Conservation Drones

• Conservation (Koh & Wich, 2012)

• Terrain mapping (Getzin, Wiegand & Schning, 2012; Hodgson, Kelly & Peel, 2013)

Computer Vision

• Convolutional networks (computational intensive) (Girshick, Donahue, Darrell & Malik, 2014; Sermanet et al., 2014)

• Bag of Words/Fisher Vectors (memory intensive) (Uijlings, van de Sande, Gevers & Smeulders, 2013; Cinbis, Verbeek & Schmid, 2013)

5

Page 6: Nature Conservation Drones

Evaluating Nature Conservation

Two tasks: Animal Detection and Animal Counting.

Recorded dataset:

• Pelican with GoPro

• Two separate flights

• 4 training videos (12,673 frames) 2 test videos (5,683 frames)30 unique animals

• Manually annotated with vatic. (Vondrick, Patterson & Ramanan, 2012)

6

Page 7: Nature Conservation Drones

Methods

Object detection

• Deformable part-based model (DPM)DPM & Color DPM (Felzenszwalb, Girshick, McAllester & Ramanan, 2010; Khan et al., 2012)

• Exemplar SVM (Malisiewicz, Gupta & Efros, 2011)

Animal Counting

• KLT Tracker (Lucas, Kanade et al., 1981)

• Merge detections when: (Everingham, Sivic & Zisserman, 2009)

7

Page 8: Nature Conservation Drones

Results - Proposal Quality

• Selective search (Uijlings, van de Sande, Gevers & Smeulders, 2013)

• Search time is not significantly decreased

• Object proposal-based detection systems are from a computational standpoint not suitable

8

Page 9: Nature Conservation Drones

Results - Animal Detection

9

Page 10: Nature Conservation Drones

Results - Animal Detection

Exemplar SVM DPM Color DPM10

Page 11: Nature Conservation Drones

Results - Animal Counting Ground Truth

11

Page 12: Nature Conservation Drones

Conclusion

• Investigated automatic object detection methods for nature conservation

• Three lightweight detection methods are benchmarked for animal detection giving promising results

• Results show that animal counting is a difficult task

• Nature Conservation Drones have potential!

12

Page 13: Nature Conservation Drones

Questions

Remember! Anything can Fly!

Camiel R. Verschoor - @Camiel_V [email protected]