NATO UNCLASSIFIED TechNet Europe 2005 TechNet Europe 2005 E.COMbat – Strategies for Success E.COMbat – Strategies for Success NATO Consultation, Command NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency and Control Agency NC3A NC3A Keynote Speech Keynote Speech Dag Wilhelmsen, General Manager Lisbon, Portugal, 20 – 21 October 2005
29
Embed
NATO UNCLASSIFIED TechNet Europe 2005 E.COMbat – Strategies for Success NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency NC3A Keynote Speech Dag Wilhelmsen,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
NATO UNCLASSIFIED
TechNet Europe 2005TechNet Europe 2005E.COMbat – Strategies for SuccessE.COMbat – Strategies for Success
NATO Consultation, Command NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agencyand Control Agency
ACT Requires ACT Requires NC3A Specifies NC3A Specifies Industry Implements Industry Implements
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 8
Challenges that the “E.COMbat”-Challenges that the “E.COMbat”- community should address community should address
1.1. Maximum use of commercial and industrial Maximum use of commercial and industrial standards standards
2.2. ““State of the art” modelling and simulation State of the art” modelling and simulation technologies to address NRF’s training technologies to address NRF’s training challengeschallenges
3.3. Experimentation, concept validation and Experimentation, concept validation and DOTMLPFI- certification using networked DOTMLPFI- certification using networked battlelabs, demonstrations and exercisesbattlelabs, demonstrations and exercises
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 9
Challenges that the “E.COMbat”-Challenges that the “E.COMbat”- community should address community should address
1.1. Maximum use of commercial and industrial Maximum use of commercial and industrial standardsstandards
2.2. ““State of the art” modelling and simulation State of the art” modelling and simulation technologies to address NRF’s training technologies to address NRF’s training challengeschallenges
3.3. Experimentation, concept validation and Experimentation, concept validation and DOTMLPFI- certification using networked DOTMLPFI- certification using networked battlelabs, demonstrations and exercisesbattlelabs, demonstrations and exercises
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 10
Software Defined Radio Software Defined Radio (SDR)(SDR)
NNEC implications:NNEC implications: Significant use of wireless network elementsSignificant use of wireless network elements Greater interconnection e.g. wireless and fixed; NATO and National systems;Greater interconnection e.g. wireless and fixed; NATO and National systems; Convergence to network technologies;Convergence to network technologies; Granularity of interoperability down to lowest echelonGranularity of interoperability down to lowest echelon
SDR is not a waveform !SDR is not a waveform ! SDR is a radio implementation which enhances:SDR is a radio implementation which enhances:
Interoperability – ‘copying’ software definitions between radiosInteroperability – ‘copying’ software definitions between radios - backwards compatibility plus fast deployment of future waveforms- backwards compatibility plus fast deployment of future waveforms
Networking at lowest levels and between national systemsNetworking at lowest levels and between national systems Civil – Military Interoperation: Software definitions of civil radiosCivil – Military Interoperation: Software definitions of civil radios
Software Communications Architecture (SCA)Software Communications Architecture (SCA) Common architecture for SDR (h/w & s/w)Common architecture for SDR (h/w & s/w)
used by current SDR procurements e.g. JTRSused by current SDR procurements e.g. JTRS NATO nations and industry have adopted SCA NATO nations and industry have adopted SCA NATO addressing alliance and coalition requirements for SCANATO addressing alliance and coalition requirements for SCA Coherence of NATO plans and SDR capabilitiesCoherence of NATO plans and SDR capabilities Maximising benefits of SDR to enable NNECMaximising benefits of SDR to enable NNEC
New NATO waveforms optimised for SDRNew NATO waveforms optimised for SDR
……. an enabler for NNEC. an enabler for NNEC
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 11
TACOMS Post 2000TACOMS Post 2000
Thirteen (13) nations signed an MoUThirteen (13) nations signed an MoU To provide the standards (STANAGs) for To provide the standards (STANAGs) for
communication interoperability in the Land Combat communication interoperability in the Land Combat Zone.Zone.
Based on commercial technologyBased on commercial technology Service-based architecture Service-based architecture (formally referred to as (formally referred to as
Service Oriented Architecture - Service Oriented Architecture - SOASOA)) Mobility supportMobility support Standards for:Standards for:
From From Need to KnowNeed to Know to to Need to Need to ShareShare
Effective C2 for international operationsEffective C2 for international operations
Shared Tactical Picture
NationalImplementation
(Nation A)
NationalImplementation
(Nation A)
NationalImplementation(Nation B)
NationalImplementation(Nation B)
AutomaticExchange Mechanism
CommonData
Model
CommonData
Model
StaffOfficers(Nation B)
StaffOfficers(Nation A)
Commander(Nation A)
Commander(Nation B)
COLABORATION
COMMON UNDERSTANDING
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 13
MIP for Coalition C2 InteroperabilityMIP for Coalition C2 InteroperabilityMIP for Coalition C2 InteroperabilityMIP for Coalition C2 Interoperability
Info Exchange
DJTF LC2IS
Info Exchange
LCCC2IS Nation A
Exchange
Info Exchange
Info Exchange
Info Exchange
e.g. NRF
Brigade C2IS Nation B
MIP Aim:Enable Mission Critical Shared Situational Awareness for Multi-National Operations
Method:Develop and implement Automated Information Exchange amongst NATO and National C2IS
NATO:• Provides LC2IS as un-biased MIP Reference system (MRS) for current and future MIP development
• Can timely validate and Influence current and required Coalition (NRF!) C2IS Interoperability
Information
Battalion C2IS Nation E
Battalion C2IS Nation D
Battalion C2IS Nation C
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 14
NCOIC Members NCOIC Members – September 16, 2005– September 16, 2005Total Members: 79Total Members: 79 Additional Pending Members: 0Additional Pending Members: 0
Active Inquiries: 81Active Inquiries: 81 Newest Members are in BlueNewest Members are in Blue
Tier 1 Members (24)Tier 1 Members (24) BAE Systems, Inc.BAE Systems, Inc. BoeingBoeing CACICACI Cisco SystemsCisco Systems EADSEADS EFWEFW EMCEMC General DynamicsGeneral Dynamics
Tier 2 Members (3)Tier 2 Members (3) Alcatel Government SolutionsAlcatel Government Solutions FactivaFactiva Israel Aircraft IndustriesIsrael Aircraft Industries
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 15
NCOIC Members NCOIC Members – September 16, 2005– September 16, 2005Total Members: 79Total Members: 79 Additional Pending Members: 0Additional Pending Members: 0
Active Inquiries: 81Active Inquiries: 81 Newest Members are in BlueNewest Members are in Blue
Tier 3 Members (52)Tier 3 Members (52) The Aerospace CorporationThe Aerospace Corporation AeroVironment IncAeroVironment Inc AFEIAFEI Anteon CorporationAnteon Corporation Argon STArgon ST Ball Solutions GroupBall Solutions Group Bay Microsystems IncBay Microsystems Inc BearingPointBearingPoint Camber CorporationCamber Corporation CB TechnologiesCB Technologies Ciena Government SolutionsCiena Government Solutions Cryptek, IncCryptek, Inc Crystal GroupCrystal Group Cubic Defense ApplicationsCubic Defense Applications DCNDCN EDISOFT S.A.EDISOFT S.A. Engenio Information TechnologiesEngenio Information Technologies EricssonEricsson FinmeccanicaFinmeccanica
FlightSafety InternationalFlightSafety International HoneywellHoneywell INDRAINDRA InnerwallInnerwall Innovative Concepts, IncInnovative Concepts, Inc Institute for Defense AnalysesInstitute for Defense Analyses Johns Hopkins U. Applied Physics LabJohns Hopkins U. Applied Physics Lab LynuxWorks IncLynuxWorks Inc.. Marconi Communications Federal IncMarconi Communications Federal Inc MBL International, Ltd.MBL International, Ltd. McDonald Bradley, IncMcDonald Bradley, Inc MicrosoftMicrosoft MITREMITRE MotorolaMotorola Objective Interface Systems, Inc.Objective Interface Systems, Inc. PTCPTC Real-Time Innovations, IncReal-Time Innovations, Inc
Rheinmetall Defence ElectronicsRheinmetall Defence Electronics SRI InternationalSRI International RUAG ElectronicsRUAG Electronics SAP Labs, Inc.SAP Labs, Inc. Sikorsky AircraftSikorsky Aircraft Smiths AerospaceSmiths Aerospace Software Engineering Institute/Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute/Carnegie Mellon
UniversityUniversity SPARTA, IncSPARTA, Inc SuprTEKSuprTEK Systematic Software Engineering A/SSystematic Software Engineering A/S Systems Integration and Development, Inc.Systems Integration and Development, Inc. Terma A/STerma A/S University of Maryland, CSHCNUniversity of Maryland, CSHCN Wakelight Technologies, IncWakelight Technologies, Inc West Virginia High Tech. Consortium West Virginia High Tech. Consortium
FoundationFoundation Wind River SystemsWind River Systems
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 16
NCOIC AffiliatesNCOIC Affiliates
NATO: NATO: ACT/ NC3A/ NIAGACT/ NC3A/ NIAG AFEI: AFEI: Association for Enterprise IntegrationAssociation for Enterprise Integration W2COG:W2COG: Worldwide Consortium for the GridWorldwide Consortium for the Grid OFT: OFT: Office of Force TransformationOffice of Force Transformation AIAA:AIAA: American Institute of Aeronautics and American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics Astronautics OASIS:OASIS: Organization for the Advancement of Organization for the Advancement of
Structured Information Standards Structured Information Standards NDIANDIA National Defense Industrial Association National Defense Industrial Association GEIA:GEIA: Government Electronics & Information Government Electronics & Information
Association Association OMG:OMG: Object Management GroupObject Management Group OGC: OGC: Open Geospatial Consortium Open Geospatial Consortium IDLS:IDLS: International Data Link Society International Data Link Society
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 17
Challenges that the “E.COMbat”-Challenges that the “E.COMbat”- community should address community should address
1.1. Maximum use of commercial and industrial Maximum use of commercial and industrial standards standards
2.2. ““State of the art” modelling and simulation State of the art” modelling and simulation technologies to address NRF’s training technologies to address NRF’s training challengeschallenges
3.3. Experimentation, concept validation and Experimentation, concept validation and DOTMLPFI- certification using networked DOTMLPFI- certification using networked battlelabs, demonstrations and exercisesbattlelabs, demonstrations and exercises
DiMuNDS 2000 Project:Building a HLA-based federation of multi-
national simulations within a representative operational context.
DiMuNDS 2000 provided:first step to support CJTF CAX requirements
procedural and technical skill building in applying HLAopen and extendible federation
Federation Participants
ALICE (Air-to-Air,
Air-to-Ground)
JTLS (Sea-to-Air,
Sea-to-Ground, Sea-to-Sea)
KIBOWI (Gnd-to-Gnd, Ground-to-Air)
STRADIVARIUS (Air-to-Air,
Air-to-Ground, Air-to-Sea)
DCT (Data Collection & Analysis)
FMT (Federation Management)
FVT (Federation Verification)
Federation Management / IntegratorNC3A
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 20
Challenges that the “E.COMbat”-Challenges that the “E.COMbat”- community should address community should address
1.1. Maximum use of commercial and industrial Maximum use of commercial and industrial standards standards
2.2. ““State of the art” modelling and simulation State of the art” modelling and simulation technologies to address NRF’s training technologies to address NRF’s training challengeschallenges
3.3. Experimentation, concept validation and Experimentation, concept validation and DOTMLPFI- certification using networked DOTMLPFI- certification using networked battlelabs, demonstrations and exercisesbattlelabs, demonstrations and exercises
Test and ValidationTest and ValidationDECONFLICTDECONFLICT COORDINATECOORDINATE INTEGRATEINTEGRATE COHERENT Effects-BasedCOHERENT Effects-Based
OperationalOperational
Interagen
cyLand Forces
Air Forces
SOFMaritim
eForces
Land Forces
Air Forces
SOFMaritim
eForces
Land Forces
Air Forces
SOFMaritim
eForces
Multination
Multination
alal
CommunciateCommunciate& Inform& Inform
Collaborate Collaborate & Plan & Plan
Sense Sense & Respond& Respond
Implementation Themes
Experiment, test and validate net-ready criteria Experiment, test and validate net-ready criteria (Interoperability Performance Parameters) during the NNEC (Interoperability Performance Parameters) during the NNEC development, e.g.:development, e.g.:
Definition of multilevel net-readiness Definition of multilevel net-readiness Information Exchange Requirements (IERs) replaced by Information Exchange Requirements (IERs) replaced by
Network Enterprise Services (NES), and Network Enterprise Services (NES), and Network Exchange Requirements (NERs)Network Exchange Requirements (NERs)
Validate systems against the developed net-ready criteriaValidate systems against the developed net-ready criteria
In previous years known as Joint Warrior In previous years known as Joint Warrior Interoperability DemonstrationInteroperability Demonstration
2004 / 2005 led by US NORTHCOM2004 / 2005 led by US NORTHCOM
2006 / 2007 to be led by US EUCOM (Germany)2006 / 2007 to be led by US EUCOM (Germany)
Participants – Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK, Participants – Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK, US, Republic of Korea, “NATO”US, Republic of Korea, “NATO”
Execution at multiple sites within each country in Execution at multiple sites within each country in June, runs on CFBLNetJune, runs on CFBLNet
NATO UNCLASSIFIED 26
Service Oriented Architecture for Service Oriented Architecture for STGP:STGP:Bringing together the worlds of MIP, Bringing together the worlds of MIP, CAESAR, NIRIS and othersCAESAR, NIRIS and others
NATO SECRETNetwork
Environment(XML overTCP/IP)
NATO SECRETNetwork
Environment(XML overTCP/IP)
End Users
ISR Platforms (e.g. JSTARS, ASTOR)
via CAESAR Shared Database
Passive Observation (Unattended)
Sensor
Service Registry
Web
Services
Interface
Web Services
Interface
(Note that development of Interfaces means NO significant changes to existing systems!)