Page 1
MODULE II
EMULSION
PRACTICUM REPORT
RESERVOIR FLUIDS
NAME : Hangga Yudha Wibisono
STUDENT ID NUMBER : 12213083
GROUP : 9 (Shift Friday Afternoon)
PRACTICUM DATE : 7 November 2014
SUBMISSION DATE : 21 November 2014
LECTURER : Ir. Zuher Syihab., M.Sc., Ph.D.
MODULE ASSISTANTS : 1. Wilson Santana 12211023
2. Irianto Petrus Binsardo 12211061
RESERVOIR FLUIDS ANALYSIS LABORATORY
PETROLEUM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
BANDUNG INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
2014
Page 2
1
CONTENT
LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... 2
LIST OF GRAPHS ........................................................................................................ 3
CH. I PREFACE ..................................................................................................... 4
1.1 Practicum Title .................................................................................. 4
1.2 Practicum Objectives ......................................................................... 4
1.3 Principle Theory ................................................................................ 4
1.4 Equipments And Materials ................................................................ 4
CH. II DATA TABULATION ................................................................................ 5
2.1 Data ............................................................................................................ 5
2.2 Data Tabulation .......................................................................................... 5
CH. III DATA ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 12
3.1 Practicum Assumption ..................................................................... 12
3.2 Analysis ........................................................................................... 12
3.2.1 Process Analysis .................................................................. 12
3.2.2 Data Analysis ....................................................................... 13
CH. IV CONCLUSION ........................................................................................... 14
COMMENTS ............................................................................................................... 15
CITATIONS ................................................................................................................ 16
Page 3
2
LIST OF TABLES
page
TABLE 2.1 Volume of Water, Oil, and Emulsion ................................................. 5
2.2 Volume Data at 650 RPM ................................................................... 5
2.3 Volume Data at 850 RPM ................................................................... 6
2.4 Volume Data at 1050 RPM ................................................................. 7
2.5 Volume Data for Chemical Adding .................................................... 8
2.6 Volume Data for Heating Treatment .................................................. 9
Page 4
3
LIST OF GRAPICHS
page
Graphic 2.1 Graph for Water Volume Fraction vs Time at 650 RPM .................... 6
2.2 Graph for Water Volume Fraction vs Time at 850 RPM .................... 7
2.3 Graph for Water Volume Fraction vs Time at 1050 RPM .................. 8
2.4 Graph for Water Volume Fraction vs Time for Chemical Adding ..... 9
2.5 Graph for Water Volume Fraction vs Time for Heating Treatment... 10
2.6 Graph for Comparison of Three Methods of Emulsion Separation ... 11
Page 5
4
CHAPTER I
PREFACE
1.1 Practicum Title
Emulsion
1.2 Practicum Objectives
Understanding how and why emulsion form
Understanding the demulsification process
1.3 Principal Theory
Emulsion is combination between two kind of liquid which is immiscible
(cannot be mixed at normal condition). Generally, emulsion between water and
oil is devided in to Normal Emulsion and Reverse Emulsion. Normal Emulsion
(W/O) is an emulsion that the water act as internal phase (dispersed) and oil act
as external phase. Reverse Emulsion (O/W) is an emulsion that is the opposite
of reverse Emulsion.
There are several condition that is needed to form emulsion:
1. Two immiscible liquid
2. Stirring process
3. Emulsifying agent
In emulsion case ther is emulsifier and demulsifier. Emulsifier is surface
active substance that accelerates the forming process of emulsion by decreasing
the interfacial tension. While demulsifier function is to decrease the effect of
emulsifier.
1.4 Equipments and Materials
1. 3 Beaker Glass 250 cc 5. Stopwatch
2. 4 Beaker Glass 100 cc 6. Crude oil, formation water, and aquades
3. Mixer 7. Demulsifier
4. Bunsen
Page 6
5
CHAPTER II
DATA TABULATION
2.1 Data
Methods
Volume (mL)
Water Oil Emulsion Final Water
Volume
650 RPM 60 40 94 37
850 RPM 60 40 94 37
1050 RPM 60 40 96 35
Demulsifier + 1050 RPM 60 40 95 39,5
Heating + 1050 RPM 60 40 95 40
Table 2.1 Volume of Water, Oil, and Emulsion
2.2 Data Tabulation
2.2.1 Agitation Factor in Emulsion Stability
a. 650 RPM
Initial volume (Total volume) = 94 mL
Time (s) Cumulative Volume of
Water (mL)
Cumulative Volume /
Total Volume
30 13 0,138297872
60 26,5 0,281914894
90 31,5 0,335106383
120 34 0,361702128
150 35 0,372340426
180 36 0,382978723
210 36,5 0,388297872
240 37 0,393617021
270 37 0,393617021
300 37 0,393617021
330 37 0,393617021
360 37 0,393617021
Table 2.2 Volume Data at 650 RPM
Page 7
6
Graphic 2.1 Graph for Water Volume Fraction vs Time at 650 RPM
b. 850 RPM
Initial volume (Total volume) = 94 mL
Time (s) Cumulative Volume of
Water (mL)
Cumulative Volume /
Total Volume
30 8 0,085106383
60 22 0,234042553
90 30 0,319148936
120 34 0,361702128
150 36 0,382978723
180 37 0,393617021
210 37 0,393617021
240 37 0,393617021
270 37 0,393617021
300 37 0,393617021
Table 2.3 Volume Data at 850 RPM
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
WA
TE
R V
OL
UM
E F
RA
CT
ION
TIME (S)
Water Volume Fraction Vs Time
Page 8
7
Graphic 2.2 Graph for Water Volume Fraction vs Time at 850 RPM
c. 1050 RPM
Initial volume (Total volume) = 96 mL
Time (s) Cumulative Volume
of Water (mL)
Cumulative
Volume / Total
Volume
30 0 0
60 14 0,145833333
90 24 0,250000000
120 30 0,312500000
150 33 0,343750000
180 34 0,354166667
210 35 0,364583333
240 35 0,364583333
270 35 0,364583333
300 35 0,364583333
330 35 0,364583333
Table 2.4 Volume Data at 1050 RPM
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
WA
TE
R V
OL
UM
E F
RA
CT
ION
TIME (S)
Water Volume Fraction vs Time
Page 9
8
Graphic 2.3 Graph for Water Volume Fraction vs Time at 1050 RPM
2.2.2 Emulsion Separation by Chemical Adding (Using Demulsifier)
At the first, the emulsion is agitated by mixer on 1050 RPM.
Initial volume (Total volume) = 95 mL.
Table 2.5 Volume Data for Chemical Adding
Time (s) Cumulative Volume of
Water (mL)
Cumulative Volume /
Total Volume
30 10 0,105263158
60 21 0,221052632
90 26 0,273684211
120 29 0,305263158
150 32 0,336842105
180 34 0,357894737
210 36 0,378947368
240 38 0,400000000
270 38,5 0,405263158
300 39 0,410526316
330 39,5 0,415789474
360 39,5 0,415789474
390 39,5 0,415789474
420 39,5 0,415789474
450 39,5 0,415789474
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
WA
TE
R V
OL
UM
E F
RA
CT
ION
TIME (S)
Water Volume Fraction vs Time
Page 10
9
Graphic 2.4 Graph for Water Volume Fraction vs Time for Chemical Adding
2.2.3 Emulsion Separation by Heating Treatment
Time (s)
Cumulative
Volume of Water
(mL)
Cumulative
Volume / Total
Volume
30 0 0
60 5 0,052631579
90 8 0,084210526
120 9 0,094736842
150 10 0,105263158
180 12 0,126315789
210 15 0,157894737
240 18 0,189473684
270 21 0,221052632
300 23 0,242105263
330 26 0,273684211
360 28 0,294736842
390 30 0,315789474
420 32 0,336842105
450 34 0,357894737
480 35 0,368421053
510 36 0,378947368
540 38 0,400000000
570 39 0,410526316
600 39 0,410526316
630 40 0,421052632
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0 100 200 300 400 500
WA
TE
R V
OL
UM
E F
RA
CT
ION
TIME (S)
Water Volume Fraction vs Time
Page 11
10
660 40 0,421052632
690 40 0,421052632
720 40 0,421052632
750 40 0,421052632
Table 2.6 Volume Data for Heating Treatment
Graphic 2.5 Graph for Water Volume Fraction vs Time for Heating Treatment
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
WA
TE
R V
OL
UM
E F
RA
CT
ION
TIME (S)
Water Volume Fraction vs Time
Page 12
11
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
30 120 210 300 390 480 510 540 570
WA
TE
R V
OL
UM
E F
RA
CT
ION
TIME (S)
Water Volume Fraction vs Time
650 RPM 850 RPM 1050 RPM Demulsifier Heating
Graphic 2.5 Graph for Comparison of Three Methods of Emulsion Separation
Page 13
12
CHAPTER III
DATA ANALYSIS
3.1 Practicum Assumption
In this practicum, we use some assumption, in order to make this practicum
more valid. The assumptions we use are :
1. Room temperature and pressure were constant.
2. When we do the separation using heating and demulsifier method, we assume that
gravity doesn’t take many effect .
3. There was no dissolved substance in crude oil (pure).
4. There was no force between the fluids and glass wall.
5. No effect to the emulsion when we pour the emulsion to measuring glass after
agitating.
6. The stirrer of the mixer mix all of the components of emulsion.
7. There is no residue when we pour the crude oil sample and emulsion to the
measuring glass.
3.2 Analysis
3.2.1 Process Analysis
In this practicum, we try to separate emulsion using three methods. The
first method is gravity settling. Here, we let the emulsion to separate naturally using
the different density of the particel. Principal basic of gravity settling is the
heaviest substance will drop to the bottom of mixture during demulsification and
the light substance will be in the top.
The second method, we use demulsifier. Principally, demulsifier will
decrease the power of film layer that separate either oil or water to another.
Demulsifier works in order to make the droplets to flocculate. Tiny droplets will
come closer to each other. Then the droplets or dispersed phase will unite and make
a bigger droplets (coalescence). And finally, the dispersed phase will separate
perfectly from the continue phase.
The last method, we use heat to separate emulsion. The calor we gave will
unstable the emulsion and separate it into two phase. Ideally, the most efficient
method should be demulsifier method.
Page 14
13
3.2.2 Data Analysis
Actually, we didn’t get the data of emulsion separation using the gravity
settling method. We can’t see the separation of emulsion, so we use the other group
data to complete the data.
From the graphic 2.6 above, we can see that the emulsion separation using
gravity settling, which the emulsion we give treatment with agitation at 650 rpm
was faster among the other treatment. This case happened because when the
emulsion stirred faster, the size of the droplet which formed became smaller than
the emulsion which stirred slower. This mean, the emulsion is more stable and the
water would take more time to flocculate and finally separate from the emulsion.
And we can conclude the faster the agitation we gave, it will take more time to
separate the emulsion.
From literature, the most effective method are heating and using
demulsifier (chemical adding). The reason is, when we use heating to separate
emulsion, the kinetic energy of dispersed molecul increase and they will collide
the film layer which prevent the oil molecul and other oil molecul with water
molecul and other water molecul to unite. This cause the stability of emulsion is
disturbed.
However, from the experiment that we have already done, the most
effective separation method is using gravity settling with emulsion which we give
agitation at 650 RPM. The demulsifier didn’t give the most effective method to
separate emulsion. This happen because of the characteristic of the demulsifier
itself. A demulsifier only work specifically with a specific kind of oil, and instead
will be emulsifier to other kind of oil. So, it is possible that the demulsifier and the
oil we use do not match.
CHAPTER IV
Page 15
14
CONCLUSION
1. Emulsion is formed from two different liquid which are immiscible and agitated so
the slighter liquid will be dispersed in the major liquid.
2. The higher speed of agitation we gave, the more stable emulsion is formed.
3. Demulsifying process can be done by heating, gravity settling, and adding
demulsifier.
4. The principal work of heating method is increasing the speed of water particle
because of its kinetic energy, and we hope that the oil molecules or water molecules
collide each other and broke the film layer.
5. Adding demulsifier will make film layer that block dispersed molecule dissolved.
6. Principal work of gravity settling method is different density of two different liquid.
7. Quality of demulsifier influences the demulsifying process. Bad quality and non
suitable demulsifier will make demulsifying process longer.
Page 16
15
COMMENTS
This is my second English week reservoir fluid laboratory session. The pretest
from Bang Wilson and Bang Peter is so hard, and the result, my score and my other
friend’s score from the pretest is really bad. Actually the pretest is not that hard, it is
just the pretest take the problem from McCain book, however our group just study the
things at the module. Well, that become our lesson not to underestimate the pre test.
During the practicum, there are several problem, including we don’t get the data from
gravity settling method, etc. But, overall i really happy with this module, because this
is our last module, and no one got kicked at this module. Thanks to Bang Wilson and
Bang Peter.
Page 17
16
CITATIONS
McCain, William D. Jr. 1990. Properties of Petroleum Fluids: Second Edition.
Oklahoma : PennWell Books
Marhaendrajana, Taufan. 2005. Diktat Kuliah Fluida Reservoir. Bandung : Teknik
Perminyakan ITB
Siagian, Ucok. 2002. Diktat Kuliah Fluida Reservoir. Bandung : Teknik Perminyakan
ITB
Laboratorium Analisa Fluida Reservoir. 2014. Buku Petunjuk Praktikum Fluida
Reservoir. Bandung: TM ITB.