Top Banner
Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i* Constantinos Giannoulis Jelena Zdravkovic
20

Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Nov 28, 2014

Download

Business

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Constantinos GiannoulisJelena Zdravkovic

Page 2: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Overview

Scope of Work & Motivation

Background

Mappings

Case Scenario

Discussion

Future work

Page 3: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Scope of Work & Motivation

Business-IT alignment: Understanding gap

o Business Strategy unknown to IT

o Traceability of strategy to IT; changes?

Unified Business Strategy Meta-model (UBSMM)

o Formalize and Unify business strategy formulations

• Complement existing alignment methods on the strategy side

• Allow mappings between Strategy and Enteprise models

Page 4: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Background

Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards (SMBSC)

Models business strategy

Addresses goals across one organization

i* Primarily used within RE

Addresses goals of actors

Page 5: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Background: SMBSC

Page 6: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Strategy Maps Four organizational perspectives of

Balanced Scorecards (BSC): financial, customer, internal, learning and growth

Both external & internal (all business activities)

Structure: Cause-effect links/assumptions

Build top-down (causality is bottom-up)

Communicate direction and priorities

Balanced Scorecards Objectives

Measures,

Targets,

Actions/Action Plan, budget, etc.

Background: SMBSC

Page 7: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Background: The SMBSC Meta-model

(Giannoulis et al., 2011)

Page 8: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Includes all elements of Strategy Maps and BSC

Generalizes some elements for applicability (Groups)

Introduces explicitely user defined groups and perspetives

Separates classes and instances (application)

Constraints expressed in a structured manner

Background: The SMBSC Meta-model

Page 9: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Background: The i* unified Meta-model

(Lucena et al., 2008)

Page 10: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Includes all elements of i*

Captures two variants of i*

o i*/Trento

o i*/Yu

(Lucena et al., 2008)

Background: The i* unified Meta-model

Page 11: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

MappingsSMBSC i*

Strategy Map SD, SR

GroupPerspectiveGroup Type

Actor

Goal GoalSoft-goal

Objective Goal

Measure -

Milestone Goal

Target Goal

Initiative TaskPlanResource

Theme Critical Dependencies

Page 12: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Case Scenario: ABB Industrie, PF Unit

(Ahn, 2001)

Page 13: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Case Scenario: The SD model

Page 14: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Case Scenario: The SR model

Page 15: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Case Scenario: ABB Industrie, PF Unit

Page 16: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

i* used for early RE can benefit from strategical input via our mappings,

Supports the identification of sets of goals need to be met by particular IT project that influence strategy as inititiatives in SMBSC. Then refined into IT project goals,

Both variants of the i’ meta-model are supported

Discussion: on the mappings

Page 17: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Measures have not been mapped to i*, though implicitely used when expressing goals in i* originating from SMBSC milestones and targets (e.g. End of 1st year: 1 realized process optimization, etc.),

Sequences; objectives, milestones, targets in SMBSC are not supported in i*; Precedence links could facilitate and not result the multiple mean-end links,

Means-end links: some variants of i* allow them between goals (i* meta-model), whereas i* wiki does not,

Using i* for SMBSC provides orDecompositions (i* meta-model), allowing to express possible alternatives for initiatives,

i*’s contribution links could be used in SMBSC to identify possible conflicts, synergies, etc.

Discussion: overall

Page 18: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Evaluate the mappings with cases including both strategy and RE

Provide Mappings towards other formalized business strategy formulations, such as the Value Configuration.

Future Work

Page 19: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

Constantinos Giannoulis

o [email protected]

o http://constantinos.blogs.dsv.su.se/

Jelena Zdravkovic

o [email protected]

o http://jelena.blogs.dsv.su.se/

Questions?

Page 20: Modeling Strategy Maps & Balanced Scorecards using i*

(Giannoulis et al., 2011) Giannoulis, C., Petit, M., Zdravkovic, J.: Modeling Business Strategy: A Meta-model of Strategy Maps and Balance Scorecards. In: 5th IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS2011) (2011)

(Lucena et al., 2008) Lucena, M., Santos, E., Silva, C., Alencar, F., Silva, M.J., Castro, J.: Towards a unified metamodel for i*. In: 2nd International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2008), pp.237–246 (2008)

(Ahn, 2001) Ahn, H.: Applying the Balanced Scorecard Concept: An Experience Report. Long Range Planning, vol. 34, pp. 441-461 (2001)

References