Top Banner
Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey
29

Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Dec 17, 2015

Download

Documents

Tabitha Lee
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter

Design Alternatives

Hung Li Chung

Viknish Krishnan Kutty

Uday Kolluri

Faculty Advisor:

Dr. Helmut Strey

Page 2: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Schematic of Chromosome Sorter

Focusing Region

Hydrodynamic Dielectrophoretic

Narrow Microchannel Design

Fluorochrome Dye (DAPI, TOTO/YOYO)Software (Banding, Moment of Inertia)

Integrated microvalves & micropumpsDielectrophoretic Switch

Stream Driving Force Syringe PumpElevation Driven Flow

Page 3: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Elevation Driven Flow

Therefore when there is a difference in elevation, a pressure difference will be generated due to the weight of the liquid itself.

P gh

Syringe PumpDriving Force Alternatives

Page 4: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Schematic of Chromosome Sorter

Focusing Region

Hydrodynamic Dielectrophoretic

Narrow Microchannel Design

Fluorochrome Dye (DAPI, TOTO/YOYO)Software (Banding, Moment of Inertia)

Integrated microvalves & micropumpsDielectrophoretic Switch

Stream Driving Force Syringe PumpElevation Driven Flow

Page 5: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Background: Chromosome Size

Page 6: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Focusing Alternative: Narrow Microchannel Design

Approximately, chromosome width and height are 1 μm

Chromosome length of 1 ~ 10 μm

Channel dimension of 10 μm x 2 μm (width x height)

Satisfy the criteria that the width to height ratio must be less than 10 to 1 (for silicon rubber) to prevent it from collapsing.

Page 7: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Focusing Alternative: Hydrodynamic Focusing

Page 8: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Flow Speed

v = average velocity of flow

h = height of the channel

η = viscosity

ΔP = pressure difference

l = length of the channel

2

12

h pv

l

5 226

42

110 /2.0 10 4 4.17 10 / 417 /

12 0.001 / (2.0 10 )

N mmv m s m s

kg m s m

417 2 10 46000 0.38Volume m m m l

Page 9: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Stokes-Einstein diffusion coefficient

Rc

TKD B

KB = Boltzmann’s constant (1.38 x 10-23 J/K)

T = absolute temperature

c = hydrodynamic constant (4 for slip and 6 for stick condition)

η = viscosity

R = radius of the solute

tDx

Page 10: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Calculation: Stokes-Einstein diffusion coefficient

21

15 2

6

4.11 101.67 10 /

6 0.01 / 1.3 10BK T J

D m sc R g cm s m

15 2 81.67 10 /s 2 5.79 10 0.058x m s m m

Page 11: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Dielectrophoresis - Background

• In 600 B.C. Thales of Miletus noticed that amber charged by friction attracted small particles

• We now know that the attraction is due to polarization of the small particles induced by the charged amber

This is an example of Dielectrophoresis

• Dielectrophorisis - Phenomenon where a force is exerted on a charge inducible particle when it is subjected to a non-uniform electric field

•Non-uniform field may be created by having an AC field, with different frequencies

Page 12: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Dielectrophoresis(Basic Concepts)

------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------

+ -

+ -

+ -

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Neutral body is

polarized

+

Uniform Field

Page 13: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Dielectrophoresis(Basic Concepts)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

+ + + +

+

Non-uniform Field

- +- + -

Polarized Neutral Body:

Pulled toward the strongest field

region

Page 14: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Focusing Alternative – Dielectrophoretic Flow Narrowing

A

• See A in figure

• Interdigitated electrodes create an electrical field with unlike charges

• Chromosomes get polarized--- centered

• Similar can be implemented into the narrowing phase of our system

•Actual experiments needed to determine strength of electrical field

‘-’ ve electrode ‘-’ ve electrode

Page 15: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Schematic of Chromosome Sorter

Focusing Region

Hydrodynamic Dielectrophoretic

Narrow Microchannel Design

Fluorochrome Dye (DAPI, TOTO/YOYO)Software (Banding, Moment of Inertia)

Integrated microvalves & micropumpsDielectrophoretic Switch

Stream Driving Force Syringe PumpElevation Driven Flow

Page 16: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Fluorescence: Background

• Emission of secondary light (different color / λ) due to excitation by UV light.

• It occurs naturally due to fluorescent materials (e.g. chlorophyll) or due to artificial dyes, or flurochromes, that are used to stain cell components.

• Flurochrome dyes are highly specific in their attachment to specific cell components.

• A UV light source, epifluorescent microscope and specific filter cubes - which consists of a dichoric mirror, excitation filter and emission filter – are needed for fluorescence microscopy.

• The filter cube is specific to the flurochrome that is used (i.e. excitation/emission λ)

• Advantages of fluorescence microscopy: high sensitivity and specificity, real-time detection, multiplex labeling. Disadvantages: photo-bleaching.

Page 17: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Properties of Common Dyes

Page 18: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Blue Fluorescent Chromosome Dyes

DAPI

Binds selectively to dsDNA

Semi-permeant to live cells

Forms a fluorescent complex when it binds to A-T rich sequences of DNA.

DAPI emits light in the blue wavelengths, generally around 460nm.

Low fluorescence emission but fluorescence greatly increases in presence of detergents, dextran sulfate, polyphosphates, and polyanions.

Hoechst

Widely used to stain nuclei of living cells.

Also show A-T selectivity, but have much more complex DNA affinities

These dyes are generally excited near the UV range of light (about 360nm), and emit light in the blue range at around 460nm (same as DAPI)

Hoechst 33342 is commonly used to stain living cells due to its membrane permeability.

Page 19: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

DAPI

Page 20: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Green Fluorescent (Cyanine) Chromosome Dyes: YOYO & TOTO

Dimers of thiazole orange (TOTO) and oxazole yellow (YOYO).

High quantum efficiency, and specificity for DNA and RNA.

Enable “extremely sensitive” flow cytometric analysis and chromosome isolation.

Counterstain for immuno-fluorescent staining of chromatin in the nuclei of developing embryos.

Studies have used cyanine dyes to examine cell-cycle dependent changes in chromatin structure.

Dual wavelength excitation of either TOTO-1 or YOYO-1 dye stained chromosomes reportedly permit specific chromosomes to be identified and sorted.

Page 21: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Imaging & Chromosome Identification

>> cool('template.bmp');

area =

116125

Imax =

2.2377e+012

Imin =

1.2752e+012

>> cool('template_2.bmp');

area =

115771

Imax =

2.2383e+012

Imin =

1.2782e+012

>> cool('template_4.bmp');

area =

115819

Imax =

2.1994e+012

Imin =

1.2918e+012

>cool('template_1.bmp');

area =

116125

Imax =

2.2377e+012

Imin =

1.2752e+012

Original translation translation + rotation arm movement

% error (Imax/Imin) 0%/0% 0.03%/0.24% 1.71%/1.3%

Page 22: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Schematic of Chromosome Sorter

Focusing Region

Hydrodynamic Dielectrophoretic

Narrow Microchannel Design

Fluorochrome Dye (DAPI, TOTO/YOYO)Software (Banding, Moment of Inertia)

Integrated microvalves & micropumpsDielectrophoretic Switch

Stream Driving Force Syringe PumpElevation Driven Flow

Page 23: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Sorting Alternative: Integrated micro-valves and micro-pumps

Multilayer soft lithography has been used to create integrated sorting devices using silicon elastomers.

Incorporated monolithic switching valves, dampers, and peristaltic pumps are used for sorting, sample dispensing, flushing and recovery.

In a typical two-layer system, the bottom layer consists of the fluidic line where the sample will be introduced and the top layer has the control lines for the valves and pumps.

Page 24: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Integrated micro-valves and micro-pumps: Technical Considerations

By altering the properties of the elastomer, flow velocity of the cell sorters can be altered. Max. flow velocity range: 6-17.5 mm/s.

Rate-limiting step of integrated sorting device (aside from image analysis) is the intrinsic valve response time for opening and closing, which is ~5 ms.

Active volume of the smallest valve on integrated sorter is 1 pL. (Total volume of 46,000 chromosomes is approx. 8.34 pL)

High throughput, but low yield. Capable of sort ~48,000 cells in 3 h (44 cells/s), but with only 40% recovery.

Page 25: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Sorting Alternative: Dielectrophoresis(Background)

• Motion of particle : forces on vertical and horizontal component

•Vertical motion:

•FDEP - function of polarizability and strength of electrode

• Fbuoyancy – negligible due electrode strength

•f - friction factor: α viscosity of fluid, shape of particle and size

Page 26: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Dielectrophoresis(Background Cont’d)

• Horizontal Motion:

• ux- velocity profile of a parabolic flow – dependent on viscosity of fluid, pressure drop and height of channel

• FDEP – function of polarizability and strength of electrode

• f - friction factor: α viscosity of fluid, shape and size of particle

• From Vx and Vynet displacement of particles are tabulated

Equations act as a guide --- experimentation needed for getting

accurate values of different parameters.

Page 27: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

DielectrophoresisSorting Principle

B

• See B in figure

• Non-uniform electrical field is created

• Chromosomes are maneuvered

•Based on nature of fluid, shape and size of particles, polarizability, and the electrical field

Page 28: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

Alternative sorting approaches with Dielectrophoresis

• 3 phases of design

1) narrowing 2) identification 3) sorting

• We may possibly use dielectrophoresis to combine the identification and sorting phase

DEP ‘+/-’ve

Page 29: Microfluidics Chromosome Sorter Design Alternatives Hung Li Chung Viknish Krishnan Kutty Uday Kolluri Faculty Advisor: Dr. Helmut Strey.

References

http://www.biologia.uniba.it/rmc/0-1a_pagina/9-2_Chromosome-size.html

http://bioweb.wku.edu/courses/BIOL115/Wyatt/Nucleic_Acids/Mgk.jpg

http://www.kdscientific.com/Products/KDS100/kds100.html

Holmes D, Green NG, Morgan H. “Microdevices for dielectrophoretic flow-through cell separation.” IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2003 Nov-Dec;22(6):85-90.