Top Banner
1 MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger Heat Exchanger Milnes David Tarun Khurana Christopher Anderson
10

MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

Jan 19, 2016

Download

Documents

Zander_

MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger. Milnes David Tarun Khurana Christopher Anderson. Process Flow. Diffusion Clean Oxide Growth Al. Sputter Backside Pattern (heaters & sensors) Al Etch Ashing PRX 1000 Clean Backside LTO deposition Backside protect Front-side Oxide Etch (HF) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

1

MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger Heat Exchanger

Milnes David

Tarun Khurana

Christopher Anderson

Page 2: MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

2

Process Flow

1. Diffusion Clean

2. Oxide Growth

3. Al. Sputter

4. Backside Pattern (heaters & sensors)

5. Al Etch

6. Ashing

7. PRX 1000 Clean

8. Backside LTO deposition

9. Backside protect

10. Front-side Oxide Etch (HF)

11. Front-side pattern (channels)

12. Front-side channel etch (STSDRIE)

13. Backside pattern (bond pads)

14. Pad etch

Page 3: MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

3

Process Layout

15. Backside pattern (through etch)

16. Through etch (STS DRIE)

17. Final released device

18. Adhesive coat on transfer substrate

19. Contact printing of adhesive

20. Membrane attachment via UV curing

21. Attachment of patterned double sticky tape (vapor channel)

22. Top cover integration

Page 4: MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

4

Images of the Heaters and Sensor

open bond pads

Page 5: MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

5

Typical Defects

1. Shorts (bridging)

2. Voids

3. Scratches – due to handling errors, motivates thicker LTO deposition (5000 A)

Page 6: MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

6

Resistance Measurements

4.4

5.0

367

? 381383 43424438943

410

400

? 385

393

150

397

401

250

380

506

423

Ground lines = 4.7 ± 0.4

Sensors = 392 ± 15

Heaters = 43 ± 0.8

In all cases resistance is almost twice as high as predicted.

Page 7: MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

7

LTO300 Deposition

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Boat Position

Dep

osi

tio

n (

A/m

in)

Dummy

Good

Average dep rate:

alternate arrangement = 58 A/min

Consecutive arrangement = 40 A/min

Average etch rate pad-etch rate:

LTO oxide = 3540 A/min

Thermal oxide = 400-600 A/min

Page 8: MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

8

STS issues

• STS down for a month, expected to be up by 1st week of Aug.• Alternatives Pursued:

– Getting trained on STS2 (through-etch still not possible)– Outside DRIE and machining service vendors

• American precision dicing (can do through etch features)• Laserod laser machining (~ $200 per wafer)• ISSYS• Honeywell MEMS foundry• IMT

– Investigated UC-Berkeley and UCSB fab• Training and qualification time is an issue (about a week in each case)

– Investigating wet etch options (KOH or TMAH)• Requires oxide or nitride as mask• Significant undercutting can result in much larger features

– Changing process flow to perform pad etch first to save time.– Created back-up device in Copper.

Page 9: MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

9

Design of Copper Device

Page 10: MEMS Two-Phase Vapor Escape Heat Exchanger

10

Thanks!

Questions?