MDR/XDR TB “The growing menace” NE TB Controllers Conference October 12 th , 2011 C. Scott Mahan, MD Director, Cuyahoga County TB Program TB Consultant, ODH
MDR/XDR TB “The growing menace”
NE TB Controllers Conference October 12th, 2011 C. Scott Mahan, MD Director, Cuyahoga County TB Program TB Consultant, ODH
Overview
• Define MDR/XDR TB
• Epidemiology
• How does resistance emerge?
• MDR/XDR in developing world
• MDR/XDR in the U.S.
TB drug resistance-definitions-WHO, 2010 Drug resistant TB- resistant to one of the 1st line tb
drugs: H,R,E,or Z MDR TB: resistant to H and R XDR TB : resistant to H,R, FQ, and to at least one
second line injectable agent (kanamycin, amikacin or capreomycin).
Primary resistance- patient has never received TB therapy previously
Secondary- resistance during therapy or after prior treatment for drug susceptible TB
Prevalence of MDR among new TB cases. (WHO, 2006)
2010 WHO estimates: 440,000 cases MDR in 2008
150,000 deaths
3.6% of overall TB cases
MDR-TB Among Previously Treated TB Cases, 2006- WHO
6
*2010: 58 countries with at least one case of XDR *5 4% of MDR are XDR
From 1993-2007: Primary XDR=48 cases, acquired XDR=33. No confirmed cases in 2009.
How does resistance emerge? 1. Spontaneous mutations
2. Selective pressure- inappropriate tx (within weeks)
3. Primary transmission of resistant TB to contacts
Adapted from Iseman, 2000
10
Spontaneous mutations develop as bacilli proliferate to >108
Drug Mutation Rate Rifampin 10-8
Isoniazid 10-6 Pyrazinamide 10-6
11
INH RIF PZA
INH
Drug-resistant mutants in large bacterial population
Multidrug therapy: No bacteria resistant to all 3 drugs
Monotherapy: INH-resistant bacteria proliferate
12
INH RIF
INH
Spontaneous mutations develop as bacilli proliferate to >108
INH mono-resist. mutants killed, RIF-resist. mutants proliferate MDR TB
INH resistant bacteria multiply to large numbers
KwaZulu-Natal Province, SA, 2005
What were are trying to avoid: KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa
• Outbreak of XDR TB in 2005 in HIV infected persons
• 544 culture confirmed cases of TB: (221) 40% MDR, 53 (10%) XDR.
• Of those with XDR TB 44 were tested for HIV and all were positive.
• 52 of 53 with XDR died within a median of 16 days from presentation. 16 of these received HAART.
KwaZula-Natal in the interim • Moodley et al, PloS ONE, 2011 • Cross-sectional study using KZN TB
laboratory databases. Sputum cx + from 1/2006- 7/2007.
• 20,858 patients from 1 of 73 hospitals had +cx for MTB.
• 4170 (20%) had MDR, 443 (2%) had XDR • Only 1429 of MDR- TB were seen at
referral hospital
A representation of the limited knowledge of the extent of MDR TB in KwaZulu-Natal Province, 2006
Friedland, 2008
High mortality due to MDR and XDR TB in Tugela Ferry (2005–2007)
The top curve represents MDR TB mortality (67 percent), and the bottom curve represents XDR TB mortality (82 percent). Gandhi et al., 2009.
Factors influencing drug resistance
• Poor public health programs. • Poor adherence to DOT. • Wide availability of TB drugs-OTC in many
countries. -highest drug resistance in
intermediate countries. • HIV- no proof of increased risk for TB drug
resistance…but some associations with resistance epidemiologically (in KZN province 90% of MDR/XDR cases have HIV)
What is needed to combat MDR/XDR TB epidemic from growing? • Rapid methods for diagnosis of drug
resistant TB- particularly in areas with a high incidence of MDR TB .
• New treatment options.
• Will need to provide high burden countries with adequate funding.
Rapid diagnosis • Liquid culture- BACTEC/ MGIT • MODS- inverted microscopy- looks for cording- results,
including initial susceptibilities within 7 days vs. 22 days for liquid, and 68 days for solid, (Moore et al., NEJM, 2006)
• Molecular methods: Line probe assays- on smear positive specimens. High sensitivity and specificity for detection of
rifampin (+/- INH) resistance. Requires DNA extraction and amplification facilities or self contained system-$$$.
• NAAT- Gen-Probe (determine MTB complex on smear positive)-labor intensive.
• Strip based ( detects TB specific antigens in positive cultures- Capila TB- inexpensive
• *serologic method(-( JID,2009- Abs to cell wall protein- ptrp) • *Urine assay- antigen detection for LAM
What are some really excited about?
• Gene Xpert MTB/RIF
• Automated molecular test for MTB and rifampin resistance
• Heminested real-time PCR (DNA amplification)
NEJM, 2010 • Tested on 1730 patients in Peru, Azerbaijan, South Africa
and India • compared solid and liquid culture versus Xpert MTB/RIF
test • Identified 98.2% with smear + TB and 72.5 with smear
negative TB. • If 3 sputums for analyzed by Xpert test sensitivity
increased to 90.2% on smear negative. • Identified 97.6% with rifampin resistant bacteria. • Results in < 2 hours
Funded by FIND
Cepheid Gene Xpert MTB/RIF test • • sputum smear +, or smear - • • simple 1-step external sample prep. procedure • • time-to-result < 2 h • • throughput: > 16 tests / day / module • • no need for biosafety cabinet • • integrated controls- easy to use • Performance • • specific for MTB • • sensitivity better than smear, similar to culture • • detection of rif-resistance via rpoB gene • Obstacles in resource poor settings: initial start up cost for device,
reliable power supply, operating temps <30 Celsius.
Dr. Leonid Heifets- “Will still need micro lab”…(other DST, second line agents… will need culture growth)
New drugs in the pipeline • High dose rifampin or rifapentin • Fluoroquinolones- Levo and Moxi. (good early and late eba,
moxi substitution for INH in intensive phase –some evidence of increased 2 month culture conversion)
• Diarylquinolone (TMC-207) –inhibits mycobacterial ATP synthetase- very effective in mouse models- phase IIb human studies- (48% vs 9% cx conversion)-(NEJM,2009)
• Nitrofuranylamides: PA-824-and OPC-67683- inhibit cell wall synthesis- both effective in mouse models with evidence for tx shortening- now in phase II studies
• SQ109- congener of ethambutol- but effective in ethambutol resistant strains- Phase 1 studies
• PNU-100480- oxazolidinones (like linezolid)- much greater activity than linezolid in mouse model. In phase 1.
• AZD5847- oxazolidinone
Need for Financial Support • WHO: medications 50-200x greater than for drug
susceptible TB
• All cost total 10X the cost. (very variable)
- Peru: standardized MDR regimen cost
$2381 (Suarez, Lancet, 2002)
- In U.S. –estimates range up to $250,000
- According to Stop TB Partnership’s Global Plan to Stop TB: 1.3 million cases will need to be treated in 27 high burden countries between 2010-2015 at a cost of $16.2 billion, current funding in 2010 in these countries is <$0.5 billion.
What about here in the U.S.A? • 34 yo male from Moldova.
• >8 months of NS, intermittently productive cough, 15 lb wt loss, anorexia and fatigue.
• Seen in FL –felt to have copd/bronchitis- tx with antibiotics without improvement. CT chest 6/09 with LLL cavitary lesion. Failed 3rd round of antibiotics in Ohio before TB considered. TST placed- read as 25 mm.
• SH: neighbor with TB in Moldova 2 years prior, married, 5 year old daughter
• Sputum smears + 7/1 -7/3/09 x 3. amplified DNA probe positive for MTB complex. HIV negative
• Referred to TB clinic 7/15/09. .
X-Ray at initial visit to TB clinic
Case continued • Started HREZ. (7/15/09). • Seen 8/14/09. little change in symptoms.
Still smear positive. No change in meds made.
• 8/20/09: Susceptibilities from 7/1/09 specimen: INH resistant (0.2 ug/ml and 1.0 ug/ml), rifampin – R , ethambutol – susceptible.
• What to change to?
Changes made 8/25/09 • Changed to: ethambutol, pza, moxifloxacin, amikacin,
ethionamide. • Asked ODH to do second-line susceptibilities on 7/1/09
specimen: • 9/17/09: result from ODH: resistant to ethambutol,
rifampin, INH, streptomycin, ethionamide. • Susceptible to ; cipro, capreomycin, PAS, ofloxacin,
amikacin, and pza. • 10/1/09: changed to PZA, moxi, amikacin, PAS, linezolid. (we asked ODH to do linezolid, clofazamine, clarithro, and
PZA susceptibilities from 8/15/09 specimen) • 10/24/09: ODH report: susceptible to linezolid,
clofazimine, clarithromycin, PZA. ( no change made to regimen)
11/2, 11/5, 11/6- afb smear negative x 3. tolerating meds
Treatment principles • Never add a single drug to a failing regimen-
preferably add 3 or more potentially active agents.
• DOT, adherence is key. Consider monitoring drug levels.
• MDR/XDR TB – consider surgery. (resistance to all 1st line agents, less than 4 second-line agents are available, localized disease)
• Treatment of 18-24 months after culture conversion with at least 4 effective drugs if possible.
Surgery for MDR/XDR TB • Indications- (Iseman)- 1)persistence of cx + MDR-TB
despite extended drug tx, 2)extensive pattern of resistance, 3) evidence of local disease amenable to resection.
• Pomerantz et al.- Denver- 1983-2000: 172 patients with MDR TB had pulmonary resections. All had minimum of 3 months of antecedent medical therapy: 3.3% operative mortality, 6.8% late mortality, 12% significant morbidity. Only 2% remained sputum positive after operation.
• Dravniece et al., Latvia 1999-2005- 17 persons with XDR TB – 47% cured with adjunctive surgery
Conclusions • MDR/XDR TB is a real threat.
• Globally: resources needed to improve public health delivery (DOT, DOTS+), need for new diagnostics, need for new treatment options.
• Management is uniquely challenging both abroad and at home.