MBA 8237 (Public Finance)

Page 1 of 55

BAYERO UNIVERSITY, KANO FACULTY OF SOCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION & ENTERPRENUER SHIP

15th December, 2014 COURSE: MBA 8237 (Public Finance) CLASS: Masters in Business Administration (MBA) Finance and Investment Option (Full Time

Regular, Full Time Special, Part Time II Regular and Part Time III Special) SESSION/SEMESTER: 2013/2014 Session — Second Semester LECTURER : Kabir Tahir Hamid, PhD., FCIFC, FIDRP CONSULTATION : Strictly by Appointment OFFICE: A8, Department of Accounting, Aminu Alhassan Dantata School of Business, New Campus, Bayero University, Kano A. COURSE DESCRIPTION This course is designed to introduce students to the basic aspects of public finance that would enhance their preparation as public administrators. B. COURSE OBJECTIVES On completion of this course, it is expected that the students will be able to understand: (i) the meaning of public finance management; (ii) the sources of government revenue and expenditure and issues related to them; (iii) expenditure and revenue framework of public sector; (iv) the policy issues surrounding public finance and fiscal policy; (v) the theory of Public Finance, public expenditure, revenue allocation, reasons for increase in

Government expenditure, price stability, full employment; (vi) the principles of taxation and provide detailed causes of internal (domestic) and external

(foreign) debts and external debt management strategies; (vii) the purpose of the Fiscal Responsibility Act and the functions and powers of the Fiscal

Responsibility Commission; (viii) the importance of revenue control techniques and those of Fund Accounting, in the Public

Sector; C. COURSE CONTENTS 1. Introduction to Public Finance 1.1 Meaning of Public Finance 1.2 Nature and Scope of Public Finance 1.3 Functions of Public Finance 1.4 The Role of Taxation in Public Finance 2 Government Revenue 2.1 Meaning of Revenue 2.2 Sources and Classification of Government Revenue 2.3 Taxation as a Source of Government Revenue 3 Public Expenditure 3.1 Meaning of Public Expenditure 3.2 Basic Functions of Government Expenditure 3.3 Purposes of Government Expenditure

Page 2 of 55

3.4 Guiding Principles of Public Expenditure 3.5 Financing Public Expenditure 3.6 The Impact of Government Expenditure 4 Fiscal Policy 4.1 Meaning of Fiscal Policy 4.2 Objectives of Fiscal policy 4.3 Instruments of Fiscal Policy 4.4 Compensatory Fiscal Policy 4.5 Incidence and Effects of Taxes 4.6 Incidence of Commodity Taxation 4.7 Factors Determining the Incidence of Commodity Tax under Perfect Competition 4.8 Effectiveness of Fiscal Policies in Nigeria 5 Government Activity and Economic Development 6 Tax System and Value Added Tax 7 Monetary Policies 8 The Federation Account 9 Monitoring Government Allocation and Expenditures

D. RECOMMENDED TEXT BOOKS (i) Public Finance in Theory and Practice by Musgrave, R.A & Musgrave, P.B. (ii) Principles of Public Sector Accounting and Finance by Jimoh, B. (iii) Public Sector Accounting and Finance by Adams, R.A. (iv) Public Sector Accounting and Finance for Decision-Making by Banmeke, S.A. (v) Public Sector Accounting and Finance by ICAN (vi) Public Sector Accounting by Daniel, G.I. (vii) Theory and Practice of Public Sector Accounting and Finance by Tiku, G.J.D. (viii) Introduction to Public Finance (NOUN) by Anthony I. Ehiagwina (ix) Introduction to Public Sector Accounting and Finance ICAN Pack (x) Monetary Economics, 2nd Edition by Jagdish Handa (xi) Public Financial Management (NOUN) by Mr. E. U. Abianga (xii) Monetary Economics: Theory, Policy and Institutions by Anyanwu, J. C. (xiii) Economic Development in Nigeria (NOUN) by Onyemaechi J. Onwe E. COURSE REQUIREMENTS Every student is required to attend the class regularly and participate actively in group discussions and study group activities. Attendance at lecture is compulsory and at least 75% attendance record is mandatory for a student to qualify to sit for the end of semester examination. F. COURSE DELIVERY STRATEGIES/METHODOLOGY Face to face lectures, multi-media presentation class discussion, group work. The course outline along with the complete lecture notes would be made available to the class and would be posted onto the internet. Students are expected to photocopy (and or download) and read the notes before each lecture for better understanding and effective participation during class discussion.

Page 3 of 55

G. BREAK-DOWN OF GRADING S/No. Type

Scores (%) 1 Assignments 20 2 Continuous Assessment

(Tests) 20

3 Final Examination 60 Total Score 100 The continuous assessment marks are to be absorbed through snap test (s) to be given without notice, scheduled test (s) and/or paper presentation.

Page 4 of 55

INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE 1.1 Meaning of Public Finance Finance is a discipline concerned with the acquisition and disbursement of funds in an optimum way for effective operations and attainment of desired objectives of an organization. Finance is a function in business (private/public) that acquires funds for the organisation and manages those funds within the organisation. These activities include preparing of budgets; doing cash flow analysis; and planning for the expenditure of funds assets. Public finance is the field of economics that deals with budgeting the revenues and expenditures of the public, taxes, public debt and public financial administration. Public Finance, therefore, deals with methods used to finance government expenditure, the characters of such expenditures and the keeping of adequate record for money raised and spent. Essentially, Public Finance deals with acquiring, spending and accounting for revenue and other receipts of the government with a view to ensuring efficiency of the state and the general well-being of the people. It is the study of the role of the government in the economy. In recent years, Public Finance has tended to shift from the traditional taxation and expenditure approach to that of stabilisation and general application of macro-economic models. Economists such as Musgrave and Prese focused on resource allocation, income distribution and stabilisation aspects. In respect of resource allocation, Government plays a paramount role in the economy because of market failure. The stabilization aspect of Public Finance is concerned with achieving macro-economic objectives such as: (a) Economic growth and development. (b) Price stability. (c) Balance of payment equilibrium (d) Equitable distribution of income. (e) Full employment.

The principles of public finance were developed as far back as the period of the classical economists. Most of the early writers on the subject focused on different areas. Adam Smith focused on taxation. David Richard and J. S. Mill laid emphasis on revenue, expenditure and public debt. A.C. Pigou in his own contribution dealt with taxation principles which are based on the theory of 'economic welfare'. He stated that taxes are levied in such a way that the overall marginal sacrifice of taxation is equal to the overall marginal benefit of public expenditure.

Public finance encompasses both positive and normative analysis. Positive analysis deals with issues of cause and effect, for example, “If the government cuts the tax rate on gasoline, what will be the effect on gasoline consumption?” Normative analysis deals with ethical issues, for example, “Is it fairer to tax income or consumption?” Modern public finance focuses on the microeconomic functions of government, how the government does and should affect the allocation of resources and the distribution of income. Public financial management is defined by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) as “the system by which financial management resources are planned, directed and controlled to enable and influence the efficient and effective delivery of public service goals.”

1.2 Nature and Scope of Public Finance The scope of public finance is cover four basic issues, namely (i) government expenditure, (ii) government revenue, (iii) public debt, and (iv) financial management.

(i) Public Revenues: Every government has to make a number of expenditures, both recurrent and capital. For this purpose it has to raise revenues with a view to finance the expenditures and the major share of public revenues is obtained through taxes. Again, government also raises revenue through non-tax sources like fees and penalties. Thus in the science of public finance, different

Page 5 of 55

types of taxes are studied, as well as, the principles of taxation, the burden of taxes, and the system of taxes.

(ii) Public Expenditures: The revenues which a government raises have to be spent on different items. Thus in public finance, the principles of making government expenditures are studied, and the major items of government expenditures. Again, whether the expenditures are diverted to productive fields or non-productive fields, and the effects of public expenditures on the level of income distribution and level of output.

(iii) Public Debt: The government revenues are at times far less than the government expenditures, thus leading to deficit which could necessitates borrowing. The government has to make the traditional as well as the welfare expenditures. In some circumstances, the government expenditures may exceed government revenues, thus necessitating government to depend on public debt. In Public finance, therefore types of public debt that are available to the government are studied; the rate of interest against each source available; the type of bonds the government can issue; and how the government will repay the debt, among others.

(iv) Financial Administration : Financial management is studied in public finance. Financial management deals with how the government prepares budgets, how the budgets are executed, budgetary control process, prudence, transparency and accountability in budget execution and public sector financial management.

A.C. Pigou and Hugh Dalton, in their own contribution to the development of the subject matter of public Finance, proposed taxation principles, which are based on the theory of economic welfare. Essentially, these principles of taxation required the government at the centre to levy taxes in such a way that the overall marginal sacrifices of taxation would be equal to the overall marginal benefits of public expenditure (OMST=OMBPE). The assumption behind this is that welfare would be maximized when expenditure and taxation are carried out in a way such that the benefit obtained from an additional unit of expenditure, is equal to the sacrifice that has to be made when an additional unit of tax is levied.

1.3 Functions of Public Finance The scope of public finance is logically concerned with the operations of the public treasury. It deals with how the public treasury operates as well as the repercussions of the various policies, which the treasury might adopt. Public tax and expenditure measures, affects the economy in a number of ways and may be designed to serve many purposes. The policy objectives which are set forth may be categorized into four, namely: (i) Allocation of resources: The resource allocation aspect in public finance deals with the role of

government in the allocation of resources as a result of market failure. It is a known fact that externalities arise in the economy. Externalities arise because of action by one economic unit which causes a gain or loss in either consumption or production by other non-involved economic units. Clearly, the initiator of the action will not pay the external costs or receive the external benefits unless “there is some form of coercive body” (such as a Government) to allocate either the costs or the benefits. Public Finance is concerned with how Government allocates costs or benefits when externalities arise.

(ii) Adjustment in the distribution of income and wealth: The income distribution aspect of public Finance is concerned with how income is distributed in the economy. Factors of production such as land, labour, capital and entrepreneurship are priced in the market place depending on competitive circumstance and the value of the marginal product. Hence, an individual’s income depends on demand and supply of the factors he has available, plus in some cases, inherited wealth. The resulting income distribution based purely on market pricing may or may not be in line with society’s desires. In this regard, society must determine somehow, the “just” state of income distribution. Some economists have suggested that in order for justice to prevail in the society, income distribution in the economy should

Page 6 of 55

be such that a person should receive the fruits derived from his endowments, others argued that income distribution should be such that total happiness should be maximized. Yet others argued that the aim of income distribution should be egalitarianism, while still others feel that ‘‘justice’’ would be obtained, when the income of the least well off individual in the society is maximized. Public Finance in this regard, is concern with tras1ating these ‘‘rules of justice’’ into a set of policies to distribute income.

(iii) Stabilization of prices and employment: The stabilization aspect in public finance is concerned with how to achieve desirable levels of price stability as well as desirable levels of employment. Without government involvement through fiscal and monetary policies, a typical capitalist economy tends to be subjected to substantial fluctuations. Thus, the economy may be in equilibrium at a level of employment far below what the government desires. When this happens, Government may use fiscal and monetary policies to adjust the economy to the desired levels. Public Finance is concerned with how Government does this.

(iv) Attaining balance of payment equilibrium: Balance of payment is the relationship between visible and invisible import and export of a country over a considerable period of time usually one year. However, when export (which is considered as a + because of the injection of foreign exchange into the economy) is greater than import (which is considered as a- because of letting some part of the economy to go as leakage due to deflation in foreign reserve) balance of a payment is said to be unfavorable. This can be corrected through public finance by embarking on activities which can stimulate export and discourage import to reverse the trend.

1.4 The Role of Taxation in Public Finance The Government of almost every country engages in a number of activities which require the expenditure of funds. In order for the Government to be able to undertake most of these activities, it raises funds through a number of sources taxation. But, taxes are the most important reliable sources of revenue to the government. In every country, there are certain services which the government must provide to the citizens because of their essential nature. The services are essential that, even where individuals are allowed to provide them, they are not allowed to monopolize their supplies or production, so as to ensure their even supply and distribution. The contributions made by individuals and corporate entities in form of taxes, fees and levies therefore serve as the main source of revenue to the government for the supply of such essential services. In this vein, Musgrave and Musgrave (1989) argued that taxation plays three major functions of allocation; stabilization and distribution within an economy. By Allocative function, as spelt out in part 1, section 4 of the Second Schedule of the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, provides for the provision of social goods; ensure adequate sharing of resources between social and private goods and creating proper mix of social goods provision. stabilization function is about maintaining price stability; high level of employment; high and sustainable economic growth as well as the attainment of favorable balance of payments. The 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria has outlined the procedure for disbursing the ‘Distributable Pool Account to the three levels of government as per section 162, subsection 1 and 2. So, distribution function promotes equity in income and wealth distribution thereby attaining of a “just” or “fair” state of distribution. To achieve these goals there is a need to adequately address the incidences of revenue leakages, excesses, abuses and fraud by improving various revenues generating capacities and cash flows thereby minimizing operating expenses. T 1.4.2 Theory of Taxation and Incidence of Taxation Taxes are the most important source of revenue for modern economies. The theory of taxation explores how taxes should be levied to enhance economic efficiency and to promote a “fair” distribution of income. Similarly, policy debates about taxation are usually dominated by the question of whether it burden is

Page 7 of 55

distributed fairly. Suppose that the government levies a tax of one dollar on the sellers of a certain commodity. Suppose that prior to the tax, the price of the commodity is N 20, and that after the tax is levied, the price increases to N21. Clearly, the sellers receive as much per unit sold as he did before. The tax has not made them worse off. Consumers pay the entire tax in the form of higher prices. Suppose that instead, the price increases to N 20.25. In this case, sellers are worse off by 75 cents per unit sold; consumers are worse off by 25 cents per unit sold. The burden of the tax is shared between the two groups. Yet another possibility is that after the tax is imposed, the price stays at N 20. If so, the consumer is no worse off, while the seller bears the full burden of the tax. The statutory incidence of a tax indicates who is legally responsible for the tax. All three cases above have exactly the same statutory incidence. But the situations differ drastically with respect to who really bears the burden. The economic incidence of a tax is the change in the distribution of private real income induced by the tax. The example above suggests that the economic incidence problem is fundamentally one of determining how taxes change prices. In the conventional supply and demand model of price determination, the economic incidence of a tax depends on how responsive supply and demand are to prices.

1.4.2 Definition of Tax Tax may therefore be defined as a compulsory contribution made by individuals and corporate entities for the purpose of financing the expenditure of the government. Taxation is therefore the process of levying and collection of tax from taxable persons. A Tax is a fee charged or levied by a government on a product, income, or activity. If it is levied directly on personal or corporate income, it is called a direct tax. If it is levied on the price of a good or service, then it is called an indirect tax. The main reason for taxation is to finance government expenditure and to redistribute income for economic development of a country 1.4.3 Classification of Taxes There are several bases used in the classification of taxes. However, we shall recognize three broad classifications as follows: (i) Classification based on Tax base; (ii) Classification based on Incidence; and (iii) Classification based on Tax rate. 1.4.3.1 Classification Based on Tax Base A Tax base is the object or item on which tax is collected. This could be income, capital, consumption etc. Within the context of the Nigerian Tax Laws, three (3) bases are identifiable. These are:

(i) Income: These are taxes levied on the income of Individual and companies. In Nigeria, the common classifications are: Personal Income Tax, Companies Income Tax and Petroleum Profit Tax.

(ii) Capital: These are taxes levied on asset. The asset could be human or other forms of assets. The Nigerian Tax Law recognizes two forms of Capital taxation i.e. Capital Gains Tax and Capital Transfer Tax. However, the Federal Government of Nigeria has through the 1996 budget abrogated the Capital Transfer Tax.

(iii) Consumption: These are taxes levied on goods and services. The most common forms of consumption tax in Nigeria are the Value Added Tax, Excise Duties and Customs duties.

1.4.3.2 Classification Based on Incidence of Tax An incidence of tax is the impact of tax on the person who pays tax to the Government. Under this classification of tax, two forms of taxes are evident.

Page 8 of 55

(i) Direct Taxes: These are taxes collected directly from the income of individuals and companies whose incidence and burden is on the individuals or the companies that paid the tax to the Government. Examples are Personal Income Tax, Company Income Tax, Petroleum Profit Tax, Capital Gains Tax, etc.

(ii) Indirect Taxes: These are taxes imposed on the value of goods and services, produced and consumed within the country, imported into the country or exported to other countries, whose burden can be shifted in part or in full by the taxpayer who has paid the tax to the government to the final consumers who do not even know either when they pay the tax or the exact amount of the tax they pay. Examples are Value Added Tax, entertainment tax, import duties, export duties, excise duties, etc. Indirect taxes paid by a company usually reflect in the selling price of the goods and Services to be payable by the consumers, depending on the nature of elasticity of demand of the product and other factors.

1.4.3.3 Classification Based on Tax Rate A Tax rate is the portion of tax base paid as tax. Under this classification, the following can be identified.

(i) Progressive Tax: This is a tax which increases as the tax base (i.e. income or stock of wealth being tax) increases. It is commonly found in income taxation and the aim is to achieve equitable distribution of tax burden. For example Mr. A earns N20,000 taxable income and pays 10% as tax (i.e. N,2000) and Mr. B earns a taxable income of N80,000 and pays 20% as tax (i.e. 16,000). In this situation, income tax is progressive, as the tax rate has direct relationship with the tax base (i.e. they change in the same direction).

(ii) Proportional Tax : This is a tax that remains fixed regardless of change in the tax base. In proportional tax, all tax payers, both the rich and the poor are made to pay the same percentage of their income as tax. For example Mr. A earns N20,000 taxable income and pays 10% as tax (i.e. N,2000) and Mr. B earns a taxable income of N80,000 and pays 10% as tax (i.e. 8,000). In this case, the rich pays more than the poor in absolute terms, even thought the tax rate is fixed percentage of the tax base.

(iii)Regressive Tax: This is the tax which decreases as the tax base (i.e. income or stock of wealth being tax) increases. For example Mr. A earns N20,000 taxable income and pays 10% as tax (i.e. N,2000) and Mr. B earns a taxable income of N15,000 and pays 20% as tax (i.e. 3,000). This tax system is usually imposed as punishment for non-performance in situation where the government created an enabling business environment but the citizens are inherently lazy.

1.4.4 Distinction between Tax and Other Levies There are other payments which resemble tax but are not tax. These payments are:

1. Fees: This is a levy imposed with the aim of reducing the cost of each recurrent service undertaken by the Government in public interest but conferring a significant advantage on the fee payer. E.g. registration fees, court fees, school fees, etc.

2. Licenses: This is a charge by Government to grant permission to a person for the performance of a service. E.g. motor vehicle license fees, broadcasting license fees, business registration fees, etc.

3. Fines: This is a levy imposed as a punishment for breach of law with a view to ensuring future adherence.

However, all these levies above are similar to tax because they are compulsory payments and they also serve as a source of income to the Government, but differ from tax in the sense that taxes are not levied in return for any specific service rendered by the Government to the taxpayer. 1.4.5 Purposes of Taxation Government imposes tax for a number of reasons, which include but not limited to the following:

1. Revenue Generation: Government imposed tax to serve as a source of income which can be used in order to finance the construction of schools, building of roads, bridges, hospitals and markets,

Page 9 of 55

provision of pipe-borne water, provision of social, health and educational facilities, provision for defense and protection of lives and properties and provision of funds for the day-to-day running of government (namely salaries and wages, insurance premium, fueling of cars and generators, maintenance of buildings, electricity and telephone charges, etc).

2. Income Re-Distribution: Tax is an important instrument used by the government income re-distribution. Tax is normally charged at a progressive rate to take resources away from those who have more than they need for good living to provide for those who need more than they have for minimum sustenance. Through the income generated by the government, most of which come from the rich, is used to finance the supply of social, health and educational facilities and services, just to mention but a few, most of which is enjoyed more by the poor than the rich.

3. Economic Stabilization: In periods of cyclical trend in economic activities, tax serves as a means of reducing or increasing the disposable income of the consumer, payment of unemployment benefits, supporting ailing industries, changing the pattern of aggregate demand, aggregate supply, national income and mopping-up excess liquidly to check inflation.

4. Discourage the Consumption of harmful goods and services: Tax is used to discourage the consumption of harmful goods and services. In doing this, a higher rate of tax is imposed on such goods as tobacco and alcohol.

5. Protect Infant Industries: The Government imposes tax on imported goods in the form of customs duties, in order to make their prices higher than locally produced items, with a view to protecting infant industries which are not matured enough to favourably compete with their foreign counterparts.

6. Prevent Dumping: Tariffs are usually imposed by the Government on imported goods in order to prevent deliberate attempt by foreign firms to kill local infant industries with a view to possessing monopoly power in the supply of certain goods.

7. Correct Unfavourable Balance of Payment: Taxes are imposed on imported items with a view to discouraging import and encouraging export so as to correct unfavourable balance of payment. For balance of payment to be favourable it thus demands that visible and invisible exports of a country should exceed her visible and invisible import over a period of time, usually one year.

1.4.6 Principles of Taxation These are the rules, qualities, conditions, standards or yardsticks by which the goodness of a tax system is measured and by which a good tax policy can be formulated. Adams Smith was noted to have been the first person to mention the principles of taxation, but he called them cannons of taxation in his book “The Wealth of Nations” in 1776. Although Adams Smith mentioned only four principles, scholars that came after him made some generally accepted additions. Some of these principles include the following:

1. Principle of Equity : This principle states that a good tax system should be as just as possible by ensuring that all persons who ought to pay the tax are covered by the tax and that each taxpayer pays exactly what is just and equitable considering his circumstance and ability. There are two types of equity i.e. vertical and horizontal equity. Vertical equity is the unequal treatment of taxable persons with varied taxable income. While horizontal equity is the equal treatment of tax payers with the same taxable income.

2. Principle of Economy: This principle states that the cost of collecting tax should not be too high so as to outweigh the benefits derivable from the imposition of tax. For example if it costs a government N9milliom to collect tax revenue of N10million, the tax system is said to lack economy.

3. Principle of Certainty : This principle states that the amount to collect as tax, the time of payment, the mode of payment and the place of payment must be made clear to the tax payer, so that the tax payer is not left at the whims and caprice of the tax authorities. In other words, the taxpayer should be fully informed about taxes to be able to arrive at a conclusion as to the amount of tax payable by him with reference to the provision of the tax law, as well as, to

Page 10 of 55

preventing him from being subjected to cheating by unwanted people and dishonest tax officials.

4. Principle of Convenience: This principle states that tax should be imposed at a time, in a manner and at a place that the taxpayer is in position to pay, so that collection of tax would be easy for the tax administrators. E.g. salary earner should be asked to pay tax when he receive his salary and not at the middle or the end of the month when the salary may have been exhausted. This is why the PAYE (Pay-As-You-Earn) is deducted at source, because it is more convenient than requiring the taxpayer to pay after collection of salary and a farmer should be asked to pay tax when he harvest his crops and not when he is doing the planting or clearing the farm.

5. Principle of Simplicity : This principle states that a good tax system and the tax law should be as simple as possible, both in interpretation and application. This requirement is particularly important in developing economy where the rate of illiteracy is high and where the culture of record keeping has not been imbibed by most small scale entrepreneurs.

6. Principle of Neutrality : This principle states that a good tax system should neither distort the consumption habit nor the production decision of a tax payer. In other words, a good tax system should not interfere with people’s willingness to work, produce, consume, save and invest.

7. Principle of Efficiency: This principle states that a good tax system should make it difficult for tax evasion (i.e. should make it difficult for nonpayment of tax or illegal reduction of one’s tax liability).

8. Flexibility : This principle states that a good tax system and tax law should be such that it can be easily amended when the need arises, without unnecessary protocol.

1.4.7 Tax Laws These are the various legal instruments put in place to ensure the realization of the tax policy objectives of the Governments. The notable ones are:

1. Personal Income Tax Act (PITA) CAP P8 LFN 2004 (as Amended in 2011): This law imposes tax on the income of individual, a partner in partnerships, an executor, a trustee, village or community throughout the Federation.

2. Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) CAP C21 LFN 2004: This law applies in relation to companies throughout the Federation.

3. Petroleum Profits Tax Act (PPTA) CAP P13 LFN 2004: This law applies to companies that engage in petroleum exploration and production throughout the Federation.

4. Capital Gains Tax Act (CGTA) CAP C1 LFN 2004: This law imposes capital gains tax on any capital gains i.e. gains resulting from the disposal of chargeable assets, by both chargeable individuals and corporate entities throughout the Federation.

5. Value Added Tax Act (VATA) CAP V1 LFN 2004: This is a multi stage tax levied on the value of some selected goods and services that are consumed within the country.

6. Education Tax Act (ETA) CAP E4 LFN 2004: This law imposes tax on the assessable profit of all registered companies throughout Nigeria in order to raise funds for the educational sector.

7. Stamp Duties Act (SDA) CAP S8 LFN 2004: The law imposes tax on documents throughout Nigeria.

2. Government Revenue 2.1 Introduction Government generates revenue from various sources to run its administration machinery and to provide the development projects in all sectors of the economy. Such revenues are generated by the revenue generation agencies and organizations through effective machinery, and allocated through the budgetary system to the spending organizations for their operations. A good system of revenue generation is paramount to ensure that government mobilizes enough financial resources to meet its expenditure programs.

Page 11 of 55

2.2 Meaning of Public Revenue Public revenue could be defined as the funds required by the government to finance its activities. Such funds are generally obtained from various sources, such as taxes, borrowing, fees, fines, income from public undertakings, sales of government assets, rents, mining and royalties, etc. It may be useful, however, to make a distinction between public revenue and public receipts. While public receipt include all sources of income available to the government, public revenue is of much narrower part and does not include borrowing, sale of government assets or income from “printing press” (printing of more money by the CBN). Revenues accruing to an economy, such as Nigeria, can be divided into two main categories, namely oil revenue (which include petroleum profit tax, rent, royalties, and Nigerian National Petroleum Company earnings) and non-oil revenue( include trade income, company income tax, customs and excise duties, and independent revenue sources which consists of fees, licenses, rent on government property, among others). For most of the 1960s, federally-collected revenue was largely revenue from non-oil sources, accounting for an average of 92 percent of the total receipts while revenue from the oil sources accounted for the balance. As can be deduced from the narration of the oil disposition from the 1970s to this day, the non-oil sector revenue accounted for the balance of about 20 to 30 percent receipts annually, to complement the oil sector receipts which form the mainstay of the sources receipts of Federal Republic of Nigeria. Since the 1970s oil revenue became the dominant source of government revenue, contributing over 70 per cent of federally- collected revenue. For most of the 1960s, federally-collected revenue from oil sources accounted for an average of 8 percent of total receipts. The oil boom of the 1970s propelled the sector to become dominant, accounting for most of the foreign exchange earnings as well as federally-collected revenue. The contribution of the oil sector to total receipts increased from average of about 46 percent between 1970 and 1973 to about 77 percent between 1974 and 1980. Through-out the 1980s and 1990s, the contribution of the oil sector to total revenue maintained its dominant position and contributed between 70 and 76 percent of the federally-collected revenue. In addition to the above, Oshisami (1994) categorized revenue accruing to the Government into internally generated revenue and revenue allocation from the Federation Account. There are two main sources via which revenue accruing to the Federation gets to the States and Local governments. These are statutory allocation and non-statutory allocation. The later takes the form of grants as may be deemed fit by the Federal Government to help pursue a policy which in the opinion of the Federal Government should be to the benefit of the country as a whole. Statutory allocation on the other hand is prescribed by law, specifying the basis for distribution of the revenue amongst the three tiers of government, the formulae for distribution and modes of distribution. 2.3 Sources and Classification of Federal/State and Local Government Revenue 2.3.1 Sources of Federal/State Government Revenue Sources of federal/ state government revenue in Nigeria are as follows: (i) Taxes: These refer to the levy collected by the government mostly in the form of company income tax,

petroleum profit tax, value-added tax, education tax (applies to companies), capital gains tax (individuals are under states while corporate bodies and Abuja residents under federal), stamp duties (instruments executed by individuals are states and corporate bodies under federal), withholding tax (individuals under states and companies under federal), personal income tax (residents of the state are under states while personnel of the armed forces, police, external affairs ministry, and residents of Abuja are under the federal), taxes on pool bets, lottery and casino wins, and customs and excise duties (i.e., import and export duties). According to the principles of public finance, tax revenue should be the main source of finance for the public sector. Citizens should be the main contributors of finance for the development of the Nation.

Page 12 of 55

(ii) Non-Tax Revenue: This is made up of all revenues, other than taxes, that are generated by government to finance its expenditures. These include fines, fees and rates, licenses, earnings from sales, rent from government properties, interest payment and repayment of loans, re-imbursement, statutory grant and miscellaneous revenue. a) Fines, Fees and Rates: This include fines imposed on individual, school fees collected from

students, water rate collected from consumers, etc. b) Licenses: These cover amount received for issuance of licenses of various types by the government,

e.g. vehicle licenses, business premises and registration fees in urban and rural areas. c) Earnings from Sales: These cover money realized from the sale of government properties e.g. sale

of government vehicles, houses, earnings from oil sales, etc. d) Rent of Government Properties: These include rent of government houses / quarters and land etc. e) Interest Payment and Repayment of Loan: These are interest payments by government

employees and government companies, on loans granted by the government, e.g. payment of interest on motor vehicle loan and the repayment of the loan itself.

f) Re-imbursements: These are refunds for services rendered to another tier of Government, public corporations and other statutory bodies by the Government.

g) Statutory Grant : This is the share received from the Federation Account and value added tax. h) Miscellaneous: These are sources other than the sources mentioned above, e.g. dividend from

investment, stamp duties, business premises and registration fees, streets name registration fees and fees for right of occupancy on urban land, mining, rents and royalties.

2.3.3 Sources of Local Government Revenue These are other revenues that central government makes available to the local government or district assembly apart from the Common Fund. Examples of these revenues are: (i) Statutory and Non-Statutory Allocation: Revenue accruing to Local Governments from the Federal

government can be categorized into two, namely statutory and non-statutory allocation. The later takes the form of grants as may be deemed fit by the Federal Government to help pursue a policy which in the opinion of the Federal Government should be to the benefit of the country as a whole. Statutory allocation on the other hand is prescribed by law, specifying the basis for distribution of the revenue amongst the three tiers of government, the formulae for distribution and modes of distribution.

(ii) Grants-in-aid: These are donations received from foreign governments through the central government.

(iii) Transfers: These are monies that the central government gives to meet other expenses and pensions of district assemblies’ staff

(iv) Ceded Revenues: These are sources of revenues which the federal government has given over to district assemblies by the virtue of Decree No. 21 of 1998. These include tenancy rates, shops and kiosk rates, fees for on-off liquor licenses, fees for butcher slabs, fees for marriage, birth and death registrations, fees for street name registration (except in the state capital) motor park fees, market taxes and levies (except in any market where state finance is involved), fees for domestic animal licenses, fees for bicycles, trucks, canoes, wheelbarrows, carts and canoes, fees for right of occupancy on land in rural areas (except those of federal and state governments) and cattle tax (applies to cattle farmers only). Others are entertainment and road closure levy, fees for radio and television licenses, vehicle parking and radio license fees, charges for wrongful parking, fees for public convenience, sewage and refuse disposal, customary ground permit fees, fees for permits for religious establishments and fees for permits for signboards, bill boards and advertisements.

2.3 Taxation as a Source of Government Revenue in Nigeria The history of taxation in Nigeria goes back to the pre-colonial rule. There was a system of taxation in existence in the form of contribution of compulsory service, money, farm produce, goods and labour, which were essentially meant to support the various monarchies that existed in the present day Nigeria.

Page 13 of 55

Mainly, these taxes were levied in the form of ground rent, palm fruit tax, farm produce tax, cattle ownership tax, etc. However, history has it that modern tax system as we have today in Nigeria was first introduced in the year 1904 by the late Lord Lugard as community tax in the then Northern Nigeria. He later made changes which resulted to Native Revenue Ordinance of 1917 in Northern Nigeria and a provision for extension to western Nigeria was made in 1918 and 1928. The ordinance was extended to the eastern part of Nigeria in 1929. During the colonial rule taxes were imposed on individuals and corporate entities through a series of promulgations by the Colonial power. In 1940 two major legislations were passed, these were the Direct Taxation Ordinance No. 4 of 1940 and the Income Tax Ordinance No. 3 of 1940. The Direct Taxation Ordinance of 1940 applied to all citizens except those in Lagos Township. The Income Tax Ordinance No. 3 of 1940 applied to expatriates and to Nigerians living in Lagos. Income Tax Ordinance was passed in 1943 repealing the 1940 Ordinance. The 1943 Ordinance together with Direct Taxation (Amendment) Ordinance, 1943 continued to apply until 1956. In 1956 Eastern Region passed the Finance Law No. l of 1956. The basis of computation of tax provided in the Finance Law No. 1 of 1956 was basically the same as in the Ordinance of 1943. In 1956 tax allowances were provided for married taxpayers, and additional allowances for families with children up to a maximum of three children. It also introduced the Pay-As-Your-Earn (PAYE) system of taxation. The Eastern Region Finance Law number 1 became operative in the Region on April 1 1956, thus ceasing the application of Direct Taxation Ordinance in the Region. Another Law was passed in 1962 repealing the 1956 Law. The Western Region departed with the Direct Taxation Ordinance by passing the Income Tax Law in 1957. The Pay-As- You-Earn system was introduced in the Region by the Income Tax (Amendment) Law 1961. To ensure uniformity in both the application and incidence of taxation on individuals throughout Nigeria, the Income Tax Management Act (ITMA) was enacted in 1961, thus repelling all previous laws applicable to individuals, and making main provisions applicable to all individuals throughout Nigeria. In the same vein the Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) of 1961 was also promulgated. Subsequently, ITMA 1961 was repelled and replaced by Personal Income Tax Act (PITA) 1993, which came into being through Decree No. 104 of 1993, while the Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) of 1961 was repelled by the enactment of Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) of 1979. The tax Acts which suffered series of amendments, reassessment and review, are now included in the Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004. Thus, codifying them as Personal Income Tax Act (PITA) CAP P8 LFN 2004 and Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) CAP C21 LFN 2004. Revenue from taxation include direct and indirect taxes. Direct taxes are taxes on individual and companies e.g. companies’ income tax, petroleum profit tax, capital gain tax, bark duty assessment, personnel income tax, surcharge on pioneer companies, with holding tax capital transfer tax, etc. Indirect taxes are taxes raised from goods and commodities in the form of customs and excise duties e.g. import duties export duties excise duty tariffs forfeiture penalty, VAT, etc. Taxation has been an important source of revenue in Nigeria since its introduction in Northern Nigeria by Lord Lugard in 1904.

Page 14 of 55

Table 1: Trend of Tax Revenue in Nigeria 2000-2012

YEAR COLLECTION TARGET (=N= Billion) ACTUAL (=N= Billion)

2000 380.5 455.3 2001 500.7 586.6 2002 396.2 433.9 2003 572.9 703.1 2004 800.0 1,194.8 2005 1,304.4 1,741.8 2006 3,054.1 1,866.2 2007 1,753.3 1,846.9 2008 2,274.4 2,972.2 2009 1,909.0 2,197.6 2010 2,557.3 2,839.3 2011 3,639.1 4,628.5 2012 3,635.5 5,007.7

Import duties, sometimes called tariffs, are taxes levied on goods imported into a country. An import duty has the effect of increasing the prices of such commodities in the importing country. Where imported goods are elastic in demand, import duties on them tend to shift demand on locally produced goods as a result of their prices (imported goods) skyrocketing. Table 2: Tax Revenue as a Percentage of GDP in Nigeria 2004-2008 Year Tax Revenue as a %

of GDP Nigeria

Tax Revenue as a % of GDP Algeria

Tax Revenue as a % of GDP Egypt

2004 0.2 **na 13.8 2005 0.2 **na 14.1 2006 0.1 40.7 15.8 2007 0.2 37.2 15.3 2008 0.3 45.3 15.3

**na indicates that data for the year is not available Adapted from World Bank Databank The reason for selecting Algeria and Egypt as countries for comparison is based on the fact that these countries are amongst the top oil producing countries in Africa. According to The Richest (September 16, 2011) Nigeria was ranked as the highest oil producing country in Africa, for year 2011, producing approximately 2.2 million barrels of oil per day; Algeria was ranked 2nd, producing approximately 2.1 million barrels of oil daily while Egypt was ranked 5th, producing about 0.68 million barrels of oil per day. One begins to wonder why total tax revenue of Algeria and Egypt as a percentage of GDP is far higher than that of Nigeria, given the fact that Nigeria produces more oil, not to mention that Nigeria exports more than these countries. Then, the citizens are forced to ask questions like “Is Nigeria too dependent on its natural resource (crude oil) that it has neglected the importance of taxation to its economy growth?” One might argue that the GDP of Nigeria is far greater than that of these countries; therefore Nigeria has more options in generating GDP. But, taking into consideration another oil producing country; say Canada, it has a far greater GDP than that of Nigeria yet they have about 13.54%, on an average (from year 2004 to year 2008), of tax revenue to account for their total GDP compared to Nigeria’s average of 0.2%. If only the issue of taxation could be

Page 15 of 55

critically considered by government, then Nigerians can say they are a step further in achieving their 20-20 vision. 2.4 Diversification of Nigeria’s Sources of Revenue for Sustainable Development Dandago (2007) reported that in all the 36 states of the federations there are abundant natural resources to be harnessed and utilized to trigger in one place and accelerate in another Nigeria’s industrial development. He also argued that Nigeria is the world largest country naturally endowed with different resources with over four hundred and fifty (450) solid minerals. Table 3: Potential Sources of Revenue in Nigeria S/N Mineral Uses State/Locations 1 Gold Currency base, Ornaments Osun, Niger, Edo, Akwa Ibom, Borno, Kebbi, Lagos,

Ogun, Ondo, Plateau 2 Bentonite Drilling mud in the soil industry,

medicinal, cosmetic and pharmaceutical preparations

Abia, Ebonyi, Borno, Akwa Ibom, Gombe

3 Barities Filler in paint, rubber, plastic, weighing in drilling mud

Borno, Yobe, Plateau, Benue, Gombe, Nassarawa

4. Bauxite Raw material for aluminuim smelter plant

Adamawa, Taraba, Cross River

5. Lead Zinc Storage batteris, soler, pipes, brass making galvanizing die-casting

Enugu, Abia, Ebonyi, Niger, Plateau, Kano Bauchi, Gombe, Taraba, Benue.

6 Feldspar In ceramics as glass material. In enamels glass industry, tiles sanitary wares and building construction

Borno, Kogi, Ogun, Kwara, Oyo, Niger, Kaduna, Gombe, Katsina Nassarawa

7. Brick Building industry Lagos, Enugu, Kano, Plateau, Oyo, Borno, Kogi 8. Tin Tin plating, bronzed brass, soler,

type maetal. Alloys, etc. Plateau, Nassarawa, Kano, Bauchi, Gombe, Benue, Taraba.

9. Calcium and Marble

In metallurgical industry Cross River, Anambara, Ebonyi, Sokoto, Kebbi edo Kwara, Delta, Adamawa, Bebue, Oyo, Plateau, Nassarawa, Kaduna

10 Ceramic thy In the ceramic industry Plateau, Nassarawa, Katsina, Bauchi, Gmbe. 11 Uranium Alternative energy sources Borno, Yobe, Cross River, Akwa Ibom, Gombe. 12 Iron Ore Iron and steel industry in most

modern industries associated with farming, building construction and manufacturing

Kwara, Kogi, Borno, Bauchi, Kano, Kaduna, Eugu, Gombe, Anambra, Katsina Nassarawa

13 Phosphate For fertilizer Sokoto, Abia, Ogun, Bauchi, Gombe. 14 Gypsum Manufacture of cement, plaster of

paris (POP) and boards Sokoto, Kebi, Bauchi, Gombe, Abia, Enugu, Edo, Yobe, Anambra Borno.

15 Germstone Jewellery and ornaments Katsina, Nassara Kaduna, Bachi, Gombe, Kogi, Kano Jigawa

16 Bitumen For production of asphalt, water roofing, insulation, road construction and roofing

Ondo, Ekiti, Ogun Lagos

17 Diatomite As filter aids in the beverage and sugar industries for heat and sound insulation, as abrasive in light weight building materials and in ceramics

Borno Yobe

18 Clay Ball In cermac industries Imo, Edo, Delta, Katsina, Akwa Ibom Rivers, Cross River, Ondo, Ekiti, Ebonyi, Nassarawa, Enugu, Anambra

19 Kaolin clay In ceramic plastic and point industries

Delta, Imo, Edo Kwara Plateua Kaduna, Katsina ,Ogun Kano, Sokoto, Kebbi, Borno

20 Fire-Clay In ceramic and pottery (refractory) Anambra, Enugu, Kwara, Ebonyi, Katsina Ogun Sokoto Kebbi, Zamfara Nassarawa.

21 Dolomite In cermic industries Kwara Kogo, Oyo Osun, Niger, FCT, Nassarawa. 22 Limostone In cement industries Anambra, Ebonyi, Cross River, Akwa ibom, Benue, Ogun,

Sokoto

Page 16 of 55

S/N Mineral Uses State/Locations 23 Sand (Glass

sand) In glass industries Edo, Delta, Ondo, Ekiti, Rivers, Bayelsa, Anambra, Enugu,

Ebonyi, Imo, Abia Kogi, Lagos, Nassarawa 24 Salt For nutritional purposes Ebonyi, Benue, Imo Abia Enugu, Anambra, Cross River,

Plateau, Nassarawa Akwa Ibom, Kebbi. 25 Soda Ash For various purposes Borno, Yobe, Kano, Jigawa. 26 Talc In paint and cosmetic industries Oyo, Osun, Ondo, Ekiti, Niger, Kog, FCT, Kwara

Nassarawa Source: Dandago (2007:106-111) The analysis of Table 3 reveals that there are twenty six (26) mineral deposits endowed in virtually all 36 states of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that could be mined for various forms of utilization. These mineral resources could be used as agents of industrializing Nigeria, accelerating the level of employment by increasing the earning propensity of the citizenry which in the long term will trigger high level of national output. The exploration of these resources will immensely contribute to credits of the Federation Account by improving the revenue generation capacity of the states of their domain by the 13% share. From the table it is reported that, for example, Anambra, Ebonyi, Benue, Cross River, Akwa ibom, Benue, Ogun, Sokoto have deposited in their areas Limostone used in producing cement. In another revelation, the table shows Delta, Imo, Edo Kwara Plateua Kaduna, Katsina ,Ogun Kano, Sokoto, Kebbi, Borno with adundant deposits of Kaolin clay for ceramic, plastic and point industries. Katsina, Nassara Kaduna, Bachi, Gombe, Kogi, Kano Jigawa states have Germstone for Jewellery and ornaments. Furthermore, there is large gold endowment in Osun, Niger, Edo, Akwa Ibom, Borno, Kebbi, Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Plateau states. Evidently, surveys reported that such resources are in large quantities could be explored for quite a long period. Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN, 2012) reported that oil revenue accounted for up to 80% of the composition federation account with contribution to the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of 25.9%, 12.9%, 15.9%, 23.7% and 19.8% in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 respectively. The report also showed that non-oil revenue accounted for the average of 6.06 contributions to GDP over the period under review. This is not plausible enough to rely on oil alone as the major source for Nigeria’s revenue even without the associated challenges. There is an urgent need for the government to identify and explore other potential revenue generating avenues dominant within the jurisdiction of Nigeria. For instance, there are abundant natural resources endowed in various locations across the 36 states of the federation untapped. It is evidently established that if these resources were to be tapped could not only generate sufficient revenue for the country to facilitate the realization of vision 20:20:20, the project could launch Nigeria among the most industrialized countries. In addition to the mineral exploration, the country is blessed with large wealth of agricultural products both for food and cash crops as well as animal products. These products could make Nigeria self sufficient in its own food production and self reliant in the provision of the necessary raw material for industrial consumption. For example, Dandago (2007) argued that if Nigeria adequately harness its agricultural potentials in food cultivation could favorably compete with Thailand in Rice Production from 17 states alone ( Akwa ibom, Benue, Gombe, Kano, Kogi, Ebonyi states among others). In Cotton could compete with Indonesia, Malaysia for raw material provision to Textile and milling industries of the country from only 10 states. In Palm produce Nigeria could enjoy competitive advantage over even Malaysia from 21 states of South-south, South-east and west including some states from the North. Nigeria has edge in tourism industry. Much a lot of revenue can be generated from tourism. Revenue centers can be created in various states’ tourist sites. For example, in Akwa Ibom, Wildlife park, Oron National Meseum etc, Anambra: Nkisi stream Onitsha, Ofala Festival, igbo ukure, palace of Oba, Cross River: Ogbudu Cattle Ranch, Ekpe Masquerade. With all abundant tourist attractions Nigeria is endowed, yet revenue generation and exchange earning are insignificant in the aggregate revenue of the country. It is

Page 17 of 55

on record that there are other countries of the world that relied on tourism as a major source of revenue and that it accounts significantly in their national income. For example Egypt, United States of America, Kenya, South Africa and the rest. Even in the area of taxation a lot is desired to be done to develop other forms of taxes to improve the complexion from taxation. Jimoh (2007) argued that some reasons are against proper generation of revenue from taxation in Nigeria. Some of the reasons, according to him, include subsistent nature of the economy; Tax avoidance and evasion; level of income; tax revenue leakages among others. 3. Public Expenditure Public expenditure refers to the expenses which Government incurs in the performance of its operations. With increasing State activities, it may be difficult to judge what portion of public expenditure can be ascribed to the maintenance of Government itself and what portion to the benefit of the society and the economy as a whole. 3.1 The Theory of Public Expenditure Two notable theories of public expenditure are examined, viz: (a) "The Law of Increasing State Activities": A German Economist- Adolph Wagner in 1890 postulated this theory. According to him, there are inherent tendencies for the activities of Government to grow, both intensively and extensively. He added that there exists a functional relationship between the growth of an economy and that of Government activities, and that the Governmental sector grows faster than the economy. All categories of Governments, irrespective of their levels, intentions and sizes, had exhibited the same kind of tendencies of increased expenditure. (b) "The Displacement Theory": Jack Wiseman and Allan T. Peacock put forth the theory in 1961. Their main argument was that public expenditure does not increase in a straight or continuous manner, but in "Jack or Stepwise" fashion. At times, some social or other disturbances occur which show the need for increase in public expenditure, which the existing level of revenue cannot meet. Therefore, public expenditure increases will make the inadequacy of the existing level of revenue clear to everyone. The movement from the initial and low level of expenditure and taxation to a new and higher level is known as the "displacement effect," while the inadequacy of the revenue as compared with the required expenditure creates the "inspection effect." Both Government and the people would attain a new level of "tax tolerance" by reviewing the revenue position and finding solution to the problem of inadequate finance. Since each major disturbance always leads Government to assume a larger proportion of the national economic activities, the net result is the 'concentration effect'. Therefore, 'concentration effect' is the tendency for Government activities to grow faster than the economy. 3.2 Types of Expenditures Public expenditure may be classified on the following basis:

(i) Nature of Expenditure Incurred: Under this basis Government expenditure is broadly divided in to two (2) main categories, namely recurrent expenditure and capital expenditure: (a) Recurrent/revenue expenditures: Recurrent expenditure is the type of expenditure that happens

repeatedly on daily, weekly or even monthly basis. This includes for example payment of pensions and salaries, administrative overheads, maintenance of official vehicles, payment of electricity and telephone bills, water rate and insurance premiums etc.

(b) Capital or development expenditures: Capital expenditure on the other hand refers to expenditure on capital projects. This includes construction of houses, roads, schools and hospitals, human capital development (expenditures on education and health), purchase of official vehicles, construction of boreholes and electrification projects, etc.

(ii) Economic Purpose for Expenditure: Under this basis we have three classes, namely: (a) Government consumption: Government purchases of goods and services for current use. (b) Government Investment: Purchases of goods intended to create future benefits e.g. infrastructure,

education and research and development.

Page 18 of 55

(c) Transfer payments: Transfers that do not involve purchase of any good or service, eg. unemployment benefits, scholarships, social welfare support, interest on public debt, etc.

(iii) Unit of government involved: Under this basis we have: (a) Federal government and its MDAs (b) State government and its MDAs (c) Local government (d) Separate Government bodies

(iv) Basis of function at which expenditure is directed: a) justice and public order; b) infrastructure (roads, railways, etc); c) military; d) Education; e) health care; f) support for the poor, the old, the disadvantaged; g) support for firms, export and production in general; h) special policy expenditure (e.g. foreign aid, fight against drugs, etc). –

(v) Kinds of goods and services purchased. This gives rise to three sub-classifications: a) capital goods; b) consumption goods; c) personnel expenditure. (In national accounts, public expenditure does not include transfers among social groups, such as pensions, and interest payments of public debt).

3.3 Models of a State

The starting point is to understand that public spending nearly corresponds to three general models of state to which a government may subscribe. In other words, how much a government spends, overall, depends on which of these political frameworks it has chosen as the foundation for running its affairs. These models are: 1) The minimal state: where justice , public order, foreign policy and some basic functions should be carried out by the state; relaying on private sector for the rest. The minimal state is currently the trend and is manifested in the drive towards less- government and greater privatization in what advocates call public sector reforms; 2) The welfare state: where the state cares about the people’s well being directly, also through expenditure in education, health, and support for the poor, the old, and the disadvantaged; 3) The developmental state: where the state takes the responsibility of promoting economic development; also through expenditure in infrastructure, support for firms, export and production in general. Items of the minimal state are found in both welfare and developmental states. However, military and special spending is common to all three models, even though in different proportions. Government expenditure virtually depends on the model of state chosen. 3.4 Determinants and Types of Public Expenditure Determinants-Public expenditure is determined, generally, by:

(a) The political will of those at the helm of affairs of the government; (b) their priorities, (c) chosen state-model (d) interpretation of current economic and political trend.

Page 19 of 55

(e) other factors: Urbanization; Population; Economic growth; Depreciation; Technological change; and Reduction in inequality.

3.5 Reasons for Increase in Government Expenditure A number of factors have been identified as causing increasing in public expenditure in various countries over time. Some of these are general, having relevance to all countries, while others are specific to certain countries. These factors include the following:

(i) The traditional functions of government such as defense, maintenance of law and order, etc. are becoming extensive and cumbersome. Defense is becoming expensive more than ever. Within the country administrative set up is increasing both in coverage and intensity, that is, government machinery has to be manned by experts in their respective fields. In addition, various complexities of economic and social measures develop which make an efficient administration complex and expensive as well.

(ii) Besides the traditional functions of the state, there is growing awareness of additional responsibilities. The government is expanding its activities in the area of various welfare measures which include measures to enrich the cultural life of the society and those designed to provide social securities to the people such as pensions, old peoples’ home etc.

(iii) Increasing population may also be a determinant of public expenditure growth. The share scale of various public goods and services has to rise in conformity with the growth of population. The need for more schools, hospitals and such likes cannot be over-emphasized is the light of increasing population.

(iv) It has been suggested that urbanization and the resulting congestion has increased the need for more infrastructure and public goods and services. Also quite a number of incidental services like those connected with traffic, roads, pedestrian bridge etc. has to be provided.

(v) The tendency for prices to go up has equally contributed to the growth of public expenditure. The increase in prices of input and other goods purchased by public sector has resulted in an increase in public expenditure. It is the responsibility of the government to protect the citizenry against the evils of price mechanism. Consequently, anti-cyclical and other regulatory measures are put in place. Efforts are made to reduce income and wealth inequalities and bring about social and economic justice.

(vi) Increasing public expenditure can also he explained in terms of increasing cost of debt servicing. Since states are related to one another through various economic transactions, there are tendencies to run into debts, which must be settled.

3.6 Purposes/Functions of Public Expenditure The effects of public expenditure include the following:

1. Economic Stabilization: The philosophy of laisser faire leaves much to be desired in terms of economic results. The more advanced and free the market mechanism, the more prone the economy is to the vagaries of income, employment and price fluctuations. Public expenditure as an anti-cyclical tool can be devised in such a manner as to create effective demand thereby stimulating investment activities. It may be emphasized that the total demand need he regulated so that the demand flows match the supply flows otherwise the stimulating effect would result in inflationary pressure.

2. Production: Public expenditure can help the economy to attain a higher level of production. Through stimulation of investment, it can create conditions favourable for market forces to push up production.

Page 20 of 55

It can be used to create human skills through education and training and maintenance of social overheads. Public sector investment can be specifically directed towards creation of particular supplies and facilities, which may form an important and necessary input for other industries. Through research and development, new and effective methods of production can be found whereby local resources are used.

3. Economic Growth: Economic growth can be defined as an increase in a country’s physical output over a long period of time. A country is said to have experiment economic growth, when the real output of goods and services is increasing at a faster rate than the rate of growth of its population. Countries pursue economic growth in order to enjoy the benefit of a greater output, hence improve their standard of living. In a developed economy, through economic stabilization, stimulation of investment activities and so on, public expenditure helps to maintain a smooth growth rate. In an under-developed economy. Public expenditure has important role to play in reducing regional disparities, developing social overheads, creation of infrastructure for economic growth in terms of communication and transportation facilities, education and training, growth of capita] goods industries, research and development etc. When expenditure is incurred, it may be directed towards a particular investment or it may be used to bring about re-allocation of investible resources in the private sector of the economy. An important way in which expenditure can accelerate the rate of economic activities is by reducing the divergence between the social and marginal productivity of certain investment.

4. Economic Development: Economic development cat be defined as the elimination or reduction in poverty, inequality and unemployment within the context of a growing economy, there may be growth without economic development.

5. Distribution: An important evil of the market mechanism is the inequalities of income and wealth, which arise on account of it and get widened through the institution of private property and inheritance Furthermore, such income and wealth disparities not only result in social and economic injustice but also distort production and employment patterns. Suffice to say that lesser income and wealth inequalities contribute towards economic stability. Welfare consideration favours an equitable distribution of income and wealth since the purpose of economic policy is to attain the maximum level of social benefits possible. A shift towards equality may be achieved through various forms of public expenditure especially those that are meant to help the poorer sector of the society. Items of common consumption may be subsidized and production of those, which are in short supply, can be taken up by Public Sector. Left for the market mechanism the supply of merit goods tiny in be possible. Public Expenditure through direct purchase production or subsidies can ensure that their supply is augmented to the desired level and can reduce unemployment and improve income and wealth distribution.

6. Price Stability: Price stability refers to a situation where the general level of process of goods and services changes very little or no changes at all. Price level stability exists when the annual rate of increases in prices measured by appropriate indexes is less than 2%. Common measures of price stability are: (i) Consumer price index (measure of level of prices of all new domestically produced goods and service); (ii) Wholesale price index; and (iii) National product deflator (an economic metric that accounts for the effect of inflation in the current year’s GNP by converting its output to a level relative to a base period).

7. Full Employment: Full employment is a concept that cannot be precisely defined. Full employment does not mean that everyone has a job. This is because there shall always be people, such as babies, under-aged kids, very old people who cannot work even if they are willing to do so. This situation makes every government to define its full employment level e.g. in US full employment level is 97%. In Canada it is 96%, then the balance being the unemployment rate. In Nigeria, however, full employment policy has not been given a place of prominence and specific

Page 21 of 55

target has not been mentioned, Unemployment is a welfare loss to the society in terms of total output that is being forgone. It is equally a welfare burden borne by individuals.

8. Balance of Payment (BOP) Equilibrium: Balance of Payment (BOP) equilibrium is a record of a country’s transaction with the rest of the world over a period of time in respect of visible and invisible items. The balance of payment provides an indicator of a country’s international economic position. Because of the importance of the above, balance of payment equilibrium becomes an important objective of economic stabilization policy.

9. Equitable Distribution of Incomes: This has to do with how income is being distributed in the economy in a fair and equitable manner. Unfortunately in less developed countries, the income distribution pattern is an asymmetrical one, i.e. it is not evenly distributed. This accounted for the widespread poverty in these countries. The policy investment usually used to achieve the above macro-economic objective are: (i) Monetary Policies (cost, allocation and distribution of credit to change the level of money supply); (ii) Fiscal Policies (government spending and levying taxes to achieve macroeconomic objectives); (iii) Incomes Policy (regulation of reward to factors of production, minimum and maximum prices, minimum wages, rent and interest). The monetary policy is a measure designed to influence cost, allocation and is tribulation of credit in order to change the level of money supply in the economy. This fiscal policy refers to the deliberate action, which the government of a country takes in areas spending money and/or levying taxes with the objective of achieving macro-economic variable. The income policy on the other hand relates to the regulation of the rewards that go to the factors of production such as labour (minimum wage legislation). It equally includes the registration of product prices (minimum and maximum price legislation).

3.8 Standard Expenditure Decisions Expenditure decisions should be guided by the following standards, among others: a) Economy: The nation's resources are scarce, compared with the needs of the society. It is therefore important that no wastage is allowed in public expenditure. The process of public spending should not involve the use of more resources than are actually necessary wasteful usage of public fund must be avoided. Scientific approach towards assessment of required expenditure must be adopted. Budgeting techniques such as Planning and Programming Budgeting System and Zero-Base Budgeting System could be adopted. (b) Benefit: Every public expenditure should be viewed against the benefits that will accrue there from. It should be incurred only if it is beneficial to the society. (c) Surplus: Government should avoid persistent deficit budgeting. It should be consistently prudent and aim at meeting its current expenditure needs out of current revenue. Government should not over- spend and eventually run into debt. Moderate surpluses over some years will take care of any unavoidable deficit during any other year. (d) Sanction: All public expenditure should be subjected to legal appropriations and authorisations. Any contravention of expenditure procedure and due process should be sanctioned. As required by law all unspent appropriations should be returned to the Treasury at the financial year end.

3.9 Public Expenditure Management and Control: The management and control of public expenditure is a responsibility that falls on government institutions and individual public servants. As an institutional duty, both executive and parliamentary arms of government have constitutional roles aimed at ensuring the proper disbursement of public fluids. Individually, all civil servants who handle government funds and properties are required to observe certain rules and guidelines in ensuring appropriate custody and spending of public monies. For clarity, expenditure management and control are discussed separately, although they are inter-related.

Page 22 of 55

3.9.1 Principles of Public Expenditure Management (PEM): Due to the scarcity of resources in the face of unlimited demands, the need for an economic utilization of these resources by the management of organizations becomes imperative. For this reason, certain guidelines, in the form of basic truths or principles, ‘have been evolved to assist in the effective and efficient management of public expenditure. Before embarking on spending any of public funds, officials should examine the Ten Principles of Public Expenditure Management contained in Table below.

Table 4: Guidelines for dealing with Public Finances

S/No.

Principles to be observed by Public Officials Action Required from Public Officials

1 Comprehensiveness Budgets must encompass all financial operations of government; off-budget expenditure and revenue are prohibited.

2 Discipline

Decision-making must be restrained by resource realities over the medium term; the budget should absorb only those resources necessary to implement government policies, and budget allocations should be adhered to.

S/No.

Principles to be observed by Public Officials Action Required from Public Officials

3 Legitimacy

Policymakers who are in a position to change policies during implementation must take part in the formulation of the original policy and agree with it.

4 Flexibility Decisions should be defend until all relevant information has become available.

5 Predictability There must be stability in general and long-term policy and in the funding of existing policy.

6 Contestability All sectors must compete on an equal footing for funding during budget planning and formulation.

7 Honesty The budget must be derived from unbiased projections of revenue and expenditure.

8 Information

There should be medium-term aggregate expenditure baseline against which the budgetary impact of policy changes can be measured; accurate information on costs, outputs and outcomes should be available.

9 Transparency

Decision-makers should have all relevant information before them and be aware of all relevant issues when they make decisions; these decisions and their bases should be communicated to the public.

10 Accountability Decision-makers are responsible and accountable for the exercise of the authority provided to them.

In addition to the ten principles outlined, civil servants are required to be cost-conscious. The following ways could check extravagance: a) Every officer or employee should justify his employment by giving efficient services in return for his earning,

Page 23 of 55

b) Every official expenditure should be duly authorized by an appropriate authority, as required by regulation, c) The expenditure should be in accordance with the Financial Regulations (Instructions/Memorandum), d) Staff recruitment should be dictated by real needs so that underemployment and over-establishment are avoided, e) Economy should be exercised in buying office furniture, equipment and stationery, f) Made-in-Nigeria goods should be preferred to imported goods, g) No officer should condone wasteful spending of public funds by other civil servants. 3.8 Financing Government Expenditures How a government chooses to finance its activities can have important effects on the distribution of income and wealth (income redistribution) and on the efficiency of markets (effect of taxes on market prices and efficiency). The issue of how taxes affect income distribution is closely related to tax incidence, which examines the distribution of tax burdens after market adjustments are taken into account. Public finance research also analyzes effects of the various types of taxes and types of borrowing as well as administrative concerns, such as tax enforcement. (i) Taxation : Taxation is the central part of modern public finance. Its significance arises not only

from the fact that it is by far the most important of all revenues but also because of the gravity of the problems created by the present day tax burden. The main objective of taxation is raising revenue. A high level of taxation is necessary in a welfare State to fulfil its obligations. Taxation is used as an instrument of attaining certain social objectives i.e. as a means of redistribution of wealth and thereby reducing inequalities. Taxation in a modern Government is thus needed not merely to raise the revenue required to meet its ever-growing expenditure on administration and social services but also to reduce the inequalities of income and wealth. Taxation is also needed to draw away money that would otherwise go into consumption and cause inflation to rise.

(ii) Public finance through state enterprise: Public finance in centrally planned economies has differed in fundamental ways from that in market economies. Some state-owned enterprises generated profits that helped finance government activities. The government entities that operate for profit are usually manufacturing and financial institutions, services such as nationalized healthcare do not operate for a profit to keep costs low for consumers.

(iii) Non-Tax Revenue: This is made up of all revenues, other than taxes, that are generated by government to finance its expenditures. These include fines, fees and rates, licenses, earnings from sales, rent from government properties, interest payment and repayment of loans, re-imbursement, and miscellaneous revenue.

(iv) Donations: Donations received from foreign governments and donors agencies. (v) Public debt: Public borrowing from the capital market by way of bonds or from local and

international financial institutions.

4. Fiscal Policy

4.1 The Concepts of Fiscal Policy The term fiscal policy has conventionally been associated with the use of taxation and public expenditure to influence the level of economic activities. Fiscal policy involves the use of government spending, taxation and borrowing to influence the pattern of economic activities and also the level and growth of aggregate demand, output and employment. Fiscal policy is concerned with deliberate actions which the Government of a country take in the area of spending money and/or levying taxes with the objective of influencing macro-economic variables, such as the level of national income or output, the employment level, aggregate demand level, the general level of prices etc in a desired direction.

Page 24 of 55

The implementation of fiscal policy is essentially routed through government’s budget. The budget is, therefore, more than a plan for administering the government sector. It (budget) both reflects and shapes a country’s economic life and is used as a tool of managing a nation’s economy. Fiscal policy can be used for allocation, stabilisation of economic activities and income distribution. Fiscal system of an economy may be either centralised or decentralised, depending on whether the political structure is federalist or unitary. Nigeria is a federation so that its fiscal system is decentralised, and there exists a division of fiscal powers and responsibilities among the federal, state, and local governments. In a unitary government such as Britain, fiscal powers are concentrated with the central government. Table 5 presents the allocation of responsibilities in Nigeria between the federal, states and the local governments. Table 5: Allocation of responsibilities by government in Nigeria (1989)

Source: 1989 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria Table 6: Nigeria’s major taxes, jurisdiction and right to revenue

Page 25 of 55

Source: Anyanwu et al (1997)

Page 26 of 55

4.2 Objectives of the Nigerian Fiscal Policies The objectives of fiscal policy at a particular time period may differ from objectives to be achieved at another time period. The Nigeria’s fiscal policy objectives include the following: (i) Generation of significant government revenues; (ii) Diversification of revenue sources away from crude oil-based revenues; (iii) Reduction of the tax burden on individual and corporate bodies; (iv) Maintenance of economic equilibrium through reduction in inflationary pressures, acceleration of

economic growth, reduction in unemployment rate, and reduction in balance of payments deficits; (v) Effective protection of domestic industries; (vi) Promotion of self-reliant development process; (vii) Progressive reduction and elimination of government budget deficits; (viii) Cost recovering activities by social services and public enterprises; (ix) Integration of the informal sector into the country’s economic mainstream; (x) Improving efficiency in government fiscal operations and promoting transparency and accountability

in the management of public finances; (xi) Fighting low productivity in agriculture and low capacity utilisation in manufacturing industry; (xii) Reduction of internal and external debt burdens; (xiii) Correction of the distorted patterns of domestic consumption and production; (xiv) Minimisation of wealth, income and consumption inequalities (xv) Achievement of balance-of-payments equilibrium and exchange rate stability. (xvi) Full employment and Exchange rate stability. (xvii) Influence the rate of growth of the economy; (xviii) Raise the level of national income, output and employment; (xix) Protect local industries from ‘unfair’ competition from abroad 4.3 Fiscal Policy Measures in Nigeria The major fiscal policy instruments in Nigeria have been changes in tax rates and government expenditures. Major sources of tax revenues for governments have been listed as personal income; company income; petroleum profits; capital gains; import duties; export duties; excise duties; mining rents; royalties; and, NNPC earnings. These taxes are imposed not only to generate government revenue but also to provide incentives and/or disincentives to certain specific socio-economic activities. Tariff rates are also imposed not only to regulate the external of the economy but also to encourage domestic production and protect domestic industry. Government expenditures, both recurrent and capital, constitute an instrument for resource allocation while generating employment opportunities and influencing the general price level, as well as determining the extent of fiscal deficits and surpluses. 4.4 Instruments of Fiscal Policy The two key instruments of fiscal policy are: (i) Government Expenditures and (ii) Taxation 4.4.1 Government Expenditures During the course of a year, the Government of any country undertakes expenditures of various kinds. Such expenditures have impact on the level of economic activities. Typically, Government expenditures may be undertaken for the following purposes. (a) To build roads and bridges (c) To provide housing for the people (b) To promote agriculture and allied activities

Page 27 of 55

(d) To improve educational facilities (e) To protect the citizens against aggression - (f) To maintain law and order (g) To create jobs indifferent sectors of the economy (h) To service a nation’s debt 4.4.2 Fiscal Policy through Variations in Government Expenditure and the Achievement of Desired Economic Goals To see how fiscal policy works, consider a business cycle. A business cycle refers to cyclical movement in the level of economic fortunes of a country. As shown below, the cycle tends to repeat itself overtime. A boom period refers to the highest prosperity level. It describes a situation where output level is high, employment, national income, and all macro-economic variables are at desirably high levels. While a boom period is generally desired, sometimes, an undesirable by-product of this situation is a high level of inflation. A recessionary phase of the business cycle refers to a downturn in the economy. It is characterized by falling levels of aggregate demand, output, income and employment. A depression phase is when things are completely down and there is widespread unemployment and general misery. A recovery phase refers to a situation when an economy is picking up again. Aggregate demand for goods and services may be rising gently to be followed by rising levels of income, output and employment. As the trend continues, this may lead to another boom as shown in figure 1.

Figure I: A Business Circle

Page 28 of 55

To see the effect of changes in Government expenditures, consider an economy which is in equilibrium at a recessionary phase. The Government, in order to stem the tide, may increase its spending. This is a fiscal measure. The increased government spending from say, G1 to G2 (G2 higher than G1), will raise the level of aggregate demand (see figure 2).

Figure II: Effect of Increase in Public Expenditure on the Economy

AD1 (C+I+G1) to AD2 (C+I+G1). The increased level of aggregate demand will raise national income (through the multiplier effects) and, therefore, output and employment, many times more than the increased Government spending that sets the scenario off. In fact, the level to which national income will rise, will depend on the marginal propensity to consume. If the marginal propensity to consume is say 4/ 5 then, the marginal propensity to save will be (1- 4/ 5)= 1/ 5 . The multiplier coefficient will then be 5 the reciprocal of the marginal propensity to save. Consequently, if the initial government spending were increased by say, N20 million, then the increased level of income that would result, would be N20 million x 5 = N00 million. By the time income is increased by N100 million, output level in the economy would have increased and so would the employment level through the multiplier effects. Thus, the effect of increased Government spending will be to stimulate the economy towards the path of growth only. It can also be used to reduce or moderate inflationary pressures. To do this, the Government has to reduce its expenditures. A reduction in Government expenditure will reduce aggregate demand for goods and services. This reduction in aggregate

Page 29 of 55

demand, in turn, will eventually lead to a reduction in prices. But again, an undesirable effect of a reduction in Government spending, may be a reduction in national income, output level and-, consequently, employment level. Because’ of this undesirable effect, Governments are very cautious about deflationary policies which affect the level of employment.

4.5 Taxation as an Instrument of Fiscal Policy A tax is a form of levy imposed by the state on people, corporate bodies or goods. There are two forms of taxes: These are: (a) Direct taxes and (b) Indirect taxes Direct taxes are levied on people or corporate bodies and the burden of such a tax cannot be shifted to anyone else (However, some tax experts have argued in recent times that virtually all taxes can be shifted). Indirect taxes are levied on goods and services. The whole or part of the burden of an indirect tax may be shifted by producers to consumers. 4.6 Automatic Stabilizers Taxes and transfer payments which change with income are referred to as automatic stabilizers. They are regarded as automatic stabilizers because they reduce fluctuations in income, output and employment without deliberate action on the part of policy makers. Thus, automatic stabilizers are built into the economy. The two automatic stabilizers are progressive income tax and transfer payments. To see how these automatic stabilizers work, let us consider the two cases separately. 4.7 Case of Progressive Income Tax In virtually all economies, some taxes are progressive. This means they change at a higher rate with changes in the level of income. Thus, if income changes, taxes, if progressive, change more than the proportion by which income has changed and thereby dampen consumption. If, therefore, income is rising as a result of the operation of the multiplier process, the extent of the fluctuation is checked to some extent by the higher progressive taxes. Thus, the progressive nature of taxes tends to have a stabilizing effect on income by reducing consumption expenditure, thereby making the multiplier smaller. The reverse is also true. A fall in income will lead to a less than proportionate fall in the amount of taxes collected. This will lead to a higher consumption relative to the amount of income. 4.8 The Case of Transfer Payments Another set of automatic stabilizers are transfer payments. As already mentioned earlier, transfer payments are expenditures such as unemployment benefits, pensions, etc which are paid to beneficiaries by the government or the private sector even though the people involved may not have contributed to the present national income. Transfer payments are stabilizing because when economic activity is at a low level and national income is declining, unemployment benefits and pensions tend to rise because more people qualify for these payments. The resulting spending from the transfer payments made to these people may generate the multiplier process leading to rising income to compensate automatically for the initial decline in income. Conversely, as economic fortunes improve for a country the level of national income starts rising and the number of people who were previously unemployed reduces. Also, some of those who probably retired earlier may now wish to go back to work. Transfer payments therefore fall this time around. The reduction in expenditure as a result of the fall in transfer payments may generate a fail in income in the opposite direction to the initial rise in income, as a result of the earlier improved economic conditions. This Situation stabilizes the economy and serves to moderate fluctuations.

Page 30 of 55

4.9 Advantages of Automatic Stabilizers Automatic stabilizers have many advantages. In the first place, as already implied above, they serve to moderate fluctuations in economic activity. As the level of economic activity declines for example, output and employment eventually would fall. This, in turn, would result in an automatic fall in taxes while government transfer payments would increase. These changes prevent disposable income, and, consequently consumption, from decreasing by as much as they would in the absence of the automatic stabilizers. This makes the decline in economic activity not to be as severe as it otherwise would be. The second advantage of automatic stabilizers is that since taxes and transfer payments change automatically when income changes, the resulting change occur rapidly. Thus, if workers lose their jobs, taxes are no longer paid. Some of them may become eligible for unemployment benefits immediately. This is unlike discretionary fiscal policy (see below) which may require legislation and therefore takes time to become effective. Despite these advantages, automatic stabilizers have one major disadvantage. Automatic stabilizers retard a nation’s recovery from recession. As income and employment increase, taxes will increase automatically and transfer payments will fall. These changes, in turn, lead to a fall in the rate of increase in disposable income and consumption which eventually leads to a fall in income.

4.10 The Use of Taxation as an Instrument of Fiscal Policy in Nigeria Fiscal policy is part of government policy concerning taxation and other revenues, public spending, and government borrowing (the public sector borrowing requirement).

Governments have to decide how much to spend, how resources should be shared between different spending programmes, how much to raise in taxes and in borrowing, as well as what taxes to levy, thereby directing the economy. For example, value-added tax (VAT) and excise duty on tobacco discourages cigarette smoking; mortgage tax relief encourages people to buy their own home. At macroeconomic level, more public spending and less taxation will stimulate total spending in the economy, leading probably to a fall in unemployment but a rise in inflation.

In Nigeria, the Fiscal Policy Department, of the Federal Ministry of Finance, formulate and implement the fiscal policies of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Formulation of Government’s fiscal policy is made on the basis of the required adjustments and changes, to be made in taxation, revenue and expenditure for purposes of economic growth, stabilization and equity. Nigeria is governed by a federal system, hence its fiscal operations also adhere to the same principle. This has serious implications on how the tax system is managed in the country. In Nigeria, the government’s fiscal power is based on a three-tiered tax structure divided between the federal, state and local governments, each of which has different tax jurisdictions. As of 2002, about 40 different taxes and levies are shared by all three levels of government.

The Nigerian tax system is lopsided, and dominated by oil revenue. The most veritable tax handles are under the control of the federal government while the lower tiers are responsible for the less buoyant ones—the federal government taxes corporate bodies while the states and local governments tax individuals. While the federal government on average accounts for 90 per cent of the overall revenue annually, it only accounts for about 70 per cent of total government expenditure. In 1995, the breakdown of total tax and levy collection of the three tiers was 96.4 per cent for the federal government, 3.2 per cent for the state and 0.4 per cent for the local government. A major element contributing to this development was the prolonged military rule that had ignored constitutional provision.

Over the past four decades, the country’s revenues were largely derived from primary products. Between 1960 and the early 1 970s, revenue from agricultural products dominated, while revenue from other sources was considered as residual. Since the oil boom of 1973/4 to date, however, oil has dominated Nigeria’s

Page 31 of 55

revenue structure, and its share in federally collected revenue from 26.3 per cent in 1970 to 81.8, 72.6 and Nigeria’s fiscal policy measures have been largely driven by the need to promote such macroeconomic objectives as promoting rapid growth of the economy, generating employment, maintaining price levels and improving the balance-of-payment conditions of the country. Although policy measures change frequently, these objectives have remained relatively constant. Until the mid 1980s, tax policies, for instance, were geared to achieving such specific objectives as: (i) ensuring effective protection for local industries; (ii) encouraging greater use of local raw materials; (iii) enhancing the value added of locally manufactured and primary products; (iv) promoting greater geographical dispersion of domestic manufacturing activities; (v) generating increased government revenue. Since the implementation of the structural adjustment programme (SAP), however, taxes have been used to enhance the productivity and competitiveness of business enterprises. Consequently, attention has been focused on promoting exports of manufactures and reducing the tax burden of individuals and companies. In line with this change in policy focus, many measures were undertaken. These involved, among others, reviewing custom and excise duties, continuing with the reduction of company income taxes, expanding the range of tax exemptions and rebates, introducing capital allowance, expanding the duty drawback scheme and manufacturing-in-bond scheme, abolishing excise duty, implementing VAT, monetizing fringe benefits and increasing tax relief to low-income earners. In line with its federal structure, Nigeria operates a three-tier government, with certain fiscal responsibilities and powers delineated to each level. To avoid conflict among the three levels, the 1999 Constitution classified governmental responsibilities and powers into exclusive, concurrent and residual categories or lists. The National Assembly is empowered to issue legislation on the taxation of incomes, profits and capital gains. It is also authorized to legislate on matters classified in the concurrent list, particularly those related to the ‘division of public revenue’—tax collection. The State Houses of Assembly, on the other hand, may prescribe the collection of any tax, fee or rate, or the administration of a law to provide for such collection by a local government council. This constitutional provision enables the state government to impose, collect and spend any tax, fee or rate which is not expressly stipulated as being within the authority of the federal government. Consequently, the state government is empowered to impose tax on all items in the concurrent list as well as residual matters. 4.11 Effects of Fiscal Measures Although fiscal measures are aimed at promoting rapid economic growth, they also generate some unintended effects, making taxation a double-edged sword. Apart from encouraging (or discouraging) activities that are socially or environmentally friendly (unfriendly), fiscal policy is also used as a tool to provide direct assistance to society or individuals. As an economic development tool, taxation provides the financial base for providing and maintaining, among others, infrastructure such as roads, electricity, telecommunications, and water that have direct impact on living conditions. The need to bring social succor to the people recognizes the potential offered by personal taxation for improving exemption benefits such as individual allowance, tuition for children, insurance premiums and allowance for dependent family members, all of which are factors that affect the social structure of the whole country. Part of the adverse impact of taxation is the possible migration of people and businesses. Taxation can become a ‘push’ or ‘pull’ factor for migration because businesses relocate to areas with smaller taxes. In fact, taxation in recent times is one of the instruments for promoting foreign investments in developing countries. The foregoing has a significant practical impact for Nigeria. For instance, an increase in import duties in the country would cause an intensification of smuggling and underutilization of some productive capacities. The approved budget for the year 2000 highlights the seriousness of this problem: Imports destined for Nigeria are still diverted to ports of neighbouring countries. This is due to relatively high port charges and levies. The result is a loss of revenue in terms of import duties going to neighbouring countries. In addition to the loss of revenue, port facilities are seriously under-utilized since importers now

Page 32 of 55

ship goods through neighbouring ports. The prohibitive taxes imposed by the government also cause, in some cases, excess capacity in domestic manufacturing plants. Since the adoption of SAP in 1986, government has used taxation as a tool to fight poverty, with the emphasis on increasing disposable income as well as shifting the focus from income to consumption. Prior to 1986, tax measures were concentrated on income when PIT was increased from N 600 or 10 per cent to N 1,200 or 12.5 per cent for income exceeding N 6,000. The 1990s witnessed a different story, when minimum individual tax was reduced in 1990 from 1 to 0.5 per cent. In anticipation of the 1994 introduction of VAT, the PIT marginal tax rate was reduced from 45 to 30 per cent in 1993, and again in 1995 and 1966 to 30 and 25 per cent, respectively. The PIT rate was also made progressive. The need to enhance disposable income has been the primary objective since 1995. With poverty alleviation in mind, the government is paying attention to tax relieves and allowances, for instance, in order to enhance workers’ disposable income for better living standards. In 1996, the government also increased children allowances from N 1,000 to N 1,500 per child up to a maximum of four children. This was increased to N 2,500 in 1998. A dependant relative allowance of N 1,000 (up to two dependants) was introduced in 1997, to be farther increased to N 2,000 in 1998. During the same year, the personal allowance of N 3,000 plus 15 per cent of earned income was raised to N 5,000 plus 20 per cent of earned income. Other relevant tax relieves include life insurance scheme which offers an exemption on paid premiums up to 10 per cent of the insured capital as well as certain disability allowances. To advance this initiative, the minimum tax-free income was raised from N 7,500 in 1995/6 to N 10,000 and to N 30,000 over the next two years. All these measures were geared towards increasing the disposable income of low-wage earners and strengthening aggregate demand. Tax relieves have significantly reduced the tax liability of the people, particularly among low-income groups. During 1995-98, the relative reduction in tax liability ranged between 48.4 and 87.5 per cent for low-income groups while it was between 25.4-45.0 per cent for high-income earners. This is clear evidence of a tax liability reduction among the poor. Relief measures have been aimed at helping workers adjust to the impact of inflation and the rising cost of living. The multiplier effect of this serves as a means of reviving the economy. With added purchasing power, aggregate demand grows and according to the accelerator principle, capacity utilization, output. This has been a recurrent event in Nigeria, as has frequently been expressed in the government’s annual budget statements. Special prominence was given to this fact in the Approved Budget for the 2001 Fiscal Year, and employment opportunities increase. However, the welfare effect of the tax relieves may not be significant because the majority of the population lives in rural areas and the ratio of formal sector workers is relatively small compared to their informal counterparts. The fiscal policies have imposed hardships on consumers and producers in the form of high prices and increased production costs. Experience shows that producers in Nigeria treat VAT input as a cost. To this end the price effect has become non-neutral, i.e., exceeding the 5 per cent rate. Some empirical studies have drawn attention to the cascading impact of VAT. Using a general equilibrium analysis, these authors conclude that if input VAT is treated as a cost under mark-up pricing regimes, its price effect is distortionary regardless of whether or not the mark-up rates are rigid or flexible downwards. The distortionary impact is severely felt in sectors such as housing, livestock, vehicle assembly, mining, drugs and chemicals, and iron and steel. Price implications of the cascading effects range between 8.7-17.5 per cent across the 29 economic sectors of Nigeria. The effect of this on the purchasing power of the domestic currency and the welfare of the citizens cannot be underestimated. The generous tax reliefs have been considered as counter-productive to the revenue generating efforts of the states. The states of Lagos, Delta and Oyo which generated substantial part of their internal revenue from PIT are unhappy with this development. Despite efforts to diversif3r the tax structure, not much has

Page 33 of 55

been achieved. The introduction of the structural adjustment programmes in 1986 did not help matters. Due to an inflexible tax structure, oil and gas receipts still constitute about 75 per cent of total revenue. And in the absence of policy, Nigeria’s fiscal operations are largely influenced by oil-driven volatility, which impacts on both revenue ana expenditure. For instance, revenue and expenditure have increased sharply during periods of high oil prices as in 1979-82, 1991-92 and 2000-2002. But as prices decline, scaling back of expenditure is the order of the day. The implications of such boom-bust fiscal policies include the transmission of oil volatility to the rest of the economy as well as distortions to the stable provision of government services. This has added to the failures over the years of public spending neither facilitating the diversification and growth of the non oil sector nor reducing poverty. Effects of the boom-bust cycle are numerous; in addition to affecting the wages of public sector employees, particularly at the state and local government levels, it also influences the implementation of development projects and maintenance of the existing infrastructure. Discussion Exercises (1) (a) What is Fiscal Policy? How is taxation used as an instrument of fiscal policy? (b) What are the objectives of fiscal policy? (c) Explain the two instruments of fiscal policy and how they are used by the government. (d) What is the effectiveness and criticisms of fiscal policy? (2) (a) Explained how taxation was used as an instrument of fiscal policy during the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) introduced in Nigeria in 986. (b) How .was taxation used as an instrument for promoting foreign investment and poverty alleviation in Nigeria, in the past years? (c) Briefly explain the factors that cause the intensification of smuggling and the under-utilization of the Nigerian ports leading to loss of revenue in terms of import duties to neighboring countries. (d) Discuss 5 issues surrounding the use of taxation as an instrument of fiscal policy in Nigeria, over the last 20 years. 5. Government Activity and Economic Development The proper role of government provides a starting point for the analysis of public finance. In theory, under certain circumstances, private markets will allocate goods and services among individuals efficiently. If private markets were able to provide efficient outcomes and if the distribution of income were socially acceptable, then there would be little or no scope for government. In many cases, however, conditions for private market efficiency are violated. For example, if many people can enjoy the same good at the same time (non-rival, non-excludable consumption), then private markets may supply too little of that good. National defence is one example of non-rival consumption, or of a public good. 5.1 Economic Development Economic growth and economic development, like any other terms, have been defined in different ways by a number of individuals and institutions. However, what is clear from the various definitions is that, while economic growth is measured by looking at the increase in the market value of goods and services produce in a country over a period of time, usually one year, which is represented by the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), economic development is measured by looking at the overall improvement in the general wellbeing of the citizenry. In other words, while economic growth refers to sustained increase in the per capita output or income of a country over a specific period of time, economic development refers to the manifestations (i.e. translations) of economic growth in terms of improvement in the general well being of the citizenry, typically involving improvements in literacy rates, life expectancy, poverty rates, employment opportunities, living standards, environmental quality, freedom and social justice. National development, therefore, is the ability of a county to improve the social welfare of the people by providing social amenities like good education, health facilities, goods roads, pipe born water, power supply, employment opportunities, freedom of speech, etc. A country's economic development is related to its human

Page 34 of 55

development, which encompasses, among other things, health and education, hence, the term socio-economic development. The term “development” according to the WCS (1990), refers to the modification of the biosphere and the application of human, financial, living and non-living resources to satisfy human needs and improve the quality of human life. Similarly, the UN-DRD (1986) contends that development is a comprehensive economic, social, cultural and political process, which aims at constant improvement of the wellbeing of the entire population and of all individuals on the basis of their active, free and meaningful participation in development and in the fair distribution of benefits resulting therefrom. In essence, development is about change for the better, and such change should involve adequate and acceptable improvement in the general wellbeing of the society, economically, socially and educationally. According to Hugo (1995) true development cannot be measured in solely economic terms, but must also include changes in the quality of lives, which are less tangible. Similarly, Rodney (1982) suggests that development in human society is a many-sided process. At the level of the individual, it implies increased skill and capacity, greater freedom, creativity, self-discipline, responsibility and material wellbeing. In Rodney’s view, the term ‘development’ is used exclusively to describe economic progress in that the nature of a country’s economy is indicative of other social variables. An economy is regarded as having recorded economic growth if there are sustained significant improvements in quantitative and qualitative terms respectively. Thus, an economy may be growing without really developing. For instance, if there is a sustained increase in the level of national output or per capita income, the economy is described as having recorded economic growth. However, Seer (1969) perhaps best posed the basic questions about the meaning of economic development by asserting that: “the questions to ask about a country’s development are therefore: What has been happening to poverty? What has been happening to inequality? What has been happening to unemployment? If all the three have declined from high levels, then beyond doubts, this has been a period of development for the country concerned. If one or two of these central problems have been growing worse, especially if all the three have, it would be strange to call the result development, even if per capita income double. Development goals must be defined in terms of progressive reduction and eventual elimination of malnutrition, disease, illiteracy, squalor, unemployment, and inequalities. 5.2 Relationship between Government Activity and Economic Development The relationship and the rising trend between government spending and economic growth have called for different arguments among scholars and policy makers. There are two basic roles of the government in any society; maintaining law and order (i.e making and enforcing) as well as providing public goods such as good roads, education, health, defence, power and so on. Over time, scholars have argued that increase in government expenditure on socio–economic and physical infrastructure fosters economic growth. For example, expenditure on education and health raises the level of national output through improved quality of labour and productivity. Similarly, spending on infrastructure such as roads, communications, power and so on reduce production costs and increase profitability o firms, thus fostering economic growth. Series of arguments and studies have emerged on the platform that increase in government spendings do not actually promote growth and development, rather reduce overall performance of the economy. Buttressing this is the fact that an increase in government spendings may result from increase in taxes or borrowing. Particularly, when higher taxes are imposed, individuals get discouraged because income is reduced and number of hours worked also reduces. On the side of the firm, higher profit tax increases production cost and reduces investment expenditure as well as profitability. If the government in a different dimension results to borrowing to finance projects rather than taxes, then private sector investment will definitely reduce and growth will also be deterred.

Page 35 of 55

Looking at the trend of public expenditure in Nigeria from 1979 to 2008, it can be seen that the amount has been on the increase throughout, with the exception of 1983 to 84, 1994 and 2000. Figure I shows the trend of public expenditure in Nigeria.

Source: CBN (2008), Statistical Bulletin: 50 Years Special Anniversary Edition

Similarly, as proved by empirical evidence, there is a significant relationship between public and real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in different parts of the world, and Nigeria is not an exception. From figure II below, series one (which is green line) is the trend in public expenditure in Nigeria, while series 2 represent the real GDP. As can be seen from the diagram, from 1975 up 1995, Nigeria’s real GDP is above public expenditure, thereafter up to date, real GDP is below public expenditure, with the margin deteriorating further year-in year-out. The decline in the Nigeria’s real GDP despite increase in public expenditure may not be unconnected with public fraud, contract over-valuations, reckless spending, corruption and poor public expenditure management in Nigeria in recent years. However, it may be said that the situation can be reversed for a better if government id to enhance judicious spending, curtail public fraud and corruption and enhanced public expenditure management in Nigeria.

Source: CBN (2008), Statistical Bulletin: 50 Years Special Anniversary Edition

Figure I: Public Expenditure Trend in Nigeria from 1979-2008

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

3500000

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29

1979-2008

Mil

lio

n N

aira

Series2

Series1

Figure II: Relationship Betwen Public Expenditure and Real GDP in Nigeria 1979-2008

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

3500000

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Years

in M

illi

on

Nai

ra

Series1

Series2

Page 36 of 55

In Nigeria, government expenditure has always been at the increase due to the flow of revenue production and sales of crude oil. This is however accompanied by huge demand for public goods such as roads, electricity, education, health, external and internal security and so on. Within this context, statistics has it that government expenditure (capital and recurrent) have continued to rise in the last forty (40) years. Similarly, the increase in expenditure feature more on education, internal and external security, health, agriculture, construction, and transport and so on. Following this scenario, the huge government expenditure has not translated into reasonable growth and development because the country is still ranked as one of the poorest in the world. In the last few years, her balance of payment, inflation and exchange rates, national savings and other macroeconomic indicators have not been behaving well. Also, there has been serious collapse of many industries partly because of breakdown in infrastructure and the result in high rate of unemployment. According to the classists model, government fiscal policy does not have any effect on the growth of the national output. Converse to this view, the Keynesian model argued that increase in government expenditure will lead to higher economic growth. The implication of this is that government fiscal policy (through intervention) will help improve the failure that might arise from the inefficiencies of the market. According to Easterly & Revelo (1993), government activities influence the direction of economic growth. This same view was however shared by Baro & Sala (1992), Brons et’ al (1999) and Baro (1990). In the same vein, Dar Atul & Amirkhalkhali (2002) emphasized in the endogenous growth model that fiscal policy is an important determinant of economic growth. Amassoma, Nwosa and Ajisafe (2011) stated that over the past thirty years, there has been a continuous contention between development economist as to the relationship that exists between economic growth and public expenditure. They observed that some scholars believe that public expenditure enhances economic growth while other scholars believe that increased government spending has a way of slowing down the performance of an economy. However, Economics Concept identified accelerating economic growth to be one of the causes of increase in government expenditure; the government of any economy has the responsibility of accelerating economic growth in order to raise the standard of living of the people. Therefore, it can be deduced that for the acceleration of economic growth the government has to ‘spend’ to meet social needs of its citizens and in order to carry out the function of spending the government has to strategize different means of sourcing for funds. Public expenditure management is an important determinant of real Gross Domestic Product and the level of national development of a country. However, in Nigeria, public expenditure has not been able to trigger the desire GDP and economic development due to a number of factors resulting in poor public expenditure management in the country. 6. Tax System and Value Added Tax Tax is a compulsory payment made on different basis and rates by citizens (corporate bodies and individuals) to government, non-negotiable but obligatorily. This payment is not on the basis of direct exchange for the payment for goods and services. It is non-negotiable because none the citizens have any direct contribution to the composition of the basis and rates of payment. Government only classifies the items on which the tax is to be paid, and the category of citizens that should be subjected to the payment. The decision is however, based on the cost of the projects or programmes government intends to execute, which is the principal determinant of the budget -size. Government also judges the basis, rates, the category of citizens, and the time period to pay the tax, on the direction of the economy desired and government’s perception of the standard of living of the citizens. This is why tax is defined as a tool for government

Page 37 of 55

revenue and fiscal policy tool for directing the economy. Taxes are not paid directly on the basis of exchange contract like any other payments except subsidies paid by government. It is paid by any citizen whether or not the citizen benefits from the government projects and programmes financed by the taxes. Consequently, the usefulness (effectiveness and/or efficiency) of taxes can be measured by several parameters, some which are its revenue generating capacity and its impact on the consumption and savings patterns in the economy. Even if the totality of tax system cannot be comprehensively measured, the various types of tax can be subjected to this measurement. In Nigeria, there are at least three types of taxes that are commonly applied to qualifying citizens and items. These are the Personal Income Tax, the Company Income Tax, and the Value Added Tax. The assessment of these forms of tax independently or otherwise becomes more necessary given the multiplicity of taxes in Nigeria, together with the problems of tax evasion and avoidance. Taxation is one the oldest economic phenomena by which the cost of providing essential services for the generality of a given set of people within a geographical area, is funded. In some countries, taxation is as old as their history while in others taxation predates their existence. In the early days of civilization, taxes were collected to maintain the Kings/Queens, provide security and fight wars. It could be a direct surcharge on the citizens of the kingdom or empire, or tributes paid by “conquerees” to show their unflinching loyalty to masters/conquerors. These forms of taxes did not necessarily depend on richness or the ability to pay concept. Historically, therefore, it can be asserted that the Sumerian empire could be the first place where taxes were levied and accounts for the utilization made. Other than this, several empires and kingdoms have levied taxes for the purposes stated above without any control or account of utilization. Examples include the Kingdoms of Israel, Judah, Babylon, Egypt and the Roman Empire. The primary use of taxes to fund wars continued to the modern times as could be seen from history of countries like Britain and USA. In particular, Britain levied taxes between 1799 and 1816 to fund the Napoleon War, while USA taxed her citizens to finance the Civil War (1861 – 1863). In most cases, this style of taxation was temporary because the levies were either relaxed or cancelled upon the realization of the purpose(s). Economic history has it that permanency of taxes was not common until 1874 when Britain made income tax a permanent levy on its citizens. This was followed by the USA in 1913. This means that it took about 50 years in both Britain and USA to sell the idea of regular income tax (US Department of Treasury, 2003; Kiyosaki, 1995). In Nigeria, and indeed some parts of Africa, the payment of taxes is not strange. This is because, even before independence, taxes were collected either by t he colonial masters or emirs/chiefs in different names. However, legislation of tax was first made in 1939 with the enactment of the Income Tax Ordinance of 1939. The second legislation was in 1940 due mainly to the inadequacies and ineffectiveness of the 1939 Ordinance. The 1940 Ordinance specified that both individuals and corporate organizations be subjected to tax payment. Ever since, there has been one enactment or the other, as well as amendments. Generally, there are certain conditions against which taxes are judged to be efficient or effective. These conditions are referred to as the canons or principles of taxation and include fairness, equity, convenience, certainty, economy, flexibility, and certainty. Accordingly, there are several objectives for the imposition of any tax. These objectives are called economic and social goals of taxation. Therefore a tax system’s efficiency could be judged against these goals, i.e. whether the goals are achieved and the extent of accomplishing these goals. These goals include revenue generation, ability to influence and control economic behaviour, transferability of resources from private to public sector, ability to distribute cost of governance, and ability to promote economic growth.

Page 38 of 55

Comparing the two measurement approaches mentioned above, it would be seen that generation of revenue and productivity are very similar and form the nucleus of any tax administration, and by far the most tangible assessor of the efficiency of an y tax system. This is because policy makers would want to enact tax laws with purpose of being an unfailing source of funding public activities as well as achieving other socio-economic motives as specified. It therefore believe on the policymakers to employ control by comparing the outcome of the imposition of tax against expectation. And the two most prominent assessment could therefore be to examine the revenue generated against budgeted, and the impact of the tax on consumption, production and disposable income. Another way of measuring the efficacy of the system is to evaluate any of the approaches of assessing the tax burden. The approaches include the Expedience approach, the Socio-Political approach, the Benefits-Received approach, the Cost of Service approach, and the Ability to Pay approach (Handley & Maheswaran, 2008; Laily & vanZijl, 2003; Bhatia, 2006). In most third world countries (Nigeria inclusive), measuring the effectiveness and the efficiencies of tax especially with regards to the economic and social goals or the socio-political and benefits received approaches has been difficult. Certain reasons account for this difficulty. One is the problem of record-keeping where there is insufficient record of the amount of tax levied and paid as a result of corruption. In this case, government activities seem to be financed from sources other than taxation. Therefore, while the public groans under the burden of taxation, government alleges that the public has little contribution to the implementation of public projects and governance, hence should not hold government accountable to the public. Using the benefit -received approach, taxation might be adjudged to be inefficient since the tax payers can hardly trace the taxes paid to any meaningful project that positively impacts on their welfare. On the basis of economy, tax system could be judged effective and efficient if the cost of administering the tax is lower than the revenue derived from the imposition. This measurement is also difficult because there is an existing tax collection machinery imbedded in the civil service whose costs are part of the recurrent cost of public administration. In Nigeria, the “rich” who control about 90 percent of the economy but are estimated to be between 5 percent and 10 percent of the population and, in most cases pay very little or nothing as tax, there are also some government officials that earn respectable incomes but exempted from tax. For instance, the Third Schedule of the Personal Income Tax Act of Cap C20 LFN 2004 provides that the official emoluments of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the Vice President, State Governors and their Deputies, Local Government Chairman, Government institutions, incomes of Charitable and Ecclesiastical institutions of a public character in so far as such income is not derived from a trade or business carried on by such institutions, gratitude payable to a public officer by the government of the federation or state, and incomes of cooperative societies registered under the Cooperative Societies Decree of 1993, are tax exempted. So, if these incomes as well as the personal reliefs and allowances of other taxable persons are considered, the questions will then be whether enough revenue is generated for the functioning of the public sector, and whether the relief and allowances reasonably even-out the gap between the different income brackets, so that the tax system can be said to be equitable. Consider for example, that in year 2007, more than N200 billion will be paid to only federal legislators as allowances, excluding their seating allowances and salaries as well as the salaries and allowances of the President, the Vice President, the Governors and their Deputies, Ministers, Commissioners, Special Advisors, etc. The exclusion of these legitimate incomes from tax could seriously reduce the value of tax revenue, but increase the consumption expenditure. It therefore means that if a tax system is efficient and effective, given the measures of productivity and fiscal policy goals, the revenues generated as a proportion of the national income should be close to or more than 100 percent of the standard rate of that tax. For instance, if the effectiveness of Personal Income Tax System were to be judged, then the tax revenue accruing from personal income divided by the national

Page 39 of 55

income should be divided by the average personal income tax rate subsisting. The higher the resulting quotient or ratio the more effective the tax system is (Ebrill, et al, 2001). The idea is that since tax is paid out of the total income, the amount of tax generated should be equal to the tax rate multiplied by the total income of the country (National Income). Where the proportion is smaller than the standard rate, it follows that the tax system is not productive and hence not effective. On the other hand, if the proportion is less than the standard tax rate where the revenue generated is divided by the total consumption expenditure, then the tax system can be said to be inefficient because it has not been able to influence consumption as it would have been originally intended. This latter measure is used to appraise the efficiency of tax system as an economic (fiscal) tool. Countries introduce a Value Added Tax (VAT) because they are dissatisfied with their existing tax structure. The Value Added Tax (VAT) was introduced in Nigeria in 1993 by the Federal Military Government. VAT is imposed “on the supply of all goods and services other than those goods and services listed in the First Schedule to this Act” Before then, Sales tax was under the jurisdiction of the States and generally poorly administered with marginal contribution in terms of revenue. It is proposed to have a shift from direct to indirect taxation within the non-oil sector in order to stimulate economic growth in the sectors, whilst still meeting revenue requirements. This is particularly necessary, given that oil revenues are no longer viewed as a sustainable source of revenue and there is the urgent necessity to diversify tax revenue. In this regard, it is proposed that there should be lower rates of direct taxes such as Companies’ Income and Personal Income tax to reduce the cost of doing business in Nigeria by increasing cash flow and disposable income for corporate entities and individuals alike. Nigeria adopts the single rate of 5 per cent of the value of all taxable goods and services which is the world lowest VAT rate. A recent attempt by the National Assembly to increase the rate of VAT to 10% was unsuccessful. Despite the avowed policy of the Federal Government to increase the VAT rate the implementation has proved to be Herculean and unachievable so far due to social and political environment. The arguments of those who are opposed to the rate increment have always been that FIRS should strive to expand the coverage of VAT to those who are presently out of the tax net and generally increase the compliance level. Schedule 3 of the Act states that the following goods are exempted from VAT: (i) Medical and pharmaceutical products (ii) Basic food items (iii) Books and educational materials (iv) Baby products (v) Agricultural equipments and products, and vet erinary medi cine (vi) Fertilizers (vii) Agricultural chemicals (viii) Exported goods (like Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas) VAT is collected through registered persons who are known as “taxable persons”. A taxable person is obliged to register with the FIRS for VAT collection “within six months of the commencement of the Act or within six months of the commencement of business, whichever is earlier.” Failure to register attract a penalty of N10, 000.00 for the first month in which the failure occurs; and N5,000.00 for each subsequent month. Since a period of six months has elapsed after the promulgation of the Act, it presupposes that every taxable person is now obliged to register as soon as it commences business. There has been a suggestion that all new businesses should be granted a period of six months’ grace after the commencement of business to register for VAT. If the suggestion were to be adopted, it might lead to the unintended effect of denying taxable persons the opportunity to set off their inputs against the output VAT. Since VAT can only be lawfully collected after registration it means that until then the taxable person will not have any output VAT against which the input tax can be offset. Although, the Act imposes an obligation on every taxable person to register, there was the initial concession, which allowed retailers a period of three years to register. Going by the bare statutory provisions, every retailer is obliged to register for VAT be collecting

Page 40 of 55

tax due upon the supply of goods and services to its customers since 1996 after the expiration of the concession period. Taxable persons are obligated to keep such records and books of all transactions, operations, imports and other activities relating to taxable goods and services as are sufficient to determine the correct amount of the tax due. No particular accounting standard is prescribed. Hence books and records which a taxable person is expected to keep will depend on the nature and size of its business provided that they are “sufficient to determine the correct amount due”. A writer had opined that it is sufficient if a taxable person keeps the usual account books such as Cashbook, Sales and Purchase Daybooks, Trial Balances, Profit and Loss Accounts and Balance Sheets. Taxable person shall render a monthly return of all the taxable goods and services to the FIRS on or before the 30th day of every month. Failure to render a return within the stipulated period of time attracts a penalty of 5 per cent of the sum due per annum plus interest at the commercial rate in addition to the tax. A taxable person who fails to render a return or renders an inaccurate return is liable to be assessed by the FIRS based on its best of judgement (BOJ). VAT is largely a self-assessed tax. Assessment by the FIRS will only be made as a last resort. Although no specific time is prescribed within which a taxable person is required to respond to the BOJ, it is submitted that the taxable person is nevertheless entitled to reasonable notice failing which the assessment may be voided. The question of how much VAT is payable may be straightforward for the final consumer (who simply pays without obligation to do anything else) but this is not so for a taxable person who is an agent of collection. While a taxable person has obligation to collect tax on taxable goods and services he is also under obligation to pay VAT on taxable goods and services supplied to him. The tax collected by a taxable person is called output VAT while the tax paid by him is called input VAT. The VAT system is structured in such a way that a taxable person is able to take credit for the VAT paid by it on its inputs. The processes are contained in sections 12, 13, 14, 15 &-16 of the VAT Act. There are three steps leading to the ascertainment of the VAT due or refundable. First, a taxable person will ascertain the VAT collected by him on his supplies during the reporting period. Second, he will ascertain the VAT paid by him on purchases used by him to provide the taxable goods during the same reporting period. Third, find out the difference between the VAT on supplies made and VAT paid on purchases made towards such supplies to determine the amount of VAT either payable to FIRS or refundable to the registered person. The taxable person is thus allowed to indemnify itself against any loss and the rate of VAT that is ultimately borne by the final consumer is kept at 5 percent. In this way, the registered person acts as a mere unpaid agent of the FIRS without bearing the tax burden. If VAT system is in reality as simple as shown in the above example, each taxable person would sustain no economic burden on the goods and services purchased by it, and all the tax burden would be shifted down the chain to the ultimate consumer. However, due to the immense complexity of transactions, inadequate record keeping, dishonesty and lack of adequate knowledge of its operations, VAT may not be as simple as it seems. VAT system in Nigeria has been effective in generating more than expected revenue but not efficient in directing or influencing the consumption expenditure of the Nigerian citizens. a great extent, VAT has been a veritable source of revenue to some states in Nigeria where industrial activities are very low. The allocation of VAT revenue as part of federally allocated revenue is indispensable to these states. One perceives that in the event of a global threat to revenue from oil and gas, especially with the debt –free posture of Nigeria, VAT rate could be increased so that allocatable revenue will increase. The alternative might be the justification for the reduction of the VAT exempt list. Although the tax-base of VAT is expanding, inefficiency in the system has resulted in low VAT revenue. This means that efforts should be

Page 41 of 55

made to improve the collection and accounting machinery of VAT in order to make it more efficient, due to poor attention paid to tax revenue because of the over-reliance on sale of oil and gas. 6.1 Challenges Facing Tax System, in Nigeria The Nigeria tax system is beset by a myriad of challenges, some of which are highlighted below: (i) Non availability of Tax Statistics: Lack of adequate statistics on tax payers and their detail

particulars. (ii) to Prioritize Tax Effort: The political economy of revenue allocation in Nigeria does not prioritize

tax efforts. It is, instead, anchored on such factors as equality of states (40 percent), pollution (30percent) landmass and terrain (10percent), social development needs (10 percent), and internal revenue effort (10percent). The approach, discourages a proactive revenue drive, particularly for internally generated revenue, makes all government tiers heavily reliant on unstable oil revenues which are affected by the volatility of the international oil markets.

(iii) Poor Tax Administration: Tax administration and relevant tax agencies suffer from limitations in manpower, money, tools and machinery to meet the ever increasing challenges and difficulties.

(iv) Multiplicity of Tax: A major problem facing the country is the multiplicity of taxes. Individuals and corporate bodies complain about the ripple effects associated with the duplication of tax, this problem arose from the states’ complaints about the mismatch between their fiscal responsibilities and fiscal powers or jurisdiction.

(v) Structural Problems in the Economy: The potential for maximizing the benefits of this taxation from however, is constrained by structural problems in the economy. The predominance of the informal sector, constituting more than 50 percent of the country’s economy, enables most domestic production to circumvent VAT.

(vi) Underground Economy: The hidden or underground is usually taken to mean any undeclared economic activity. The major issue is how inland revenue authorities would tackle hidden economy covering these groups: (a) Business that should be registered to pay tax, such VAT, but are not; (b) People who work in the hidden economy such as the rural areas with difficult terrain and pay no tax at all on their earnings.

(d) People who pay tax on some earnings but fail to declare other additional sources of income (vii) Tax Evasion and Corruption: Tax evasion and corruption undermines revenue generation drive of the

government. 6.2 Challenges Militating Against VAT It is important to note that in Nigeria the administration of VAT has been beset with problems, namely: (i) Tax evasion and avoidance; (ii) Inadequate finding for the revenue services (iii) Limited or lack of independence of revenue services; (iv) The lack of the VAT tribunal, as recommended under VAT Act Decree No. 102 of 1993 (v) Proposals by some state governments (e.g. Lagos) to re-introduce sale tax; (vi) Practical problems related to the implementation of VAT’s dual elements (input and output). 6.3 The Way Forward (i) Autonomy. With autonomy, the revenue boards will be responsible and responsible to what they are

supposed to do, and we can be talking about professionally tax administration in Nigeria. (ii) Efficient and effective Tax Administration (iii) The use of computer technology (iv) Strengthening Auditing and back duty investigation (v) Tax Rates and Use of Tax Money (vi) Public Enlighment

Page 42 of 55

7. Monetary Policies Monetary Policy refers to the specific actions taken by the Central Bank (Monetary Authority) to regulate the value, supply and cost of money in the economy with a view to achieving predetermine macroeconomic goals. The Central Bank of Nigeria, like other central banks in developing countries, seeks to achieve price stability through the management of money supply. Money supply comprises narrow and broad money. Narrow money (M1) is defined as currency in circulation with non-bank public and demand deposits or current accounts in the banks. The broad money (M2) includes narrow money plus savings and time deposits, as well as foreign currency denominated deposits. Broad money measures the total volume of money supply in the economy. Thus, excess money supply (or liquidity) may arise when the amount of broad money is higher than the level required to sustain non-inflationary output growth in the economy. The need to regulate money supply is based on the knowledge that there is a relatively stable relationship between the quantity of money supply and economic activity and that if the supply of money is not limited to what is required to support productive activities, it will result in undesirable effects such as inflation or deflation. Several factors influence the supply of money, some of which are within the control of the central bank, while others are outside its control. The specific objectives and focus of monetary policy may change from time to time, depending on the level of economic development and economic fortunes of the country. 7.1 Objectives of Monetary Policy In Ngeria, the major objectives of monetary policy include: (i) attainment of price stability and sustainable economic growth (ii) full employment (or a low unemployment rate), (iii) high output (or a high output growth), (iv) a stable price level (or a low inflation rate), (v) a stable exchange rate (or a desirable balance of payments).

These goals are usually achieved indirectly by the monetary authorities (central banks) through its use of monetary policy instruments including open market operations (OMO), changes in discount/bank rate (both of which determine the monetary base), and required reserves (the minimum reserves the commercial banks must hold against the public’s deposit with them).

7.2 Stance of Monetary Policy The stance of monetary policy refers to either expansionary or contractionary actions of the central bank to control money supply. Expansionary Monetary Policy is a set of actions by the monetary authority to increase money supply in the economy. It is conventionally used to stimulate economic activity, usually in a recession. Contractionary Monetary Policy on the other hand seeks to reduce the level of money supply in the economy. It is conventionally used to reduce inflationary pressures in the economy. 7.3 Instruments of Monetary Policy in Nigeria Monetary policy guides the central bank’s supply of money in order to achieve the objectives of price stability (or low inflation rate), full employment, and growth in aggregate income. This is necessary because money is a medium of exchange and changes in its demand relative to supply, necessitate spending adjustments. Fiduciary or paper money is issued by the central bank based on an estimate of the demand for cash. To conduct monetary policy effectively, the central bank the monetary aggregates, the policy rate or the exchange rate in order to affect the variables which it does not control directly. The instruments of monetary policy used by the central bank depend on the level of development of the economy, especially the financial sector. These instruments could be direct or indirect. 7.4 Direct Instruments of Monetary Policy

Page 43 of 55

(i) Direct Credit Control The central bank can direct Deposit Money Banks on the maximum percentage or amount of loans (credit ceilings) to different economic sectors or activities, interest rate caps, liquid asset ratio and issue credit guarantee to preferred loans. In this way the available savings is allocated and investment directed in particular directions as desired by the authorities. (ii) Indirect Instruments of Monetary Policy

(a) Reserve Requirements: This instrument is used by the central bank to influence the level of bank reserves and hence, their ability to grant loans. Reserve requirements are lowered in order to free reserves for banks to grant loans and thereby increase money supply in the economy. On the other hand, they are raised in order to reduce the capacity of banks to provide loans thereby reducing money supply in the economy.

(b) Open Market Operations (OMO): The most important and flexible tool of monetary policy is open market operations. It is the buying and selling of government securities in the open market (primary or secondary) in order to expand or contract the amount of money in the banking system. By purchasing securities, the central bank injects money into the banking system and stimulates growth whereas by selling securities it absorbs excess money. Thus, if there is excess liquidity in the system, the central bank will in a bid to reduce the money supply sell the government securities such as Treasury Bills. On the other hand, in periods of liquidity shortages, the central bank buys government securities so as to increase money supply. Instruments commonly used for this purpose include treasury bills, central bank bills, or prime commercial paper. OMO enables the central bank to influence the cost and availability of reserves and bring about desired changes in bank credit and money supply. This important instrument of monetary policy has a number of advantages because it is flexible and precise, it is implemented quickly and easily reversed and the central bank has complete control. The effectiveness of OMO, however, depends on the existence of well developed financial markets that are sensitive to interest rate movements.

(c) Discount Window Operations: This instrument is a facility provided by the central bank which enables the DMBs to borrow reserves against collaterals in form of government or other acceptable securities. The central bank operates this facility in accordance with its role as lender of last resort and transactions are conducted in form of short term (usually overnight) loans. The central bank lends to financially sound DMBs at the policy rate. This rate sets the floor for the interest rate regime in the money market (the nominal anchor rate) and thereby affects the supply of credit, the supply of savings (which affects the supply of reserves and monetary aggregate) and the supply of investment (which affects employment and GDP).

(ii) Other Instruments (a) Exchange Rate: The balance of payments can be in deficit or in surplus and this can affect the

monetary base, hence the money supply, in one direction or the other. By selling or buying foreign exchange, the central bank ensures that the exchange rate is at an optimal level. The real exchange rate when misaligned affects the current account balance because of its impact on external competitiveness.

(b) Prudential Guidelines: The central bank may require DMBs to exercise particular care in their credit operations in order to achieve specified outcomes. Key elements of prudential guidelines remove some discretion from bank management and replace them with rules.

(c) Moral Suasion: The central bank issues licenses to DMBs and regulates the operation of the banking system. Thus, it can persuade banks to follow certain policies such as credit restraint or expansion, increase savings mobilization and promote exports through financial support, which otherwise they may not do, on the basis of their risk/return assessment.

Page 44 of 55

Figure III: Framework for monetary policy in Nigeria Source: Anyanwu et al (1997)

Page 45 of 55

Table 8: Monetary and other aggregates (1960 to 2005) (Nm)

Notes: COB = Currency Outside Banks DD = Demand Deposits M1 = Narrow Money supply QM = Quasi-Money NCB = Number of Commercial Banks Sources: (1) National Bureau of Statistics, Statistical Abstract, 2006 (2) CBN Statistical Bulletin, 2006. 8. The Federation Account Sources of revenue refer to the various ways and or procedures by which individuals, organizations or government adequately generate the necessary incomes to meet numerous impending expenditures. Government revenue sources are constitutionally provided especially for a republic like Nigeria. The constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria identifies different sources from which revenues could be sourced for each tier of government. Thus, the Constitution created Federation Account by section 162. Furthermore, Section 80 of the Constitution established Consolidated Revenue Funds (CRF). Federation Account is a special account into which shall be paid all revenue collected for the government of the federation (Federal, States and Local Governments). It is designed to distribute the monthly collectables between Federal, States, Local Governments and special fund in accordance to a stipulated formula provided and sanctioned by the Constitution. Federation Account has a revenue composition consisting

Page 46 of 55

“Oil and Oil” and Taxation except personal income tax of Armed Forces personnel, Police personnel, Foreign Service personnel and residents of the federal capital territory. Consolidated Revenue Funds (CRF) is the individual account that can be maintained by the Federal government and States Governments. CRF records revenues derived by the government and brought in by the government from all sources except those specify for other accounts (Federation Account, Development Fund Etc.). The revenue composition of this account includes: share from the federation account, Direct taxes ( personal income tax of Armed Forces personnel, Police personnel, Foreign Service personnel and residents of the federal capital territory), licenses and internal revenue, Mining (Gold etc), Fees, Earning and Sales, Rent, Interest and Repayments, Armed Forces Receipt, Miscellaneous Income. In broad terms, the Nigeria’s sources of revenue have been classified into oil and non oil revenue. The oil revenue consists of sales of crude oil, sales of petroleum products in Nigeria, pipeline license fees, rent of mining rights, rent of oil well, rent of oil ground, Royalties, penalty for gas flared etc. the non-oil constituent encompasses all other sources from which government generate income other than oil. For example, Taxation, agriculture, fees, fines, etc. In this category, disequilibrium exists between the contribution of oil and non-oil revenue to the aggregate revenue of the country. For instance, oil revenue for 2008-2012 accounted for up to 80% while non oil revenue contributed only 20% for the total revenue from the category (CBN, 2012). According to Section 162(1) of the 1999 constitution, the federation account is a special account required to be maintained by the Federation of Nigeria. Into this account shall be paid all revenue collected by the government of the Federation except the proceeds from the personal income tax of the Armed Forces of the Federation, the Nigeria Police Force, the Ministry or Department of Government charged with the responsibility of Foreign Affairs and the residents of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. The Federation Account is the account from which all the accruing revenue will be shared among the three tiers of Government namely Federal, State and Local Government using the existing Revenue Allocation Formula. 8.1 Revenue Allocation in a Federal System of Government The Statutory Allocation Formula is the recognized and acceptable yardstick by which all revenue accruing to the Federation Account is to be distributed among the Federal, State and Local Government Councils and any other beneficiary as may be specified by law. This varies from time to time based on the terms and procedures as may be prescribed by law. Federalism is the decentralization of the administrative system designed to cope with the size, differences, peculiarities of the regions or state and/or ethnic groups. Specifically, Nigerian fiscal federalism structure involves the allocation of taxing power, federally collectable revenue and federal expenditures, to the different levels/components of government in the federation so as to enable them discharge their constitutionally assigned functions and responsibilities to the citizens. In Nigeria since 1946, the country accepted the principles of federalism. As at 2015, there are three distinct levels of government in the country. These are the federal government at centre in Abuja, the 36 state governments as at 1999 and the 774 local government units including the six Area councils within the federal capital territory, Abuja. Each of these levels of government has its sphere of influence and functional competence. The allocation of functions among component units of the Nigerian Federal system (i.e. Federal, state and local Governments) is spelt out in part 1, section 4 of the Second Schedule of the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. In like manner, the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria has

Page 47 of 55

outlined the procedure for disbursing the ‘Distributable Pool Account to the three levels of government as per section 162, subsection 1 and 2. Resource allocation within the context of this paper refers to allocation of revenue between the 3-tiers of government in Nigeria, namely the federal, the states and the local governments according to the provisions of the Nigerian constitution. The problem of how best to allocate or share the revenue in the Federation Account among the component parts is a controversial issue in all countries that practice the federal system of government like Nigeria. Revenue sharing in Nigeria is faced with series of problems. This situation arises from the fact that States lack the authority to either raise certain types of tax or collect the proceeds. Consequently the problem centres not on who should raise taxes but how the proceeds should be shared. This problem of revenue sharing is not peculiar to Nigeria. Older Federations such as Australia, Canada and United States have faced similar problems. These older Federations were able to solve their problems in their own way given their stable economic and political environment. Furthermore, these Federations have settled constitutional history as none is still undergoing the kind of changes in the number of fiscal units as it is the case in Nigeria where the number has risen from 3 to 4, 12 to 19, 21 to 30 and to 36 States within a space of three and a half decades. The primary motivation of revenue sharing in older Federations is economic. It is to assist those States which are financially and fiscally weak, with the federally collected revenue. In these Federations, federally collected revenue forms a small fraction of the State resources. Consequently, federally generated revenue is a supplementary rather than a primary source of resources for the States. In Nigeria, the above scenario is not the case since revenue sharing reflects to a great extent the political power of the parties to the bargain. Besides, many States are economically weak to fund their activities. To solve this problem of revenue sharing, a number of Commissions and ad-hoc Committees were set up at various times in the past. 8.2 Causes of Revenue Allocation Problems in Nigeria The factors causing perennial revenue allocation problems in Nigeria include: (a) Political and Economic Instability: The political and economic instability in Nigeria has led to the absence of planning. This situation slows down economic growth and development. The instability is evidenced by the large number of Heads of State who had governed the country from the time of independence to date. (b) Constitutional Framework: The absence of a stable Constitution is a significant aspect of the problem of revenue allocation in Nigeria. The situation has not abated as there has been continued call for constitution review. This is one of the key issues which the National Assembly is now grappling with. (c) Financial Weakness: Since most of the physical units were created without guiding political and economic philosophy, they are financially weak to stand on their own. Consequently, the States are always agitating for increase in the share of the proceeds of the Federation Account. (d) Insincerity : There is an observation insincerity on the part of the Judiciary, Legislature and the Executive to address the problems of revenue allocation once and for all. The issue of the goose that lays the golden egg can also not be wished away. 8.3 Nigeria's Experience in Revenue Allocation Successive governments realised that revenue allocation is always a thorny issue in the country hence the setting up of several revenue allocation Commissions and committees to design an ideal formula for revenue distribution among the component parts of Nigeria. Notable revenue allocation Commissions are:

Page 48 of 55

(a) The Philipson Commission - 1946 The constitutional change to be introduced in 1946 by Richardson created the need to formulate proposals to enable the newly created regions of West, East and North, perform their new political and economic functions. The Philipson Commission was charged with the responsibility of formulating financial and administrative procedures to be adopted under the new Constitution. The Commission divided regional revenues into two categories, namely: "DECLARED" and "NON-DECLARED." 'Declared revenues were those locally collected by the regional authorities, such as direct taxes (personal income tax), licences, fees, income from property and rent. It was the central Government that determined what portion of the non-declared revenue was to be shared among the Regions. For the sharing of the non-declared revenues among the Regions, Philipson considered three basic principles: DERIVATION, EVEN-PROGRESS AND POPULATION. (b) The Hicks-Philipson Commission - 1951 The changes envisaged by the 1951 McPherson Constitution and the dissatisfaction with the Philipson's scheme led to the appointment of Prof. John Hicks and Sir Sidney Philipson to develop a new scheme that would achieve a more equitable sharing of revenue. The Commission recommended that the Regions should have power to raise, regulate and appropriate to themselves certain items of revenue. The commission proposed that revenue should be shared on the principles of DERIVATION, NEED AND NATIONAL INTEREST. (c) The Chick Commission - 1953 The Constitutional conference of 1953 gave an opportunity for the review of the previous allocation scheme. Sir Louis Chick was then appointed to ensure that the total revenue available was allocated in such a way that the principle of derivation was followed and compatible with the needs of the Central as well as the Regional Governments. Chick did not merely adhere to the instruction, he expanded the allocation scheme to include not only import and excise duties, but also export duties, mining, rent and royalties and personal income taxes. (d) The Raisman Commission - 1958 The Commission was appointed to review the tax jurisdiction as well as the allocation of revenue from these taxes such that the Regions could have the maximum possible proportion of the funds within their exclusive competence. To facilitate the sharing of some federally collected revenues, the Commission created the 'Distribution Pool Account' now called Federation Account, for the purpose of equitable sharing among the Regions. However, two principles were proposed, namely: DERIVATION AND NEED. (e) The Binns Commission - 1964 The Commission was set up under Section 164 of the 1963 Republican Constitution. The terms of reference of the Commission were to review and make recommendations with respect to the allocation of mining rent and royalties, and the sharing of funds in the distributable pool account among the Regions. The Commission applied the principle of financial comparability which was somewhat of a hybrid between NEED and EVEN-DEVELOPMENT. The Military Era - (1967/1975) and beyond The period of 1967 to 1975 was characterized by series of military pronouncements. Act No.15 of 1967 resolved the problem of revenue sharing by allocating equally the percentage that belonged to the Northern Region, among the six new States created. The problem of the East and West appeared resolved among the new States, on the basis of population.

Page 49 of 55

(a) Dina Interim Revenue Allocation Review Committee - 1968 The Committee was appointed in 1968 to probe into the existing system of revenue allocation as a whole and make necessary suggestions. The Committee was also to determine new revenue sources for both the Federal and State Governments. The Committee renamed the distributable pool account as "State Joint Account." It established a special grants account and recommended a permanent Planning and Fiscal Commission to administer the account, undertake continuous study and review of revenue allocation schemes. The report was rejected by the Federal Military Government and was therefore not published. Act No.13 of 1970 adopted a two-factor formula, namely: population and equality of States, while Act No. 9 of 1971 gave to the Federal Military Government absolute right to revenue from 'off-shore' rent and royalties. Act No. 6 of 1975 emphasized that all revenue to be shared by the States had to be passed through the distributable pool account, except 20% of the 'onshore' mining rents and royalties due to the State of origin, on the basis of the principle of derivation. (b) The Aboyade Technical Committee - 1977 In line with the political programme, the Technical Committee on revenue allocation was set up in 1977 to review the existing allocation scheme. The Committee recommended that all federally collected revenue without distinction be paid into the Federation Account and that the proceeds of the account be shared among the Federal, State and the Local Governments, in the following proportions: (a) Federal Government 60% (b) State Government 30% (c) Local Government 10% The Committee created a special grants account (3% from the Federal Government's share) to be administered by the Federal Military Government to the benefit of mineral producing States and other areas in need of rehabilitation from emergencies and disasters. The principle for sharing among the States was built into five-factor formula, as follows: (a) Equality of access to development opportunities. (b) National minimum standards. (c) Absorptive capacity. (d) Independent revenue and tax effort. (e) Fiscal efficiency. (c) The Okigbo Commission - 1979 was inaugurated on 23 November, 1979, to device a method of allocation that would be understood and equitable. For this reason, the Commission deliberated on the meaning of "revenue" in Sections 149(1) and 149(6) of the 1979 Constitution and concluded that receipts from repayment of loans, sales of Government capital assets and reimbursements cannot be regarded as revenue and therefore should not form part of the Federation Account or the total revenue of the Federal Government, The 1979 Constitution accorded the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, the status of a State as from 1st October, 1979, participating with other States in the share of money from the Federation Account. Section 149 of the 1979 Constitution also provided that all revenue collected by the Federal Government should be paid into the Federation Account, except for the proceeds of personal income tax of the Armed Forces personnel, the Nigerian Police personnel, the Ministry of External Affairs and the residents of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. The Commission recommended that the proceeds of the Federation Account should be shared among the Federal, State and the Local Governments, as listed hereunder: (a) Federal Government 53% (b) State Government 30% (c) Local Government 10%

Page 50 of 55

(d) Special Fund 7% The 7% Special Fund was to be applied as follows: (a) Initial development of the Federal Capital Territory 2.5% (b) Special problems of mineral producing areas 2.0% (c) Ecological and similar problems: Flood, erosion, etc. 1.0% (d) Revenue Equalization Fund 1.5% The Commission further recommended the use of four-factor formula for allocation to the State Governments, using the following weights: a) Minimum responsibility of government 40% (b) Population 40% c) Social development factor: Direct primary school enrolment 11.25% Inverse primary school enrolment 3.75% 15% d) Internal revenue effort 5% 100% 3-tiers of Government prior to and mid-way into Ibrahim Babangida's regime, shared the proceeds of the Federation Account, thus: (a) Federal Government 55% (b) State Government 35% (c) Local Government 10% The 35% accruing to the States which was paid into "States Joint Local Government Account" was in turn shared thus: (a) Direct to the States 30.5% (b) Mineral producing areas on derivation basis 2.0% (c) Amelioration of ecological problems 1.0% (d) Development of oil producing areas 1.5% The respective shares of the various Governments out of the Federation Account are known as "Statutory Allocation." In his speech on the eve of his fourth year in office, Ibrahim Babangida announced a new revenue allocation formula approved by the Armed Forces Ruling Council (AFRC), as follows: (a) Federal Government 50% (b) State Governments 30% (c) Local Governments 15% (d) Special Funds 5% The Armed Forces Ruling Council also decided that any surplus arising from the sale of gas should be separately accounted for and lodged in the Federation Account. (d) The National Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission (NRMAFC) The Commission headed by Lt. Gen. T. Y. Danjuma (Rtd) was established in 1989 as a permanent revenue allocation body. It was charged with the regular review of allocation formula. The Commission applied the following basis, viz: (a) Federal Government 48.5% (b) State Government 24.0% (c) Local Government 20.0% (d) Special Funds 7.5%

Page 51 of 55

The 7.5% of the special funds is utilized, thus: (a) Ecological problems 2.0% (b) Emergency problems 2.5% (c) Mineral producing areas 3.0% 8.4 The Principles of Revenue Allocation The various principles of revenue allocation which have been suggested and/or adopted over the years are summarised below: a) Derivation: The principle was mainly applied to the proceeds of exports and taxes on agricultural products. It asserts that the State from which the bulk of revenue is obtained should receive an extra share above what other States receive. This principle is hinged on the need to be just. b) Even Development: The goal of Government is that the Federation itself should grow and develop at an optimal rate and that each constituent State should develop at that benchmark (but necessarily equally) rate. The principle requires that growth and development be spread so that serious inequalities or imbalances are reduced in the Federation. These may be achieved by sacrificing efficiency in the form of reduced overall growth. c) Need: The rate of development which a State is able to achieve depends on the revenue it can generate. The States require financial as well as other resources to maintain existing facilities and develop additional capacities. Given a set of these other resources, a State requires funds to enable it realise its potentials. When the needs of a State are put against those of others, it may require transfer of financial resources from one State to another. d) National Interest: This principle is used residually by the highest level of Government to intervene and transfer funds to lower levels or Units to serve various considerations. It lies therefore in the sphere of discretionary grants to be administered by the highest tier, the Central Government of the Federation. e) Independent Revenue: The principle is that each level of Government should be able to raise and keep some revenue for its use. The bulk of the revenue of a State comes from what is raised and collected by the Federal Government. The main sources left to the State Governments are those on personal income taxes, capital gains tax from individuals, withholding tax and stamp duties, all of which should be exploited. (f) Continuity of Government Services: The principle suggests that each level of Government has certain minimum responsibility and that the level of services provided should not be allowed to fall below that minimum. (g) Equality of State: All men are created equal, but are endowed differently. Similarly, States are created equally but they emerge at creation and through passage of time, with different endowments of economic, financial and political power. The principle asserts that revenue sharing among the States should be done on equal basis. (h) Equality of Access to Development Opportunities: This principle was introduced to correct unequal endowments of the States. The principle asserts that preferential treatment should be given to those States which by some measure of development, lag behind others or fall below certain norms. (i) Absorptive Capacity: It represents the capacity of a State to make proper use of funds. That means that funds should be released to those States which could best make use of them. (j) Population: The principle asserts that since Government is about people, development is about people and that the purpose of Government is the welfare of the people. Therefore, States with larger population should receive extra share over and above others with smaller population. (k) Tax Effort : The principle applied in most Federations, is designed to encourage States to exploit their tax capacities. The realization of a State's potential in respect of tax revenues will widen its development possibilities. (I) Fiscal Efficiency: This principle asserts that States would minimize the cost of fiscal administration or obtain the maximum revenue from a given cost. Fiscal efficiency reflects not only on the ability to raise taxes and collect them, but the structure of tax base itself and the overall administrative machinery of government.

Page 52 of 55

8.5 Structure for Revenue Allocation from the Federation Account The allocation principles of revenue sharing formula that are in use at the inception of the present democratic dispensation are: Population, Equality of States, Internal Revenue Generation, Land mass, Terrain, Population density and Derivation. These principles are expressed in the Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution under Section 162 (2), which provides that “in any approved formula, derivation accruing to the area which is home to natural resources being exploited for foreign exchange earnings, takes a magnitude of not less than thirteen percent of the revenue accruing to the Federation Account. So far, a revenue allocation formula was proposed by the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission in 2003 and submitted to the National Assembly through the Presidency, as prescribed by the 1999 Constitution. There emerged a structure of sharing of revenue from the Federation Account as typified below: Vertical Formula This shows the structure of allocation to the three tiers of government. 1. Federal Government 46.00% 2. State Government (including FCT) 33.33% 3. Local Governments (including Area Councils) 21.00% Total 100.00% Horizontal Formula This shows the structure of allocation among State Governments (including FCT) and among Local Governments (including Area Councils) to the three tiers of government. i. Equality 45.00 ii. Population 25.60 iii. Population Density 1.45 iv. Internal Revenue Generation Effort 8.31 v. Land Mass 5.35 vi. Terrain 5.35 vii. Rural Roads/Inland Waterways 1.21 viii. Portable Water 1.50 ix. Education 3.00 x. Health 3.00 Total 100.00 8.6 Revenue Sharing Formula in use in Nigeria

Page 53 of 55

The first resource allocation and control commission in Nigeria was the Sydney Philipson’s commission of 1946. Philipson adopted the principle of derivation and even progress. By which a region received according to the proportion of the resources the region produced. This later led to criticism and disagreement as the principle favored some states at the detriment of others. This criticism led to setting up another commission called Hicks commission which introduced the principles of (i) needs (2) independent (3) national interest (4) special grants. There emerged subsequent criticisms and disagreement on the subsequent commission set up even till the end of colonial rule. After the colonial rule, the question of how resources/revenue is to be controlled and allocated also generated problem continuously. The Dina’s commission of the 1962 introduced another formula whereby the north was given 42%, east 30%, west 20% and Midwest 8% . This still did not address any problem in the federation. In 1979, Okigbo’s commission was established and having done a thorough review of past allocations, it came up with 58.5% of resource allocation to the central government, 31.5% to the state government and local governments 10%. But what we have in place as an arrangement of resource control/allocation today in Nigeria as codified in the 1999 federal republic constitution section(162-168) are principles of (1) population (2) equality of states (3) internally generated revenue (4) landmass (5) terrain (6) population density (7) the principle of derivation. Presently, after the deduction of the 13 percent provision for the oil producing states, the remaining 87 percent of national revenue is distributed as follows; Federal Government is allocated 52.7 percent, States Government 26.7 percent Local Governments 20.6 percent. 9. Monitoring Government Allocation and Expenditures

The principles for managing public resources run through many diverse organizations delivering public services. The requirements for the different kinds of body reflect their duties, responsibilities and public expectations. The standards expected of public services anywhere in the world are honesty, impartiality, openness, accountability, accuracy, fairness, integrity, transparency, objectivity and reliability, carried out

Page 54 of 55

in the spirit of, as well as to the letter of, the law in the public interest to high ethical standards achieving value for money. Expenditure control could be defined as the strings of coordinated actions which have to be taken to ensure that all expenditures are 'wholly', 'necessarily', 'reasonably' and 'exclusively' incurred for the purposes for which they are meant. The following are the basic controls exercised over Government expenditure: (a) The Executive Control. (b) The Legislative Control. (c) The Ministry of Finance Control. (d) The Treasury Control (Office of Accountant - General of the Federation) (e) The Departmental Control. (f) Office of the Auditor - General for the Federation. 9.1 The Executive Control The Executive comprises the President and his cabinet members who have the responsibility for the efficient and effective control of the administration of the country - politically and economically. The Constitution created two other arms of government, called the Legislative and the Judiciary for purposes of checks and balances. All measures and policies taken by the President are subject to the approval of the Legislature within the ambit of the Constitution. Consequently, in accordance with Section 75(1) of the Constitution, "The President shall cause to be prepared and laid before each House of the National Assembly at anytime in each financial year, estimates of revenue and expenditure of the Federation for the following financial year." The President, in order to satisfy the provisions of the Constitution also appoints a Cabinet Committee on Estimates, to advise him on the contemplated policy measures. The policy measures contemplated are then transmitted to the Budget Department in the Presidency. This development in turn leads to the issuance of guidelines on the preparation of the Budget. As a result, effective supervision is exercised on all the Agencies involved in budget operation. Any Unit of the Government whose requirements are higher than the 'control figures' already issued, is invited to defend the excess request. The Legislative Control The National Assembly is the Supreme Authority on matters of the Nation's finance. The control exercised by the Legislature is both 'antenatal' and 'post-natal'. The 'ante-natal' control is in the sense in which the Legislature considers and approves the Estimates submitted to it by the President. 'Post-natal' control is the review of transactions after payment. No amount of public fund may be spent without the approval of the National Assembly. However, Section 82 of the 1999 Constitution empowers the President to spend from the Consolidated Revenue Fund to carry on the administration of Government of the Federation for not more than six (6) months or until the coming into operation of the Appropriation Act, whichever is earlier. Ministry of Finance Control When Ministries/Departments require money to pay for services, they normally apply to the Minister of Finance, for such funds. The tradition is that once a year the Ministries and Parastatals present Estimates to cover their needs and requirements which are expected to be prudent, necessary and reasonable, in accordance with the Financial Regulations and Appropriation Act. The Minister passes the Consolidated Revenue and Expenditure Estimates to the President who will present them to the Federal Executive Council for approval before they are forwarded to the National Assembly as Appropriation Bill. The Treasury Control - Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation (OAGF) The Accountant-General has overall responsibility for the total expenditure of Government. His office would keep necessary books of accounts to record all the receipts and expenditure of the various Ministries and Departments. The Treasury Department exercises some measure of supervision and checks over the accounting records of the Non-Self Accounting Units.

Page 55 of 55

Inspectorate Officers from the Office of the Accountant - General of the Federation visit the various Ministries and Departments to evaluate the system of internal control. They do this to ensure that the accounting system and maintenance of various books of accounts conform to the approved regulations and procedures. This is another aspect of control exercised in any organisation. The Treasury dispatches Internal Auditors to the Ministries and Self-Accounting Departments to appraise the effectiveness of the existing internal checks and report upon any inadequacy discovered. Controls by Warrants Although the Estimates and Appropriation Acts guide the disbursement of public funds, the release of money is subject to issuance of relevant Warrants by the Finance Minister, for the expenditure. The Warrant authorizes the Accountant-General to release fund from the Consolidated Revenue Fund or Development Fund. The system of Warrant gives the Executive greater control over the issuance of funds than would be offered by a system which relies solely on the provisions of the Appropriation Acts. Departmental Control over the Budgeted Expenditure A Departmental Vote Expenditure Allocation Book (D.V.E.A. Book) is a record of payments made and liabilities incurred under the Votes or Funds approved for each Ministry or Extra-Ministerial Department. A Vote Book is maintained for each Head or Sub-Head of expenditure. It is an integral part of the Budgetary Control System. The Book is designed to facilitate vote watching to ensure that expenditure incurred are not in excess of appropriation. Over-expenditure of departmental vote amounts to reckless use of public funds and is seriously frowned at by Government. It is the duty of the Officer who is controlling the Vote to thoroughly investigate, without delay, payments or charges which appear in the schedules drawn up by the Accountant-General, which do not appear in the Vote Books particularly with a view to the prevention and detection of fraudulent payments. Auditor-General for the Federation The Auditor General for the Federation scrutinizes all accounts and records of the money collected and spent and reports to the National Assembly appropriately on the instances of waste, extravagance, inefficiency or fraud. It is observed that the Auditor-General's duty is post-payment audit, except in the matters relating to pension and gratuity payments on which he performs pre-payment audit. This is in addition to the regularity and compliance audit that he carries out as a duty.