Society of Malawi - Historical and Scientific is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Society of Malawi Journal. http://www.jstor.org MATERIALISM AND ETHNICITY: THE RISE OF LOMWE ETHNIC CONSCIOUSNESS IN MALAWI, 1890-2010 Author(s): Gift Wasambo Kayira and Paul Chiudza Banda Source: The Society of Malawi Journal, Vol. 66, No. 2 (2013), pp. 39-50 Published by: Society of Malawi - Historical and Scientific Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23611971 Accessed: 28-03-2015 17:08 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
13
Embed
Materialism and Ethnicity: The Rise of Lomwe Ethnic Conciousness in Malawi, 1890-2010
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Society of Malawi - Historical and Scientific is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to TheSociety of Malawi Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
MATERIALISM AND ETHNICITY: THE RISE OF LOMWE ETHNIC CONSCIOUSNESS IN MALAWI,1890-2010 Author(s): Gift Wasambo Kayira and Paul Chiudza Banda Source: The Society of Malawi Journal, Vol. 66, No. 2 (2013), pp. 39-50Published by: Society of Malawi - Historical and ScientificStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23611971Accessed: 28-03-2015 17:08 UTC
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of contentin a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
MATERIALISM AND ETHNICITY: THE RISE OF LOMWE ETHNIC CONSCIOUSNESS IN MALAWI,
1890-2010
Gift Wasambo Kayira and Paul Chiudza Banda
The last decade in Malawi has been one characterized by a rise in the number
of resuscitated ethnic groups. For instance, the Ngoni, the Chewa, and the Yao
all seem to have regrouped to revive their common ethnic identities. One other
ethnic group that has followed a similar route and suddenly risen to a position
of prominence is that of the Lomwe, commonly found in Southern Malawi.
Such a rise to prominence has seen the group form an organization called
Mulhako wa Alomwe and indeed construct its own national headquarters in
Mulanje District. This paper thus discusses factors that had for long time hindered the Lomwe's rise to a position of prominence and also those that
have shaped and consolidated the ethnic group to express its ethnic
consciousness in the manner it has done. The paper argues that the
contemporary Lomwe atavism has largely been driven by material rather than
merely common historical forces.
Key words: Ethnicity, Ethnic consciousness, Lomwe
Introduction
This paper highlights the development of ethnic consciousness among the Lomwe ethnic group of southern Malawi. It argues that the rise of ethnic
consciousness amongst the Lomwe people has been driven by materialism and
political power. This is so because the drive towards ethnic re-union started and gathered momentum at a time when the former Head of State, Dr. Bingu wa Mutharika who was of Lomwe origin, assumed his position. In the process, the paper also re-traces a brief historical background of the Lomwe people.
Data for this paper was collected from both oral and written sources.
Oral data was collected through interviews which were conducted with
ordinary Lomwe people; Lomwe leaders, and other independent observers. These interviewees were sampled using three main ways, namely; random
sampling, snow-ball sampling and purposive sampling. In total, thirty respondents were interviewed as part of this study. The written sources
included books, journal articles and also newspaper articles. These too were also purposively and carefully sampled and analyzed before being considered to form part of this final write-up.
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Setting the context Over the last four decades, an ethnic group has been placed as an
appropriate unit of study across academia. The term ethnic group has been defined in different ways by different scholars. One such scholar, Thomson
(2004), defines it as a community of people who have the conviction that they have a common identity and common fate, based on issues of origin, kinship ties, traditions, cultural uniqueness, a shared history and possibly a shared
language.1
From this definition, it is clear that an ethnic group is based more, or formulated more, on sentiments of origin and descent rather than the
geographical considerations of a nation. Based on this conceptualization, Malawi as a country has more than
ten ethnic groups spread across the country's three regions and twenty-eight districts. Some of the most prominent ethnic groups include the Yao, Chewa, Tumbuka, Ngoni, and Tonga.
The term ethnic consciousness or ethnicity, as used in other sources,
represents an awareness of one's belonging to a particular ethnic group,
different from others, and the sort of action that follows that realization and/or awareness.
According to Ake (2000), there are two main schools of thought that
are used in explaining the concept of ethnicity. The first of these is the 'Primordialist School', while the second one is the 'Instrumentalist School'. The former contends that members of the same ethnic group have a common
primordial bond that determines their personal identity and turns the group into a natural community of a type that is older than the modern nation or modern
class system. On the other hand, the instrumentalists contend that ethnicity is
essentially a means for people, especially leaders, to pursue their own purpose,
such as forming, mobilizing and manipulating groups of people for political ends.2 It is the latter conceptualization of ethnicity that guides this paper's key argument.
Ethnicity as it has developed elsewhere in the world has many characteristics which are only enforced depending on a need that is constructed
according to circumstances. Some of the characteristics are as follows: (a) that
although ethnic groups exist, they do not have the permanency with which one could determine the number of members or functions which they must
perform; (b) in most cases, ethnicity and/or ethnic consciousness is driven by
and produced by material and historical forces; (c) ethnicity exists only within a political society consisting of diverse ethnic groups; (d) ethnicity is
1 A. Thomson, An Introduction to African Politics, 2nd edition, (London: Routledge,
2004), p.60. 2
C. Ake, The Feasibility of Democracy in Africa (Dakar: CODESRJA, 2000), p.93.
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
characterized by conflict; (e) ethnicity is characterized by a common consciousness of being one in relation to other relevant groups (i.e. putative we versus putative they).3
From these characteristics, and indeed some that could be added, what
one notes is that ethnicity or ethnic consciousness exists as a reaction to some
forces and dynamics taking place in society.4 In other words, ethnicity does not
develop in a vacuum; rather it is an instrument by means of which its enactors can gain political, economic or social advantages in a competitive arena. As such, ethnicity is and has over the years been used as a tool that benefits other
people while at the same time disadvantaging others.5
The Lomwe of Malawi and the Rise of Ethnic Consciousness The Lomwe peoples mostly found in Southern Malawi originated
from Northern Mozambique and started coming in large numbers into Malawi from the late 19th century, with a steady increase being experienced between
1900 and 1945. The Lomwe population has steadily been increasing emerging into the second largest ethnic group in the country with 2,288,285 people.6
Several works have documented the Lomwe migrations from
Mozambique.7 But perhaps Chirwa's (1994) work summarises the rest. He notes that there were four major phases of Alomwe immigration into Malawi, from the late 19th century to mid 20th century. The first phase took place before
the advent of colonial rule (before the 1890s, and this was largely due to
3 Ibid, p.95 and A.E. Ojie, "Democracy, Ethnicity and the Problem of Extrajudicial
Killing in Nigeria" Journal of Black Studies,_\o\36, No.4, Mar.2006, pp.546-569,
p.547-548. See also W.C. Chirwa, "Democracy, Ethnicity and Regionalism" in K.M. Phiri and K.R. Ross, Democratization in Malawi: A Stocktaking (Limbe: Assemblies of
God Literature Press, 1998), p.53. 4
For a detailed analysis of how ethnicity in Southern Africa has developed see L. Vail.
"Ethnicity in Southern African History" in L. Vail, et al, The Creation of Tribalism in
Southern Africa (London: James Currey Press1_1989), pp. 2-6. 5
W.C. Chirwa, ibid, p.53. See also M.H. Ross, "Political Alienation, Participation and
Ethnicity: An African Case" American Journal of Political Science, Vol.19, No.2, May 1975, pp.291-311), pp.294-295. 6
See Government of Malawi, Population and Housing Census, 2008_ (National Statistical Office, Sept.2009), p.66. 7
See works by A. Chilivumbo, "On Labour and Alomwe Migrations into Malawi", Rural Africana. Vol. 24, (1974), pp.49-57; T. Galligan, "The Nguru Penetration into
Nyasaland, 1892-1914" in R. MacDonald (ed.), From Nyasaland to Malawi (Nairobi:
1957), pp. 108-123; L. White, '"Tribes' and the Aftermath of Chilembwe Rising", African Affairs, Vol. 83, (1984), pp. 511-541; Boeder, 1984, W.C. Chirwa, "Alomwe and Mozambican Immigrant Labor in Colonial Malawi, 1890s-1945", The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Vol.27, No.3, 1994, pp.525-550,
pp.527-550.
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
ecological factors. This phase involved movement of Lomwe communities
who were agriculturalists into the more fertile areas of Eastern Malawi and the
edges of the Shire Highlands in present day Lake Chirwa and Phalombe Districts.
The second phase took place between 1892 and 1901, at a time when officials of the Church of Scotland (Blantyre) Mission began to establish contacts with the African communities in Portuguese East Africa
(Mozambique), east of the Shire Highlands. These contacts paved way for labour recruiters from Nyasaland to hire labourers from that area. Furthermore,
during the same period, there were other internal developments within
Mozambique that propelled this emigration. For instance, there were the
pacification wars of the late 1890s, fought between the Portuguese and other
independent African chiefs; and the outbreak of famine between 1900 and 1901. Large family units also migrated due to the tax and labour demands of the Mozambican colonial economy. The Government had introduced a labour
code that required all male Africans between fourteen and sixty years of age to
work. Furthermore, a 'head tax' of 1,200 Reis (about 3 Shillings, 6 Pence) was
imposed on every adult African. 8
Failure to pay tax was punished severely in
such means as shooting, imprisoning and beating. Such developments made the pattern of the migration to change from individual seasonal migrant
labourers to family units coming to settle permanently. This trend continued
into the third phase. The third phase which stretched from about 1903 to the 1920s was
characterized by changes in the internal sources of agricultural labour in
Nyasaland itself. The beginning of external recruiting of labour in 1903/04 forced the local employers to look to Mozambique as an important alternative
source of labour. Immigrant families began to settle as labour tenants on the
white estates in the Shire Highlands. The process was firmly established with the expansion in African cotton production from 1910, and tobacco production after the First World War.
The last major phase began in the early 1930s onwards, and saw
increasing numbers of Mozambican seasonal migrant labourers coming to
work on the expanding tea plantations of Thyolo and Mulanje Districts. Here two factors played an important role which contributed to the increase in labour emigration from Mozambique. The first had to do with the proximity of the two tea-producing districts (Thyolo and Mulanje) to the Malawi
Mozambique border, which made it easy for people from northern
Mozambique to enter Malawi, at a time when the borders were not closely
guarded. Secondly, there was the opening up of Nyasaland to external
recruiters from 1935. From that year onwards, Government policy deliberately
! Chirwa, 1994, 525-550.
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
allowed Nyasaland labourers to be employed by other foreign labour recruitment agents from Southern Rhodesia and South Africa, such as Witwatersrand Native Labour Association (WNLA) and The Employment Bureau Association (TEBA), and this meant that the local settler employers were unable to compete effectively for the local labour, especially because the
former offered higher wages and better working conditions. As such, the Lomwe labourers offered an alternative source of labour supply.9 What is clear from these four major phases of Lomwe emigration into Malawi is that the movements were not made with considerations of one's ethnic group in mind, nor did the people come under the leadership of their ethnic leaders. What seemed to matter most were individual interests, in terms of personal
safety and the need for personal subsistence (for those looking for fertile land and jobs). As one of the study's informants commented:
Most of them were coming as individuals just with their
families, and not with chiefs. That explains why here in
Mulanje you will find that there are very few Lomwe chiefs. Most of the chiefs are of either Yao or Mang'anja ethnic identity, who were the original inhabitants of this area. For instance, TA Chikumbu is Yao, TA Mtilamanja is a Yao, TA Juma is a Yao, while TA Njema and TA Mabuka are both of Mang'anja origin.10
This probably explains why it took so long for the Lomwe to establish
themselves as one of the dominant ethnic groups in the country despite their
increasing numbers. As noted by White in Chirwa (1994), what the Lomwe migrants did was to integrate themselves into the local communities already resident in Nyasaland, such as the Yao and Mang'anja. White thus provides four reasons why the Lomwe easily integrated into the other local
communities. The first had to do with the fact that their languages were mutually intelligible with the Chiyao and Chimang'anja spoken in Nyasaland, which allowed easy communication. Secondly, the Lomwe structures and
matrilineal descent were similar to those of the Ayao and the Amang'anja. Again, just like the Lomwe, the Ayao and Amang'anja were also originally from Mozambique. They all shared a common consciousness of being 'foreigners', having come from a common place of origin. Lastly, the Lomwe came into Nyasaland at a time when Ayao and Amang'anja chiefs were
competing for political power. By incorporating the immigrants into their local
9Chirwa, 1994, pp. 527-528. 10
O.T. (Oral Testimony), Interview with TA Chikumbu, on 16th June 2011, at Chisitu,
Mulanje District.
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
communities, these chiefs boosted their own political strength.11 Whites'
analysis however conceals rather than reveals challenges the Lomwe faced at
the time. It is to Boeder we turn to for a revelation of such factors.
Boeder (1984) notes that the Lomwe who came to Malawi were
usually treated as a lower caste group due to the vulnerable position which
brought them in the country. In some areas of Thyolo, Mulanje, Chirzadzulu and Zomba, they were referred to as Akapolo (slaves), as they worked for local
chiefs in return for land. And in other areas, they were called derogatory terms such as the name 'Anguru', for failing to speak local languages.12
All these developments would thus provide an explanation as to why it took long for the Lomwe migrants to establish their own chiefdoms in Malawi as compared to the other ethnic groups that came far much earlier and
indeed with their own traditional leaders. Boeder notes that it was only after the 1930 that colonial administrators, through the policy of 'Indirect Rule',
began to appoint chiefs and councillors from amongst the Lomwe peoples to lead people around the estate areas of the Shire Highlands. In most cases, this
process was problematic because the appointees were usually not favourites of
the local people and could be scorned even by some Lomwe people. The colonial government however favoured working with the Lomwe leaders because it viewed them as being intelligent, hardworking and willing to
work.13
Using this trend of analysis, one would posit that the Lomwe
chieftainships that began to emerge after 1930 were merely a colonial creation,
that were established by the colonial administrators in line with the Indirect Rule Policy, which compelled the government to work with collaborative local rulers. For instance, it was during that era that the areas for such chiefs as
Chikumbu, Mabuka, Mtiramanja, Mkanda, and Nazombe, among others, were
erroneously demarcated as Lomwe chieftainships.14 But even with that, the
Lomwe existed without a paramount chief. It was only later on 25 th
October,
2008 that Paramount Chief Mkhumba was installed by Dr. Bingu Wa
Mutharika, a position that still remains highly contested.15
11 L. White, Magomero in W.C. Chirwa, op cit, p.536.
12 R.B. Boeder, Silent Majority: A History of the Lomwe of Malawi_(Pretoria: Africa
Institute of South Africa, 1984), pp. 19-18).
"ibid, pp.31-33. 14
MNA/S1/1312/30: The District Administration (Native) Ordinance, 1924:
Proclamation No.5 of 1931. 15
There are traces in the Lomwe Oral Tradition that Mkhumba is a Mang'anja not
Lomwe as such he could not be a Lomwe Paramount Chief: This was a general consensus among members of Focus Group Discussion No.l, held on 15,h June 2011,
at Group Village Headman Ndala's Compound, TA Njema, Mulanje.
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Nevertheless, one remarkable effect of such colonial favours could
have been the emergence of the Lomwe welfare association in the early 1940s.
As early as 1943, under the leadership of Lewis Mataka Bandawe, a tribal
group called Lomwe Tribal Representative Association (LTRA) was formed.
Among some of its key aims were to: uplift the values and behaviour of the Lomwe people; bring about cooperation amongst the Lomwes; bring to
government's attention the existence of Lomwe people in the country and to
raise issues concerning the people's welfare with colonial government authorities.16 It was the LTRA that fought hard in persuading the colonial
government to prohibit the use of the derogatory name 'Anguru' for the
preferred 'Alomwe' in all official government documents. However, this association only remained active until 1947, when most of its thoughtful leaders felt that it was better to put aside their parochial ethnic pursuits and direct their energies in working with the then newly formed Nyasaland African
Congress (NAC), which transcended tribal lines.17 The fact that its dissolution did not invite any opposition from the local masses would perhaps suggest that the organization largely existed in the minds of the Lomwe elite. In fact, a
good number of our informants expressed ignorance of the existence of such a
grouping. Colonial favours towards the Lomwe people appear to have short
lived. Malawi's post-colonial political landscape presented a new set of
challenges to the achievement of Lomwe ethnic consciousness. For instance,
the Banda regime (1964-1994), mainly promoted the Chewa ethnic group and
gave very little room for other ethnic groups to flourish.18 Most of this study's
informants also echoed this sentiment:
We all know that Kamuzu's (Dr. Banda's) aim was to have a united country, despite being made up of different ethnic groups. So to simplify his job, what he did was to have one national language (Chichewa) and refer to all of us as Malawians. This meant that it was
difficult for any other ethnic group to rise up and
challenge the Chewa dominance. So I would partly blame the dictatorship of Dr. Banda because it made other ethnic groups and their traditions be treated as second class.19
16 Boeder, 1984, pp. 73-75.
17 Boeder, pp.73-75.
18 See R.B. Boeder, p.54 and W.C. Chirwa, "Democracy, Ethnicity and Regionalism",
in K.M. Phiri and K.R. Ross, Democratization in Malawi: A Stocktaking,_(Limbe: Assemblies of God Literature Press, 1998), pp.57-63. 19
O.T., Interview with Mr. Hastings Maloya, (Now the late). He was the National
Spokesperson of the Mulhako wa Alomwe cultural group, 21sl June 2011, Mulanje
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Another informant had this to say: Let us be frank here, during that regime the Lomwes were not considered as one of the dominant ethnic
groups. In fact, just the mention of the name 'Lomwe',
was raising all sorts of stereotypes against us. Most of us could not be employed once we revealed our ethnic
identity. We could hardly speak our own language. And no one could dare oppose that, since Dr. Banda
could even brutally kill those close to him if they opposed his policies. What's more, with villagers like
us, we simply had no voice.20
Such sentiments were in agreement with an earlier study by Chirwa (1998) who argued that the Banda regime (1964-1994) survived on regional and ethnic divisions. That regime favoured the Chewa people of the Central
Region, at the expense of the Northern and Southern Regions. For instance,
Chichewa was imposed on the country as a 'national language'21; and indeed in the late 1980s, teachers from the Southern and Northern Regions were sent back to their respective regions. Chirwa describes this as a 'Chewa-isation'
process, which eventually contributed to the polarization of the country along
regional lines which had an impact of posing a threat to the efforts of 'national
unity'.22
It is not clear whether Dr. Banda really had a deliberate policy of
silencing the Lomwe and other ethnic groups of the country. What could be
certain, however, is that the authoritarian political environment Dr. Banda had
created had the potential of silencing the Lomwe and other related groups. Other revelations on the silence amongst the Lomwe people had to do
with the fact that the Lomwe ethnic group was described in stereotypical terms, hence people shunned being associated with it. One informant provided the
following revelations: It was due to the fact that there were so many stereotypes
that were levelled against the Lomwes. These included
Boma. 20
O.T., One of the members of the Focus Group Discussion, No.l held on 15th June
2011, at Group Village Headman Ndala's Compound, TA Njema, Mulanje. 21
Even though the motion to have Chichewa adopted as a national language was moved
in Parliament by one Flax Musopole from Chitipa District, the fact that no formidable
opposition was levelled against it shows how appealing it was to Dr. Banda and the
Chewa fraternity. 22
W.C. Chirwa, op cit, pp.57-63.
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
All these factors taken together might have suppressed the Lomwe voice
during the Banda era.
While the highlighted factors come closer to our understanding of the Lomwe's silence, the Lomwe should have been the first people to express their consciousness out of their primordial bond following several advantages they had. The estates in the Shire Highlands brought them together, an advantage which neither of the other ethnic groups in Malawi enjoyed. The colonial favours towards them even saw the installation of the allegedly Lomwe chiefs in the 1930s, and again the establishment of the Lomwe Tribal Representative Association, all presented special advantages to the Lomwe. It is tempting to want to suggest that it was the nature of their being a stateless people that
presented a formidable challenge towards any form of cultural expression. Unlike the other ethnic groups such as the Chewa, Tumbuka, Ngonde who came under the guidance of their legendary leaders, and managed to establish elaborate political structures that permitted different forms of cultural
expression, the same was not true with the Lomwe. As noted above, they infiltrated Malawi in small groups without chiefly leaders and at different
periods. Besides, they remained increasingly divided along dialectical lines to warrant the achievement of a strong cultural identity.24 Boeder in particular observes that the Lomwe of Mozambique were at first one group. However,
later on they split into two groups, namely, the Lomwe proper and the Lolo.
With time, these two groups again split into numerous groups. For instance,
from the Lomwe proper, there appeared groups such as the Manyawa,
Maratha, Likhuku, the Nguru, just to mention a few. Similarly, from the Lolo
appeared the Kokhola, Thakwani and the Marenje. Given the highlighted challenges, it was less probable that such a stateless people would ably express their cultural consciousness out of primordialist motives.
The recently increased levels of bonding amongst the Lomwe are
therefore far much beyond the primordialist motive, which binds people together simply because they share a common background and identity. If this had been the case, then the renewed re-organization could have started way back in time, and might not have waited for a time when one of their own had assumed the topmost seat in the country's political hierarchy. Evidence shows that the rise of the contemporary Lomwe ethnic consciousness has largely been
23 O.T., Interview with TA Chikumbu, op cit.
24 For a detailed discussion of the Lomwe's dialectical groups see works by M. Tew,
Peoples of the Lake Nyasa Reg ion_(]London: OUP, 1950); E.Colson, and M. Gluckman,
(eds.), Seven Tribes of British Central Africa JLondon: OUP, 1951); T. Price. "The
Name 'Nguru'", The Nyasaland Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1 (1952); Boeder, 1984.
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
driven by 'instrumentalist motives' as the idea of ethnic and cultural revival did not emanate from the local people, rather it was an idea that was hatched
by the elite before it was introduced to the local masses. The most notable outcome of which was the founding of the Mulhako wa Alomwe cultural group
on 25th October, 2008 and the construction of its national headquarters at
Chonde in Mulanje District. As pointed out by some of the key informants: This group was a brainchild of the State President, Professor Bingu wa Mutharika, who himself, being a
Lomwe, sat down and realized that our ethnic group was
slowly losing its identity. This made him consult other Lomwes who, together with the President, thought of
establishing the group...It was going to be difficult for
people in the villages to start such a project, because most of them were always shy of being associated with the Lomwe ethnic group.25
The idea and indeed the actual formation of the group was started by the educated elite. In fact, we don't even have to go far; this group was started by the Head of State, Professor Bingu wa Mutharika. After going through his documents, I discovered that he actually hatched this idea
even before he became State President. In the early years,
I understand it was difficult for him to convince others to
take part in this ambitious project. However with time the educated ones organized themselves and thought of
selling the idea to the local masses.26
One would only speculate instrumentalist objectives at play in the
brokering of the Lomwe identity. Firstly, the Lomwe population ranks second
to that of the Chewa according to 2008 National Population and Housing Census. Given the voting trend in Malawi that has generally followed regional lines, politicians aligning themselves with dominant groups automatically gain political mileage over the rest.27 Secondly, the fact that the Mulhako wa Alomwe Organisation has been supported by key professionals and
businessmen displays politics of patronage. A good number of the Lomwe elite
might have supported Mutharika in his bid to unify the Lomwe for economic
gains. Mutharika's position of influence as the Head of State and Government
25 O.T., Interview with TA Chikumbu, op cit.
26 O.T., Interview with Mr. Hastings Maloya, op cit.
27 For a detailed discussion of Malawi's politics of regionalism see W.C. Chirwa,
"Democracy, Ethnicity and Regionalism", in K.M. Phiri and K.R. Ross,
Democratization in Malawi: A Stocktaking,_(Limbe: Assemblies of God Literature
Press, 1998), pp.57-63.
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
opened opportunities for qualified citizens of Lomwe origin. During his
presidency, for instance, crucial positions in the civil service and parastatal institutions were given to the Lomwe people who equally proved to be key supports of their cultural organization.
Although the above sentiments provide a picture that the rise of the ethnic consciousness did not emanate from the local masses, one interesting
development is the extent to which the idea was welcomed at grass-roots level. Discussions held with the local masses indicate that this cultural revival and re union was something that they had been missing for a long time, and that their involvement in such consciousness should not be interpreted as being driven
by material and political forces and/or motives. The comments below illustrate this point:
We take part in Mulhako wa Alomwe activities because it is culturally good for us to celebrate our heritage as
Lomwes. When we go to our meetings we are able to
learn more about our culture, especially of things like
songs, dances, foodstuffs and other traditional beliefs. So our aim is just to enjoy ourselves at such gatherings. Even if they tell us that there will be no food provided, we would still go. For us, what we want is to learn more about our culture.28
We just go there (Mulhako wa Alomwe) to enjoy our cultural heritage. Even if they do not give us food or
transport, we would still go because it concerns our
ethnic group. Even if the President were to say that he is
busy and that he would not come (to the national
celebrations), you will still see us there.29
What one notes from such sentiments is that while it is not possible to totally rule out the 'instrumentalist' motives that were at play during the early stage in
the rise of the Lomwe ethnic consciousness, what has developed over the years has gone beyond that.
Conclusion This paper can only claim to have analysed factors that for a long time
prohibited the Lomwe people of Southern Malawi from expressing their ethnic consciousness and also those that consolidated it later during the early years of the first decade of the 21st Century. The account shows that the Lomwe never
achieved any meaningful ethnic consciousness owing to the various challenges
28 O.T., Focus Group Discussion, No.l, op cit.
29 O.T., Member of Focus Group Discussion, No.2, held on 15th June 2011, at Group
Village Headman Ndala's Compound, TA Njema, Mulanje.
This content downloaded from 157.182.150.22 on Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:08:12 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions