Top Banner
Comparing Marine and Terrestrial Ecosystems: Implications for the Design of Coastal Marine Reserves Author(s): Mark H. Carr, Joseph E. Neigel, James A. Estes, Sandy Andelman, Robert R. Warner and John L. Largier Source: Ecological Applications, Vol. 13, No. 1, Supplement: The Science of Marine Reserves (Feb., 2003), pp. S90-S107 Published by: Ecological Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3100000 . Accessed: 05/02/2014 14:10 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecological Applications. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 131.123.60.5 on Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:10:07 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
19

Marine Terestrial

Aug 16, 2015

Download

Documents

kellenroth

Marine Terestrial
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript

Comparing Marine and Terrestrial Ecosystems: Implications for the Design of Coastal MarineReservesAuthor(s): Mark H. Carr, Joseph E. Neigel, James A. Estes, Sandy Andelman, Robert R.Warner and John L. LargierSource: Ecological Applications, Vol. 13, No. 1, Supplement: The Science of Marine Reserves(Feb., 2003), pp. S90-S107Published by: Ecological Society of AmericaStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3100000 .Accessed: 05/02/2014 14:10Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. .Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access toEcological Applications.http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 131.123.60.5 on Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:10:07 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and ConditionsEcologicalApplications,13(1)Supplement,2003,pp.S90-S107 e2003by the EcologicalSocietyofAmerica COMPARINGMARINEANDTERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS:IMPLICATIONS FORTHEDESIGNOFCOASTALMARINERESERVES MARKH.CARR,1 JOSEPH E.NEIGEL,2 JAMES A.ESTES,3 SANDYANDELMAN,4 ROBERT R.WARNER,5 ANDJOHN L.LARGIER6 'DepartmentofEcologyandEvolutionaryBiology,andInstituteofMarineSciences,UniversityofCalifornia, SantaCruz, California95064USA 2Department ofBiology,UniversityofLouisiana,Lafayette,Louisiana70504-2451USA 3U.S.GeologicalSurvey,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaCruz,California95064USA 4NationalCenter forEcologicalAnalysisandSynthesis,UniversityofCalifornia, SantaBarbara,California93101-5504USA 5Department ofEcology,Evolution,andMarineBiology,andMarineScienceInstitute,UniversityofCalifornia, SantaBarbara,California93106USA 6Marine Life ResearchGroup,ScrippsInstitutionofOceanography,UniversityofCalifornia, SanDiego,California92093-0209USA Abstract.Conceptsand theoryfor the designand applicationofterrestrial reservesis basedonourunderstandingofenvironmental,ecological,andevolutionaryprocessesre- sponsibleforbiologicaldiversityandsustainabilityofterrestrial ecosystemsand howhu- mans haveinfluencedtheseprocesses.Howwellthis terrestrial-based theory can be applied towardthedesignand applicationofreservesinthecoastalmarineenvironmentdepends, inpart, onthedegreeofsimilaritybetweenthesesystems.Severalmarked differencesin ecologicaland evolutionaryprocessesexistbetweenmarineand terrestrial ecosystemsas ramificationsoffundamentaldifferencesintheirphysicalenvironments(i.e.,therelative prevalenceofair and water)and contemporarypatterns ofhumanimpacts.Mostnotably, thegreat extentand rate ofdispersalofnutrients, materials, holoplanktonicorganisms,and reproductivepropagulesofbenthicorganismsexpandscalesofconnectivityamongnear- shorecommunitiesand ecosystems.Consequently,the"openness"ofmarine populations, communities,and ecosystemsprobably has marked influenceson their spatial, genetic,and trophicstructures and dynamicsin waysexperiencedbyonlysometerrestrial species.Such differencesappear tobeparticularlysignificantfor thekindsoforganismsmostexploited and targetedforprotectionincoastalmarineecosystems(fishesandmacroinvertebrates). Theseand other differencesimplysomeuniquedesigncriteria and applicationofreserveg inthemarineenvironment.Inexplainingtheimplicationsofthesedifferencesformarine reservedesignandapplication,weidentifymanyoftheenvironmentalandecological processesanddesigncriterianecessaryforconsiderationinthedevelopmentoftheana- lyticalapproachesdevelopedelsewhereinthisSpecialIssue. Keywords:fisheries;marineconservation;marineprotectedareas;marinereserves;reserve network design. INTRODUCTION Reservedesigntheoryhas beendevelopedprimarily withterrestrial systemsand speciesin mind,and most applicationsofreservedesigntheoryhavealsobeen terrestrial (Souleand Terborgh 1999).Currently,