03/09/2013 1 Walking Together Toward Greater Health A Common CoSA Model Local CoSA office CM CL SV SV SV SV Legend: CM: Core member (WED SO as suggested client) SV: Support volunteer CL: Circle liaison (CoSA staff person or experienced SV) CoSA Wpg. Standard Circle CoSA recruits and screens potential core member (CMV) and support volunteers (SV) for a circle. Open to wider range of clients Safety Balance of High Risk, High Need, High Violence Capacity of Support Volunteers available More than one Core Member Volunteer in a circle Support volunteers are trained. The program then creates and facilitates a circle that: meets on a weekly basis, ideally begun within the correctional facility plans safe and appropriate activities tailor made to each CMV connects on a regular basis with the High Risk Management Team (HRMT) and other community resources includes adult volunteers of both genders CoSA provides: ongoing support to CMVs and SVs annual evaluation re: ongoing need means to celebrate milestones and address concerns CoSA Wpg. Standard Variations • Need to interact with local community when implementing a model Blend some circles as clients gain maturity Staff/Liaison remain in circles for full duration Average length @ 2 years Development of alternative models
6
Embed
Making peace happen in the face of long term entrenched patterns of violence
Safer communities: A person at high risk to re-offend moves into our community; what can we do? Circles of Support & Accountability seeks to address this by assisting those coming out of prison to integrate in healthy ways. Join us for a session exploring a Circles of Support & Accountability model, theories undergirding its implementation in Manitoba and new directions. This session will focus on the following two primary areas: Best Practices and Community Engagement and Model Shifts.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
03/09/2013
1
Walking Together
Toward
Greater Health
A Common CoSA Model
Local CoSA office
CM
CL
SV
SV
SV
SV
Legend: CM: Core member (WED SO as suggested client) SV: Support volunteer CL: Circle liaison (CoSA staff person or experienced SV)
CoSA Wpg. Standard Circle CoSA recruits and screens potential core member (CMV) and support volunteers
(SV) for a circle.
Open to wider range of clients Safety Balance of High Risk, High Need, High Violence Capacity of Support Volunteers available More than one Core Member Volunteer in a circle
Support volunteers are trained.
The program then creates and facilitates a circle that:
meets on a weekly basis, ideally begun within the correctional facility plans safe and appropriate activities tailor made to each CMV connects on a regular basis with the High Risk Management Team (HRMT) and other
community resources includes adult volunteers of both genders
CoSA provides: ongoing support to CMVs and SVs annual evaluation re: ongoing need means to celebrate milestones and address concerns
CoSA Wpg. Standard Variations
• Need to interact with local community when implementing a model Blend some circles as clients gain maturity
Staff/Liaison remain in circles for full duration
Average length @ 2 years
Development of alternative models
03/09/2013
2
Resources
CoSA Wpg. program summary page (Aug./13) Ontario & Canada wide CoSA study
Dr. Robin Wilson
Calgary CoSA “No More Victims” Measured Outcome’s webpage: www.measuredoutcome.org
Look for National Crime Prevention study 2015 For more information: www.cosacanada.com
BEST PRACTICES
Strengths Based
Balanced Approach
Team Work
Community Responsibility
National Network
Potential for Transformation
Strengths Based Approach CLIENT DRIVEN
“… resources to address concerns are best found within those living in the difficult situation itself.” (Brown, Hart, Hwoshinsky, Lederach, Maruna, Ross, etc.)
Some theories underlying our approach
Motivational Approaches (General Social Work)
Attachment Theory (Child & Family Services)
Conflict Resolution Theories
Making the Connections (Harrison)
Risk- Need- Responsivity (Andrews & Bonta)
Good Lives Models (Hart & Ward)
Balanced Approach
• Stop violence AND
• Identify, develop and implement positive skills and interests.
• CMV, SV & Staff all learn AND contribute.
03/09/2013
3
Benefits of Setting Out to Work Together
Reasons to Connect
• Acceptance of program • Establishment of program • Stability and support for program • Consultation and guidance • Cross training opportunities • Enhanced resources for clients • Shared risk management
Education
Training
Employment
University/ College Media Politicians
Social Assistance Victim – Survivor
Advocates/Services
Faith
Community
Housing
Community
Notification
Committee
Halfway Houses Child Welfare Mental Health/
Health
Correctional
Institutions
National Parole Board
Parole/ Probation Cultural
Law
Enforcement
Prosecution
Defense
Judiciary
Core Member Core Member
Family/Friends
Daily Living Resource Network
Treatment CoSA Recreational/
Social
Person with HRO history
Treatment
Team Probation
Parole
Halfway House Staff
Residential Supports
Police
Social Assistance
Worker
Social Worker
• Mental Health Worker
• Case Worker
Education
Work
Supports
CoSA
Family
Core Member Team Meetings
03/09/2013
4
The Core Members’ Perspective
• Initially leery but grow to appreciate
• Access: – Team Members
– Feedback
• Inclusion
• Consistency
• Support – Diverse
– From unexpected sources
Benefits of a Team Approach (Nguyen & Ellerby, 2006)
Improved case/risk management & community safety
Increased information sharing & open communication
Input by various team members
Shared responsibility for case
Enhanced support
Increased compassion for the CMV
Enhanced understanding/appreciation amongst team members
Cost sharing enhances access to services
Enhanced services to CMV
Benefits of a Team Approach
• Greater time in the community offense free
• Quick detection and apprehension
• Fewer incidents of re-offending and
Lowered numbers of those victimized
• Less violent and intrusive offenses
Does This Approach Work
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Team Approach Expected
Sexual Violent (including Sexual) Re-Offence
%
N=48
Expected based on Static 99 Scores 6+ over 5 years- Ellerby, YEAR
03/09/2013
5
Community Responsibility In the beginning… Victim Survivor Advisory Team for 2
years
As we continue… CoSA Advisory Team representatives