Top Banner
What would you recommend as first line therapy for a 68 y/o woman with advanced pancreatic cancer and limited metastatic disease with ECOG-1? Gemcitabine plus nab- Paclitaxel Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
21

Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Feb 22, 2016

Download

Documents

Marek

What would you recommend as first line therapy for a 68 y/o woman with advanced pancreatic cancer and limited metastatic disease with ECOG-1? Gemcitabine plus nab- P aclitaxel. Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Von Hoff et al, NEJM 2013. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

What would you recommend as first line therapy for a 68 y/o woman with advanced pancreatic cancer and limited metastatic

disease with ECOG-1? Gemcitabine plus nab-Paclitaxel

Maeve Lowery MDMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Page 2: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Von Hoff et al, NEJM 2013

Page 3: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Page 4: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Page 5: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Updated MPACT Results GI ASCO 2014

• Median overall survival remained significantly longer on combination arm

• 4% of patient on gem-nab-P arm alive at 3 years, none in gem arm

• Prespecified subgroups: KPS, age, presence of liver met, elevated Ca 19.9 associated with worse outcomes,

• Combination therapy reduced negative survival association of elevated Ca 19.9 (homogeneity of biliary decompression not known)

• No grade 4 neuropathy, 17% grade 3 median time to improvements 29 days, half could resume treatment.

Page 6: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Page 7: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Page 8: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Page 9: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Modified FOLFIRINOX (MSKCC)

Page 10: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Modified FOLFIRNOX (MSKCC)

Page 11: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

How Can We Compare the Data?

• Trial enrolled different patient populations (older pts, ECOG 2 included in MPACT)

• MPACT trial performed in both community and academic centers, USA, Europe and Australia – results are more broadly applicable in variety of clinical settings

• We just know both combinations are more effective than Gemcitabine …

Page 12: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Why Gem & nab-P?

• Toxicity profile (less febrile neutropenia, neuropathy reversible)

• More likely to be given in combination with experimental therapy

• Limited metastatic disease, ECOG 1 • No mediport• In practice, FOLFIRINOX is given as a modified

regimen in US academic centers

Page 13: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Is there a Better Way to Select Therapy?

• Clinical characteristics• Blood biomarkers

– CTCs– Pharmacogenomic profiling– cfDNA

• Tissue biomarkers– Genotyping– Protein expression

Page 14: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Heinemann et al, Cancer Treatment Reviews, Volume 40, Issue 1, 2014, 118 - 128

SPARC Expression as Biomarker of Response to Gem & nab-P

• Phase I/II study, high SPARC expression was associated with a significantly longer OS vs. low SPARC expression

• Median OS 17.8 vs. 8.1 months; p = 0.0431 [n = 36]

Page 15: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Page 16: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Page 17: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Page 18: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Page 19: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Page 20: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

A B

Results (N=35)

Page 21: Maeve Lowery MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Conclusions

• Gem & nab-P appropriate for 1st line therapy, especially in ECOG 1, limited disease burden

• Where possible, patients will eventually receive both treatments in sequence

• We need better predictive biomarkers to select 1st line therapy in advanced PAC

• It’s good to have options…