Lund University Libraries Head Office Organizing Collection Management and End User Access in a Decentralized Library Environment Lars Björnshauge Lund University Libraries Sweden
Dec 19, 2015
Lund University LibrariesHead Office Organizing Collection
Management and End User Access in a
Decentralized Library EnvironmentLars Björnshauge
Lund University Libraries
Sweden
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Outline of presentation
The new Decentral Library StructureCollection Development & Management in the new structureThe Outcomes so farOrganizing end user access
I will not deal with: weeding policy, archiving, the appropriateness of the Big Deals – unless promted!
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Lund University
Founded in 1666, located in the southernmost province of Sweden, ScaniaAmong the oldest and largest in ScandinaviaCampus at several locations: Lund (main campus), Malmo, Helsingborg and moreMultidisciplinary: 7 faculties + several research centres+35,000 students, +3,000 doctoral students, +6,000 employees
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Lund University
Decentralized organization and economyTension between central and de-central units on power and resourcesTension reproduced within the library organisation
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Library Structure before the changes
University Library, central (main) library, UB1 and UB2
Cultural heritage collections, legal deposit Library services for the faculties based on contracts
+/- 90 department librariesfunded and operated by faculties/departmentshuge differences in service levels
University Librarian and Library Board had only authority over University Library, but not over department libraries
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
The Drivers for change: Specific
Dissatisfaction espressed by faculty leaders (deans etc.) towards the central library services and the (lack of) development of digital library servicesWidespread development of decentral (faculty/departemental) library servicesDemands for more up-to-date and cost efficient library services and for university wide solutions.
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Preparations for and implementation of a New Library
Organisation1999-2000:
External report on the state of library services Decisions by the University Board: reorganization of the library services
2001: Start of the implementation of a new Library organization of Library Services
2001 and ongoing: Restructuring/merging/development of faculty/department librariesDevelopment of the digital library services
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Primary goals of a New Library structure
Implementation of minimum service levels (standards) for librariesDevelopment of digital library servicesCost efficiency & transparencyFocus on the needs of students
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Important features of a new structure
Establishing the library structure as a network of libraries.Faculties, departments & research centers operate and fund libraries in their specific area.The University as such funds the Head Office and the University Library (central funding)
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
The new structure
Lund University Libraries as a network of libraries
+/-25 Faculty or Department librariesUniversity Library: Cultural heritage, special collections and deposits Library Head Office: management and coordination of the network of libraries, development of the digital library
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Faculty and Departemental Libraries
Provides the basic library services to researchers, teachers and students Are operated and funded by faculties, departments and centersStandards apply for libraries….
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Standards for Faculty or Department Libraries in the
NetworkAll relevant library services avialableOpening hours (min. 36 hours)Collections are catalogued in the OPACLibrary educated staff (min. 3,0 FTE)Adequate work facilities for studentsOwn (Faculty/Department) Library CouncilOwn budget (staff, acquistions etc.)Own web-site
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Centrally funded units
Library Head OfficeManagement, infrastructure, digital library services and development
University Library:Cultural heritage, special collections, Swedish imprints, deposits and services generated from these collections
(central funds are deducted from the funding that goes to the faculties – taxing!)
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
The Library Head Office
is the unit for management and coordination of the new network of libraries, operates the library automation system &operates and develops digital library services, runs competence development programs Library IT-development projects35 FTE (whereof 20 FTE centrally funded)
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Division of responsibilities
A Library Board: policymaking, standards etc.A Library Council (heads of faculty/ department libraries): advicing the Director of LibrariesThe Director of Libraries: responsible for the library services in generalLibrary Head Office – executive unit: infrastructure & coordination
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Balancing expectations
The University Management expects:
more and better services for the same funding
The Faculties expects: more and better central services for less funding
Our promises: much more and much better services for a little bit more funding
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
The outcomes so far
Increased commitment from the faculties to library issuesAway from the customer-supplier relation between faculties and libary management. Faculties are library operaters themselves!Library Services are on the agenda everywhere
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Specific problems in a reorganization
Such a reorganization generates a number of issues to deal with:
downsizing university library operations creates stress and tensionsreallocation of staff (+40 FTE staff have been reallocated) competence development in high demand reallocation of funds
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Specific issues in a decentralized environment
faculty/department libraries want an independent profile and specific visibility – autonomy!the funders want efficiency!common guidelines, standards and rules (decided by the Library Board) are needed – however these can only be implemented if they are born in a climate of debate, consultation, involvement and negotiation
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Areas where problems have been encounteredLibrary Web-sites:
how much autonomy in design, layout and presentation?
Classification, subject presentation:One size fits all?? – hardly!!
General library services to replace manually maintained journal lists, subject gateways etc.
be carefull!!
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Collection development & management before the
reorganizationLack of coordinationEach unit took care of collection management based on their own specific needsThis might work in a non-digital environmentBut: in an emerging digital environment there is a strong need for coordination
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Problems in the old structure – acquisition of
monographsAcquisition of monographs:
to a large extent outsourced from the faculties to the subject librarians at the university library(ies)Missing links between the needs of the users (and funders!) and the actual acquisitionsFaculties building own collections to compensate the lack of adequate collection development
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Problems in the old structure – subscription to
databasesInsufficient central funding for general resources (i.e. encyclopedias, reference works, multidisciplinary databases etc.)Lots of different funding models for databases:
One faculty, two faculties, three or more faculties
No clear policy as to accessMakes life difficult for end users!
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Problems in the old structure – subscription to
journalsVery few agreements with publishers (package deals) – different funding models here as wellHundreds of
Dubble/triple etc. subscriptionsBundled subscriptions – but electronic access not activated or only activated for the subscribing unitUncontrollabels
Several subscription agents operating
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Problems in the old structure – summary
Lack of overview of spendingUnsufficient funding for general resourcesNo explicit policy for access
Department, faculty or campus wide
Lack of decision making information as to the potential benefits of package deals
But:Room for improvements!!
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Collection Development & Management in the new
structureGoals, Principles & PoliciesAcquisition of monographs and course material (print)Digital library resources (databases, journal package agreements, e-books etc.)
Subscriptions to databasesSubscriptions to journalsAdministration of journal subscriptions
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Goals:
Promote end user influence by involving library committees and faculty/department librarians (subject specialists)Value for money - Create synergy – 1+1=3 - Much more for a little bit more!Facilitate remote accessReduce duplicates & uncontrollabelsReduce handling costs
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Principles & Policies
Digital resources are general resources – thus central funding should applyUniversity wide accessJournals: electronic versions where possiblePromote Open Access resources and university based publishing
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
The primary challenge:
Managing the transition from printed to digital information Handling the reallocation of funds
How to convince the faculties that more central funding (taxing!) should go to general digital library resources
The answers:Faculties have influence on the selectionTransparency in fundingEasier access to more information resources
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Collection development & Management
Responsibilities of the Head OfficeResponsibilities of Faculty & Department LibrariesInvolvement, Negotiation and Selection
Library Councils (Faculty/Department level)Committee for Digital Resources
Funding
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Acquisition of monographs and course
materialResponsibility of the faculty/department libraries.Paid by faculties/departments.Decided by the library councils at faculties/departments (end user involvement)Handled by the faculty/department libraries
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Digital library resources (databases, journal package agreements, e-books etc.)
Decision making/selection:Responsibility of the Committee for Digital Resources (1 member appointed by each faculty)
Funding:centrally
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Subscription to databases:
Selected and decided by the Committee for Digital Resources Centrally funded. Managed by the Head Office: supplier contacts, access management, authorization, payments, local help desk etc.
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Subscription to journals:
Electronic subscriptions are the rule as a matter of policyElectronic journals in package deals are subject to central fundingSubscription to printed journals are paid by the faculty/department
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Administration of journal subscriptions:
The Head Office takes care of: management, administration, communication with subscription agent, payments etc. Activating electronic access to bundled subscriptions are handled by the Head Office
Faculty/department libraries takes care of print journals:
Issue handling and claims
1 (one) Subscription Agent (mandatory)
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
The outcomes so far:Huge increase:
in central funding for digital resourcesin subscriptions to electronic journals
Considerable reductions in print subscriptions, duplicates and uncontrollabels Increased commitment from the faculties for the (digital) library services
Increased awareness as to problems in scholarly publishing and of the importance of Open Access
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Central funding for digital library resources
2001 400,000 Euro2002 1,500,000 Euro2003 1,900,000 Euro2004 (?) 2,200,000 Euro
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
There are problems here as well
Selecting digital resources:Making prioritiesThere are limits for central funding
So far the big deals have got priority
But the era of the big deals is running out – what then??
E-books are coming in
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Organizing end user access
The problems:Numerous databases and journal providers – numerous interfacesSeveral thousand e-journals difficult to find (Especially in a decentralised library system)Portals provided by subscription agents and journals publishers are not invented primarily to accomodate end user needs but more to generate their business.
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Finding information
Library branding very important – users often believe that full-text e-journals are free on the Internet!”If it is not on the web, it does not exist”
We want to brand our services and promote Open Access resourcesPublisher trap – a world outside Verona?
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
KluwerSpringe
r Elsevier
Wiley EbscoIOP
Publisher trap?
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Navigare necesse est - but with a chart….
Where are the buried treasures? We want to find them quickly and easilySearch all the islands in the sea simultaneouslyWithout leaving the ship!
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
All these islands to explore!
Publisher Resources
Open Archives
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Organising end user access
The goals:Integration of all servicesDevelopment of personalized servicesBranding of library services
Principles:Single sign on – automatic authentification – one login/password to all resourcesRemote access
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Integration of Library Services – Towards the one stop shop
OPAC –printed collectionsDatabases, encyclopedias, reference works etc.Electronic journals Open access resources
JournalsE- & preprint archives, institutional repositoriesSubject gateways
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Personalization
”My Library”Recommended resources – selected by subject librariansAdd your personal favourites
SDI-alerts from databases, journals etc.TOC-alertsUsers register at one site for all alerts
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Our answer to the demand for the one stop
shop
ELIN@ - a library developed
interface to hybrid library resources
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Librarians are navigation expertsWe can offer efficient and user-friendly
navigation tools, alias search interfaces ELIN@ integrates data from publishers,
databases, Open Archives with the local OPAC and document delivery services
HMS ELIN@
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Now, this is more like it!
All treasures on one island !
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
ELIN@ - Electronic Library Information Navigator
Advantages for end users:One interface for all content Cross search documents from multiple sources – free or licensed Document delivery services for documents not available in Full Text ToC alerts and SDI´sIntegration with reference management tools
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
ELIN@ - Electronic Library Information
NavigatorAdvantages for librarians:
Enhancing availability and visibility of scientific
literature
Increasing e-journal cost efficiency – Usage is
boosting
Administrative functions/Management tools:
• Customization, Statistics, Collection
Management, Budgeting, Marketing
• Subscription administration functionalities
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
ELIN@ - Electronic Library Information Navigator
Contents (July 2003)+14,000 journals, whereof+7,500 journals with metadata (cross searchable on article level)+11,000,000 recordsE-print archives,Databases
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Direct to full-textAutomatic order if
full-text is not available
Basic Search
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Bibliographic information and abstract
Searchablekeywords
Searchable author names
Link to full-text
Searchable journal names
Export to reference programs
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
Thank you for your attention!
July 2003 Lars Björnshauge
URLs etc
Lund University Libraries: www.lub.lu.se
Directory of Open Access Journals: www.doaj.org
contact: [email protected]