-
1 Lumanog vs. People
EN BANC
LENIDO LUMANOG and AUGUSTO SANTOS, Petitioners,
- versus -
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
G.R. No. 182555
CESAR FORTUNA, Petitioner,
- versus -
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent. x- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -x
G.R. No. 185123
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
- versus -
SPO2 CESAR FORTUNA y ABUDO, RAMESES DE JESUS y CALMA, LENIDO
LUMANOG y LUISTRO, JOEL DE JESUS y VALDEZ and AUGUSTO SANTOS y
GALANG, Accused,
RAMESES DE JESUS y CALMA and JOEL DE JESUS y VALDEZ,
Accused-Appellants.
G.R. No. 187745 Present: CORONA, C.J., CARPIO, CARPIO MORALES,
VELASCO, JR., NACHURA, LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, BRION,* PERALTA,
BERSAMIN, DEL CASTILLO, ABAD, VILLARAMA, JR., PEREZ, MENDOZA, and
SERENO, JJ. Promulgated: September 7, 2010
x-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
DECISION
VILLARAMA, JR., J.:
-
2 Lumanog vs. People
For review is the Decision[1] dated April 1, 2008 of the Court
of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-HC
No. 00667 which affirmed with modification the Joint
Decision[2]dated July 30, 1999 of the Regional Trial
Court of Quezon City, Branch 103 in Criminal Case Nos.
Q-96-66679, Q-96-66680, Q-96-66682, Q-
96-66683 and Q-96-66684.
The consolidated cases arose in connection with the killing of
former Chief of the Metropolitan
Command Intelligence and Security Group of the Philippine
Constabulary, now the Philippine National
Police (PNP), Colonel Rolando N. Abadilla (Abadilla), who was
ambushed in broad daylight while
driving his car along Katipunan Avenue, Quezon City.
The Facts
On June 13, 1996, at around 8:00 oclock in the morning, Abadilla
left his house at Soliven I,
Loyola Grand Villas, Loyola Heights, Quezon City and drove his
car, a black Honda Accord with Plate
No. RNA-777. Soon after he left, his wife Susan Abadilla
received a phone call from him and they
briefly talked. Just a few minutes after their conversation, she
received another phone call from
Abadillas tailor who was asking about her husband because,
according to him, he heard a radio
broadcast report that Abadilla met an accident.[3]
Meanwhile, at about 8:40 a.m., Senior Police Officer (SPO) 2
Arthur Ortiz, the desk officer on
duty at Station 8 of the Central Police District Command (CPDC)
located at P. Tuazon Blvd., Project 4,
Quezon City, answered a telephone call from a male person who
reported a shooting incident along
Katipunan Avenue. Station Commander Police Chief Inspector
(Insp.) Edward Villena, together with his
investigators SPO2 Wahab Magundacan, Police Officer (PO) 2
Gerardo Daganta and PO1 Ronald
Francisco immediately boarded a PNP marked vehicle and headed
towards Katipunan Avenue.[4]
Upon reaching the area at 8:45 a.m., they saw several onlookers
around and near a black Honda
Accord with Plate No. RNA-777 on a stop position in the middle
lane of Katipunan Avenue facing south
going to Libis. They found the victims bloodied and
bullet-riddled body partly slumped onto the
pavement at the cars left door, which was open. The front
windshield and sliding glass windows on the
left and right side were shattered; a hole was seen on the glass
window of the left rear door, apparently
pierced by a bullet. Glass splinters were scattered inside the
car and on the pavement at both sides of
the car. On orders of Chief Insp. Villena, PO2 Daganta and PO1
Francisco assisted by a certain Cesar
Espiritu, immediately brought the victim to the Quirino Memorial
Hospital in Project 4, Quezon
City. SPO2 Magundacan was instructed to stay behind to cordon
the area for the start of the
-
3 Lumanog vs. People
investigation while Chief Insp. Villena went to their station to
get his camera.[5] After ten (10) minutes,
Chief Insp. Villena returned and took pictures of the crime
scene, and also of the victim at the
hospital.[6] SPO2 Magundacan was able to pick up several spent
shells and two (2) slugs, apparently
fired from .45 and 9 mm. pistols.[7] A sketch was prepared by
PO2 Daganta who also interviewed some
of the witnesses present at the crime scene.[8] The spot report
and list of recovered items (including a
Philippine Military Academy gold ring on which was engraved the
name Rolando N. Abadilla) were
later prepared by SPO2 Magundacan at the police station.[9]
On the same day, witnesses Cesar F. Espiritu (who was driving
his car ahead of the victim),
Aurora Urbano (Metro Aide), Ani C. Icot (house gardener of the
Abadilla family, Freddie Alejo (security
guard posted at Eliscon Electrical Supply store located at 211
Katipunan Avenue) and Minella Alarcon
(college professor at Ateneo de Manila University) gave their
respective statements before the Criminal
Investigation Division of the Central Police District Command
(CID-CPDC), PNP-National Capital Region
(NCR) at Camp Karingal, Sikatuna Village, Quezon City, while the
statement of Merlito Herbas (security
guard posted at the Blue Ridge Realty Corporation located at No.
219 Katipunan Avenue, Quezon City)
was taken at Station No. 8, CPDC at P. Tuazon Blvd., Proj. 4,
Quezon City.[10]
Based on their accounts, the black Honda Accord with Plate
Number RNA-777 was caught in
traffic while traversing Katipunan Avenue going to Santolan at
past 8:00 oclock on the morning of June
13, 1996. While on a stop position, four (4) men armed with
handguns surrounded the said car and
fired several successive shots at the man inside it. One (1) of
the men who were positioned at the left
side of the car opened its door and took something inside. He
grabbed the victim by the neck and
dropped his body down towards the pavement at the left door.
When there were already several people
who had come out to see what was happening, one of the suspects
shouted, Walang gagalawDapa!
Minella Alarcon, who was then with her son-in-law on board her
white KIA Pride, was following
the victims car (at other side or diagonal line) at the time of
the incident. After the shooting, two (2) of
the armed men who fired at the victims car approached their car
and pounded at it saying
BabaBaba! Terrified, she and her son-in-law got off and crawled
towards the side of the street. The
assailants then boarded the KIA Pride and went away to the
direction of an alley along Katipunan
Avenue. Her car was later recovered, as it was found abandoned
along Aguinaldo Street near the corner
of J.P. Rizal Street, Project 4, Quezon City, still with
bloodstains on the car door.[11]
The victim was pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital. The
victims identity was confirmed
by Susan Abadilla who had rushed to the hospital. Chief Insp.
Villena escorted her in bringing the
-
4 Lumanog vs. People
victims body to the PNP Crime Laboratory in Camp Crame for the
autopsy requested by the CPDC,
PNP-NCR, Camp Karingal.[12] From the testimony and medico-legal
report of Dr. Jesusa N. Vergara, it
was disclosed that the victim died of hemorrhage as a result of
multiple gunshot wounds, mostly in the
head and chest, and also sustained abrasions, contusions,
lacerated skin, hematoma and incised wounds
or cuts in the skin caused by glass splinters.[13]
Records indicate that immediately after the incident, elements
of the CPDC, PNP-NCR at Camp
Karingal were already coordinating with investigators of Station
8-CPDC who had turned over to said
office the evidence gathered and referred the witnesses present
at the crime scene.[14] As a result of
follow-up operations, Joel de Jesus, alias Tabong, was
apprehended on June 19, 1996 at his house at
Dahlia St., Fairview, Quezon City. He executed his Sinumpaang
Salaysay dated June 20, 1996
and Karagdagang Sinumpaang Salaysay dated June 21, 1996.[15]
In his first statement, Joel de Jesus narrated that on June 13,
1996 at 6:30 in the morning after
parking his tricycle at the corner of Regalado and Camaro
Streets, Fairview, he was fetched by Lorenzo
Larry delos Santos who was his neighbor at Ruby St. Larry was
accompanied by his nephew Ogie, and
a certain Tisoy who drove the owner-type jeep. Larry told him
they were going to kill a big-time
personality (may titirahin na malaking tao), whose name was
Abadilla, and that they were going to
ambush the latter at Katipunan Avenue. The ambush would be
carried out by Joel, Larry, Tisoy, Ram (de
Jesus), Cesar who was a policeman, and four (4) others. That
same morning, they proceeded to
Katipunan Avenue on board Larrys owner-type jeep without a plate
and a Mitsubishi L-300 van. They
carried .45 and 9 mm. pistols; Joel used a .38 caliber revolver.
According to Joel, he only acted as
lookout; Lorenzo, Ram and Cesar were the ones who fired shots,
while Tisoy focused on a security guard
at a store. After the shooting, they separated ways: the
owner-type jeep he was riding in headed
towards Santolan; Cesars group split so that three (3) of them
rode the L-300 van and the three (3)
others boarded a car stolen from a woman driver. Upon reaching
Commonwealth Avenue and Tandang
Sora, they stopped at Glori Supermarket where all the firearms
used were returned to the group,
including the revolver earlier given to Joel. It was already
dusk when Lorenzo dropped him off at the
tricycle parking area at Camaro St.[16]
Joel further stated that the ambush-slay of Abadilla was planned
by the group three (3) days
before, when they met at the house of Ram de Jesus also in
Fairview near his house. Although he did
not know the identity of the person who masterminded the
ambush-slay of Abadilla, he described the
mastermind as the one (1) who opened Abadillas car and pulled
Abadilla from the inside of the car, and
he was also the one (1) who drove the L-300 van. Lorenzo told
him he should not worry because
Lorenzo would take care that he would be compensated for his
participation. When they reached
-
5 Lumanog vs. People
Katipunan Avenue, they alighted from their respective vehicles
to wait for Abadilla. The L-300 van
where the mastermind and Cesar rode was just behind Abadillas
car. There was no more order given to
fire because when traffic stopped the vehicles on the road,
those in the L-300 van just got down,
positioned themselves and fired upon Abadilla. The mastermind
not only fired at Abadilla from outside
the latters car, he even made sure Abadilla was dead, as half of
his body went inside the car, firing
again at Abadilla before finally dropping him to the ground.
Joel added that he just remained silent
after the incident, for which he did not earn anything and was
threatened by one (1) of those who were
in the L-300 van whose name he did not know.[17]
In his second statement, Joel pointed to his cohorts in a police
line-up inside the CID-CPDC,
PNP-NCR, Camp Karingal, Quezon City where he positively
identified Rameses de Jesus (Ram), Cesar
Fortuna, Lenido Lumanog and PO2 Romeo Costibolo as among those
who participated in the ambush-
slaying of Abadilla on June 13, 1996.[18]
The afore-named suspects identified by Joel were apprehended
during further follow-up
operations conducted on June 20, 1996 by Task Force Rolly
subsequently formed by the PNP after the
lead initially provided by him. As mentioned in the Joint
Affidavit executed by Police Senior Inspector
(P/Sr. Insp.) Ronello N. Navarro, Police Inspector (P/Insp.)
Ferdinand A. Marticio, SPO4 Wilfredo G.
Galvan and SPO1 Allan dela Cruz dated June 21, 1996, as early as
June 15, 1996, or two (2) days after the
ambush-slay of Abadilla, their investigation already established
the identities of a number of suspects
through photo files and forensic sketches of suspects provided
by eyewitnesses.[19] Said arresting officers
were also able to seize certain firearms and other pieces of
evidence, to wit:
4. That after SPO2 cesar Fortuna revealed the whereabouts of the
slain victims stolen cal .45 pistol, we conducted a follow up in a
gunsmith located at Sampaloc, Manila on 21 June 1996, from where we
held for investigation, one
DANTE MONTEVIRGEN y VILLANUEVA, 37 years old, married,
self-employed/gunsmith, native of Pula, Oriental Mindoro and with
given address at 1412 Riverside Street, Commonwealth Avenue, Bgy.
Holy Spirit, Quezon City. 5. That upon confrontation said subject
person surrendered two (2) cal .45
pistols whom suspect Cesar Fortuna allegedly brought to him for
repair/tampering of serial numbers, to wit:
(a) 1- COLT MARK IV cal .45 pistol Govt Model SN-66B5574; and
(b) 1-COLT MARK IV cal .45 pistol Series 70 SN-647048.
6. On the same day, 21 June 1996, after SPO2 Cesar Fortuna
expressed
willingness to surrender the motorcycle allegedly used in casing
and surveillance upon
-
6 Lumanog vs. People
the deceased victim, we took said motorcycle at Gate 2 of Camp
Crame along Santolan Road (Col Bony Serrano Avenue), Quezon City,
to wit:
1- Unit, KAWASAKI motorcycle without license plate,
chassis No. C-5121696, Motor No. 658 122951
7. That the aforenamed subject person together with the
property/articles recovered were turned over to the Police
Headquarters for investigation and appropriate action;
x x x[20]
With respect to Lorenzo delos Santos, he also executed a
statement dated June 21, 1996 admitting
his participation in the ambush-slay of Abadilla on June 13,
1996, and pointing to Rameses de Jesus as
the mastermind and also named the following suspects: POGS whose
real name was Lenido Lumanog,
Joel de Jesus alias Tabong, Cesar Fortuna and four (4) others
whom he did not know. He said that he
was just brought along by Rameses de Jesus and was further
threatened that if he would not go with
them, they would kill his family. He claimed that he merely
acted as a lookout. As similarly recounted
by Joel, Lorenzo stated that the group used an L-300 van, a car
and a jeep in going to Katipunan Avenue
in the morning of June 13, 1996. Joel had a .45 cal pistol,
Cesar a .38 revolver, Lenido a 9 mm., a certain
Manuel dela Rosa who did not get out of the vehicle, carried a
.38 cal revolver, and Lorenzo, also a .38
cal revolver. Rameses, Joel, Cesar and Lenido were the ones who
shot Abadilla. After the shooting, the
group left him behind and he just walked on the street before
taking a taxi ride to the Bureau of
Customs. Lorenzo maintained that he was not given any money. He
was just picked up from his house
at Ruby St., Fairview Subdivision by Rameses, Lenido, Cesar and
Joel. He was made to board Rameses
car with a warning that if he did not join the group, they would
throw a hand grenade at his family.[21]
In his Karagdagang Salaysay dated June 21, 1996, security guard
Freddie Alejo positively identified
Joel and Lorenzo during a police line-up. Alejo confirmed these
two (2) as the persons he saw from his
guard post walking to and fro before the shooting incident. They
were also the ones who shouted that
no one (1) should interfere at the time the four (4) armed men
were firing shots at Abadilla.[22]
SPO2 Cesar Fortuna y Abudo, Rameses de Jesus y Calma, Lorenzo
delos Santos y Dela Cruz,
Lenido Lumanog y Luistro, Joel de Jesus y Valdez and Arturo
Napolitano y Caburnay were charged in
Criminal Case No. Q-96-66679 with theft of the alleged gun owned
by the late Abadilla (Colt Mark IV
cal .45 pistol SN-66BS574), a gold-plated Omega wristwatch and a
wallet containing an undetermined
amount of cash plus calling cards and other important papers,
all of which were supposedly stolen by
them after killing Abadilla.[23]
-
7 Lumanog vs. People
On the other hand, Lorenzo delos Santos y Dela Cruz, SPO2 Cesar
Fortuna y Abudo and
Rameses de Jesus y Calma were respectively charged with illegal
possession of firearms (Presidential
Decree No. 1866) in Criminal Case Nos. Q-96-66680, Q-96-66682
and Q-96-66683.[24]
All the seven (7) named accused in Criminal Case No. Q-96-66684
were indicted for Murder
under the following Information:
That on or about the 13th day of June, 1996 in Quezon City,
Philippines, the above-named accused, conspiring together,
confederating with several other persons whose true names,
identities, whereabouts have not as yet been ascertained and
mutually helping with one another, did then and there, wilfully,
unlawfully and feloniously with intent to kill, with evident
premeditation, treachery, in consideration of a price, reward or
promise, and taking advantage of superior strength, attack and
employ personal violence upon the person of COL. ROLANDO ABADILLA y
NOLASCO by then and there shooting the latter with the use of
different kinds of firearms, hitting him on the different parts of
his body, thereby causing the instant and immediate cause of his
death, to the damage and prejudice of the heirs of the said COL.
ROLANDO ABADILLA y NOLASCO.
Contrary to law.[25]
When arraigned, all the accused pleaded not guilty to the murder
charge.
In view of the dismissal of the criminal cases for illegal
possession of firearms (P.D. No. 1866)
and theft (Criminal Case Nos. Q-96-66679, Q-96-66680, Q-96-66682
and Q-96-66683),[26] our
discussion of the proceedings before the trial court will be
confined to the case for murder against
Fortuna, Lumanog, Joel de Jesus, Rameses de Jesus and
Santos.
Evidence for the Prosecution
The prosecution presented the testimonies of police officers who
conducted the investigation and
follow-up operations up to the actual apprehension of suspects
in the killing of Abadilla: SPO2 Wahab
Magundacan, PO2 Gerardo Daganta, Maj. Edward Villena, P/Insp.
Rogelio Castillo, SPO2 Jose Garcia, Jr.,
SPO3 Romeo De Guzman, SPO2 Pio Tarala, Atty. Florimond Rous,
P/Sr. Insp. Jose B. Macanas and
P/Insp. Ferdinand Marticio.
The testimonies of P/Insp. Castillo, SPO2 Garcia, SPO2 Tarala,
Atty. Rous and P/Sr. Insp. Macanas
were given in court in the light of serious allegations of
torture, forced confessions and violations of
-
8 Lumanog vs. People
constitutional rights raised by the accused, which were widely
reported in the media and brought before
the Commission of Human Rights (CHR) and eventually to Amnesty
International-USA.
P/Insp. Castillo, testifying on cross-examination, admitted that
accused Joel de Jesus was
apprehended by members of his squad led by Lt. Rodolfo on June
19, 1996, but said suspect was not
presented to him until noontime of the next day, June 20, 1996.
He did not ask his men if Joel had been
subjected to investigation and if he was, whether he was
assisted by counsel. He explained that there
were still then follow-up operations in which they needed Joel.
As for the press conference wherein Joel
was presented together with then Secretary Barbers and General
Recaredo Sarmiento, he learned about
it only later.[27]
The witness declared that the constitutional mandate and
requirements under Republic Act
(R.A.) No. 7438 had been complied with because he secured the
services of a counsel during the
interrogation of then suspect Joel de Jesus when his sworn
statement was taken on June 20, 1996. He
had informed the said suspect of his right to counsel in the
presence of CID personnel and when he
brought him to the office of Atty. Confesor R. Sansano of the
Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP)
located at the second floor of the Hall of Justice, Quezon City
Hall. Asked why it occurred to him to
bring the suspect to the IBP, the witness replied that he
believed IBP was a private, not a government,
institution. He also asked Joel -- who was allowed to make a
telephone call, although he was not aware
if Joel made any such call -- whether he had his own lawyer. He
recalled asking Joel if he was willing to
go with them to the City Hall, because he had asked to secure
the services of counsel. There had been
instances when the IBP lawyers assisted some suspects brought by
the CPDC. The CPDC provided the
typewriter and papers to be used and in this case, Atty. Sansano
accommodated them in using the
facilities of the IBP Chapter office. Joel executed his
statement, with SPO2 Jose L. Garcia, Jr.
propounding the questions. They started taking his statement at
1:10 p.m. of June 20, 1996 at Room
235, IBP Office, Quezon City Hall of Justice in the presence of
Atty. Sansano and a number of people
inside said office.[28] He was apprised for the first time about
a suspect (Joel) who was just apprehended
when he called their office upon arriving home on the night of
June 19, 1996. The information was
given to him by the desk sergeant and thereupon he gave
instruction to contact the witness and include
that suspect in a line-up. He then informed their Chief
regarding this development. When he asked for
the whereabouts of this suspect, he was given the reply that the
suspect was still with their squad
conducting follow-up operations.[29]
P/Insp. Castillo recounted that he reported to the office at
8:00 oclock in the morning of June
20, 1996 and Joel was actually presented to him by Lt. Rodolfo
at 10:00 oclock that same morning, in
the presence of CID men. He told Joel he was being implicated in
the case, to which Joel replied Sir,
-
9 Lumanog vs. People
lookout lang naman ako, sir. This initial questioning of Joel
took place at the investigation room of the
CID, where there were other private complainants talking to
investigators, and there were a number of
policemen around who were not in uniform. He advised Joel that
he was free to use the telephone, and
although Joel had no relatives present at that time, he warned
Joel that his case was serious and he must
seek the services of counsel. He first thought of the legal
assistance provided by the City Attorney, then
that by the Public Attorneys Office (PAO), and lastly by the
IBP. Between 12:30 and 1:00 p.m., he and
his men, together with Joel in a separate vehicle, left the CID
to go to the Quezon City Hall. They
scouted for a lawyer and inquired from the IBP chapter office.
They found Atty. Florimond Rous and
the lady counsel at a hearing in a courtroom. Atty. Rous advised
them to wait for Atty. Sansano, who
apparently was the head of the IBP chapter office. He was moving
in and out of the office while the
statement of Joel was being taken in the presence of Atty.
Sansano. Before that, Atty. Sansano talked to
Joel alone, after which they were called in again for the taking
of the statement at 2:00 p.m. They left
City Hall at past 4:00 or 5:00 that afternoon.[30]
SPO2 Garcia, Jr. testified that he was a member of the CID-CPDC
at Camp Karingal. On June
20, 1996 when he reported for duty, he was assigned by P/Insp.
Castillo to take down the statement of
Joel de Jesus. While still inside the office of P/Insp.
Castillo, he asked Joel if his statement was voluntary
and what kind of statement he was going to give. Joel answered
that his statement was voluntary and
he wanted to be included as state witness in the Abadilla case.
Together with Joel, SPO2 Tarala and
SPO1 Edilberto Nicanor, he took lunch at the back of their
office before proceeding to the Quezon City
Hall at around 12:00 oclock noon, with P/Insp. Castillo who said
that Joels statement would be taken
infront of a counsel. At the Hall of Justice lobby, P/Insp.
Castillo instructed them to guard Joel as he
would look for a counsel. After more or less 25 to 30 minutes,
P/Insp. Castillo came back and they
proceeded to the second floor of the office of the IBP chapter.
They were met by a lady secretary, and
afterwards he saw P/Insp. Castillo talking to a lawyer whom he
came to know as Atty. Rous. It seemed
Atty. Rous could not decide on what P/Insp. Castillo told him
and said he (Atty. Rous) would first ask
the permission of Atty. Sansano. They waited for Atty. Sansano,
who arrived in about twenty (20) to
twenty-five (25) minutes. Atty. Sansano and P/Insp. Castillo
talked for about five (5) minutes and
thereafter, Atty. Sansano requested them to leave, because he
would talk personally to Joel. Atty.
Sansano and Joel talked inside the room for five (5) to ten (10)
minutes. Thereafter, he, P/Insp. Castillo,
SPO2 Tarala and SPO1 Edilberto Nicanor went inside the room and
that was the time Atty. Sansano
announced that Joel was ready for the taking of his
statement.[31]
SPO2 Garcia, Jr. further testified that he took down the
statement of Joel using a typewriter in
the office of Atty. Sansano. He brought said typewriter near the
table of Atty. Sansano and a chair to sit
on beside Joel. Joel was seated infront of the desk where Atty.
Sansano was sitting. After completing the
-
10 Lumanog vs. People
taking down of the statement, he gave it to Joel and asked the
latter to read it. Joel read the typewritten
statement and when he finished reading, he gave the same to
Atty. Sansano. Atty. Sansano read all the
contents of the document and asked Joel if he understood it, to
which he answered Yes, sir. Atty.
Sansano then asked Joel if he was willing to sign the statement,
to which the latter again replied in the
affirmative. Joel signed the statement in his presence and also
that of Atty. Sansano, who likewise
signed it in his presence. SPO2 Garcia, Jr. also identified his
own signature and that of SPO1 Nicanor
who signed the statement in his presence. From the office of
Atty. Sansano, they proceeded to the
fourth floor in the office of Prosecutor Ramon Gerona before
whom Joel subscribed his statement. After
reading the statement, Fiscal Gerona explained to Joel in
Tagalog the consequences of the statement he
executed. Joel was calm and said he was only a lookout in the
crime. Earlier, before propounding
questions to Joel at the office of Atty. Sansano, the latter
addressed Joel in Tagalog: Joel naiintindihan
mo na ang mga itinatanong sa iyo ng mga pulis? Ito ba sarili mo
o boluntaryo ba tong statement mo na
ito hindi ka ba nila tinakot, sinaktan o anupaman? While Joel
was answering his questions, Atty.
Sansano halted him from typing the answer given by Joel to ask
the latter if he could understand the
question propounded to him. The witness was also asked to
identify Joel de Jesus inside the
courtroom.[32]
On cross-examination, SPO2 Garcia, Jr. affirmed that before the
taking down of the statement,
he had explained to Joel the consequences of his being a state
witness, in accordance with the
instruction of P/Insp. Castillo. He specifically explained to
Joel: Itong statement na ito ay puwedeng
gamitin laban o panig sa yo sa alinmang hukuman dito sa
Pilipinas. Ikaw ba ay nakahandang tumestigo
sa mga sasabihin ng tao dito sa statement mo na ito na magiging
laban sa kanila. Joel told him, Yes,
sir. P/Insp. Castillo had told him that Joel was to turn state
witness before the latter was brought to
the IBP Office. When P/Insp. Castillo had returned to the lobby
of the Hall of Justice, he told them that
the only person present who would act as Joels counsel would be
located at the IBP Office, and Joel
would be brought there. It was his first time to meet Atty.
Sansano. As to whether Joel was also
assisted by Atty. Rous when he was investigated on June 21,
1996, the witness said he did not
know.[33] Regarding the portion of the statement dated June 20,
1996 wherein he asked Joel about a
pending case against him, which Joel identified as a rape case,
he denied having knowledge of any such
pending case before the taking of the statement. He also did not
ask Joel if he already had a counsel, or
if Joel already knew Atty. Sansano. Another lawyer, Atty. Rous,
was actually present when he was taking
Joels statement at the office of Atty. Sansano, who was also
present throughout the time he was taking
down the statement of Joel. He did not hear Joel mention the
name of another lawyer to Atty. Sansano,
specifically that of Atty. David as suggested by defense
counsel.[34]
-
11 Lumanog vs. People
SPO2 Tarala testified that as a member of the PNP Station in
Kamuning, Quezon City, assigned
at the CID, he came to investigate accused Lorenzo delos Santos
on June 21, 1996. On that day, after
lunch, he was instructed by P/Insp. Castillo to proceed to the
Public Assistance and Reaction Against
Crime (PARAC), Dallas Bldg. in Tomas Morato Avenue, because one
(1) of the suspects in the Abadilla
slaying was apprehended by the PARAC follow-up team and was
supposed to give his statement. So he
went there together with SPO1 Primo Borito and PO3 Ramil
Hatchero. Upon arriving at said office, he
met P/Sr. Insp. Macanas, who called a person he introduced as
Lorenzo delos Santos. Before taking
down the statement of Lorenzo, he advised the latter of his
rights under the law, warning that any
statement he would make could be used against him in any court
of law, so that he had the right not to
answer any question which to his mind would incriminate him.
Lorenzo responded by saying that he
wanted to give a statement and to be a state witness. When
Lorenzo asked if he could use a telephone
at the information table, he said yes. Lorenzo then called his
office because he was a customs broker,
and also called up a relative who was a certain Col. Sala (Col.
Milagros Sala), a Quezon City police
official. He told Lorenzo that he should have a lawyer of his
choice during the taking down of his
statement. He prodded Lorenzo to call the lawyer, whom Lorenzo
knew to be always at the City
Hall. They then proceeded to the Quezon City Hall to look for
that lawyer at the Office of the City
Attorney. However, Lorenzo was not able to find said lawyer; he
asked somebody (a woman) who
referred them to the Hall of Justice. After failing to find the
person Lorenzo was looking for to be his
counsel, an old man, a vendor suggested to them to go upstairs
at the IBP Office. The lady secretary of
the IBP chapter office introduced them to Atty. Florimond Rous,
who then asked him and his
companions to step out of the room so Atty. Rous could talk to
Lorenzo. Atty. Rous and Lorenzo talked
for ten (10) to fifteen (15) minutes, after which they were
called again to enter the office. His two (2)
companions were left outside and he was told by Atty. Rous that
he had already apprised Lorenzo of his
rights, but Lorenzo still wanted to give a statement.[35]
Upon the instruction of Atty. Rous, he took down the statement
of Lorenzo, the three (3) of
them in one (1) corner of the room while over at the receiving
area there were the secretary and a lady
lawyer. The statement of Lorenzo was in Tagalog, typewritten in
question-and-answer form. Each time
after he had asked a question, Atty. Rous would in turn ask
Lorenzo if he wanted to answer it, and
Lorenzo would answer yes. He was at the typewriter, and the two
(2) (Atty. Rous and Lorenzo) were
infront of him, seated across each other. The taking of the
statement started at about 3:10 in the
afternoon and was finished in more than one (1) hour. He asked
Lorenzo to read first his statement,
and then Atty. Rous read it also. Next, they went up to the
office of Fiscal Refuerzo, but was referred
by the secretary to the inquest fiscal on duty, Fiscal Ben dela
Cruz. At his office, Fiscal dela Cruz asked
Lorenzo to stand infront of him and asked if the statement was
voluntarily given by him, if what was
contained therein was true, and if he was ready to swear before
him. Lorenzo answered yes, and the
-
12 Lumanog vs. People
subscribing of his statement before Fiscal dela Cruz was also
witnessed by Atty. Rous.[36] Lorenzo had
earlier told him and his companions at the PARAC office that his
participation in the ambush-slay of
Abadilla was that of a lookout, and that he was only forced to
join the group because of the threat to
his family.[37]
SPO2 Tarala admitted that the first time he went to the IBP
Office at the Hall of Justice was on
June 20, 1996 when SPO2 Garcia, Jr. took the statement of Joel
de Jesus. Since only SPO2 Garcia, Jr. and
Joel stayed inside the room, he and his companion just walked
around.[38]
Atty. Rous testified that he was one (1) of the free legal aid
counsels of the Free Legal Aid
Committee of the IBP-Quezon City Chapter. One (1) of their
primary duties was to assist indigents in
their cases, and aside from this, they were also tasked to
assist the various suspects during custodial
investigations in the various investigations of different
agencies, such as the CIS and PNP. He recalled
handling at least ten (10) to fifteen (15) of such custodial
investigations. On June 21, 1996, he assisted a
person by the name of Lorenzo delos Santos accompanied by a
police investigator (whose name he
could no longer remember) from the Central Police District, who
told him that the said suspect was
willing to make a confession and asked if he could assist him
during his custodial investigation. He
identified Lorenzo inside the courtroom.[39] The police
investigator had informed him of the charge
against Lorenzo, which was the killing of Abadilla.[40]
Before the start of the investigation of Lorenzo, Atty. Rous
related that he asked the policeman
to leave him and Lorenzo. When the investigators were gone, he
asked Lorenzo to remove his shirt so
he could see if there were any tell-tale marks of any harm or
specific mark upon him. Having satisfied
himself that there were no such mark on the suspects body, Atty.
Rous began interviewing him. He
asked Lorenzo if he was willing to execute a confession, and
Lorenzo answered he was willing to do
so. He then asked Lorenzo if he was willing to have him as his
counsel. Evidently, Lorenzo wanted him
to be his counsel during the custodial investigation for the
taking of his statement. Convinced that
Lorenzo was giving his statement without any pressure or force,
they started the investigation
proper. The police investigator who accompanied Lorenzo to their
office was the one (1) who had
propounded questions in Tagalog and typed the answers given by
Lorenzo also in Tagalog. He was just
within hearing distance and was present during the entire time
of the taking of Lorenzos
statement. Afterwards, he let Lorenzo read the typewritten
statement, and he asked Lorenzo if those
were the questions given to him and the answers he had given, to
which he replied in the
affirmative. He further asked Lorenzo if he was willing to sign
the statement without pressure, and
Lorenzo said he was willing to sign the same. He asked Lorenzo
to sign his statement before the office
of Prosecutor Ben dela Cruz. Prosecutor dela Cruz first read the
statement and then asked Lorenzo if
-
13 Lumanog vs. People
he was willing to sign the same, and he answered in the
affirmative. Lorenzo signed the statement in
their presence; he and Prosecutor dela Cruz also signed
it.[41]
Atty. Rous further testified on cross-examination, that after
the police investigator and Lorenzo
had left, a few minutes later, some other investigators arrived
at their office, bringing along Joel de
Jesus. This Joel de Jesus had given a statement the previous
day, June 20, 1996, and he was told that Joel
would be giving this time a supplemental statement. The
investigators apprised Joel of his constitutional
rights before the taking down of his statement. He was not sure
if Lorenzo and the police investigator
had actually left already, and he could not remember exactly
what transpired at this point. The defense
counsel noted the absence of the word competent to qualify the
word counsel in the preliminary
portion of Lorenzos statement. Atty. Rous described the answers
given by Lorenzo as spontaneous, and
he did not recall any hesitancy on the part of the latter. He
maintained that he found no contusions or
abrasions on Lorenzos body.[42]
P/Sr. Insp. Macanas testified that he was then assigned at the
PARAC as its operations
officer. They were closely coordinating with and sharing
evidence for case build-up operations with the
CPDC in the investigation of the killing of Abadilla. On June
19, 1996, at around 3:00 oclock in the
afternoon, they were directed to proceed to the CPDC
headquarters in view of an information that a
certain suspect alias Tabong was already located while repairing
his tricycle somewhere in Fairview,
during which he was identified by an eyewitness, security guard
Alejo who went there with CPDC
operatives. At the time this radio message was received, they
were within the vicinity of Fairview, and
the CPDC gave the signal for them to accost said suspect. He was
present when Tabong, who was
later identified as Joel de Jesus, was arrested by the joint
elements of the CPDC and PARAC. Joel was
turned over to the CID-CPDC at about past 4:00 p.m.
Subsequently, their superior, P/Sr. Supt.
Bartolome Baluyot, informed them of revelations given by Joel,
for which they were called in again for
joint follow-up operations. They brought Joel to Fairview along
Ruby St. where Joels supposed
companions, namely: one alias Ram, Lorenzo delos Santos, Ogie
and one (1) alias Cesar, could be
found. Joel first pointed to the house of Ram (Rameses de
Jesus), but they did not find him there;
instead they found a man named Cesar Fortuna, whom Joel pointed
to infront of said house. They
immediately apprehended Fortuna and identified themselves. He
informed Fortuna that he was being
implicated by Joel in the killing of Col. Abadilla. Fortuna
introduced himself as a policeman assigned
with the Traffic Management Command (TMC). As a standard
procedure, they informed Fortuna of his
constitutional rights and then brought him to the CPDC for
investigation. At the time, Fortuna had a
gun (caliber .38) tucked in his waist, which they
confiscated.[43]
-
14 Lumanog vs. People
P/Sr. Insp. Macanas further testified that in the course of
their follow-up operations, with
information being provided by Joel, they were also able to
arrest another suspect alias Larry, whom
they met at a dark alley. Upon being pointed to by Joel, they
apprehended Larry who was later
identified as Lorenzo delos Santos, frisked him and found in his
possession a cal .38 Smith and Wesson,
for which he could not present any license or document. They
brought Lorenzo to the CID-CPDC. He
identified both Lorenzo and Fortuna inside the courtroom.[44] On
cross-examination, the witness
admitted they had no warrant of arrest when they went to
Fairview to locate the suspects, as it was a
hot person case ordered by their superior and requiring the
immediate arrest of suspects identified by
witnesses like, in this case, Joel. Joel had admitted to the
CID-CPDC investigators his participation in the
Abadilla killing. After accosting Joel at Camaro St., whom they
identified through a photograph, and
before taking him to the CID-CPDC, he informed Joel that he was
identified as one (1) of the suspects in
the killing of Col. Abadilla; that he had a right to remain
silent; that anything he will say could be used
against him; he had the right to counsel of his own choice, and
if he could not afford one, the
government would provide him. As to Lorenzo, he was arrested
past midnight of June 20, 1996; they
had brought Joel along while moving to locate Lorenzo.[45] He
was just at the back of those operatives
who actually arrested Lorenzo.[46]
The principal witness for the prosecution was Freddie Alejo, who
testified that as a security
guard employed by Provider Security Agency, he was then assigned
at 211 Katipunan Avenue, Blue Ridge,
Quezon City. On June 13, 1996, he reported for duty at 7:00
oclock in the morning. By 7:30 a.m., he
noticed two (2) men walking back and forth infront of his post.
He was shown by the prosecutor some
photographs taken of the parking area he was then guarding, his
guard post beside the building and the
street infront of said building (Exhibits G, H, I and
J[47]).
Alejo recounted that there was a man riding in a black car who
was shot by four (4) persons
infront of the building he was guarding. The car was in the
middle lane of the road, and the cars
specific location was found in one (1) of the photographs
(Exhibit H-4[48]). One (1) of the two (2)
persons he earlier saw walking back and forth in front of him
pointed a gun at him (the position of said
man was marked as Exhibit H-5[49]). That man was holding a short
gun and he told Alejo to come
down (Baba!), but he did not budge. He then saw one (1) of the
assailants (No. 1 in Exhibit H[50]), the
one (1) standing on the left side of the car (left front door),
grab the victim by the neck, get the clutch
bag of the victim inside the car, pull said victim out of the
car, and drop him on the road. He then
heard another shot coming from said attacker (No. 1). Another
man (No. 5 in Exhibit H[51])
shouted: Dapawalang makikialam! and the rest of the four (4) men
(marked as Nos. 2, 3 and 4 in
Exhibit H[52]) faced him (witness Alejo). Next, the companion of
No. 5, who was earlier walking back
and forth infront of him (marked as No. 6 in Exhibit H[53]),
pointed a gun at him. This time, he did
-
15 Lumanog vs. People
come down, lowering his body and bowing his head inside the
guardhouse. The witness identified the
suspects inside the courtroom as the persons he saw and marked
as No. 5 (Joel de Jesus) the first one
who pointed a gun at him shouting Baba ka!; No. 1 who grabbed
the victim, got his clutch bag and
pulled him out of the car (Lenido Lumanog); No. 2 (Rameses de
Jesus); No. 6 the second person who
pointed a gun at him (Lorenzo delos Santos); No. 4 (Augusto
Santos) and No. 3 who was positioned at
the right front door of the victims car (Cesar Fortuna). Nos. 1
and 3 (Lumanog and Fortuna) were the
ones who shot the victim with short firearms, while No. 2
(Rameses) was just standing and facing the
victim with a gun in his hand, and No. 4 (Augusto) was also just
standing facing the driver and holding
a short gun. It was probably less than a minute when the gunfire
stopped, and he stood up at his guard
post. The assailants were no longer in sight and he saw the cars
window shattered. He identified the
victims black car as shown in photographs (Exhibits A-1 to
A-4[54]).[55]
Alejo further testified that he was one (1) of those asked by
the policemen who arrived
regarding the incident. He was told to go to Station 8, which
was just near the place. At Station 8,
another security guard of an adjacent building was also being
investigated. Thereafter, the police
officers brought him to Camp Karingal, along with the other
security guard.[56]
On cross-examination, Alejo described his guard post as
elevated; and two (2) arms length on
the left and right side, there was an alley just beside the
guard post which was at the corner. [57] The
victims car was infront of the building he was guarding, at a
slightly slanted direction from it (Lihis po
ng konti). His view was toward the direction of the front door
of the car (rear end). From where he
was at the time, the car was at a distance of more or less ten
(10) meters. The first time one (1) of the
suspects pointed a gun at him, he was not scared. He saw four
(4) men standing around the victims
car, two (2) on the left side, and two (2) on the right side. He
saw only two (2) of them (the ones at
the front left and right sides of the car) shooting at the car;
they were carrying short firearms. One (1)
of these two (2) got the clutch bag (at the left front side of
the car), grabbed the victim by the neck and
shot him once before dropping him down the road. Even if he
could not see the gun when that assailant
pulled the victim from the car, he knew that the victim was shot
again, because he saw a gun smoke
just beside the left side of the car where the victim was
dropped. The second man who pointed a gun
at him shouted Dapa! and thereupon his companions (the ones at
the right rear side, left rear side,
and front right side) faced him for less than a minute. Because
at that precise moment the gun was not
yet poked at him, he was able to recognize their faces. When
finally the gun was pointed at him, he
became nervous and bowed down his head inside the guard house.
The color of the clutch bag taken
from the victim was black. He could see the inside of the car
from his guard post because the cars
glass window was not tinted and, besides, his position was
elevated or higher than the height of the
car.[58] He confirmed the contents of his Sinumpaang Salaysay
(Exhibit L) before policeman Edilberto
-
16 Lumanog vs. People
Nicanor on June 13, 1996 taken at the CID-PNP, Camp Karingal at
1:55 p.m. or barely four (4) hours
after the shooting incident.[59]
Alejo further testified on cross-examination that on June 19,
1996 at around 2:00 oclock in the
afternoon, he was fetched by four (4) policemen at his agency in
Monumento and they told him they
were going to Fairview. Before this, in the afternoon of June
18, 1996, they showed him a picture of a
man wearing eyeglasses, but he told them he would not point a
man in photographs, but would like to
see the man in person. That was the second time he saw Joel de
Jesus since the shooting incident on
June 13, 1996. He executed a supplemental statement on June 21,
1996 when he identified said suspect
in a police line-up.[60]
On September 26, 1996, the trial court conducted an ocular
inspection of the place where the
shooting incident took place, in the presence of the
prosecutors, defense counsel, Alejo and Maj.
Villena. Alejo was asked to demonstrate his exact location, the
relative positions of the assailants and
the victims car, and the entire incident he had witnessed in the
morning of June 13, 1996. The
Presiding Judge who took the same position of Alejo in the
guardhouse made the following observations:
COURT:
From this position, the Presiding Judge can see the car very
clearly even if the car would be moved back by another segment of
the cement or even if it is forwarded by another segment also, as
segment can accommodate one car of the likes of Honda Accord and
the Court observes that from the guard post the faces of the
persons beside the car are very clear.
x x x
COURT:
The Court observed that from where the witness Alejo was he can
still see the whole car as it has been moved back per the directive
of Major Villena.
x x x
COURT:
The Court adds that from the position of the witness, Freddie
Alejo, the Court can still see faces behind the car which can
accommodate another car.
x x x
COURT:
The front right window has been rolled down and also the back
right window of the car have been rolled down with the left front
door opened, the Court can
-
17 Lumanog vs. People
observed the two (2) front seats particularly the upper portion,
meaning the head rest and the back rest, half of the back rest, all
the head rest can be seen.
x x x
INTERPRETER:
(measuring the distance from the guardhouse to the black
car).
The measurement from the foot of the guardpost up to the right
front door of the black car is fifteen (15) meters.
x x x
INTERPRETER:
(Measuring the distance between the bodega to the black car)
The measurement from the front portion of the bodega (papaya) to
the side of the black car is 11.8 meters.
x x x
INTERPRETER:
The measurementthe distance from where suspect No. 6 was
standing to the guard house when measured is 7.34 meters, your
Honor.
x x x
INTERPRETER:
The distance from where suspect No. 5 was standing up to the
guard house is 5.17 meters.
x x x
COURT:
After the demonstration while witness Alejo was demonstrating
how [suspect No. 2] got the clutch bag and how [suspect No. 2]
grabbed the neck of the driver of the black car, the Judge was at
the guard post and saw for himself that [Alejo] clearly saw the
taking of the clutch bag even if the untinted windows were closed
and the pulling of the driver of the black car.[61]
P/Insp. Castillo, on re-direct examination testified that Atty.
Sansano actively assisted Joel de
Jesus during the time the latters Sinumpaang Salaysay was being
taken by SPO2 Garcia, Jr. There were
questions propounded to Joel which Atty. Sansano had told Joel
not to answer, and advice was given by
said counsel. They left Quezon City Hall at about 5:00 oclock in
the afternoon and returned to the
-
18 Lumanog vs. People
CPDC headquarters. He maintained that all the accused were
brought before the City Prosecutor for
inquest proceedings prior to the filing of the information in
court.[62]
Susan Samonte-Abadilla testified that their family incurred
expenses for the burial of her
husband, repair of the Honda Accord and loss of the .45 cal gold
cup pistol and Omega watch during
the shooting of her husband. She further testified that she was
very shocked and saddened by the tragic
death of her husband. Because she led a practically sheltered
life, it was difficult for her, as it was the
older children who were now taking care of their businesses,
which were attended to by her husband
when he was still alive. Three (3) of her eight (8) children
were still studying (Ana, 14; Nico, 13; and BJ,
10), and one had just graduated last March 1997.[63]
Merlito Herbas, in his Karagdagang Salaysay dated June 21, 1996,
identified Joel de Jesus in a
police line-up at the CID-CPDC, Camp Karingal, as one (1) of
those men who shot the victim on June 13,
1996.[64] However, not having been presented by the prosecution
as witness, he testified for the defense
declaring that none of those whom he saw during the shooting
incident was present inside the
courtroom. He produced a list of amounts he had received from
Mayor Abadilla, totaling P30,000.00 in
support of his claim that Mayor Abadilla did not fulfill his
promise to give him exactly the same salary
he was receiving as security guard (P6,000.00 monthly only
instead of the P8,000.00 he used to receive
as monthly pay), although he admitted having stayed for free
inside the Abadilla compound from July 11,
1996 up to November 26, 1996. He was later told that he would no
longer be presented as witness
because the testimony of Alejo would be sufficient.[65]
Defense Evidence
All the accused raised the defense of alibi, highlighted the
negative findings of ballistic and
fingerprint examinations, and further alleged torture in the
hands of police officers and denial of
constitutional rights during custodial investigation.
P/Insp. Reynaldo D. de Guzman, firearms examiner and Chief of
the Firearms Division of the
PNP Crime Laboratory, testified that he conducted an examination
of the slug recovered from the body
of Col. Abadilla, as per request of the CPDC for cross-matching
with a bullet also recovered from the
body of another shooting victim, Suseso de Dios, i.e., whether
or not they were fired from one (1) and
the same firearm.[66] The result of their microscopic
examination was that the aforesaid bullets were
fired from the same firearm.[67]
-
19 Lumanog vs. People
Dr. Jesse Rey Cruel, medico-legal officer of the CHR, testified
that he examined accused Cesar
Fortuna, Rameses de Jesus, Lenido Lumanog on June 25, 1996 and
Lorenzo delos Santos on July 3,
1996. His findings showed that their bodies bore the following
injuries: (1) Fortuna - abrasions on
forearm, elbow and knee; contusions on chest area; and incised
wounds on the waist and legs[68]; (2)
Rameses - contusions on chest, abdomen, knee and thigh
areas[69]; (3) Lumanog - contusions on
abdomen and lumbar region, and a horizontal lacerated wound on
the forehead[70]; and (4) Lorenzo -
abrasions on the arms, contusions in thigh and knee, petechia
marks (minute hemorrhages) between
chest/abdomen and the penis, discoloration on right arm, and new
scars on left arm, right foot and
second toe.[71] All said wounds required not more than nine (9)
days of medical attendance. The
defense also presented pictures taken at the time of the
examination.[72] On cross-examination, Dr.
Cruel opined that it was possible the injuries could have been
self-inflicted and pointed out that the
injury on the forehead of Lumanog was not complained of.[73]
Remedios Dedicatoria, a fingerprint examiner at the PNP Crime
Laboratory testified on the
results stated in a Dactyloscopy Report No. F-086-96 comparison
of the latent prints lifted from the
Honda Accord with Plate No. RNA-777, Kia Pride PTZ-401 and
Mitsubishi Lancer car with the standard
fingerprints of the accused. The only match was found in the
specimen fingerprint of Rameses de Jesus
with respect to the fragmentary prints lifted from the
Mitsubishi Lancer car. None of the fingerprints
of the accused is identical with the latent prints lifted from
the Honda Accord and Kia Pride.[74] On
cross-examination, the witness stated that if a person had
touched the car and rubbed it, there would be
no fingerprint that could be lifted therefrom. She also admitted
that no latent print was taken from
inside the Honda Accord nor was there any fingerprint taken of
the late Rolando Abadilla (only two [2]
fingerprints were taken from his car). When asked if a person
opened the car holding only the back
portion of the handle, the witness answered that there would
likewise be no fingerprint on the outside
of the car.[75]
Joel de Jesus testified that on June 19, 1996, at around 3:00
oclock in the afternoon, he was at
their street corner fixing his tricycle and was with Arturo
Napolitano and Felicisimo Herrera. A van
stopped and six (6) armed men alighted from it, among whom he
recognized Antonio Rodolfo, Pio
Tarala and Dario Aasco (whom he came to know when they charged
him with rape on January 17,
1994, from which charge he was acquitted on June 19, 1996). He
even greeted said cops, but they forced
him into the van, and handcuffed and blindfolded the three (3)
of them. They were brought to a
certain house where they were boxed, kicked and slammed on the
wall. When his blindfold was
removed, the police officers were forcing him to admit that he
killed Abadilla. Capt. Rodolfo was also
there and he later identified the rest of those who picked him
up as Romulo Sales, Lt. Castillo,
Bartolome Baluyot, Major Reyes and Catalua. After he denied
having anything to do with the killing,
-
20 Lumanog vs. People
PO2 Tarala tried to suffocate him with a plastic bag. He could
not breathe and lost
consciousness. Recounting his ordeal in tears, the witness said
that for one (1) hour his captors
repeatedly inserted a plastic bag and boxed him. A younger
looking man then slapped him saying that
they had ambushed his father. While detained, he was only given
water to drink and not allowed to
contact his relatives. He was asked to sign by Lt. Castillo a
seven (7)-page document, torturing him if
he refused to do so. There were already other signatures on the
edge and every page of said document
(Sinumpaang Salaysay dated June 20, 1996). He denied the
contents of this statement but admitted that
he was brought to the IBP Office, Quezon City Hall. After
signing, he heard Lt. Castillo call somebody
saying, Parating na kami dyan. He was then made to board a
vehicle and was taken to the Quezon
City Hall where a man wearingbarong tagalog was waiting, asking
if he was Joel de Jesus. When Lt.
Castillo answered in the affirmative, the man just signed the
document. He denied having met Atty.
Confesor Sansano, nor was he told of his right to the assistance
of counsel; he even told them the name
of his lawyer at that time, but they just said, Mas marunong ka
pa sa amin.[76]
Testifying on cross-examination, Joel insisted that on June 13,
1996, he went home at around
10:00 oclock in the evening. He started plying his route at 6:00
oclock in the morning; he was
hired (inarkila) by a passenger who asked him to bring her to an
albularyo in Roosevelt Avenue,
Novaliches. He admitted this was the first time he mentioned
this, as it was not mentioned in his
Affidavits[77] which were prepared by the police. Atty. Lupino
Lazaro assisted him in filing charges
against the police officers and Atty. Hector Corpuz before the
Department of Justice (DOJ). He
admitted that he did not say anything about the illegality of
his arrest and the torture he suffered prior
to his arraignment.[78] On re-direct examination, he denied
having executed the Karagdagang
Salaysay dated June 21, 1996 before the IBP lawyer, because at
this time he was still detained in a
safehouse where he remained until June 25, 1996. He was just
forced to sign said document; after
signing it, he heard Lt. Castillo say to one (1) Fiscal Soler,
Fiscal, salamat. Thereafter, he and the other
accused were presented in a press conference as suspects in the
Abadilla slaying inside Camp
Crame. During this time, he pointed to Lorenzo delos Santos and
Augusto Santos, because they were
his enemies at their place. He only pointed to them out of fear
that he might be salvaged by the police
and because of the torture. He really did not know Abadilla nor
was he at any time within the vicinity
of Katipunan Avenue on June 13, 1996. He knew Rameses de Jesus,
being his longtime neighbor, and
also Lumanog who ran for councilor in their place. All he knows
was that his co-accused were picked
up from their place, and he saw them only during the press
conference. He affirmed the contents of
the Sinumpaang Salaysay he executed before Police Major (Pol.
Maj.) Escote with the assistance of Atty.
Lazaro.[79]
-
21 Lumanog vs. People
Joel admitted that he was the one (1) who pointed out Cesar
Fortuna and Rameses de Jesus to
the PARAC investigators. He confirmed that he was known as
Tabong in their locality. He also filed
a complaint before the CHR against the same police
officers.[80]
Cesar Fortuna testified that he was a member of the PNP assigned
at Cagayan de Oro City. He
came to Manila on June 7, 1996, as he was ordered by his
superior, Col. Roberto Sacramento, to attend
to the documents required for reassignment of some of their
companions (as evidenced by a used Super
Ferry ticket and an unused return ticket for June 20, 1996). On
June 11, 1996, he went to the PNP
Directorate for Personnel at the office of Insp. Oscar Alcala.
However, on the night of June 19, 1996, he
was arrested by PARAC operatives while he was at the house of an
acquaintance, Rameses de Jesus, in
Ruby St., Fairview. He had brought for repair a Ford Maverick
Model 69 registered in the name of Col.
Sacramento. At 11:00 oclock in the evening, his mechanic
road-tested the car, but since he was left
alone, he decided to go to the house of Rameses which was near
the shop. Several armed policemen
arrived and entered the house of Rameses. Not finding Rameses
there, they asked him instead to go
along with them. He was made to board an owner-type jeep and
immediately blindfolded. After one (1)
hour, they arrived at a place which he was told was the office
of PARAC. Somebody approached him
and he felt a lighters flame touch his chin. He then identified
himself as a policeman, but was only told:
Walang pulis pulis dito. They kept on asking him where Rameses
could be found. Still blindfolded, he
led them to Palmera Subdivision where he knew Rameses had
another house. Upon reaching Palmera,
his blindfold was removed, but he was unable to locate the house
until they went home at 5:00 p.m. In
the morning of June 20, 1996, the policemen told him that he was
just confusing them (nililito), but he
explained that he had been to that house only once. The driver
of the Honda Civic was already angry at
him and inserted a .45 cal pistol in his mouth. They went back
to the PARAC office, and he was
interrogated about the Abadilla killing. He was informed that he
was being implicated as somebody had
pointed at him. When he still denied having any knowledge about
the ambush-slay, he was repeatedly
suffocated with a plastic bag placed on his head while he was
handcuffed and blindfolded. After one (1)
hour and due to hardship he suffered, he just told them he would
admit whatever it was they wanted
him to admit. He said that he acted as a look-out. They had him
copy a prepared sketch and when his
blindfold was finally removed, someone introduced himself as
Col. Bartolome Baluyot who told him he
just had to obey and he would not be hurt. Maj. George Reyes
arrived, looked at the sketch and said it
was not the place where Col. Abadilla was ambushed. He was
blamed for that fiasco even as he said it
was they who prepared the sketch. After an hour, they returned
to Palmera Subdivision, Novaliches and
this was already between 2:00 and 3:00 p.m. After rounding the
area, he found the house, but Rameses
was not there. He was made to sit the whole night in the
kitchen.[81]
-
22 Lumanog vs. People
Fortuna continued to narrate that on June 21, 1996, he was made
to lie down on a bench
covered with a GI sheet and was asked where the firearm of Col.
Abadilla was. When he answered that
he really did not know about it, they electrocuted him and
poured cold water on his body. He told them
that if they needed a gun, he had a gun in Sampaloc, a .45 cal
licensed firearm. Thereupon, they asked
him to go to that place where Dante Montevirgen was the
gunsmith. Only the policemen alighted from
the vehicle and talked to Montevirgen. He saw that Montevirgen
gave them two (2) firearms, after which
they went back to the PARAC office. On his licensed firearm, he
just brought this for repair on May 10,
1996, saying ayaw mag-automatic, while the other gun belonged to
Capt. Regis, and these were
covered by receipts. Next, they asked him about the Rolex watch
of Col. Abadilla. When he denied
having any knowledge about it, he was again electrocuted. He had
filed a complaint before the CHR for
the injuries inflicted on him and the violation of his rights.
Aside from this case and the charge of
illegal possession of firearms, he was also charged with an
administrative case and a criminal complaint
for carnapping (of the KIA Pride). The carnapping complaint was
dismissed by Assistant Prosecutor
Amolin on September 23, 1996. The Decision issued by P/Sr. Supt.
Rodolfo N. Caisip of the PNP
Headquarters Traffic Management Group also dismissed
Administrative Case No. 96-09-03. He insisted
that on the morning of June 13, 1996, he was at Camp Crame
following up the reassignment papers of
his colleagues, showing the letter-order issued by Col.
Sacramento. He saw PO3 Ramon Manzano at
the Office of the Directorate for Personnel at about 9:00 oclock
in the morning. He left said office as
soon as he got the folder, signed their logbook, gave it to SPO4
Mercado of the Office of PNP Personnel
Highway Patrol. Then he went home to eat before proceeding to
the Metro Traffic Force, Central
District at the office of Col. Juanito de Guzman at Roces St.,
Quezon City, at around 2:00 oclock in the
afternoon, for the renewal of the license of Col. Sacramentos
driver.[82] He also filed with the CHR an
administrative complaint against those police officers who had
illegally arrested, detained and tortured
him.
Fortuna further testified that PARAC operatives seized his
Kawasaki motorcycle which he had
left inside Camp Crame because it had no fender. However, the
certificate of registration was lost since
it had been in custody of the police; the Land Transportation
Office (LTO) registration paper was locked
inside, and he forgot what its plate number was. He admitted
that he was able to use said motorcycle
in June 1996 even with the missing fender. He left the
motorcycle at Gate 2, Camp Crame before leaving
for Cagayan de Oro City; as to his car, he left it at Pier 2. He
admitted that he was the same person
charged with kidnapping and serious illegal detention with
ransom in Criminal Case No. 96-312, which
was filed on July 15, 1996 in Mabalacat, Pampanga against him,
Lumanog and Rameses by a certain Dr.
Jesusa dela Cruz. Said case was transferred to the Quezon City
RTC in the same sala of the presiding
judge in this case. The filing of this case destroyed his
reputation as a police officer and affected his
children, who stopped going to school. He admitted though that
he had once been dishonorably
-
23 Lumanog vs. People
discharged from the service as a result of an extortion case
filed against him. He had appealed his case
and he was reinstated on August 20, 1983. A memorandum dated
June 25, 1996 was issued by Col.
Sacramento to attest to his moral character and loyalty to the
service.[83] He admitted that he never
raised the issue of the legality of his arrest or the torture he
suffered while in detention, during his
arraignment. When confronted with his sworn statement submitted
to the CHR, he admitted that he did
not mention therein the pouring of cold water on his body, that
he was asked to make a sketch of
Katipunan Avenue, that a .45 cal pistol was inserted into his
mouth and that there was no firearm
confiscated from him at the time of his arrest. When he was
apprehended on the night of June 19,
1996 at the house of Rameses at Ruby St., he was half-naked
standing outside at the balcony. He saw
someones hand, but not the whole body of that person to whom he
was shown that night, and he just
heard from the policemen he had been positively
identified.[84]
Fortunas claim that he was at Camp Crame following up papers in
the morning of June 13, 1996
was corroborated by Oscar Alcala (Chief Clerk of the Recruitment
and Selection Division) and SPO2
Ramon Manzano (Office of the Directorate for Personnel and
Recruitment). However, Alcala could not
present the particular logbook containing the record of the
documents and transaction with Fortuna, as
it could not be located, as it got lost after the office
renovation in the early part of 1997. A xerox copy
of the logbook entry was presented in court (Exhibit 70).[85]
However, said witness admitted he was
not the custodian of the said logbook, and he did not have
personal knowledge of the date and time of
the entries in Exhibit 70; it was also SPO2 Manzano who xeroxed
the said logbook entry. [86] Manzano
confirmed that he personally saw Fortuna in the morning of June
13, 1996, between 9:00 and 9:30, when
Fortuna retrieved the papers he earlier submitted in May
1996.[87]
On further cross-examination, Fortuna admitted that he never
told his lawyer (Atty. Ramonito
M. Delfin) when they brought his complaint before the CHR that
he had documents to prove he was at
Camp Crame in the morning of June 13, 1996. He explained that
the matter did not enter his mind
because he had no food and no sleep for several days: At the
time my salaysay was taken from me,
everything was still fresh and there were so many things that I
wanted to say but I was not able to say
because masama pa ang aking pakiramdam. Neither did he mention
it to Fiscal Refuerzo who
interviewed him after the press conference, as they did not ask
him about it.[88] He had brought up
such matter with his lawyer in another case not before the sala
of the presiding judge in this case.[89]
Lorenzo delos Santos testified that on June 13, 1996, he left
his house at Fairview and boarded a
bus bound for Quiapo. Upon reaching Quiapo, he heard mass in
Quiapo Church until around 8:30
a.m. He arrived in their office at Binondo on June 13, 1996 at
9:30 a.m. He remembered going to the
office of the Felipe Santos Brokerage in the same building to
check on the date of arrival of a certain
-
24 Lumanog vs. People
shipment. Thereafter, he went back to his office and stayed
there until 2:30 p.m. He left his place of
work about 4:30 in the afternoon and went to a client who
invited him to drink at the house of his
brother somewhere in Quezon City. On June 19, 1996, at around
11:00 olock in the evening, several
persons suddenly barged into his house while he and his wife
were sleeping. Sgt. Bela introduced
himself, and he was slapped and handcuffed and the house was
searched. They took his .38 cal revolver
which was licensed. He was blindfolded, made to board a car and
taken to a safehouse where he was
tied and tortured (suffocation with plastic bag and
electrocution). He was told that he was pointed to
by Joel, but he explained to them that Joel was his opponent in
a court case (for grave threats, physical
injuries and trespassing).[90] He also answered their questions
regarding his co-accused. He told them
that he used to see Rameses when he brings his children to
school and came to know Lumanog when he
ran as city councilor, while he did not know Fortuna. After the
interrogation, he was again subjected to
torture and he felt weak; this lasted up to June 21, 1996. On
June 21, 1996, he was brought to a
field (bukid) where he was forced to sign a paper. He was then
brought to the Quezon City Hall of
Justice at the second floor and instructed that he should just
walk along. There were two (2) women
inside aside from policemen, and he was elbowed by a policeman
to sign a document. He signed it out
of fear, and the document was handed by the policemen to a man
who entered the room, whom he later
came to know as Atty. Florimond Rous. He was brought to another
floor at the Fiscals Office while he
was still limping. Somebody there asked why he was in that
condition, but one (1) of his police
companions elbowed him so he just said it was nothing. A man who
was probably the Fiscal signed the
document, and they left at around 5:00 in the afternoon.[91]
Lorenzo admitted he had an owner-type
jeep, which was registered in his own name, but said jeep had
been mortgaged to Danilo Lintag since
May 27, 1996.[92]
Lorenzo presented as witness Edith Lingan, an employee of Felipe
M. Santos, who corroborated
his alibi.[93]
Augusto Santos testified that on June 13, 1996 at around 7:00
oclock in the morning, he
accompanied his brother-in-law Jonas Ayhon whose wife, his
sister, gave birth on June 11, 1996 at the
Jose Fabella Hospital at Sta. Cruz, Manila. He stayed there
until 2:00 oclock in the afternoon. On June
26, 1996, five (5) men suddenly barged into their house. He was
hit in the neck with a .45 cal. pistol,
blindfolded and brought outside where he was beaten. They had no
warrant of arrest but were forcing
him to admit that Joel de Jesus gave him big money and that he
knew what it was. He told them that
he did not know anything, and that Joel was his enemy, as his
Tito Lorenzo had a quarrel with Joel in
which he helped his Tito. He confirmed the contents of the
Sinumpaang Salaysay dated July 3, 1996
which he executed at Camp Crame, and also presented a copy of
the birth certificate of the baby
delivered by his sister at Fabella Hospital.[94]
-
25 Lumanog vs. People
Jonas Padel Ayhon corroborated the foregoing testimony of his
brother-in-law, Augusto Ogie
Santos, whose half-sister was his wife.[95]
Rameses de Jesus testified that on June 12, 1996 at 7:00 oclock
in the evening, he and Lumanog
left for Mabalacat, Pampanga on board the latters brand new
Mitsubishi Lancer, together with Romeo
Costibollo, Manny dela Rosa and Boni Mandaro. They arrived in
Mabalacat at about 10:00 oclock in the
evening and after resting they started digging infront of the
church, inside the compound of the Tiglao
family, Lumanogs in-laws. They dug until 4:00 oclock in the
morning of June 13, 1996. Thereafter,
they slept and woke up at around 10:00 oclock in the morning.
They helped in the preparations for the
celebration of the wedding anniversary of the Tiglaos. After
eating lunch, they drank liquor. They
returned to Manila only on June 14, 1996 at 7:00 p.m.. On June
19, 1996, they went back to Pampanga
and returned to Manila on June 20, 1996. At around 10:00 p.m.,
they proceeded to Fairview, Quezon
City to visit the sick child of Romeo Costibollo who was then
confined at Fairview Polymedic
Hospital. After Costibollo and Lumanog alighted from their car
and while he was parking infront of the
hospital, several armed men came. Two (2) men approached him
from behind and asked him if
Costibollo and Lumanog were his companions. When he replied yes,
he was pushed inside the car;
Costibollo and Lumanog were handcuffed. Without any warrant,
they were apprehended, blindfolded
and taken to a place where he was tortured. They were forcing
him to admit that he and his
companions killed Kabise who was the ex-governor of Ilocos
Norte. Despite his denials they continued
to torture him by electrocution and suffocation with a plastic
bag. A policeman arrived with Fortuna,
who was asked how much Ram gave them, to which Fortuna replied
P10,000.00. He got mad at
Fortuna and cursed him for telling such a lie. After two (2)
days, he was brought to Camp Karingal still
blindfolded. He was again tortured for two (2) days, the
policemen forcing him to admit he participated
in the killing of Col. Abadilla. When he could no longer bear
the torture, he finally admitted to Insp.
Castillo that he took part in the Abadilla ambush-slay. When the
one (1) interviewing him asked how he
did it, he just said that Fortuna came to his house with an
owner-type jeep and two (2) other persons,
and that they rode to Dau, Pampanga and headed to Tarlac, on
their way to Ilocos to kill
Abadilla. Insp. Castillo got angry, saying that he was just
fooling them and he was again hit.[96]
Rameses continued to narrate that after two (2) or three (3)
days stay at Camp Karingal, he
and the other accused were presented at a press conference.
During the inquest conducted by Fiscal
Refuerzo, he saw Freddie Alejo for the first time, and also his
co-accused Lumanog, Fortuna, Lorenzo,
Joel and Augusto. As far as he knew, they had brought the matter
of the torture they suffered in the
hands of policemen to the DOJ.[97]
-
26 Lumanog vs. People
On cross-examination, Rameses was shown a medical certificate
issued by Dr. Servillano B.
Ritualo III at the PNP General Hospital, Camp Crame, but he said
he could no longer remember the date
he was examined by said doctor. He confirmed that Fortuna was
renting a room in his house together
with his mistress Baby. When confronted with his Sinumpaang
Salaysay dated June 26, 1996 he
executed before the CHR, he admitted that there was no mention
therein of their treasure-hunting trip
to Pampanga on June 12 to 15, 1996. He said he was never asked
about it. He likewise admitted that he
was included in the kidnapping charge filed in Mabalacat, but
asserted that it was trumped-up
(Ipinatong po sa akin yan ni Col. Baluyot).[98]
The Trial Courts Verdict
On August 11, 1999, the trial court promulgated a Joint Decision
dated July 30, 1999, the
dispositive portion of which reads:
ACCORDINGLY, judgment is hereby rendered as follows:
x x x
V. In Criminal Case No. Q-96-66684, for Murder,:
1. Accused Arturo Napolitano y Caburnay is hereby ACQUITTED;
2. Accused SPO2 Cesar Fortuna y Abudo, Rameses de Jesus y Calma,
Leonardo Lumanog y Luistro (a.k.a. Leonido or Lenido), Joel de
Jesus y Valdez, and Augusto Santos y Galang are hereby found GUILTY
beyond reasonable doubt as co-principals of the crime of MURDER as
defined and penalized in the Revised Penal Code for the death of
ex-Col. Rolando Abadilla y Nolasco with the aggravating
circumstances of treachery (absorbing abuse of superior strength)
and evident premeditation and they are hereby sentenced to suffer
the penalty of DEATH;
3. Accused Lorenzo delos Santos y dela Cruz is hereby
ACQUITTED.
On the civil aspect, accused SPO2 Cesar Fortuna y Abudo, Rameses
de Jesus y Calma, Leonardo Lumanog y Luistron (a.k.a. Leonido or
Lenido), Joel de Jesus y Valdez and Augusto Santos y Galang are
hereby ordered jointly and solidarily to pay the heirs of the
deceased ex-Col. Rolando Abadilla y Nolasco the following:
1. As actual damages, the sum of P294,058.86;
2. As indemnity damages, the sum of P50,000.00;
3. As moral damages, the sum of P500,000.00;
4. As exemplary damages, the sum of P500,000.00.
-
27 Lumanog vs. People
The firearm, one (1) Smith & Wesson .38 caliber revolver
with Serial No. 980974, subject of Case No. Q-96-66680 is hereby
ordered returned to Lorenzo delos Santos y dela Cruz.
The firearm, one (1) Amscor .38 caliber revolver with Serial No.
21907, subject of Case No. Q-96-66683 is hereby ordered forwarded
to the PNP Firearms and Explosives Division, Camp Crame, Quezon
City for safekeeping in accordance with law and as said firearm
belongs and is licensed to accused Leonardo Lumanog y Luistro
(a.k.a. Leonido or Lenido) who has been sentenced in Case No.
Q-96-66684 for Murder, until further orders from this court.
Costs against the accused.
Let the entire records of these cases be transmitted forthwith
to the Honorable Supreme Court for automatic review, in accordance
with law and the Rules of Court.
SO ORDERED.[99]
The trial court was firmly convinced that the prosecution
succeeded in establishing the identities
of accused Joel, Rameses, Lumanog, Fortuna and Augusto as the
perpetrators in the fatal shooting of
Abadilla in the morning of June 13, 1996. It found that both
security guards Alejo and Herbas confirmed
the presence of Joel de Jesus in the crime scene. However, with
respect to the positive identification of
all the five (5) accused, namely, Joel de Jesus, Rameses de
Jesus, Cesar Fortuna, Lenido Lumanog and
Augusto Santos, the trial court gave more credence to the
testimony of Alejo than the declaration on the
witness stand of Herbas who had backtracked on his earlier
statement dated June 21, 1996 wherein he
pointed to Joel as one (1) of those participants in the shooting
incident.
In doubting the credibility of Herbas, the trial court stressed
that Herbas was obviously
disgruntled at the Abadilla familys failure to give him the
promised salary, and circumstances showed
that his need for job and money colored his perception and
attitude in testifying for the
defense. Moreover, despite the impression he had given to the
police and the Abadilla family that he
could identify the four (4) persons who surrounded Col.
Abadillas car, Herbas could not have really
been able to recognize the faces of the ambushers for three (3)
reasons: (1) he was on the ground when
he turned his head (lumingon) towards where the gunshots were
being fired and quite a lot of vehicles
in traffic stopped at the time; (2) the whole incident, as far
as Herbas observed, happened in seconds
only; and (3) Herbas was three (3) Meralco posts away from the
ambush site. All these factors
combined, according to the trial court, could not have given
Herbas enough time and opportunity to
clearly see those who ambushed Abadilla, and hence he was really
a poor and inadequate witness either
for the prosecution or the defense.[100]
-
28 Lumanog vs. People
Compared to Herbas, the trial court found the eyewitness
testimony of Alejo more credible due
to his elevated position at his guard post and the fact that the
ambush had taken place before his very
eyes, so near that one (1) of the conspirators had to order him
to lie flat (which obviously he could not
do because of the narrow space inside his guard house), and
which appeared to be the reason why a
second order came for him to get down from the guard house, to
which he nervously complied. From
his vantage point, Alejo sufficiently and in a detailed manner
recognized the relative positions and
participations of the ambushers, each of whom he had identified
as Rameses, Fortuna, Lumanog,
Augusto and Joel, both in the police line-up and again inside
the courtroom during the trial.[101]
The trial court also found that the statements of Joel, in which
he admitted his participation in
the crime assisted by Atty. Sansano and in the presence of the
IBP personnel and police investigators,
were not flawed by intimidation or violence when obtained and
sworn to before the fiscal. The common
defense of alibi put up by all the accused was rejected by the
trial court, holding that (1) the alleged
treasure-hunting trip made by Lumanog and Rameses was incredible
and unpersuasive, as it was
contrary to ordinary human experience; (2) Fortunas claim was
weak, the logbook entry on his
supposed transaction in the Office of the Directorate for
Personnel and Recruitment at Camp Crame
was a mere photocopy, and also, as in the case of Rameses, he
never mentioned such digging activity in
Pampanga in the sworn complaint he had filed before the CHR; (3)
Augustos alibi was supported only
by his brother-in-law, and it was simply not usual for menfolk,
instead of women, in our family culture,
to fetch a woman who had just given birth at the hospital, aside
from the observation that Augusto
could have gone straight to Fabella Hospital in Sta. Cruz,
Manila instead of going first to Buendia,
Makati before 7:00 a.m. to fetch his brother-in-law. With
respect to Lumanog, the trial court pointed
out that his silence and failure to testify in court, despite
the evidence implicating him in the murder of
Abadilla, justified an inference that he was not
innocent.[102]
On August 25, 1999, Lumanog filed a motion for
reconsideration.[103] On September 2, 1999, Joel
filed a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence
to present two witnesses, Merevic S.
Torrefranca and Rosemarie P. Caguioa, who offered to testify on
the whereabouts of Joel on the day of
the incident.[104] Lumanog likewise filed a motion for new trial
for the presentation of a new witness,
who was allegedly on board a taxi immediately behind Abadillas
car, and who clearly saw that those
who perpetrated the gruesome crime were not the accused.[105] In
his Supplement to the Motion for
Reconsideration, Lumanog assailed the inconsistencies in the
declarations of Alejo, and the non-
presentation of eyewitnesses Minella Alarcon and Metro Aide
Aurora Urbano. In addition, Lumanog
pointed to well-publicized statements of the Alex Boncayao
Brigade (ABB), which claimed responsibility
for the killing of Abadilla, but the investigation got
sidetracked by another angle -- that a political rival
of Abadilla paid money for a contract assassination. He
contended that the police opted for the path of
-
29 Lumanog vs. People
least resistance by rounding up the usual suspects, indeed
another glaring example of our law enforcers
strategy of instituting trumped-up charges against innocent
people just to comply with their superiors
directive to accelerate solving an ambush-slay case.[106] In
additional pleadings filed by his new counsel,
Lumanog reiterated the ABBs assassination theory in the light of
more recent press statements issued
by said group describing the accused as mere fall guys of the
police to project an image of efficiency.[107]
On January 25, 2000, the trial court issued an Order ruling on
the pending motions:
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the court resolves:
1. to DENY the Motion for Reconsideration by accused Lenido
Lumanog;
2. to DENY the Motion for New Trial by accused Joel de
Jesus;
3. to consider the Motion for New Trial by accused Lenido
Lumanog as abandoned and/or withdrawn