LSA.218 Sound change in progress LSA.218 Transmission and diffusion Linguistic InstituteCambridge July 2005.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

LSA.218 Sound change in progress

LSA.218Transmission and

diffusion

Linguistic Institute Cambridge July 2005

Family tree and wave models of linguistic change

The family tree model has been the principal guide and major output of the comparative method. Yet all linguists agree that there are some situations where the effects of a wave model must be recognized, registering the influence of distinct terminal branches of the tree on one another.

Best Indo-European family tree (Ringe, Warnow & Taylor 2002)

A definition of linguistic descent (transmission)

A language (or dialect) Y at a given time is said to be descended from language (or dialect) X of an earlier time if and only if X developed into Y by an unbroken sequence of instances of native-language acquisition by children.

--Ringe, Warnow and Taylor p. 63

Transmission the result of incrementation

This is the normal type of internal language change, “change from below,” which is responsible for increasing distances between the branches over time.

Such internal changes are generated by the process of incrementation, in which successive cohorts and generations of children advance the change beyond the level of their caretakers and role models, and in the same direction over many generations (Labov 1994: Ch. 14).

The mechanism of incrementation

Incrementation begins with the faithful transmission of the adult system, including variable elements with their linguistic and social constraints (Labov 1989, Roberts 1993).

These variable elements are then advanced further in the direction indicated by the inherited age vectors.

The incrementation of the change may take the form of increases in frequency, extent, scope or specificity of a variable.

Though internal changes may simplify the system (as in mergers), they normally maintain structural contrasts (as in chain shifts) or increase it (as in splits).

Fronting of (aw) by age with partial regression lines for sex in Philadelphia Neighborhood Study [N=112]

1600

1700

1800

1900

2000

2100

2200

Under 20 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-

F2 constant + age*F2 age coefficient

WOMEN:slope = -5.38r2=.961

MEN:slope = -6.60r2=.788

Regression analyses of fronting of (aw) of men and women by decade in the Philadelphia Neighborhood Study [N=112]

A definition of diffusion

We also observe changes that diminish the distances between branches of the family tree. This may happen spontaneously, when parallel branches converge through independently motivated changes, but more often it is the result of contact between the speech communities involved and the transfer of features from one to the other. This transfer across branches of the family tree is here designated linguistic diffusion.

Best family tree with indications of contact between Germanic and Italo-Celtic

--Ringe, Warnow & Taylor 2002

Constraints against structural diffusion

Though most language contact situations lead to unidirectional, rather than bidirectional linguistic results, conditioned by the social circumstances, it is also the case that linguistic structure overwhelmingly conditions the linguistic outcomes. Morphology and syntax are clearly the domains of linguistic structure least susceptible to the influence of contact, and this statistical generalization is not vitiated by a few exceptional cases.

--Gillian Sankoff, Age: Apparent Time and Real Time. Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, in pres..

RWT argue for a strong linguistic constraint against structural borrowing. They state that the essential condition for the family tree model is that morphosyntactic structures are faithfully transmitted across generations, and are not transferred from language to language in normal linguistic development.

Accounting for the difference between transmission and diffusion.

It is proposed here that the contrast in patterns of transmission within and across languages is the result of two different kinds of language learning. On the one hand, transmission is the product of the acquisition of language by young children. On the other hand, the limitations on diffusion are the result of the fact that most language contact is largely between and among adults. It is proposed here that structural patterns are not as likely to be diffused because adults do not learn and reproduce linguistic forms, rules and constraints with the accuracy and speed that children display

Lowering of /æ/ on Brunlanes peninsula: Speakers age 70-

Trudgill 1974: Map 3.7

Lowering of /æ/ on Brunlanes peninsula: Speakers age 25-69-

Trudgill 1974: Map 3.8

The cascade model: change originates in the largest city, diffuses to the next largest city, and so to successively smaller cities.

The gravity model: the influence of one city on another is directly proportionate to population size and inversely proportionate to the square of the distance between them (Trudgill 1974)

Two models of linguistic diffusion

Why does change diffuse in a stronger form within the metropolis, but in a weaker form to communities without?

Question:

Ghazvin

Tehran

The metropolis of Tehran [500,000] and the neighboring capital of Ghazvin province, [distance: 150 km]

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Casual Careful Reading Word lists Minimal pairs

Tehran 10-19

Tehran 20-29

Teheran over 50

Ghazvin 10 to 29

Ghazvin over 50

Source: Modaressi 1978

Percent raising of /a/ to /u/ in the Farsi of Tehran and Ghazvin by age and style.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Some college 10-12 years 7-9 years under 7 years

Teheran

Ghazvin

Source: Modaressi 1978

Percent raising of /a/ to [u] before nasals by years of education in the Farsi of Teheran and Ghazvin

Short-a systems in North American dialectsAll North American dialects show a differentiation of the short-a class into tense and lax forms (ANAE: Ch. 13). There are five basic types:

a. The nasal system, All short-a before nasal consonants are raised and fronted (man, manage, span, Spanish) while all others remain in low front position.b. Raised short-a. All words with historical short-a are raised and fronted to mid and high position. Found only in the Inland North..c. Continuous short-a raising. Short-a words are variably raised and fronted, with vowels before nasal codas leading and vowels before voiceless stops and words with obstruents/liquid onsets (glass, brag) remaining in low front position..d. Southern breaking. Breaking of short-a into a low front nucleus, palatal glide and following inglide in the Southern dialect area.e. Split short-a systems. A phonemic split between tense and lax short-a is found in New York City and the Mid-Atlantic states, with distribution dictated by phonological, grammatical, stylistic and lexical conditions.

Eastern N.E. nasal short-a system: Diane S., 37, Providence, RI

/æh/

General raising of short-a in the Northern Cities Shift: Donna K., 34, Syracuse NY: highlighted symbols indicate following nasals

tense

New York City short-a pattern:tensing in closed syllables

p t c& k

b d j& g

m n N

f T s s&

v D z z&

l r

cab mad bagbadge

manham

half bath pass cash

Further constraints on tensing of short-a in New York City

Function words (an, and, I can, had) are lax while corresponding content words are tense (tin can, hand, add), with the exception of can’t, which remains tense.Short-a is lax in open syllables, so that we have tense ham, plan, cash but lax hammer, planet, cashew).Syllables are closed by inflectional boundaries, so that tense forms include planning as well as plan, staffer as well as staff, as opposed to lax planet and raffle. There is considerable variation before voiced fricatives (magic, imagine, jazz).Initial short-a with codas that normally tense are lax (asperin, asterisk) exept for the most common words (ask, after).Abbreviated personal names are often lax (Babs, Cass). There are a number of lexical exceptions: e.g., tense avenue is normally tense as opposed to lax average, savage, gavel, etc.Many learned or late-learned words with short-a in tense environments are lax: alas, carafe.

Mid-Atlantic split short-a system: Nina B., 42, NYC

tense

lax

voiced stops

voiceless fricatives

æh

æfunction word

am

manatee

animalopen syllable

open syllable

Diffusion of the NYC short-a system

The Hudson Valley as a dialect area

NYC Rutherford, NJ

An ambiguity in polarity

“Did you mean C-A-N or C-A-N-T?”

“I can’t take you. . .”or

“I can take you. . .”

“Hey Dad, can I go with you?”

The Hudson Valley as a dialect area

NYCNo. Plainfield

Rutherford, NJ

Short-a system of Alex O., 81, No. Plainfield NJ

voiced stops

voiceless fricatives

tense auxiliaries

voiced stops

tense/lax

The Hudson Valley as a dialect area

Albany

NYCNo. Plainfield

Rutherford, NJ

Diffusion of NYC short-a system to the Hudson Valley: John E., 46, Albany NY, TS 353

open syllable

lexically tense in NYC

tense

lax

voiceless fricatives

voiced stops

animal

Diffusion of the NYC short-a pattern

The Cincinnati short-a system

We also find in Cincinnati the same type of deviations from the NYC pattern as in North Plainfield and Albany. The open syllable constraint is missing: The Telsur subjects show tense Catholic, passive, fascinated, davenport, Canada, Spanish, cabin, family. In addition, the function word and is found in the tense group, reflecting this loss of this grammatical constraint.

While other Midland cities show either a nasal system or a continuous pattern of raising, the traditional Cincinnati system closely resembles that of NYC, with a tense class of short-a before nasals, voiced stops and voiceless fricatives and a residual lax class. While the Mid-Atlantic region of Baltimore, Wilmington and Philadelphia limits tensing before voiced stops to only three words—mad, bad, glad—Cincinnati has tensing before all voiced stops except /g/. While the Mid-Atlantic region limits tensing to codas with front voiceless fricatives, Cincinnati resembles NYC in tensing cash, ash, hashbrown

Diffusion of NYC pattern to Cincinnati: Lucy M., 58 TS120

open syllable

function word

open syllable

open syllable

lax /g/

tense

lax

voiced stops voiceless fricatives

voiced fricatives

The settlement of Cincinnatti

Cincinnati was first settled in 1787, when Congress opened to settlement the land between the Allegheny Mountains and the Mississippi River. Benjamin Stites was a native of Scotch Plains, not far from the town of North Plainfield. He first became acquainted with the Cincinnati region during the French and Indian wars, and conveyed his enthusiasm for settlement to John Cleves Symmes, a native New Yorker who moved to New Jersey at the age of 28, became a New Jersey congressman and like Stites, fought in the Revolutionary War. Symmes and associates purchased 330,000 acres between the Great Miami and Little Miami Rivers. Shortly afterwards, a party of 26 settlers headed by Stites arrived. His children Benjamin Jr., Elijah and Hezekiah were all prominent in the early history of the area; Benjamin Jr.’s wife is said to have been the first white woman in Cincinnati. Following the Principle of First Effective Settlement (Zelinsky 1993) it is likely that the original English dialect of Cincinnati was based on the speech of residents of New York and neighboring regions of New Jersey.

Diffusion of the NYC short-a pattern New Orleans

New Orleans and New York

There is a New Orleans city accent. . . associated with downtown New Orleans, particularly with the German and Irish Third Ward, that is hard to distinguish from the accent of Hoboken, Jersey City, and Astoria, Long Island, where the Al Smith inflection, extinct in Manhattan, has taken refuge. -A. J. Liebling, The Earl of Louisiana (NY: Simon and Schuster, 1961)

Diffusion of NYC short-a pattern to New Orleans: Sybil P., 69, TS 167

function word

function word

tense

lax

voiced stops voiceless fricatives

Elizabeth G.

A younger New Orleans speaker studied by Telsur is Elizabeth G, who was 38 years old when interviewed in 1996. She was a teacher, of French/Irish/German background. Again, the distribution of tense vowels matches the NYC system, including short-a before nasals, voiced stops (dad, bad, sad, grabbing) and voiceless fricatives (ask, grass, glass, master, past).

Again the class of function words is tense, and not lax (have). The status of the open syllable constraint is severely weakened. The word internationally is clearly tense, and ceramic is in an intermediate position. On the other hand, Canada and catholic are in the lax set.

The short-a pattern of Dr. John (Mac Rebennac)

Tense [closed syllable] answer, fancy, hand, bad, dadTense [open syllable] piano (2), classical, daddy, fascinate [2],

MannyLax [closed syllable] that, cats, fact, that’s, atLax [open syllable] Allen

from A History of New Orleans Donald McNabb & Louis E."Lee" Madère, Jr.

From 1810 until 1840, New Orleans grew at a faster rate than any other large American city. By 1830, New Orleans was America's third largest city, behind New York and Baltimore; and in 1860, it was still the nation's fifth largest city. New Orleans, despite the Post-Civil War boom that transformed the North into an urban-industrial area, would remain among the twelve largest U.S. cities until 1910.

New York City and New Orleans

In the ante-bellum period, roughly between 1820 and 1860, financial, commercial and social relations between the city and the South were at fever pitch: New York banks underwrote the plantation economy, cotton was shipped routinely from New Orleans, Charleston, Savannah and Mobile to be trans-shipped to England, and Southern planters regularly combined business with pleasure in the Big Apple of the 1800s. “…down to the outbreak of the Civil War, New York dominated every single phase of the cotton trade from plantation to market” (Foner 1941).

--Marshall D. Berger, New York City and the Antebellum South. In J. L. Dillard (ed.) Perspectives on American English. The Hague: Mouton. 1980. P. 137

Commercial relations between NYC and New Orleans

. We find many descriptions of commercial and social relations between New Orleans and New York in the five-volume history of The Older Merchants of New York City by John Scoville (1885), but the typical pattern involves movement of New Yorkers to New Orleans.

Korn’s history of The Early Jews of New Orleans deals with social and business relations from 1718 to 1812. References to New York City are found on 55 pages, compared to 6 for Boston.

Thus in the description of the prominent Seixas merchant clan, founded by Benjmain Seixas in 1780, we read: “Madison [Seixas] is in New Orleans, and a partner in the large firm of Glidden and Seixas.” (Vol II, p. 127)

Optimality constraints on tensing of short-a

*æh[+voc]: no tensing before resonants (pal, carry)*æh[-cont,-voi]: no tensing before voiceless stops (cap, bat, back)*æ#: no laxing before Class 2 inflectional boundaries (manning, passes)*æh.: no tensing before syllable boundaries (manner, castle)*æ[+cont,-voi]: no laxing before voiceless fricatives (pass, cash, half)*Vh[+G]: no tensing in function words (can, am, an, had, has)*æ[-cont,+voi]: no laxing before voiced stops (cab, bad, bag)*æh[+vel]: no tensing before velars (bag, bang)*æ[+nas]: no laxing before nasals (ham, man, bang)*æh: IDENT-æ*æ: No lax æ.

Inland North constraints on tensing of short-a

*æ x y zbæht Fbæt !*bæhk Fbæk !*mæhn Fmæn !*

New York City short-a constraints

*æh

[+cont]

*æh [–cont, –voi] *æ# *æh.

*æh [+G]

*æ [+cont, –voi]

*æ [–cont ,+voi]

*æh [+vel]

*æ [+nas]

bæht *! F bæt bæhk *! *

F bæk F kæhn kæn * kæhn [aux] *!

F kæn [aux] * mæh.nr *!

F mæ.nr * F mæh.n#ing * mæ.n#ing *! * hæhd *!

F hæd * F pæhs pæs *!

F kæhs& * kæs& *!

F fæh.s&n *! fæ.s&n * *

F bæhg * bæg *!

F bæhng *! bæng * pæhl *!

F pæl

Short-a constraints in Northern New Jersey

*æh

[+cont]

*æh [–cont –voi] *æ# *æh.

*æ [+nas]

*æh [+G]

*æ [+cont –voi]

*æh [+vel]

*æ [–cont +voi]

F kæhn kæn *!

F kæhn [aux] * kæn [aux] *! hæhd *!

F hæd *

mæh.nr *!

F mæ.nr * F mæh.n#ing *! mæ.n#ing *! *

fæh.s&n *!

F fæ.s&n * bæhg *!

F bæg * F bæhng * bæng *!

Short-a constraints in New Orleans

*æh

[+cont]

*æh [–cont –voi] *æ#

*V [+nas]

*æ [+cont–voi] *æh.

*æh [+vel]

*æ [–cont +voi]

*æh [+G]

F kæhn kæn *!

F kæhn [aux] *

kæn [aux] *! F hæhd [aux] * hæd [aux] *!

F mæh.nr *

mæ.nr *! F mæh.n#ing *! mæ.n#ing *! *

F fæh.s&n *!

fæ.s&n * bæhg *!

F bæg * F bæhng * bæng *!

The diffusion of the Northern Cities Shift along the St. Louis corridor

head

desk

boss

busses

socks

mat

The Northern Cities Shift

U.S. at Night

U.S. at Night

The St. Louis corridor along Interstate I-55

Fairbury

The Northern Cities Shift AE1 measure: raising of /æ/ to F1 < 700 Hz.

The Northern Cities Shift EQ measure reversal of relative positions of /e/ and /æ/

The Northern Cities Shift O2 measure: fronting of /o/ beyond 1450 Hz/

The Northern Cities Shift ED measure: front-back alignment of /e/ and /o/

The Northern Cities Shift UD measure: /^/ backer than /o/

Full Northern Cities Shift of Kitty R., 56, Chicago, TS 66

Partial Northern Cities Shift of Rose M., 38, St. Louis, TS161,

Speakers with all the defining features of the Northern Cities Shift

Distribution of NCS measures in No. Illinois and the St. Louis corridor

Northern Illinois AE1 O2 EAQ EOD UD Age RankSterling IL 34 1Elgin IL SS 19 1Elign IL RS 42 1Joliet IL 30 1Rockford JG 37 2Belvidere IL 33 2

Hammond IN 45 3Rockford IL VS 65 4Lena IL 47 5St. Louis Corridor Corr 0.738St. Louis MH 48 1St. Louis JH2 57 2Fairbury IL 25 3Springfield AK 60 4Bloomington 27 5Springfield KR 32 6Springfield WK 67 6St. Louis JH 53 6St. Louis RM 38 6

Corr -0.05

Diffusion along the St. Louis corridor

is largely the result of the acquisition of the individual elements of the Northern Cities Shift and is not driven by the chain shift mechanism that is responsible for the uniform development of the NCS in the Inland North.

Conclusions

• Both family tree models and wave models are needed to account for the history and relatedness of language families. • Family tree models are generated by the transmission of changes internal to the system of the speech community, while the wave model reflects diffusion through language contact. • Transmission is through the language learning activity of children, while diffusion is largely due to contact among adults.• The strong constraint against the diffusion of language structure in language contact. is due to the limited language learning abilities of adults.• It follows that the results of language contact will be slower, less regular, and less governed by structural constraints than the internal changes that are the major mechanism of linguistic diversification in the family tree model. • The difference will be a matter of degree, since recent studies of language change across the lifespan have shown that adults do participate in ongoing change, but more sporadically and at a much lower rate than in their formative years.

Research frontiers

Incrementation

At what age can it be said that children have acquired the dialect of their caretakers?

At what age does the influence of peers first affect the dialect acquired from caretakers and how completely can it be reo-organized?

If children look to older peers as models of behavior, how does it happen that they overtake and surpass those peers in the incrementaton of linguistic variables?

Diffusion

How rapidly does language learning ability fall off in late adolescence and early adulthood and how does this cognitive change intersect with social factors?

Are there communities where children are the agents of language contact?

Who are the agents in the diffusion of the new verb of quotation (be like) throughout the English-speaking world?

Northern Cities Shift of Martha F., Kenosha WI, TS3: Vowel means

i

e

æ

ah

oh

√

Eastern N.E. nasal short-a system Dawn L., 21, Boston MA

/æ/

/æh/

Mid-Atlantic split short-a system: Nina B., 42, NYC

tense

lax

Acquisition of Philadelphia output phonetic variables by children of out-of-state families by age of arrival

AGE OF ARRIVAL

aw ay° ow oy uw

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0-4 [n=17]

5-9 [n=14]

10-14 [n=3]

Percent complete acquisition

from Payne 1976

from-- - HISTORY OF CINCINNATI AND HAMILTON COUNTY

The large number and great wealth of the Hebrew people in Cincinnati would lead one to expect handsome synagogues and interesting charities, and that expectation would not be disappointed. No handsomer edifice is to be found in the city than the Plum Street Temple, over which Dr. Isaac M. Wise has been rabbi for fifty years. In this noble structure, whose elegant proportions delight the eye, are seats for 1,500 people. It is the wealthiest organization in the city.

Jewish Synagogues: Holy Congregation of Children of Israel, Eighth and Mound streets; Beth Tfila Congregation House of Prayer, Carlisle avenue; Hevra Beth Hakenisis, George street; Holy Congregation of Brethren in Love, John and Bauer avenue; Holy Congregation Children of Jeshurun, Plum and Eighth; K. K. Beth Hamedrasch Hagadol Congregation, Fifth street; K. K. Beth Hamedrasch Synagogue, West Court street; Synagogue Kashir Israel, Mound and Richmond streets.

Tense in but not in

closed syllables open syllables

semantic panic

passing passive

bad

tin can

had

I can

Three further constraints on NYC short-a tensing

inflectional paradigms derivational forms

content words function words

Philadelphia short-a patterncompared to NYC

p t c& k

b d j& g

m n N

f T s s&

v D z z&

l r

cab * bagbadge

****

half bath pass cash

*mad, bad, glad only

**all except irregular verbs ran, swam, began

North American short-a systemsThe nasal system

The general raising system

Split of /æ/ and /æh/

New York City

Mid-Atlantic

Continuous raising

Southern breaking

Lax and tense short-a vowels of 30 Philadelphia African American speakers in casual speech

Normally tense Lax Tense

Nasals can, ham 5 95

Voiceless fricatives half, glass, bath 27 69

mad, bad, glad 16 83

Normally lax

Intervocalic nasals hammer, banana 56 43

ran, swam, began 29 71

Anita Henderson, The short-a Pattern of Philadelphia among African-American speakers. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 3.1:127-140, 1996

The Inland North defined by the front-back approximation of /e/ and /o/

Percent deletion of coronal consonant clusters in spontaneous speech of 256 children in 2nd to 4th grade

African American 56

White 40

Latino (learned to read in English first) 48

Latino (learned to read in Spanish first) 56

Logistic regression weights of deletion of consonant clusters in spontaneous speech of 256 children in 2nd to 4th grade by language/ethnic group

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

SibilantNasalStop

FricativeLiquid

2 1

Derivational

Monomorphemic

PreteritVoiceless

Voiced

HomogeneousHeterogeneous

UnstressedStresssed

LateralNasal/w/

Fricative

/r/StopPause

/h/ /y/

Vowel

African American White Latino(Eng) Latino(Span)

Preceding Number Gram’l Voicing Voicing Stress Following segment cons. status relation segment

Frequency of invariant BE by ethnic/language group and region

0

5

10

15

20

Atl Phi Cal

Percent BE of all copula

A

E

S

W

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Atlanta Philadelphia California

Percent BE of all copula

African American

Latino(Eng)

Latino(Span)

White

Distribution of invariant BE by complement

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Progressive Adj/Loc BE like

Numbers of invariant BE

Latino(Eng)

African American

The Inland North defined by the relative frontness of /o/ and /√/

A 4th grade Latino(Eng) speaker’s use of invariant BE

Elizabeth: A haunted house. What do you think it's like there.

P02-012: They be killing real people with real knives

Elizabeth: Really?

P02-012: On my block, there's some store, they be having a lot of people hanging up right there with fake costumes. They put like - like newspapers, a lot of newspapers, so it can look like a real person, they press, they have a string, then they press the - uhm - when they be back there and that thing be over here, they press - they pull the string, and the thing squeeze and blood come out from the face like that.

Latino (Eng) speaker’s use of invariant BE

P07-001: And I told my mom to don't sell 'em. I only have - I'm'onna - I'm'a - I - my sist- - my cat's gonna have eight. And my - my sister's gonna have one, my mom's gonna have two - the big one and the little one, and my brother's gonna have one. He doesn't like our cat. He always um - he always jumps on it.

EAW: Oh okay.

P07-001: He bes mad. When he's mad he throws stuff at it.

The Inland North defined by the relative reversal of /e/ and /æ/

Eastern N.E. nasal short-a system, Debbie T., 34, Manchester, NH

Diffusion of NYC pattern to Cincinnati: Lucy M., 58 TS120.

Continuous short-a distribution of June K., 23, Columbia, MO

Preliminary to the Northern Cities Shift: tensing of lax low vowels

Structural changes in the Inland North Vowel system

Short vowels Long and ingliding vowelsfront back

high

mid

low

i u

e √

æ o ah

oh

æh

Collision course in the Northern Cities Shift

Northern Cities Shift for Martin H., 48, TS 111

from A History of New Orleans Donald McNabb & Louis E."Lee" Madère, Jr.

For New Orleans, American annexation brought population growth and economic development. The Louisiana Purchase removed the political barriers to the development of New Orleans' natural economic and situational advantages. From 1803 until 1861, New Orleans' population increased from 8,000 to nearly 170,000. The 1810 census revealed a population of 10,000 making New Orleans the United States' fifth largest city, after New York, Philadelphia, Boston, and Baltimore and the largest city west of the Appalachians. From 1810 until 1840, New Orleans grew at a faster rate than any other large American city. By 1830, New Orleans was America's third largest city, behind New York and Baltimore; and in 1860, it was still the nation's fifth largest city. New Orleans, despite the Post-Civil War boom that transformed the North into an urban-industrial area, would remain among the twelve largest U.S. cities until 1910.

Diffusion of the NYC short-a pattern

Sephardic bankers in NYC

Among the bankers closely related to New Orleans were many representatives of the large Sephardic Jewish families. Scoville underlines the importance of the Jews in many places:

The Israelite merchants were few then [1790], but now? they have increased in this city beyond any comparison. There are 80,000 Israelites in the city. It is the high standard of excellence of the old Israelite merchants of 1800 that has made this race occupy the proud position it does now in this city

+front -front -front +front -front -front

-back -back +back -back -back +back

+high, -low            

-high, -low e ^ oh æ e ^

-high, +low æ   o   o oh

(4) The Northern Cities Shift as a structural rotation

+front -front -front +front -front -front

-back -back +back -back -back +back

+high, -low            

-high, -low e ^ oh æN e,^ oh

-high, +low æ   o æ o