Top Banner
Logical Fallacies
14

Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Dec 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Logical Fallacies

Page 2: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Sentimental Appeal

• Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts

• To which emotions is this appealing?

Page 3: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Ad Hominem

• Arguments that attack a person’s character instead of their reasoning

• What two ways are these men’s character being attacked?

Page 4: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

False Authority• Wants the audience to

agree with the argument based simply on the person, who is not an expert in the field

• Freedom of speech=yes, credible authority=no.

• “When you talk about postpartum (depression) women today can use vitamins to help”.

Page 5: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Red Herring

• Using misleading or unrelated evidence to distract from the actual argument

Page 6: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Scare Tactic

• Trying to frighten people to agree with the argument or face unrealistically dire consequences

Page 7: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Bandwagon

• Encourages the audience to agree with the argument because everyone else is doing it

Page 8: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Slippery Slope

• Suggests that one thing will lead to another and another usually ending with disastrous results

Page 9: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Moral Equivalence

• Compares minor problems with much more serious crimes (or vice versa)

• Obamacare is just like what Hitler did to the youth of Germany prior to World War II.

Page 10: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Strawman (Person)

• An argument is set up and dismantled easily in order to misrepresent its strength

Page 11: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Hasty Generalization

• Draws conclusions from little or no evidence; extrapolates minute evidence into a larger claim

Page 12: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc (Faulty Causality)

• Mob after a woman accused of witchcraft in Nepal

• In Latin it means: “After this, therefore because of this”

• One event is said to be the cause of a later event, simply because it occurred earlier.

Page 13: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Non Sequitur• Latin for “does not follow”• A statement does not logically follow that

which comes before

Page 14: Logical Fallacies. Sentimental Appeal Using emotion to distract the audience from the facts To which emotions is this appealing?

Begging the Question

• Restating the same claim in a different way; circular logic– A: Stem cell research

is acceptable– B: How do you know– A: Because stem cell

research science says so

– B: Why should I believe the stem cell research science

– A: Because stem cell research is acceptable