LEVIN, PROTO, TERMED United States District Court Northern ...

LEVIN, PROTO, TERMEDUnited States District Court

Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.2.3 (Chicago)CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:99−cv−03356

EEOC v. Dial CorpAssigned to: Hon. Warren K. UrbomDemand: $0Cause: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Date Filed: 05/20/1999Date Terminated: 04/29/2003Jury Demand: PlaintiffNature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: JobsJurisdiction: U.S. Government Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Equal Employment OpportunityCommission

represented byNoelle Christine BrennanNoelle Brennan &Associates, Ltd.20 South Clark StreetSuite 1530Chicago , IL 60603(312) 422−0001Email: nbrennan@brennan−monte.comTERMINATED: 09/10/2004LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Ines M. MonteThe Monte Law Firm, Ltd.300 South Wacker Dr.Suite 2300Chicago , IL 60606(312) 422−0004Fax: 312−276−5420Email: imonte@monte−law.comATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Jean Powers KampUnited States Equal EmploymentOpportunity Commission500 West Madison StreetSuite 2800Chicago , IL 60661(312) 353−7568Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

John C. HendricksonUnited States Equal EmploymentOpportunity Commission500 West Madison StreetSuite 2800Chicago , IL 60661(312) 353−8551Fax: (312) 353−8555Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

John A. KnightUnited States Equal EmploymentOpportunity Commission500 West Madison StreetSuite 2800Chicago , IL 60661(312) 353−7568TERMINATED: 09/10/2004

Case: 1:99-cv-3356 As of: 10/30/2009 03:35 PM CDT 1 of 31

mailto:[email protected]




V.

Defendant

Dial Corporation represented byCondon A. McGlothlenSeyfarth Shaw LLP131 South Dearborn StreetSuite 2400Chicago , IL 60603−5577(312) 460−5000Fax: (312) 460−7000Email: [email protected] ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Kimball Richard AndersonWinston &Strawn LLP35 West Wacker DriveChicago , IL 60601−9703(312) 558−5600Email: [email protected]: 03/03/2003LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Alexis MacDowallWinston &Strawn LLP35 West Wacker DriveChicago , IL 60601−9703(312) 558−5600Email: [email protected]: 03/03/2003

Camille Annette OlsonSeyfarth Shaw LLP131 South Dearborn StreetSuite 2400Chicago , IL 60603−5577(312) 460−5000Fax: (312) 460−7000Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

David Elliot MetzSeyfarth Shaw LLP55 Easet Monroe StreetSuite 4200Chicago , IL 60603(312) 460−5000Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

Ellen E. McLaughlinSeyfarth Shaw LLP131 South Dearborn StreetSuite 2400Chicago , IL 60603−5577(312) 460−5000Fax: (312) 460−7000Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

James A. BursteinSeyfarth Shaw LLP55 Easet Monroe Street








Suite 4200Chicago , IL 60603(312) 460−5000

Laura Anne LindnerLindner &Marsack, S.C.225 W. WashingtonSuite 2200Chicago , IL 60606(312) 924−0265Email: llindner@lindner−marsack.comATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Robert L. Jackson , IIISeyfarth Shaw LLP55 Easet Monroe StreetSuite 4200Chicago , IL 60603(312) 460−5000

Sheldon Leigh JeterSeyfarth Shaw LLP131 South Dearborn StreetSuite 2400Chicago , IL 60603312−460−5000Fax: 847 491 2506Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

Movant

Viad Corp., The represented byDaniel V. KinsellaSchuyler, Roche &Zwirner P.C.130 East Randolph StreetSuite 3800Chicago , IL 60601(312) 565−2400Fax: 312−565−8300Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

David T. MaddoxSchmitt, Schneck, Smyth &Herrod PC1221 East Osborn RoadSuite 105Phoenix , AZ 85014−5540(602) 277−8663ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.

Intervenor

Jane DoeTERMINATED: 12/26/2001

represented byDaniel V. Kinsella(See above for address)TERMINATED: 12/26/2001LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Intervenor

John Roe represented byDale A. DannemanLewis &Roca40 North Central Street





Suite 1900Phoenix , AZ 85004(602) 262−5311LEAD ATTORNEYATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Shayle P. FoxHolland &Knight LLC131 South Dearborn Street30th FloorChicago , IL 60603(312) 263−3600Email: [email protected] TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed # Docket Text

05/20/1999 1 COMPLAINT; jury demand − Civil cover sheet − Appearance(s) of John C. Hendrickson,Jean Powers Kamp, Noelle Christine Brennan as attorney(s) for plaintiff ( no summons(es)issued.) ( Documents: 1−1 through 1−3) (dmkf) (Entered: 05/21/1999)

05/26/1999 SCHEDULE set on 5/26/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing is set for 10:007/9/99. Plaintiff is to advise defendant of status. Mailed notice (gl) (Entered: 05/26/1999)

06/22/1999 SCHEDULE set on 6/22/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing set for 7/9/99 isstricken and is reset to 10:00 7/23/99. Mailed notice (gl) (Entered: 06/22/1999)

06/22/1999 2 WAIVER of service of summons as to defendant Dial Corp sent on 5/20/99 (dmkf)(Entered: 06/23/1999)

07/20/1999 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Condon A. McGlothlen, Ellen E.McLaughlin, James A. Burstein, Robert L. Jackson III (dmkf) (Entered: 07/22/1999)

07/20/1999 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Sheldon Leigh Jeter (dmkf) (Entered:07/22/1999)

07/20/1999 5 ANSWER to complaint by defendant [1−1] (dmkf) (Entered: 07/22/1999)

07/23/1999 SCHEDULE set on 7/23/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing held and continued to10:00 8/27/99. Parties are to come in with a joint discovery plan. Mailed notice (gl)(Entered: 07/23/1999)

07/26/1999 6 REFERRAL ORDER of 07/23/99: The case is referred to the Honorable Ian H. Levin fromHonorable Marvin Aspen pursuant to local general rule 2.41(b): Settlement conference. (Forfurther detail see order.) Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 07/26/1999)

08/04/1999 SCHEDULE set on 8/4/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held; continued to 8:458/20/99 . Settlement conference set for 1:30 8/24/99 in courtroom 2494 . Mailed notice(smm) (Entered: 08/04/1999)

08/04/1999 7 JOINT STATUS REPORT by plaintiff and defendant in referral case (yap) (Entered:08/05/1999)

08/09/1999 8 AMENDED ANSWER to complaint [5−1] by defendant (dmkf) (Entered: 08/11/1999)

08/20/1999 SCHEDULE set on 8/20/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held; continued to 9:3010/8/99 . Settlement conference set for 8/24/99 is vacated. Mailed notice (smm) (Entered:08/20/1999)

08/27/1999 SCHEDULE set on 8/27/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing held and continued to10:00 2/11/2000. Discovery ordered closed on 2/1/2000. Joint Pretrial order is to besubmitted in open court on 10:00 2/11/2000. Real dates. No extensions of time will begranted. Filing of motions of any kind does not stay discovery or filing of pretrial order.Defendant is given to 11/1/99 any counterclaim. Plaintiff's expert(s) should be identified by12/1/99. Defendant's expert(s) should be identified by 1/1/2000. Mailed notice (gl) (Entered:08/27/1999)



09/09/1999 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff by Ines M. Monte; Notice of filing. (dmkf)(Entered: 09/16/1999)

10/08/1999 10 MINUTE ORDER of 10/8/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held. Settlementconference set for 12/1/99 at 1:15p.m. The settlement conference will be conducted inaccordance with the court's standing order settlement conferneces, which is enclosed. Partieswith ultimate settlement authority must be personally present. Mailed notice (dmkf)(Entered: 10/12/1999)

10/28/1999 13 MOTION by defendant to compel plaintiff EEOC to produce all questionnaires and relatedinformation received from alleged victims of sexual of sex−based harassment, and/orwomen who allege they have information concerning sexual or sex−based harassment(Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 11/02/1999)

11/01/1999 11 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion to compel discovery. (dmkf) (Entered:11/02/1999)

11/01/1999 12 EMERGENCY MOTION by plaintiff for protective order (Attachments); Notice of motion.(dmkf) (Entered: 11/02/1999)

11/01/1999 18 MOTION by defendant for leave to file second amended complaint (Attachments); Noticeof motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 11/08/1999)

11/02/1999 14 MINUTE ORDER of 11/2/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The referral to Magistrate JudgeLevin is enhanced to include defendant's motion to compel and motion for protective orderre [12−1], re [13−1]. Telephoned notice (dmkf) (Entered: 11/02/1999)

11/03/1999 15 RESPONSE by defendant to EEOC's emergency motion for protective order [12−1](Attachments). (dmkf) (Entered: 11/04/1999)

11/03/1999 16 MINUTE ORDER of 11/3/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin: Defendant's motion to compel isdenied for the reasons stated of record [13−1]. No notice (dmkf) (Entered: 11/04/1999)

11/03/1999 17 MINUTE ORDER of 11/3/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin: Motion hearing held. EEOC'semergency motion for protective order is granted [12−1] for the reasons stated and on theterms stated of record. Defendant and any of its officers, directors, managers, agents, orattorneys are prohibited from engaging in ex parte communication with any of subject 96identified class members in EEOC's litigation in this matter. Plaintiff shall produce by11/19/99 an attorney's affidavit on the terms stated of record. Mailed notice (dmkf)(Entered: 11/04/1999)

11/05/1999 19 MINUTE ORDER of 11/5/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Defendant counsel appears formotion. Defendant's motion for leave to file second amended answer is allowed [18−1],with the understanding that it is not goring to alter discovery timetable. Mailed notice(dmkf) (Entered: 11/08/1999)

11/15/1999 20 MOTION by plaintiff to vacate the order entered by this court on 11/05/99 (Attachment);Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 11/19/1999)

11/19/1999 21 MINUTE ORDER of 11/19/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Filed plaintiff's motion to vacatethis court's order of 11/05/99. Answer brief to motion due 12/01/99. Reply to answer briefdue 12/6/99. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 11/19/1999)

11/22/1999 SCHEDULE set on 11/22/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Noticed motion set for 9:3011/23/99. No notice (gl) (Entered: 11/22/1999)

11/23/1999 22 MOTION by plaintiff to extend the time for disclosure of experts (Attachments); Notice ofmotion. (dmkf) (Entered: 11/24/1999)

11/23/1999 23 MINUTE ORDER of 11/23/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Plaintiff's motion to extend fordisclosure of experts until 03/15/00 is granted [22−1]. The status hearing and for filing ofthe joint pretrial order set for 02/11/00 is reset to 3/31/00 at 10:00a.m. No furtherextensions. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 11/24/1999)

11/24/1999 24 TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): held on 11/03/99 before HonorableIan H. Levin (dmkf) (Entered: 11/24/1999)

12/01/1999 26 JOINT MOTION by plaintiff, defendant for entry of a stipulated protective order(Attachment); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 12/03/1999)


12/01/1999 SCHEDULE set on 12/1/99 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Settlement conference held. Statushearing on settlement set to 9:00 1/10/00 . Mailed notice (smm) (Entered: 12/07/1999)

12/02/1999 25 RESPONSE by defendant to motion to vacate the order entered by this court on 11/05/99[20−1]; Notice of filing. (dmkf) (Entered: 12/03/1999)

12/03/1999 27 MINUTE ORDER of 12/3/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Joint motion for entry of astipulated protective order is granted. (Enter stipulated protective order.) Telephoned notice(dmkf) Modified on 12/03/1999 (Entered: 12/03/1999)

12/06/1999 28 REPLY by plaintiff to defendant's response in opposition to plaintiff's motion to vacate[25−1] (Attachments). (dmkf) (Entered: 12/08/1999)

12/09/1999 SCHEDULE set on 12/9/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing is set for 10:0012/10/99. Telephoned notice (gl) (Entered: 12/09/1999)

12/10/1999 SCHEDULE set on 12/10/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing held and continuedto 10:00 4/7/2000. Discovery is extended to 3/15/2000. Pretrial order is to be filed in opencourt on 4/7/2000 at 10:00 a.m. The status hearing and for filing of the pretrial order set for3/31/2000 is stricken. Mailed notice (gl) (Entered: 12/13/1999)

12/10/1999 29 MINUTE ORDER of 12/10/99 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The court stands by its order of11/05/99, and allows defendant's leave to file second amended answer with affirmativedefenses conditional on the defendant answering outstanding disovery. Defendant is toproduce documents as to the five previously identified plaintiffs within one week. Plaintiff'smotion to vacate is denied at moot [20−1]. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 12/14/1999)

12/30/1999 30 MOTION by plaintiff to compel defendant to fully respond to certain interrogatories anddocument requests (Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 01/04/2000)

01/04/2000 31 MINUTE ORDER of 1/4/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The referral to Magistrate JudgeLevin is enhanced to include plaintiff's motion to compel re [30−1]. No notice (dmkf)(Entered: 01/04/2000)

01/10/2000 32 MINUTE ORDER of 1/10/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin: Plaintiff's motion to compel is grantedin part and denied in part on the terms stated of record [30−1]. Status hearing held andcontinued to 1/24/00 at 11:00a.m. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 01/12/2000)

01/13/2000 33 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Laura Anne Lindner, David Elliot Metz(dmkf) (Entered: 01/13/2000)

01/18/2000 35 NOTICE of filing by defendant of hearing transcript; (Attachment). (mbw) (Entered:01/25/2000)

01/21/2000 34 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff by John A. Knight (yap) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

01/21/2000 36 MOTION by plaintiff to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense for failure to comply withthis court's order (Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 01/27/2000)

01/24/2000 SCHEDULE set on 1/24/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held; continued to 9:303/13/00 . Mailed notice (smm) (Entered: 01/26/2000)

01/25/2000 37 MINUTE ORDER of 1/25/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Filed EEOC's motion to strikeDial's eighth affirmative defense for failure to comply with this court's order [36−1].Answer brief to motion due 02/03/00. Reply to answer brief due 2/8/00. Mailed notice(dmkf) (Entered: 01/27/2000)

02/03/2000 38 TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): held on 01/10/00 before HonorableIan H. Levin (dmkf) (Entered: 02/03/2000)

02/04/2000 39 RESPONSE by defendant in opposition to plaintiff's motion to strike Dial's eighthaffirmative defense [36−1] (Attachment). (dmkf) (Entered: 02/08/2000)

02/08/2000 40 REPLY by plaintiff to defendant's response in opposition to plaintiff's motion to strikeDial's eighth affirmative defense [36−1] (Attachments). (dmkf) (Entered: 02/11/2000)

02/09/2000 41 MOTION by plaintiff to compel discovery: For inspection of premises at which sexuallyhostile and abusive work environment maintained by Dial Corporation (Attachments);Notice (ar) (Entered: 02/11/2000)


02/10/2000 42 MINUTE ORDER of 2/10/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : The referral to Magistrate JudgeLevin is enhanced to include plaintiff's motion to compel [41−1]. No notice (ar) (Entered:02/11/2000)

02/14/2000 47 MINUTE ORDER of 2/14/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The referral to Magistrate JudgeLevin is enhanced to include plaintiff's motion to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense forfailure to comply with this court's order. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 02/25/2000)

02/15/2000 48 MOTION by plaintiff for an order to show cause why Paul Jones should not be held incontempt for failure to comply with deposition subpoena (Attachments); Notice of motion.(dmkf) (Entered: 02/28/2000)

02/17/2000 43 MOTION by plaintiff for clarification of expert disclosure discovery schedule(Attachments); Notice of motion. (dmkf) (Entered: 02/22/2000)

02/17/2000 46 AMENDED RESPONSE by defendant to plaintiff's motion to compel inspection ofpremises [41−1] (Attachment); Notice. (srb) (Entered: 02/22/2000)

02/18/2000 44 REPLY by plaintiff to defendant's response in opposition to plaintiff's motion to compelinspection of premises [41−1] (Attachment); Notice of filing. (dmkf) (Entered: 02/22/2000)

02/22/2000 45 MINUTE ORDER of 2/22/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: Filed plaintiff's motion forclarification of expert disclosure discovery schedule [43−1]. Answer brief to motion due02/29/00. Reply to answer brief due 3/2/00. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 02/22/2000)

02/25/2000 49 MINUTE ORDER of 2/25/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The referral to Magistrate JudgeLevin is enhanced to include plaintiff's motion for an order to show cause why Paul Jonesshould not be held in contempt for failure to comply with deposition subpoena. No notice(dmkf) (Entered: 02/28/2000)

02/25/2000 50 NOTICE by plaintiff of motion to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense for failure tocomply with this court's order [36−1] and motion to compel discovery: For inspection ofpremises . [41−1] (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

02/28/2000 54 MOTION by defendant to compel class member depositions plus related documents andtestimony (Attachment); Notice. (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

02/28/2000 57 SURREPLY by defendant in opposition to plaintiff's motion to compel inspection ofpremises [41−1] and plaintiff's motion to strike Dial's eighth affirmative defense [36−1](Attachments). (srb) (Entered: 03/03/2000)

02/29/2000 51 MINUTE ORDER of 2/29/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Plaintiff EEEOC's motion to strikeaffirmative defense [36−1] and to compel discovery and inspection of premises is granted[41−1] in part and denied in part on the terms as stated. No notice (tlm) (Entered:03/02/2000)

02/29/2000 52 MINUTE ORDER of 2/29/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Plaintiff's motion to strike [36−1] isdenied. Defendant to submit supplemental responses by 03/07/00. Plaintiff to producerecords by 03/08/00. No notice (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

02/29/2000 53 MINUTE ORDER of 2/29/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Plaintiff's motion for an order to showcause is withdrawn without prejudice. [48−1] No notice (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

02/29/2000 55 RESPONSE by defendant to EEOC's motion for clarification of expert disclosure discoveryschedule; Notice. [43−1] (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

02/29/2000 56 MINUTE ORDER of 2/29/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Defendant's motion to compel classmember depositions plus related documents and testimony is granted in part and denied inpart on the terms stated of record. [54−1] No notice (tlm) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

03/02/2000 58 REPLY by plaintiff to defendant's response to plaintiff's motion for clarification of expertdisclosure schedule [43−1] (Attachment); Notice of filing. (dmkf) (Entered: 03/15/2000)

03/13/2000 SCHEDULE set on 3/13/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing held and continued to10:15 a.m. 4/5/00 . Mailed notice (ldg) (Entered: 03/13/2000)

03/15/2000 59 MINUTE ORDER of 3/15/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen: The referral to magistrate JudgeLevin is enhanced to include expeditious ruling on plaintiff's fully−briefed motion forclarification of expert disclosure schedule. Mailed notice (dmkf) (Entered: 03/16/2000)


https://ecf.ilnd.uscourts.gov/doc1/067019023?pdf_header=1&pdf_toggle_possible=1&de_seq_num=63&caseid=177169





03/16/2000 60 MINUTE ORDER of 3/16/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Plaintiff EEOC's motion forclarification of expert disclosure discovery schedule [43−1] to extend for disclosure ofexperts is granted to and including 04/30/00. (See reverse of minute order.) Notice mailedby Magistrate Judge's staff (ar) Modified on 03/21/2000 (Entered: 03/21/2000)

03/23/2000 62 MOTION by defendant to clarify/confirm expert disclosure schedule (Attachments); Notice(ar) (Entered: 03/30/2000)

03/24/2000 61 TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 02/29/00 before the Honorable IanH. Levin (1 vol.) (ar) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

03/28/2000 63 MINUTE ORDER of 3/28/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Defendant's motion to clarify/confirmexpert disclosure schedule is hereby withdrawn without prejudice [62−1]. No notice (ar)(Entered: 03/30/2000)

03/29/2000 SCHEDULE set on 3/29/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing and for filing of thejoint pretrial order set or 4/7/00 is stricken and reset to 10:00 4/18/00. Mailed notice (gl)(Entered: 03/29/2000)

03/30/2000 64 MOTION by plaintiff to reset due date for pretrial order (Attachments); Notice (rmm)(Entered: 04/06/2000)

03/30/2000 65 MOTION by plaintiff to continue pretrial order date ; Notice (rmm) (Entered: 04/06/2000)

04/04/2000 66 MINUTE ORDER of 4/4/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Motion to reset due date for pretrialorder is granted [64−1]. As stated in open court, fact discvoery is closed. All expertdiscovery is closed 8/31/00. The status hearing and for filing of the joint pretrial order set4/18/00 is reset to 10:00 a.m. on 9/15/00. No further extensions. Mailed notice (rmm)(Entered: 04/06/2000)

04/04/2000 67 MINUTE ORDER of 4/4/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Motion to continue pretrial orderdate is granted [65−1]. As stated in open court, fact discvoery is closed. All expert discoveryis closed 8/31/00. The status hearing and for filing of the joint pretrial order set 4/18/00 isreset to 10:00 a.m. on 9/15/00. No further extensions. Mailed notice Mailed notice (rmm)(Entered: 04/06/2000)


04/05/2000 68 REASSIGNMENT ORDER of 4/5/00 Case reassigned to Hon. Warren K. Urbom from theHon. Marvin Aspen pursuant to Rule 13 of the Internal Operating Procedures. (For furtherdetail see order.) Mailed notice (ar) (Entered: 04/07/2000)

04/13/2000 69 MOTION by defendant for leave to file summary judgment brief exceeding 15 pages andsummary judgment submissions under seal pursuant to existing protective order(Attachment); Notice (ar) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

04/13/2000 70 MOTION by defendant for summary judgment ; Notice (ar) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

04/18/2000 71 MINUTE ORDER of 4/18/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Defendant's motion for leave tofile summary judgment brief exceeding 15 pages and summary judgment submissions underseal pursuant to existing protective order is allowed [69−1] [69−2]. Memo is to be 30 pagesin length. Mailed notice (ar) (Entered: 04/18/2000)

04/18/2000 72 MINUTE ORDER of 4/18/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Brief in support of defendant'smotion for summary judgment due 05/02/00 [70−1]. Answer brief to defendant's motion forsummary judgment due 05/17/00. Reply to answer brief due 05/24/00. Mailed notice (ar)(Entered: 04/18/2000)

04/19/2000 73 MOTION by plaintiff for reconsideration of order entered 04/17/00 (Attachment); Notice(ar) (Entered: 04/24/2000)

04/21/2000 74 MOTION by defendant to compel expert deposition per court−ordered briefing schedule(Attachments); Notice (ar) (Entered: 04/26/2000)

04/25/2000 75 MINUTE ORDER of 4/25/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : The referral to Magistrate JudgeLevin is enhanced to include defendant's motion to compel expert deposition [74−1].Telephoned notice (ar) (Entered: 04/26/2000)










04/27/2000 77 RESPONSE by plaintiff to Dial's motion to compel expert deposition [74−1] (Attachments);Notice (ar) Modified on 04/28/2000 (Entered: 04/28/2000)

04/27/2000 78 MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file summary judgment brief and for extension of time tofile response (Attachment) (ar) (Entered: 04/28/2000)

04/27/2000 76 DOCUMENT stricken pursuant to order of 04/28/00 [81−1] (ar) Modified on 05/02/2000(Entered: 05/02/2000)

04/28/2000 79 MINUTE ORDER of 4/28/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff's motion forreconsideration, Dial's moton to compel expert deposition and plaintiff's motion for leave tofile summary judgment brief exceeding fifteen pages and for extension, will be resolvedafter further conversation with counsel [73−1] [74−1] [78−1] [78−2]. (EnteredMemorandum and Order on Three Pending Motions) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar)Modified on 05/02/2000 (Entered: 05/02/2000)

04/28/2000 80 MINUTE ORDER of 4/28/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff's motion to reopendiscovery for limited purpose of conducting deposition of Jane Doe is granted [76−1].(Entered Memorandum and Order on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission'sMotion to Reopen Discovery for Limited Purpose of Conducting Deposition of Jane Doe)Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 05/02/2000)

04/28/2000 81 MINUTE ORDER of 4/28/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The Clerk of the Court isdirected to substitute the EEOC's corrected motion to reopen discovery for limited purposeof conducting deposition of Jane Doe for EEC's motion to reopen discovery for limitedpurpose of conducting deposition of Jane Doe [76−1] and return the time−stamped originalof the motion and copies of the exhibits accompanying the time−stamped original to theEEOC for destruction or to destroy the original motion and exhibits. (Entered Order toSubstitute Motion in Court File) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 05/02/2000)

04/28/2000 82 CORRECTED MOTION by plaintiff to reopen discovery for limited purpose of conductingdeposition of Jane Doe (Attachments); Notice (ar) Modified on 05/24/2000 (Entered:05/02/2000)

05/01/2000 83 REPLY by plaintiff to defendant's response in opposition to plaintiff's motion to reconsider[73−1]; Notice (ar) Modified on 05/02/2000 (Entered: 05/02/2000)

05/02/2000 MAILED to Noelle Christine Brennan, counsel for plaintiff, the original document entitledNotice of Filing; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Motion to ReopenDiscovery for Limited Purpose of Conducting Deposition of Jane Doe with ExhibitsA,B,C,D and E attached [76−1], via certified mail no. Z−332−066−032 (ar) (Entered:05/02/2000)

05/02/2000 89 NOTICE of removal of material from the the custody of the Clerk's office: EEOC's motionto reopen discovery for limited purpose of conducting deposition of Jane Doe; Notice(Exhibits A−E) [76−1]. Mailed to Noelle C. Brennan, counsel for EEOC. (ar) (Entered:06/01/2000)

05/08/2000 84 RETURN of certified receipt no. Z−332−066−032 (ar) (Entered: 05/11/2000)

05/16/2000 85 MINUTE ORDER of 5/16/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The defendant shall, on or before05/31/00, file and serve its response to the plaintiff's motion to reopen discovery for limitedpurpose of conducting deposition of Jane Doe [82−1]. The plaintiff shall, on or before06/09/00, file and serve its reply. (Entered briefing schedule on corrected motion to reopendiscovery for the limited purpose of conducting deposition of Jan Doe) Notice mailed byJudge's staff (ar) Modified on 05/24/2000 (Entered: 05/24/2000)

05/16/2000 86 MINUTE ORDER of 5/16/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff's motion forreconsideration [73−1] is granted to the extent stated in this order. The minute order of04/18/00 [71−1] is reconsidered and is amended. Entered Memorandum and Order onPlaintiff EEOC's Motion for Reconsideration. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) Modifiedon 05/24/2000 (Entered: 05/24/2000)


05/18/2000 87 MINUTE ORDER of 5/18/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Telephone conference held on05/17/00. The briefing schedule on plaintiff's corrected motion to reopen discovery isvacated [82−1]. Dial's motion to compel is deemed moot [74−1]. Plaintiff's motion for leave








to file summary judgment brief exceeding fifteen pages and for extension of time is granted[78−1] [78−2]. (Entered Scheduling Order and Ruling on Pending Motions) Notice mailedby Judge's staff (ar) Modified on 05/24/2000 (Entered: 05/24/2000)

05/26/2000 90 MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for clarification of prior permitting deposition of Jane Doe(Attachments); Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 06/02/2000)

05/30/2000 88 Document stricken pursuant to order dated 5/31/00 (eav) (Entered: 06/09/2000)

05/31/2000 92 MINUTE ORDER of 5/31/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : EEOC's motion for clarificationof prior order permitting deposition of Jane Doe [90−1] is denied. (Entered Memorandumand Order) Mailed notice (eav) (Entered: 06/09/2000)

05/31/2000 93 MINUTE ORDER of 5/31/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The Clerk of the U.S. DistrictCourt for the Northern District of Illinois is to substitute Dial's corrected response toEEOC's motion for clarification of prior order permitting deposition of Jane Doe, for Dial'sresponse to EEOC's motion for clarification of prior order permitting deposition of jane Doe(which was filed on 5/30/00), and to return the file−stamped original of the motion andcopies of the exhibits accompanying the file stamped original to the Dial Corporation fordestruction, or to destroy, the original motion and exhibit. (Entered Order) Mailed notice(eav) (Entered: 06/09/2000)

06/01/2000 91 AMENDED RESPONSE [88−1] by defendant to EEOC's motion for clarification of priororder permitting deposition of Jane Doe [82−1] (Attachments) (ar) (Entered: 06/06/2000)

06/08/2000 94 MEMORANDUM of law by defendant in support of its motion for summary judgment[70−1] (ar) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

06/08/2000 96 LOCAL RULE 56.1 Statement of material facts as to which there is no genuine issue bydefendant (1 vol.) (ar) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

06/08/2000 99 MOTION by defendant for leave to file its narrative appendix in support of its motion forsummary judgment (ar) (Entered: 06/13/2000)

06/09/2000 FORWARDED by mailing on 6/9/00 Original of the Dial's response to EEOC's motion forclarification of prior order permitting deposition of Jane Doe (which was filed on 5/30/00)and exhibits accompanying the file stamped original to the Dial Corporation's AttorneyCondon A. McGlothlen for destruction, or to destroy, the original motion and exhibit andcopy of Judge Urbom's order dated 5/31/00 via certified mail no. Z 341 947 214 (eav)(Entered: 06/09/2000)

06/09/2000 95 NARRATIVE APPENDIX filed by defendant in support of its motion for summaryjudgment [70−1] (ar) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

06/09/2000 97 MOTION by defendant instanter for extension of time to file its supporting summaryjudgment papers (ar) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

06/09/2000 98 APPENDICES filed by defendant in support of its Local 56.1 statement of material facts asto which there is no genuine issue [96−1] (4 vols. V, VI, VII and VIII; Doc. Nos. 98−1through 98−4) (ar) Modified on 06/22/2000 (Entered: 06/12/2000)

06/09/2000 101 MINUTE ORDER of 6/9/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion for leave tofile its narrative appendix in support of its motion for summary judgment is granted [99−1].Defendant's motion instanter for extension of time to file its supporting summary judgmentpapers is granted [97−1]. (Entered Order) Notices mailed by Judge's staff (ar) Modified on06/21/2000 (Entered: 06/21/2000)

06/15/2000 100 RETURN of certified receipt no. Z−341−947−214 (ar) (Entered: 06/15/2000)

06/21/2000 102 FOUR VOLUMES OF APPENDICES filed by defendant to its Local 56.1 statement ofmaterial facts as to which there is no genuine issue [96−1] (Vols. I,II,III and IV, #102−1through #102−4) (ar) Modified on 06/22/2000 (Entered: 06/22/2000)

06/21/2000 103 MOTION instanter by defendant for extension of time to file redacted Volumes I−IV of itssummary judgment appendix (ar) (Entered: 06/22/2000)

06/21/2000 104 MOTION by defendant to compel production of expert documents (Attachments) (ar)(Entered: 06/22/2000)





06/21/2000 105 MINUTE ORDER of 6/21/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Defendant's motion to compel expertdeposition is moot [74−1]. All matters relating to the referal of this action having beenresolved, the case is returned to the assigned judge. Terminating the case referral to Hon.Ian H. Levin and referral of motions [70−1] [82−1] [103−1] [104−1]. Mailed notice (ar)(Entered: 06/22/2000)

06/22/2000 106 MINUTE ORDER of 6/22/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff shall have until06/26/00 to respond to the defendant's motion to compel production of expert documents[104−1]. The defendant may reply on or before 06/27/00. (Entered Scheduling Order onDefendant's Motion to Compel Production of Expert Documents) Notice mailed by Judge'sstaff (ar) Modified on 06/27/2000 (Entered: 06/27/2000)

06/22/2000 107 MINUTE ORDER of 6/22/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion for extensionof time to file redacted Volumes I−IV of its summary judgment appendix is granted[103−1]. (Entered Order on Defendant's Motion Instanter for Extension of Time to FileRedacted Volumes I−IV of Its Summary Judgment Appendix) Notice mailed by Judge'sstaff (ar) (Entered: 06/27/2000)

06/27/2000 108 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion to compel production of expert documents[104−1] (Attachments); Notice (ar) (Entered: 06/28/2000)

06/27/2000 109 REPLY memorandum by defendant in support of its motion to compel production of expertdocuments [104−1] (Attachments) (ar) (Entered: 06/28/2000)

06/28/2000 110 MINUTE ORDER of 6/28/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion to compelproduction of expert documents is granted [104−1]. (Entered Memorandum and Order onthe Defendant's Motion to Compel Production of Expert Documents) Notice mailed byJudge's staff (ar) (Entered: 07/10/2000)

07/24/2000 112 MOTION by defendant to extend its expert disclosure deadline and summary judgmentbriefing schedule (yap) (Entered: 07/27/2000)

07/25/2000 114 MINUTE ORDER of 7/25/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant shall, on or before08/09/00, file and serve its response to EEOC's motion to unseal briefs, hearing transcript,court order and deposition of Jane Doe [111−1]. The plaintiff may, on or before 08/16/00,file and serve its reply. (Entered Briefing Schedule) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar)(Entered: 08/01/2000)

07/25/2000 115 MINUTE ORDER of 7/25/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Dial Corp. shall comply withFRCP 26(a)(2) by 08/25/00. EEOC shall take the deposition of Dial's expert, Dr. BarbaraGuteck, on 09/21/00 and 09/22/00. EEOC shall response to Dial Corp.'s motion forsummary judgment [70−1] on or before 11/17/00. Dial Corp. shall reply on or before01/19/01. Pretrial order shall be filed on or before thirty (30) days after the court's decisionon Dial's motion for summary judgment. (Entered Order on Defendant's Motion to ExtendIts Disclosure Deadline and Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule) Notice mailed byJudge's staff (ar) (Entered: 08/01/2000)

07/26/2000 111 MOTION by plaintiff to unseal briefs, hearing transcript, court order and deposition of JaneDoe (Attachment); Notice (ar) (Entered: 07/26/2000)

07/28/2000 113 RESPONSE by plaintiff to Dial's motion to extend its expert disclosure deadline andsummary judgment briefing schedule [112−1] [112−2]; Notice (ar) (Entered: 08/01/2000)

08/01/2000 117 MINUTE ORDER of 8/1/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff may deliver to its expert,Dr. Fitzgerald, a copy of the transcript of the deposition of Jane Doe. Dr. Fitzgerald shallmaintain complete confidentiality of the contents of that transcript, revealing them to noperson, except counsel in this case, and using them only for the purposes of this case.(Entered Order on Disclosure of Deposition to Expert) Notices mailed by Judge's staff (ar)(Entered: 08/12/2000)

08/07/2000 116 TRANSCRIPTS of proceedings for the following date(s): 07/23/99 and 12/10/99 beforeHonorable Marvin E. Aspen (2 vols.) (ar) (Entered: 08/09/2000)

08/07/2000 118 MINUTE ORDER of 8/7/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's unopposed motion forextension to respond to EEOC's motion to unseal Jane Doe materials is granted. Defendantshall, on or before 08/21/00, file and serve its response to EEOC's motion to unseal Jan Doematerials. Plaintiff may, on or before 08/28/00, file and serve its reply to said motion[111−1]. (Entered Order on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension to Respond to










EEOC's Motion to Unseal Jane Doe Materials) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered:08/16/2000)

08/08/2000 SCHEDULE set on 8/8/00 by Hon. Ian H. Levin : Status hearing of 8/9/00 is stricken.Telephone notice (smm) (Entered: 08/08/2000)

08/21/2000 119 MOTION by Viad Corp to intervene pursuant to Rule 24 FRCP (RESTRICTED) (emd)(Entered: 08/22/2000)

08/21/2000 120 DESIGNATION of local counsel by Viad Corp (RESTRICTED). (emd) (Entered:08/22/2000)

08/21/2000 121 RESPONSE by Viad Corp in opposition to EEOC's motion to unseal and motion forprotective order pending decision of court on motion for summary judgment anddeterminationa of admissibility. (RESTRICTED) (emd) (Entered: 08/22/2000)

08/21/2000 122 RESPONSE in opposition by defendant to plaintiff's motion to unseal Jane Doe record anddeposition transcript [111−1] (RESTRICTED). (emd) (Entered: 08/22/2000)

08/21/2000 123 MOTION by petitioner Jane Doe for leave to appearances instanter . (maf) (Entered:08/23/2000)

08/21/2000 124 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for Jane Doe by Kimball Richard Anderson, T. AlexisMacDowall. (maf) (Entered: 08/23/2000)

08/21/2000 125 MOTION by John Roe to intervene pursuant to Rule 24(b) Fed. R. Civ. P. (RESTRICTED).(maf) (Entered: 08/23/2000)

08/21/2000 126 MOTION by John Roe to continue protective order (RESTRICTED). (maf) Modified on08/23/2000 (Entered: 08/23/2000)

08/21/2000 127 MOTION by John Roe for leave to file declaration under seal (RESTRICTED). (maf)(Entered: 08/23/2000)

08/21/2000 128 PETITION by Jane Doe for leave to intervene (Attachments) (RESTRICTED). (maf)Modified on 08/23/2000 (Entered: 08/23/2000)

08/21/2000 130 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for Viad Corp by Daniel V. Kinsella. (kef) (Entered:08/24/2000)

08/21/2000 157 APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by David T. Maddox for Viad Corp ; Orderentered granting leave by Hon. Warren K. Urbom (yap) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

08/22/2000 129 DESIGNATION by intervenor John Roe of local counsel for service. (mbw) (Entered:08/24/2000)

08/23/2000 131 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude testimony of Jane Doe and related evidence ;Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice. (maf) (Entered: 08/24/2000)

08/23/2000 132 EXHIBIT 2 by defendant in support of its memorandum in support of its motion in limine toexclude testimony of Jane Doe and related evidence [131−1] (RESTRICTED). (maf)(Entered: 08/24/2000)

08/23/2000 134 MINUTE ORDER of 8/23/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that the parties shallhave until 09/01/00 to respond to the motion to intervene [119−1], petition for leave tointervene [128−1], and motion for leave to appearance instanter [123−1]. Viad Corp. mayreply to any such response on or before 09/08/00. (Entered Briefing Schedule) Noticemailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 08/29/2000)

08/24/2000 133 UNOPPOSED MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to amend briefing schedule ; Notice. (maf)(Entered: 08/25/2000)

08/24/2000 135 MINUTE ORDER of 8/24/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The parties shall have until09/01/00 to respond to the motion to intervene filed by Viad Corp. [119−1], the petition forleave to intervene filed by Jane Doe [128−1] and the motion for leave to appearance[123−1]. Replies may be filed ten days after the service of any such response. EEOC mayfile and serve a consolidated reply to any pleadings in opposition to EEOC's motion tounseal Jan Doe materials [111−1] within ten days after the court has ruled on Viad's andDoe's motion to intervene. (Entered Revised Briefing Scheuled) Notice mailed by Judge'sstaff (ar) (Entered: 08/29/2000)




08/28/2000 140 APPLICATION for leave to appear pro hac vice by Dle A. Danneman for John Roe; Orderentered granting leave by Hon. Warren K. Urbom (ar) (Entered: 09/07/2000)

09/01/2000 136 RESPONSE by Dial Corp to motion to intervene filed by Viad Corp [119−1] (ar) Modifiedon 09/06/2000 (Entered: 09/06/2000)

09/01/2000 137 RESPONSE by Dial Corp to motion to intervene filed by John Roe [125−1] (ar) (Entered:09/06/2000)

09/01/2000 138 RESPONSE by Dial Corp to motion for leave to intervene file by Jane Doe [128−1] (ar)(Entered: 09/06/2000)

09/01/2000 139 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION by EEOC to Jane Doe's, John Roe's and Viad Corp.'smotions to intervene [128−1] [125−1] [119−1]; Notice (ar) (Entered: 09/06/2000)

09/05/2000 141 MINUTE ORDER of 9/5/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that, on or before09/13/00, the parties and Viad Corp. may file and serve responses to John Roe's motion tocontinue protective order [126−1] and motion for leave to file declaration of John Roe underseal [127−1]. John Roe may reply to such responses on or before 09/20/00. (EnteredBriefing Schedule re John Roe's Motion) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) Modified on09/07/2000 (Entered: 09/07/2000)

09/11/2000 149 REPLY by Viad Corp to plaintiff EEOC's response in opposition to Viad Corp.'s motion tointervene [119−1]; Notice (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 09/29/2000)

09/12/2000 142 RESPONSE by Viad Corp to John Roe's motion to continue protective orders [126−1] andmotion for leave to file declaration under seal [127−1] (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered:09/13/2000)

09/13/2000 143 RESPONSE by petitioner/intervenor Jane Doe to John Roe's motion to continue protectiveorders [126−1] and motion for leave to file declaration of John Roe under seal [127−1](RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 09/14/2000)

09/14/2000 SCHEDULE set on 9/14/00 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Status hearing and for filing of thejoint pretrial order set for 9/15/00 before Judge Aspen is stricken. Mailed notice (gl)(Entered: 09/14/2000)

09/14/2000 144 RESPONSE by EEOC in opposition to John Roe's intervention [125−1] and motion to filedeclaration under seal [127−1]; Notice (ar) (Entered: 09/16/2000)

09/14/2000 145 RESPONSE by Dial Corp to John Roe's motions to continue protective order [126−1] andfor leave to file declaration under seal [127−1] (ar) (Entered: 09/16/2000)

09/15/2000 146 REPLY by John Roe in support of motion to intervene [125−1] (RESTRICTED) (ar)(Entered: 09/18/2000)

09/15/2000 147 REPLY by Jane Doe in support of petition for leave to intervene [128−1] (Attachments)(RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 09/18/2000)

09/20/2000 148 REPLY by John Roe in support of his motion to continue protective orders [126−1] andmotion for leave to file declaration under seal [127−1] (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered:09/21/2000)

09/21/2000 151 MINUTE ORDER of 9/21/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Viad Corp.'s motion to intervenepursuant to Rule 24 FRCP is granted [119−1]. (Entered Order on Motion to Intervenepursuant to Rule 24 Fed.R.Civ.P.) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 10/04/2000)

09/21/2000 152 MINUTE ORDER of 9/21/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : John Roe's motion to intervenepursuant to Rule 24(b) Fed. R. Civ. P. is granted [125−1]. (Entered Order on Mtoion toIntervene pursuant to Rule 24(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered:10/04/2000)

09/21/2000 153 MINUTE ORDER of 9/21/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Jane Doe's motion for leave tointervene pursuant to Rule 24(b) FRCP is granted [128−1]. (Entered Order on Jane Doe'sPetition for Leave to Intervene) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 10/04/2000)

09/28/2000 154 MINUTE ORDER of 9/28/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that the parties shallhave until 10/12/00 to respond to the motion for protective order filed by Viad Corp. and thereply may be filed and served or before 10/19/00. (Entered Briefing Schedule) Noticemailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 10/04/2000)







10/03/2000 150 RESPONSE by Viad Corp to defendant's motion in limine to exclude testimony of Jane Doeand related evidence [131−1] (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 10/04/2000)

10/05/2000 158 MOTION by intervenor Jane Doe for extension of time to file response to motion in limine(yap) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

10/06/2000 155 REPLY brief by plaintiff in support of motion to unseal briefs [111−1] (RESTRICTED) (ar)(Entered: 10/10/2000)

10/06/2000 156 RESPONSE in opposition by plaintiff to Dial's motion in limine [131−1]; Notice.(RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

10/10/2000 166 MINUTE ORDER of 10/10/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that the plaintiff'smotion for leave to file, instanter, an oversized reply brief in support of its motion to unsealbriefs, hearing transcript, court order and deposition of Jane Doe, dated 10/05/00, is granted.(Entered Order) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) Modified on 10/20/2000 (Entered:10/20/2000)

10/13/2000 159 RESPONSE by plaintiff to Jane Doe's proposed filing; Notice (ar) (Entered: 10/16/2000)

10/13/2000 160 MOTION by EEOC to strike Viad's response to Dial's motion in limine (RESTRICTED)(ar) (Entered: 10/17/2000)

10/13/2000 161 RESPONSE by EEOC in opposition to Viad's motion for protective order (RESTRICTED)(ar) (Entered: 10/17/2000)

10/13/2000 162 RESPONSE by Jane Doe to defendant's motion in limine to exclude testimony of Jane Doeand related evidence [131−1]; Memorandum in support (Attachments) (RESTRICTED) (ar)(Entered: 10/17/2000)

10/17/2000 163 MOTION by defendant for extension of time to file its reply brief in support of its motion inlimine ; Notice (ar) (Entered: 10/18/2000)

10/18/2000 164 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE by EEOC to strike Jane Doe's response to Dial's motion inlimine [131−1] (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 10/20/2000)

10/18/2000 167 MINUTE ORDER of 10/18/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion forextension of time [163−1] to file its reply brief in support of its motion in limine is granted.The defendant shall, on or before 10/26/00, file and serve its reply in support of its motionin limine [131−1]. (Entered Order on Defendant's Motion for Extension of TIme to File ItsReply Brief in Support of Its Motion in Limine) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar)(Entered: 10/25/2000)

10/19/2000 165 REPLY by Viad Corp to in support of its motion for protection with response(RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 10/20/2000)

10/19/2000 165 RESPONSE by Viad Corp in opposition to EEOC's motion to strike [160−1] with reply(RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 10/20/2000)

10/26/2000 168 REPLY memorandum by Dial Corp in support of its motion in limine to exclude testimonyof Jane Doe and related evidence [131−1] (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 10/27/2000)

10/27/2000 169 REPLY by Jane Doe EEOC's response in opposition [159−1] to Jane Doe's proposed filingand to EEOC's supplemental response [164−1] to strike Jane Doe's response to Dial'smotion in limine (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 10/30/2000)

11/03/2000 170 MOTION by EEOC for extension of time in which to file its response in opposition to Dial'smotion for summary judgment ; Notice (ar) (Entered: 11/06/2000)

11/03/2000 171 MINUTE ORDER of 11/3/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : EEOC's motion for extension oftime [170−1] in which to file its response in opposition to Dial's motion for summaryjudgment with certificate of service is granted. The plaintiff shall have on or before12/05/00 in which to file and serve its response in opposition to Dial's motion for summaryjudgment [70−1]. (Entered Order on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Motionfor Extension of Time in which to File Its Response in Opposition to Dial's Motion forSummary Judgment) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 11/08/2000)

11/28/2000 172 MINUTE ORDER of 11/28/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Enter memorandum and order:Plaintiff's motion to unseal briefs, hearing transcript, court order and deposition of Jane Doe[111−1] is denied. Viad's motion for protective order [121−1] is granted. John Roe's motion






to continue protective order [126−1] is granted. John Roe's motion for leave to filedeclaration of John Roe under seal [127−1] is granted. (Entered Memorandum and Order onPlaintiff's Motion to Unseal Briefs, Hearing Transcript, Court Order and Deposition of JaneDoe, Motion by Viad for Protective Order, Motion by John Roe for Protective Order, andMotion by John Roe to File Declaration) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) Modified on11/29/2000 (Entered: 11/29/2000)

11/28/2000 173 MINUTE ORDER of 11/28/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Entered memorandum andorder: Defendant's motion in limine to exclude testimony of Jane Doe and related evidence[131−1] is granted. (Entered Memorandum and Order on Defendant's Motion in limine toExclude Testimony of Jane Doe and Related Evidence) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar)(Entered: 11/29/2000)

12/05/2000 174 MEMORANDUM by EEOC in opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment[70−1] (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 12/06/2000)

12/05/2000 175 RESPONSE by EEOC to defendant's statement of material facts [96−1] (RESTRICTED)(ar) (Entered: 12/06/2000)

12/05/2000 176 EXHIBITS numbered volumes 1 through 17 by EEOC in support of its response [175−1] todefendant's statement of material facts [2 boxes #176−1 and #176−2)(Document NotScanned.) (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 12/06/2000)

12/12/2000 177 MOTION by defendant for extension of time to file its summary judgment reply papers(Attachment) (yap) (Entered: 12/15/2000)

12/14/2000 178 MINUTE ORDER of 12/14/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : EEOC's motion for leave to filebrief in opposition to Dial's motion for summary judgment in excess of 38 pages instanter, isgranted. Defendant's motion for extension of time [177−1] in which to file its summaryjudgment reply papers is granted. Defendant shall, on or before 02/28/01, file and serve itsreply to its motion for summary judgment [70−1]. (Entered Order) Notice mailed by Judge'sstaff notice (ar) Modified on 12/27/2000 (Entered: 12/27/2000)

12/21/2000 179 MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file its redacted summary judgment papers instanter ;Notice (ar) (Entered: 12/27/2000)

12/21/2000 180 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to Defendant Dial's motion for summaryjudgment [70−1] (ar) (Entered: 12/27/2000)

12/29/2000 181 MINUTE ORDER of 12/29/00 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff's motion for leave tofile its redacted summary judgment papers instanter is granted [179−1]. (Entered Order)Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 01/04/2001)

01/19/2001 182 MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file its redacted summary judgment papers instanter ;Notice (ar) (Entered: 01/22/2001)

01/19/2001 183 STATEMENT by plaintiff of additional facts (1 vol.) (ar) (Entered: 01/22/2001)

01/19/2001 184 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's Local Rule 56.1 statement of material facts [96−1] (1vol.) (ar) (Entered: 01/22/2001)

01/19/2001 185 CORRECTIONS by plaintiff to its response to defendant's Local Rule 56.1 statement ofmaterial facts and its statement of additional facts [175−1] [184−1] (ar) (Entered:01/22/2001)

01/24/2001 186 MINUTE ORDER of 1/24/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff's motion for leave to fileits redacted summary judgment papers instanter is granted [182−1]. (Entered Order) Noticemailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 01/29/2001)

02/06/2001 187 MOTION by plaintiff for leave to fileits redacted summary judgment papers instanter ;Notice (ar) (Entered: 02/15/2001)

02/06/2001 189 APPENDICES filed by plaintiff to its response [184−1] to defendant's Local 56.1 statementof material facts [96−1] and to plaintiff's statement of additional facts [183−1] (17 vols.#189−1 through #189−17) (ar) (Entered: 02/15/2001)

02/15/2001 188 MINUTE ORDER of 2/15/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The Clerk of the Court isdirected to file and docket side−bound documents filed on 02/06/01 by plaintiff [187−1]. Nonotice (ar) (Entered: 02/15/2001)







02/27/2001 193 MINUTE ORDER of 2/27/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff's motion for leave to fileredacted summary judgment papers instanter is granted. (Entered Order) Notice mailed byJudge's staff (ar) (Entered: 03/06/2001)

02/28/2001 190 REPLY memorandum by defendant of law in support of its motion for summary judgment;Notice (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 03/01/2001)

02/28/2001 191 UNREDACTED RESPONSE by defendant to plaintiff's statement of additional facts[183−1] (RESTRICTED). (ac) Modified on 03/01/2001 (Entered: 03/01/2001)

02/28/2001 192 UNREDACTED REPLY by defendant to the additional facts alleged in plaintiff's responseto defendant's Local Rule 56.1 Statement [184−1], [185−1] (RESTRICTED). (ac) Modifiedon 03/01/2001 (Entered: 03/01/2001)

03/09/2001 194 JOINT MOTION by plaintiff and deffendant for substitution of corrected redacted filings .(yp) (Entered: 03/15/2001)

03/12/2001 196 MINUTE ORDER of 3/12/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The Clerk of the Court isdirected to remove immediately from the public (Clerk's) file and destroy, defendant'sstatement of undisputed material facts in support of summary judgment [98−1]; plaintiffEEOC's response to defendant's statement of undisputed facts [175−1]; and plaintiff EEOC'sstatement of additional facts in opposition to summary judgment [183−1] andcontemporaneously to replace those pleadings with substitute versions of same which theparties have revised and have marked "corrected redacted filing (Substitute)." (EnteredOrder on Joint Motion for Substitution of Corrected Redacted Filings.) Mailed notice byjudge's staff (mw) (Entered: 03/23/2001)

03/19/2001 195 RESPONSE by plaintiff to Dial's motion to strike portions of EEOC's evidence pursuant toFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 56; Notice. (fce) (Entered: 03/20/2001)

03/21/2001 197 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's Local Rule 56.1 statement of material facts [96−1].(mw) (Entered: 03/23/2001)

03/21/2001 198 STATEMENT by plaintiff of additional facts; Notice. (mw) (Entered: 03/23/2001)

03/29/2001 199 REPLY by defendant Dial Corp to EEOC's response to Dial's motion to strike portions ofEEOC's evidence [195−1]. (vmj) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

03/29/2001 200 REDACTED REPLY memorandum of law in support of its motion for summary judgment[70−1] by defendant The Dial Corporation (Attachments). (vmj) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

03/29/2001 201 REDACTED REPLY by defendant Dial Corp to the additional facts alleged in plaintiff'sresponse to defendant's Local Rule 56.1 statement of material facts as to which there is nogenuine issue [197−1] (2 vols: 201−1, 201−2). (vmj) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

03/29/2001 202 RESPONSE by defendant Dial Corp to plaintiff's statement of of additional facts [198−1].(vmj) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

03/29/2001 203 NOTICE of filing by defendant Dial Corp of response [202−1], reply [201−1], reply[200−1], reply [199−1]. (vmj) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

05/03/2001 211 MINUTE ORDER of 5/3/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The order of 03/12/01 [196−1] isvacated. The Clerk of the Court is directed to remove immediately from the public (Clerk's)file, to destroy the documents that appear on the docket sheet as documents [96−1],[183−1], and [184−1] and to replace those documents with substitute versions of the samewhich the parties have revised in accordance with the governing protective orders and havemarked "Corrected Redacted Filing (Substitute)," which substitute documents havepreviously been tendered to the Clerk. (Entered Revised Order on Joint Motion forSubstitution of Corrected Redacted Filings) Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) Modified on09/19/2001 (Entered: 09/19/2001)

08/09/2001 204 MINUTE ORDER of 8/9/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Enter memorandum and order:Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted [70−1] in part and denied in part.(Entered memorandum and order on defendant's motion for summary judgment.) Mailednotice by judge's staff. (yp) (Entered: 08/14/2001)

08/29/2001 205 REDACTED SUPPLEMENTAL by plaintiff filing pursuant to the 8/9/01 court order[204−1]. (yp) (Entered: 09/04/2001)






09/05/2001 206 MOTION by defendant for an order holding EEOC of contempt for violating the court'sconfidentiality orders ; Memorandum in support. (RESTRICTED) (yp) Modified on10/03/2001 (Entered: 09/07/2001)

09/05/2001 207 MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of its motion for an order holding EEOC omcontempt for violating the court's confidentiality orders [206−1] (Attachments); Notice. (yp)(Entered: 09/13/2001)

09/06/2001 208 MINUTE ORDER of 9/6/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The plaintiff shall have until9/20/01 to respond to the defendant's motion for an order holding EEOC om contempt forviolating the court's confidentiality orders [206−1], filed 9/5/01; and the defendant shallhave until 10/2/01 to reply. (Entered Briefing Schedule.) Mailed notices by judge's staff.(las) (Entered: 09/17/2001)

09/13/2001 209 MOTION by defendant for certification of issues for appeal ; Memorandum in support.(tlm) (Entered: 09/18/2001)

09/14/2001 210 MINUTE ORDER of 9/14/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff shall have until09/27/01 to respond to the defendant's motion for certification of issues for appeal [209−1],with a certificate of service dated 09/13/01; and the defendant shall have until 10/04/01 toreply. (Entered Briefing Schedule.) Mailed notice by judge's staff (mw) (Entered:09/19/2001)

09/20/2001 212 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant Dial's motion for contempt [206−1] (Attachments).(yp) (Entered: 09/24/2001)

09/27/2001 213 RESPONSE by plaintiff to Dial's motion for certification [209−1] (Attachment). (yp)(Entered: 09/28/2001)

10/02/2001 214 REPLY MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of its motion for civil contemptsanctions [206−1] (Attachments). (yp) (Entered: 10/03/2001)

10/04/2001 215 REPLY MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of its motion for certification of issuesfor appeal [209−1]. (yp) (Entered: 10/05/2001)

11/29/2001 216 MINUTE ORDER of 11/29/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that EEOC isadjudged to be in civil contempt for failure to comply with the stipulated protective order.Dial is awarded its costs and attorney's fees incurred in preparing and prosecuting thecontempt motion; and Dial will have until 12/12/01 to file its application for costs andattorney's fees and documentation; the EEOC will then have until 12/27/01 to respond.(Entered Memorandum and Order on Defendant's Motion for Contempt Order.) Mailednotice by judge's staff. (yp) Modified on 12/12/2001 (Entered: 12/06/2001)

12/11/2001 217 REQUEST by plaintiff EEOC for extension of time to comply with 11/29/01 order. (yp)(Entered: 12/12/2001)

12/12/2001 218 PETITION by defendant Dial Corp for attorneys' fees and costs incurred to prepare andprosecute its motion for an order holding EEOC in contempt (Attachments). (yp) (Entered:12/13/2001)

12/12/2001 219 MINUTE ORDER of 12/12/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : EEOC's request for extensionof time to comply with 11/29/01 order is granted and the plaintiff's deadline for compliancewith the court's 11/29/01 order is extended to 1/2/02, (Attachment). Mailed notices byjudge's staff (cem) (Entered: 12/20/2001)

12/20/2001 220 MINUTE ORDER of 12/20/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion forcertification of issues for appeal is granted [209−1], because the issue "Whether the timelimitations which apply to privately prosecuted class−based Title VII claims apply to anEEOC prosecuted pattern and practive Title ViI claim" meets the requirements of 28 USC1292 and this court's order of 8/9/01 (filing 204−1) is therefore certified to the SeventhCircuit of Appeals for interlocutory review. (Entered Memorandum and Order onDefendant's Motion for Certification of Issues for Appeal.) Mailed notice by judge's staff.(yp) (Entered: 12/27/2001)

12/26/2001 223 MOTION by intervenor Jane Doe to remove from mailing list . (yp) (Entered: 01/03/2002)

12/26/2001 224 MINUTE ORDER of 12/26/01 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that Jane's motionto remove from mailing list is granted [223−1] and their names removed from any futurepleadings or minute entries. terminating party Jane Doe (Entered Order.) Mailed notice by











judge's staff. (yp) Modified on 01/03/2002 (Entered: 01/03/2002)

12/27/2001 221 RESPONSE by plaintiff to Dial's petition for attorney's fees and costs [218−1]. (yp)(Entered: 12/28/2001)

12/28/2001 222 RESPONSE by plaintiff to the Court's 11/29/01 contempt order [216−1] (Attachments).(mw) (Entered: 01/02/2002)

01/18/2002 226 MINUTE ORDER of 1/18/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Enter second memorandum andorder: It is ordered that when the plaintiff has fully complied with my memorandum andorder on defendant's petition for attorneys' fees and costs incurred to prepare and prosecuteits motion for an order holding EEOC in contempt, the memorandum and order ondefendant's motion for contempt order, dated 11/29/01, will have been fully complied withand the subject of that order concluded. (Entered Second Memorandum and Order onDefendant's Motion for Contempt Order.) Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp) Modified on01/25/2002 (Entered: 01/25/2002)

01/18/2002 225 MINUTE ORDER of 1/18/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Enter memorandum and order:Defendant's petition for attorneys' fees and costs incurred to prepare and prosecute itsmotion for an order holding EEOC in contempt, is granted to the extent that the DialCorporation shall have from EEOC an attorney's fee and costs in the amount of $7,151.75,together with interest until paid in full. (Entered Memorandum and Order on Defendant'sPetition for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Incurred to Prepare and Prosecute its Motion for anOrder Holding EEOC in Contempt. Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp) Modified on01/25/2002 (Entered: 01/25/2002)

02/15/2002 227 CERTIFIED copy of Order dated 2/12/02 from the 7th Circuit: The Dial Corporation'spetition for permission to appeal under 28 U.S.C. 1292(b), filed on 1/7/02 by counsel.Opposition of the Equal Opportunity Commission to petition for permission to appeal underU.S.C. 1292(b), filed on 1/25/02 by counsel. It is ordered that #1 is denied. (02−8002) (yp)(Entered: 02/21/2002)

03/27/2002 228 MINUTE ORDER of 3/27/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion for an orderholding EEOC of contempt for violating the court's confidentiality orders is granted[206−1]. No notice (yp) (Entered: 03/28/2002)

03/27/2002 229 MINUTE ORDER of 3/27/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion forsubstitution of corrected redacted filings is granted [194−1] pursuant to this court's order of3/12/01. No notice (yp) (Entered: 03/28/2002)

04/26/2002 230 MINUTE ORDER of 4/26/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Telephone conference held.Defendant shall have until 6/13/02 to file motions in limine, to which the plaintiff mayrespond by 7/9/02, and a reply may be filed by 7/19/02. Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp)(Entered: 05/02/2002)

06/13/2002 231 MOTION by defendant for leave to file its memorandum in support of its motion in limineto exclude evidence of alleged harassment before 1994 or, alternatively, before 1991, inexcss of fifteen pages, instanter . (srb) (Entered: 06/14/2002)

06/13/2002 232 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude evidence of sex−based harassment, retaliation,or other forms of discrimination ; Notice. (yp) (Entered: 06/25/2002)

06/13/2002 233 MOTION by defendant Dial Corp in limine to exclude evidence relating to the allegationsof Class Member 80 (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 06/25/2002)

06/13/2002 234 MOTION by defendant Dial Corp for reconsideration of the court's "Scope of the Charge"and timeliness rulings and its memorandum in support thereof (RESTRICTED). (yp)(Entered: 06/25/2002)

06/13/2002 235 MOTION by defendant Dial Corp in limine to exclude plaintiff's expert's testimony and itsmemorandum in support thereof (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 06/25/2002)

06/13/2002 236 MOTION by defendant Dial Corp in limine to exclude evidence of alleged harassmentbefore 1994 or, alternatively, before 1991 and its memorandum in support thereof(RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 06/25/2002)

06/20/2002 244 MINUTE ORDER of 6/20/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion for leave tofile its memorandum in support of its motion limine to exclude evidence of allegedharassment before is granted [231−1], in excss of pages, instanter is granted [231−2].












(Entered Order on Defendant's Motion for Leave to File its Memorandum in Support of itsMotion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Harassment Before 1994 or,Alternatively, Before 1991, in Excess of Fifteen Pages, Instanter.) Mailed notice by judge'sstaff. (yp) Modified on 06/28/2002 (Entered: 06/28/2002)

06/26/2002 237 REDACTED MOTION by defendant Dial Corp in limine to exclude evidence relating to theallegations of class member 80 ; Notice. (yp) (Entered: 06/27/2002)

06/26/2002 238 MOTION by defendant Dial Corp in limine to exclude plaintiff's expert's testimony ;Notice. (yp) (Entered: 06/27/2002)

06/26/2002 239 MOTION by defendant Dial Corp for reconsideration of the court's notice and timelinessrulings ; Notice. (yp) (Entered: 06/27/2002)

06/26/2002 240 MOTION by defendant Dial Corp in limine to exclude evidence of alleged harassmentbefore 1994 or, alternatively before 1991 ; Notice. (yp) (Entered: 06/27/2002)

06/26/2002 241 REDACTED MEMORANDUM OF LAW by defendant Dial Corp in support of its motionin limine to exclude evidence of alleged harassment before or, alternatively before 1991[240−1] (Attachments). (yp) Modified on 06/27/2002 (Entered: 06/27/2002)

06/26/2002 242 REDACTED MEMORANDUM OF LAW by defendant Dial Corp in support of its motionfor reconsideration of the court's notice and timeliness rulings [239−1] (Attachments). (yp)Modified on 06/27/2002 (Entered: 06/27/2002)

06/26/2002 243 REDACTED MEMORANDUM of law by defendant Dial Corp in support of its motion inlimine to exclude plaintiff's expert's testimony [238−1] (Attachments). (yp) (Entered:06/27/2002)

06/26/2002 254 ORIGINAL declaration of Phyllis Fletcher by defendant (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered:07/10/2002)

06/26/2002 255 ORIGINAL declaration of William Jensen by defendant (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered:07/10/2002)

06/26/2002 256 ORIGINAL declaration of Bernhard J. Welle by defendant (RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered:07/10/2002)

06/27/2002 245 CORRECTED TAB C by defendant Dial Corp to its memorandum in support of its motionin limine to exclude plaintiff's expert's testimony (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered:07/01/2002)

06/28/2002 247 MINUTE ORDER of 6/28/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that theMemorandum and Order on defendant's petition for attorneys' fees and costs incurred toprepare and prosecute its motion for an order holding EEOC in contempt, the interest ratefor the amount of attorneys' fees and costs as of 01/18/02 is 2.03 per cent per annum.(Entered Order Amending Memorandum and Order on Defendant's Petition for Attorney'sFees and Costs Incurred to Prepare and Prosecute Its Motion for an Order Holding EEOC inContemt). Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 07/03/2002)

07/01/2002 246 NOTICE of filing by plaintiff regarding its motion for extension of time to file its responseto defendant's motion in limine to exclude plaintiff's expert testimony (ar) (Entered:07/03/2002)

07/01/2002 248 MOTION by plaintiff for extension of time to file its response to defendant's motion inlimine to exclude plaintiff's expert testimony . (fce) (Entered: 07/03/2002)

07/01/2002 250 MINUTE ORDER of 7/1/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The plaintiff shall on or before07/08/02, file and serve its response to defendant's motion for reconsideration; and thedefendant may on or before 07/12/02, file and serve its reply to the defendant's motion forreconsideration. [239−1] (Entered Briefing Schedule) Mailed notice (hp) (Entered:07/09/2002)

07/01/2002 251 MINUTE ORDER of 7/1/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that the plaintiff'smotion for extension of time to file its response to defendant's motion in limine to excludeplaintiff's expert testimony, with a notice of filing dated 07/01/02, is granted and theplaintiff shall have until 07/30/02 to file and serve its response. [248−1] (Entered Order)Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 07/09/2002)














07/02/2002 249 NOTICE by David T. Maddox, counsel for Viad Corp of change of address. (fce) (Entered:07/03/2002)

07/08/2002 252 MOTION by defendant for attorney fees, costs, and expenses incurred in defending againstfrivolous class member claims (hp) (Entered: 07/09/2002)

07/08/2002 257 MEMORANDUM of law by Dial Corp in support of its motion for attorney fees, costs, andexpenses incurred in defending against frivolous class member claims [252−1]; Notice(RESTRICTED) (ar) (Entered: 07/10/2002)

07/08/2002 264 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to Defendant Dial's motion for reconsideration[239−1]; Notice. (tlm) (Entered: 07/17/2002)

07/09/2002 259 RESPONSE by EEOC to defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence of sex−basedharassment, retaliation, or other forms of discrimination [232−1] (fce) (Entered:07/11/2002)

07/09/2002 260 RESPONSE by EEOC to defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence of allegedharassment before 1994 or, alternatively before 1991 [240−1] (Attachments). (fce) (Entered:07/11/2002)

07/09/2002 261 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence relating to theallegations of class member 80 [237−1] (Attachment); Notice. (fce) (Entered: 07/11/2002)

07/09/2002 263 MINUTE ORDER of 7/9/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that plaintiff shallhave until 07/23/02 to respond to the defendant's motion for attorney fees, costs, andexpenses incurred in defending against frivolous class member claims [252−1]; and thedefendant may have until 07/30/02 to reply. (Entered Briefing Schedule on Defendant'sMotion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses Incurred In Defending Against FrivolousClass Member Claims.) Mailed notice by judge's staff (lc) (Entered: 07/17/2002)

07/10/2002 253 NOTICE of filing by defendant of motion for attorney fees, costs, and expenses incurred indefending against frivolous class member claims [252−1]. (vmj) (Entered: 07/10/2002)

07/10/2002 258 Redacted MEMORANDUM of law by defendant in support of its motion for attorney fees,costs, and expenses incurred in defending against frivolous class member claims [252−1](Attachments). (fce) (Entered: 07/11/2002)

07/12/2002 262 REPLY memorandum by defendant in support of its motion for reconsideration of thecourt's "Scope of the Charge" and timeliness rulings [239−1] (gcy) (Entered: 07/15/2002)

07/19/2002 265 REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT by defendant of its motion in limine to excludeevidence relating to the allegations of class member 80 [237−1], [233−1]. (yp) (Entered:07/22/2002)

07/19/2002 266 REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT by defendant of its motion in limine to excludeevidence of alleged harassment before 1994 or, alternatively before 1991 [240−1]. (yp)(Entered: 07/22/2002)

07/19/2002 267 REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT by defendant of its motion in limine to excludeevidence of sex−based harassment, retaliation, or other forms of discrimination [232−1].(yp) (Entered: 07/22/2002)

07/19/2002 268 MOTION by defendant for leave to file third amended answer (Attachment). (yp) (Entered:07/22/2002)

07/19/2002 269 REQUEST by plaintiff for extension of time to respond to defendant's motion for attorneys'fees, costs, and expenses incurred in defending against privolous class member claims;Notice. (yp) (Entered: 07/22/2002)

07/19/2002 270 MINUTE ORDER of 7/19/02 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Enter memorandum and order:defendant's motion for reconsideration of the court's notice and timeliness rulings is denied[239−1]. (Entered Memorandum and Order on Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration ofthe court's Notice and Timeliness Rulings.) Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp) (Entered:07/23/2002)

07/19/2002 271 MINUTE ORDER of 7/19/02 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : EEOC's request for extension oftime to respond to defendant's motion for attorney fees, costs, and expenses incurred indefendant against frivolous class member claims, is granted; the plaintiff shall on or before8/23/02 file and serve its reponse and the defendant may on or before 8/20/02, file and serve



















a copy [252−1]. (Entered Order on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Requestfor Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, andExpenses incurred in Defending against Frivolous Class Member Claims.) Mailed notice byjudge's staff. (yp) (Entered: 07/23/2002)

07/23/2002 272 MINUTE ORDER of 7/23/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that the plaintiffshall have until 07/31/02 to respond to the defendant's motion for leave to file thirdamended answer [268−1] and the defendant shall have until 08/07/02 to reply. (EnteredOrder). Mailed notice by judge's staff. (jmp) Modified on 07/30/2002 (Entered: 07/30/2002)

07/30/2002 277 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion in limine to exclude plaintiff's expert'stestimony [238−1] (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 08/08/2002)

07/31/2002 273 OBJECTIONS by plaintiff EEOC to defendant Dial's motion for leave to file third amendedanswer [268−1]; Notice. (gcy) (Entered: 08/01/2002)

08/06/2002 274 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendnt's motion in limine to excludeplaintiff's expert's testimony [238−1] (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 08/07/2002)

08/06/2002 275 MOTION by defendant for extension of time to file its reply memorandum in support of itsmotion in limine to exclude plaintiff's expert's testimony . (yp) (Entered: 08/07/2002)

08/06/2002 276 REPLY MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of its motion for leave to file thirdamended answer [268−1]. (yp) (Entered: 08/07/2002)

08/09/2002 278 MINUTE ORDER of 8/9/02 by Hon. Marvin E. Aspen : Defendant's motion for extensionof time to file its reply memorandum in support of its motion in limine to exclude plaintiff'sexpert's testimony is granted [275−1]. Defendant may on or before 8/13/02 file its replymemo. (Entered Order on Defendant's Motion for an Extension of Tiem to file its ReplyMemorandum in Support of its Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert's Testimony.)Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp) Modified on 08/14/2002 (Entered: 08/14/2002)

08/13/2002 279 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW by defendant Dial Corp in support of its motion inlimine to exclude plaintiff's expert's testimony [238−1]. (yp) (Entered: 08/14/2002)

08/22/2002 280 MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file instanter its sur−reply in response to defendant's replymemorandum of law in support of its motion in limine to exclude plaintiff's experttestimony (Attachments); Notice. (yp) (Entered: 08/23/2002)

08/22/2002 282 MINUTE ORDER of 8/22/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff's motion for leave to fileinstanter its sur−reply in response to defendant's reply memorandum of law in support of itsin limine to exclude plaintiff's expert testimony is granted [280−1]. (Entered Order onPlaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Instanter its Sur−Reply in Response to Defendant'sReply Memorandum of Law In Support of its Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiff'sExpert Testimony.) Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp) (Entered: 08/28/2002)

08/23/2002 281 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion for attorney fees, costs, and expensesincurred in defending against frivolous class member claims [252−1]; Notice. (yp) (Entered:08/26/2002)

08/30/2002 283 REPLY MEMORANDUM by defendant Dial Corp in support of its motion for attorneyfees, costs, and expenses incurred in defending against frivolous class member claims[252−1]. (yp) (Entered: 09/03/2002)

08/30/2002 284 MINUTE ORDER of 8/30/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that a statusconference shall commence at 12:15 p.m., on Wednesday, 10/9/02, in room no. 1764.(Entered Order Setting Status Conference.) Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp) (Entered:09/05/2002)

09/17/2002 285 MINUTE ORDER of 9/17/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : (Entered Memorandum andOrder: Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Sex−Based Harassment,Retaliation, or Other Forms of Discrimination is denied [232−1].) Mailed notice by judge'sstaff. (yp) Modified on 09/30/2002 (Entered: 09/30/2002)

09/17/2002 286 MINUTE ORDER of 9/17/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : (Entered Memorandum andOrder: Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Relating to the Allegations ofClass Member 80 [233−1] and [237−1] is denied.) Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp)(Entered: 09/30/2002)















09/17/2002 287 MINUTE ORDER of 9/17/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : (Entered Memorandum andOrder: Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Alleged Harassment Beforeor, Alternatively, Before 1991 [236−1] &[240−1] is denied.) Mailed notice by judge's staff.(yp) (Entered: 09/30/2002)

09/17/2002 288 MINUTE ORDER of 9/17/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : (Entered Memorandum andOrder: Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exlude Plaintiff's Expert Testimony and itsMemorandum in Support Thereof is granted in part and denied in part [235−1], [238−1].)Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp) (Entered: 09/30/2002)

09/18/2002 289 MINUTE ORDER of 9/18/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : (Entered Meomorandum andOrder: Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees, Costs, and Expenses Incurred in AgainstFrivolous Class Member Claims [252−1] is granted in part and denied in part.) Mailednotice by judge's staff. (yp) Modified on 09/30/2002 (Entered: 09/30/2002)

10/01/2002 291 MINUTE ORDER of 10/1/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Enter memorandum and order: Itis ordered that the motion (Doc 268−1) for leave to file third amended answer is granted; theThird Amended Answer to Complaint, a copy of which was attached to the motion for leaveto file Third Amended Answer, shall be filed immediately. (Entered Memorandum andOrder) Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp) (Entered: 10/07/2002)

10/02/2002 292 PETITION by defendant Dial Corp for attorney fees , and for costs incurred as a directresult of EEOC's Inaccurate responses to defendant's interrogatories relating to the claims ofclass members 9, 20, 37, 52, 63, 70, 84, and 99 ; Notice (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered:10/07/2002)

10/03/2002 290 PETITION by defendant Dial Corp for attorney fees and costs incurred as a direct result ofEEOC's inaccurate responses to defendant's interrogatories relating to the claims of classmembers 9, 20, 37, 52, 63, 70, 84, and 99 (Attachments). (yp) (Entered: 10/04/2002)

10/07/2002 293 THIRD AMENDED ANSWER to complaint [8−1], [5−1] by defendant; Notice. (yp)(Entered: 10/08/2002)

10/09/2002 295 MINUTE ORDER of 10/9/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Pretrial conference held andcontinued to 2/28/03 at 1:00 p.m. Trial set for 4/28/03 at 9:00 a.m. Enter memorandum andorder on pretrial conference: Plaintiff may file by 10/15/02 a motion for reconsideration ofthe ruling on the attorney's fees. Dial shall have 10 days to respond, and the pliantiff 5 daysto reply. By 1/13/03, counsel shall sumit their proposed questions to be included on aquestionnaire to prospective jurors prior to their reporting for possible service. Final pretrialorder shall be submitted by 2/21/03. (Entered Memorandum and Order on PretrialConference.) Mailed notice by judge's staff. (yp) (Entered: 10/18/2002)

10/15/2002 294 MOTION by plaintiff for reconsideration of its 9/18/02 ruling (Attachments); (hmb)(Entered: 10/17/2002)

10/29/2002 296 RESPONSE by defendant Dial Corp to EEOC's motion for reconsideration of the court'sorder granting Dial's motion for attorneys' fees [294−1]. (yp) (Entered: 10/30/2002)

11/05/2002 297 REPLY by plaintiff in support of its motion for reconsideration [294−1]; Notice. (cem)(Entered: 11/06/2002)

12/09/2002 298 MOTION by defendant for clarification of the court's order of a bifurcated trial ;Memorandum in support (Attachment). (lc) (Entered: 12/11/2002)

12/10/2002 299 MINUTE ORDER of 12/10/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: Plaintiff shall on or before12/24/02, file and serve its response to defendant's motion for clarification of the court'sorder of a bifurcated trial [298−1]. The defendant may on or before 1/2/03, file and serve itsreply to its motion for clarification. (Entered Briefing Schedule.) Notice mailed by judge'sstaff (air) Modified on 12/16/2002 (Entered: 12/16/2002)

12/13/2002 300 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude plaintiff's expert'stestimony concerning matters raised in section II of her report (Attachments); Memorandumin support. (air) (Entered: 12/16/2002)

12/16/2002 301 MINUTE ORDER of 12/16/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that the plaintiffshall respond to defendnat's supplemental motion in limine to exclude plaintiff's expert'stestimony concerning matters raised in section II of her report [300−1] on or before12/30/02. The defendant may file and serve its reply on its suplemental motion in limine onor before 1/13/03. (Entered Order). Notices mailed by Judge's staff (hmb) (Entered:
















12/19/2002)

12/20/2002 302 JOINT MOTION by plaintiff, defendant to stay current briefing schedule . (ntf) (Entered:12/23/2002)

12/20/2002 303 MINUTE ORDER of 12/20/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Joint motion to stay currentbriefing schedule, dated 12/20/02 is granted [302−1]; briefing schedules entered on12/10/02 and 12/16/02 are stayed until furter order of the court. (Entered Order). Noticemailed by judge's staff (ntf) (Entered: 12/24/2002)

12/20/2002 304 MINUTE ORDER of 12/20/02 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The motion for reconsiderationof its 9/18/02 ruling [294−1], dated 10/15/02 is granted. The order contained within theMemorandum and Order on Defendant's motion for attorney fees and expenses incurred indefending against frivolous class member claims, dated 09/18/02, is vacated. Thedefendant's motion [290−1], [292−1], [292−2] for attorneys' fees, costs and expensesincurred in defendant against frivolous class Member Claims, filing 52, is denied. (EnteredMemorandum and Order on Motion for Reconsideration of 09/18/02, Ruling on Dial'sMotion for Attorneys' Fees). Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf) (Entered: 12/24/2002)

01/07/2003 305 MOTION by plaintiff EEOC, and defendant Dial Corp to stay the 01/13/03 deadline forproviding the court with proposed questions to be included on a prospective juryquestionnaire ; Notice (ntf) (Entered: 01/09/2003)

01/21/2003 306 MINUTE ORDER of 1/21/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: (Entered Order Extending DatesRegarding Defendant's Motion For Clarification of The Court's Order of Bifurcated Trial,The Defendant's Supplemental Motion In Limine To Exlude Plaintiff's Expert's TestimonyConcerning Matters Raised In Section II of Her Report and Proposed Questions To BeIncluded On A Questionnaire To Prospective Jurors Prior To Their Reporting For PossibleService.) Notice mailed by judge's staff (air) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

01/21/2003 308 MINUTE ORDER of 1/21/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: The parties' joint motion to staythe 01/13/03 deadline for providing the court with proposed questions to be included on aprospective jury questionnaire [305−1] with a notice of filing dated 1/7/03 is granted. The1/13/03 deadline is stayed until further order of the court. (Entered Order On The Parties'Joint Motion To Stay the 1/13/03, Deadline For Providing The Court With ProposedQuestions To Be Included On A Prospective Jury Questionnaire.) Notice mailed by judge'sstaff (air) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

01/24/2003 307 BRIEF by plaintiff in support of punitive damages award and instruction in phase I of thetrial; Notice. (air) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

01/30/2003 309 UNOPPOSED MOTION by Dial Corp for an extension of time to file its replymemorandum in support of its motion for clairification of the Court's order of a bifurcatedtrial (ar) (Entered: 02/03/2003)

01/31/2003 310 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's supplemental motion in limine to exclude plaintiff'sexpert's testimony [300−1] (Attachments); Notice. (gcy) (Entered: 02/03/2003)

02/03/2003 311 REPLY memorandum by defendant in support of its motion for clarification of the court'sorder of a bifurcated trial [298−1]. (vmj) (Entered: 02/04/2003)

02/12/2003 312 REPLY MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of its supplemental motion in limine toexclude plaintiff's expert's testimony concerning section II of her report [300−1]; Notice.(air) (Entered: 02/14/2003)

02/14/2003 313 MINUTE ORDER of 2/14/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : (Entered Memorandum andOrder on defendant's motion for clarification on the Court's order of a bifurcated trial)[298−1]. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (ar) (Entered: 02/20/2003)

02/18/2003 314 MINUTE ORDER of 2/18/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: Enter order that Viad Corp. andits counsel be removed from any future minute entries or pleadings in this matter. (EnteredOrder.) Notices mailed by judge's staff (cdy) (Entered: 02/26/2003)

02/18/2003 315 MINUTE ORDER of 2/18/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: Defendant's motion for anextension of time to file its reply memorandum in support of its motion for clairification ofthe Court's order of a bifurcated trial, with certificate of service dated 01/30/03, is granted.The defendant shall have until 02/03/03 to file its reply memorandum in support of itsmotion for clarification of the order of a bifurcated trial. (Entered Order on Defendant's
















Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to File its Reply Memorandum in Support ofits Motion for Clarification of the Court's Order of a Bifurcated Trial.) Notices mailed byjudge's staff (cdy) Modified on 02/26/2003 (Entered: 02/26/2003)

02/26/2003 316 JOINT MOTION by plaintiff and defendant to modify pretrial order schedule ; Notice.(jmp) (Entered: 03/03/2003)

02/26/2003 317 MOTION by defendant to withdraw Kimball R. Anderson and T. Alexis MacDowall . (ntf)(Entered: 03/03/2003)

02/26/2003 318 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Camille Annette Olson (ntf) (Entered:03/03/2003)

02/27/2003 320 MINUTE ORDER of 2/27/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: Joint motion [316−1] to modifypretrial order scheduled is granted. The Joint Pretrial Conference of 04/04/03 shallcommence at 9:30 a.m. in Room 1764 of the Everett Dirksen Building, 219 S. Dearborn St.,Chicago, Illinois. (Entered Order on Joint Motion to Modify Pretrial Order Schedule.)Mailed notice by judge's staff (gcy) (Entered: 03/04/2003)

02/28/2003 319 FINAL PRE−TRIAL ORDER; Notice. (gcy) (Entered: 03/04/2003)

02/28/2003 321 MINUTE ORDER of 2/28/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: It is ordered that the order onjoint motion to modify pretrial order schedule is amended in that date set for the jointpretrial conference has been changed and the Joint Pretrial Conference shall commence on04/03/03 at 12:30 p.m.; otherwise, the order on joint motion to modify pretrial orderschedule shall remain the same. (Entered Amended Order on Joint Motion to ModifyPretrial Order Schedule). Mailed notice by judge's staff (gcy) (Entered: 03/04/2003)

03/03/2003 332 MINUTE ORDER of 3/3/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : motion to The motion for leave towithdraw, filed on 2/26/03 is granted and Kimball R. Anderson and T. Alexis MacDowallare granted leave to withdraw their appearance and shall be removed from the case servicelist [317−1]. (Entered Order on Motion for Leave to Withdraw). Notices mailed by judge'sstaff. (las) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/04/2003 322 OBJECTIONS by plaintiff to defendant's proposed jury instructions; Notice (rmm)(Entered: 03/06/2003)

03/10/2003 333 MINUTE ORDER of 3/10/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : It is ordered that the defendant'ssupplementalmotion in limine to exclude plaintiff's expert's testimony concerning mattersraised in section II of her report is denied [300−1]. (Entered Memorandum and Order).Notices mailed by judge's staff. (las) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/11/2003 343 MINUTE ORDER of 3/11/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion Doc.[234−1] for reconsideration of the Court's "Scope of the Charge" and timeliness rulings isdenied as being a repetition of filing 239, which was denied by my order of 7/19/02, filing270. (Entered Memorandum and Order) Mailed notice by judge's staff (eav) (Entered:03/18/2003)

03/12/2003 323 MOTION by defendant in limine to bar EEOC's newly identified expert witness ; Notice(las) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 324 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude evidence of newspaper article regarding AuroraMoose Lodge incident ; Notice (las) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 325 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude EEOC's determination letter ; Notice (las)(Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 326 MOTION by plaintiff to exclude in limine policies and training materials not limited tosexual harrassment and/or distributed by Dial Corp (Attachments); Notice (las) (Entered:03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 327 MOTION by plaintiff in limine to bar evidence of any human resource−related actions orefforts of Dial Corp (las) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 328 MOTION by plaintiff in limine to exclude class members releases (Attachments) (las)(Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 329 MOTION by plaintiff in limine to exclude evidence pursuant to Rule 412 (las) (Entered:03/13/2003)



















03/12/2003 330 MOTION by plaintiff in limine to bar evidence or argument regarding the charge ofdiscrimination underlying this litigation (las) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 331 MOTION by plaintiff in limine to bar testimony of Dial's expert Barbara Gutek(Attachments) (las) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 334 MOTION by defendant to admit evidence pursuant to Rule 412 of the Federal Rules ofEvidence ; Memorandum in support (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 335 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude evidence regarding the claims of a formermanager at Dial's Omaha Plant (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 336 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude witnesses form testifying about allegations forwhich they have no personal knowledge (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 337 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude evidence regarding unreported acts of coworkersexual harassment (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 338 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude evidence of sexually explicit materials neverseen by class members during their employment (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered:03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 339 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude EEOC form informing the Jury about theidentity or number of class members (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 340 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude evidence of disciplinary records unrelated toallegations of sexual harassment .(RESTRICTED) (yp) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/12/2003 341 MOTION by defendant for reconsideration of the court's denial of its motion in limine toexclude evidence of alleged harassment before 1991 and, alternatively, to exclude evidencethat is not relevant background evidence (RESTRICTED). (yp) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

03/14/2003 342 OBJECTIONS by defendant Dial Corp to plaintiff's proposed jury instructions; Notice.(vmj) (Entered: 03/17/2003)

03/18/2003 344 MOTION by defendant for reconsideration of the court's denial of its motion in limine toexclude evidence of alleged harassment before 1991 , and, alternatively, to exclude evidencethat is not relevant backround evidence (Attachments); Notice (cdy) (Entered: 03/19/2003)

03/18/2003 345 MOTION by defendant The Dial Corporation in limine to exclude EEOC from informingthe jury about the identity or number of class members (cdy) (Entered: 03/19/2003)

03/18/2003 346 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude evidence of disciplinary records unrelated toallegations of sexual harassment (cdy) (Entered: 03/19/2003)

03/18/2003 347 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude evidence regarding unreported acts of coworkersexual harassment (cdy) (Entered: 03/19/2003)

03/18/2003 348 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude evidence regarding the claims of a formermanager at Dail's Omaha Plant (cdy) (Entered: 03/19/2003)

03/18/2003 349 MOTION by defendant in limine to exclude witnesses from testifying about allegations forwhich they have no personal knowledge (cdy) (Entered: 03/19/2003)

03/18/2003 350 MOTION by defendant Dial Corp in limine to exclude evidence of sexually explicitmaterials never seen by class members during their employment (Attachments). (ntf)(Entered: 03/20/2003)

03/21/2003 351 MEMORANDUM by defendant in opposition to EEOC's motion in limine to exclude classmembers releases [328−1]; Notice. (fce) (Entered: 03/24/2003)

03/21/2003 352 MEMORANDUM by defendant in opposition to EEOC's motion in limine to bar evidenceor argument regarding the charge of discrimination underlying this litigation [330−1]. (fce)(Entered: 03/24/2003)

03/21/2003 353 MEMORANDUM by defendant in opposition to EEOC's motion in limine to excludeevidence pursuant to Rule 412 [329−1]. (fce) (Entered: 03/24/2003)

03/21/2003 354 MEMORANDUM by defendant in opposition to EEOC's motion in limine to bar testimonyof Dial's expert Barbara Gutek [331−1] (Attachments). (fce) Modified on 03/24/2003(Entered: 03/24/2003)
















03/21/2003 355 MEMORANDUM by defendant in opposition to EEOC's motion in limine to bar evidenceof any human resource−related actions or efforts of Dial Corp [327−1] (Attachments);Notice. (fce) (Entered: 03/24/2003)

03/21/2003 356 MEMORANDUM by defendant Dial Corp in opposition to EEOC's motion to excludepolicies and training materials not limited to sexual harrassment and/or distributed by DialCorp [326−1] (Attachments) (eav) (Entered: 03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 357 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion in limine to exclude EEOC from askingwitnesses to offer opinion testimony on the ultimate issue for the jury; Notice of filing (eav)(Entered: 03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 358 RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence ofdisciplinary records unrelated to allegations of sexual harassment [347−1] (eav) (Entered:03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 359 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to Dial's motion in limine to exclude newlyidentified certified Public Accountant (eav) (Entered: 03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 360 RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to Dial's motion in limine to exclude EEOC's determinationletter (eav) (Entered: 03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 361 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to Dial's motion in limine to excludesexually explicit materials [350−1] (eav) (Entered: 03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 362 RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to Dial's motion in limine to exclude evidence of newspaperarticle regarding Aurora Moose Lodge incident [324−1] (Attachments) (eav) (Entered:03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 363 RESPONSE by plaintiff EEOC to defendant's motion for reconsideration of the court'sdenial of Dials motion in limine to exclude evidence of alleged harassment before 1991 or[344−1], alternatively to exclude evidence that is not relevant backround evidence [344−2](eav) (Entered: 03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 364 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence regardingunreported acts of coworker sexual harassment [347−1] (RESTRICTED). (ntf) (Entered:03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 365 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion in limine to exclude witnesses fromtestifying about allegations for which they have no personal knowledge [349−1](RESTRICTED). (ntf) (Entered: 03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 366 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion in limine to admit evidence pursuant to Rule412 [329−1] (RESTRICTED). (ntf) (Entered: 03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 367 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion in limine to exclude EEOC form informingthe Jury about the identity or number of class members [339−1] (RESTRICTED). (ntf)(Entered: 03/25/2003)

03/24/2003 368 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence regarding theclaims of a former manager at Dail's Omaha Plant [348−1]; Notice (RESTRICTED). (ntf)(Entered: 03/25/2003)

03/25/2003 369 JOINT MOTION by parties to modify filing date for deposition designation submissions ;Notice. (cem) (Entered: 03/27/2003)

03/26/2003 370 MINUTE ORDER of 3/26/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Joint motion to modify filingdate for deposition designation is granted [369−1]. (Entered Order on Joint Motion toModify Filing Date for Deposition Designation Submission) Notice mailed by judge's staff(ntf) Modified on 03/31/2003 (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/27/2003 383 REPLY by defendant in support of its motion in limine to bar EEOC's newly identifiedexpert witness [323−1]; Notice. (fce) (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/27/2003 384 REPLY by defendant in support of its motion in limine to exclude EEOC's determinationletter [325−1]. (fce) (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/27/2003 385 REPLY by defendant in support of its motion in limine to exclude EEOC from askingwitnesses to offer opinion testimony on the ultimate issue for the jury. (fce) (Entered:03/31/2003)
















03/27/2003 386 REPLY brief by defendant in support of its motion for reconsideration of the court's denialof its motion in limine to exclude evidence of alleged harassment before 1991 [344−1], and,alternatively, to exclude evidence that is not relevant backround evidence [344−2]. (fce)(Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/27/2003 387 REPLY by defendant in support of its motion in limine to exclude evidence regarding theclaims of a former manager at Dial's Omaha Plant [348−1] (RESTRICTED). (fce) (Entered:03/31/2003)

03/27/2003 388 REPLY by defendant in support of its motion in limine to exclude EEOC from informingthe jury about the identity or number of class members [345−1] (RESTRICTED). (fce)(Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 371 REPLY by plaintiff in support of its to motion in limine to bar evidence or argumentregarding the charge of discrimination underlying this litigation [330−1]. (ntf) Modified on03/31/2003 (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 372 REPLY by plaintiff in support of its motion in limine to exclude evidence pursuant to Rule412 [329−1]. (ntf) Modified on 03/31/2003 (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 373 REPLY by plaintiff in support of its motion in limine to bar testimony of Dial's expertBarbara Gutek [331−1]. (ntf) (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 374 REPLY by plaintiff in support of its motion in limine to exclude class members releases[328−1]. (ntf) (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 375 REPLY by plaintiff in support of its motion in limine to bar evidence of any humanresource−related actions or efforts of Dial Corp [327−1] (Attachments). (ntf) Modified on03/31/2003 (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 376 REPLY by plaintiff in support of its motion to exclude in limine policies and trainingmaterials not limited to sexual harrassment and/or distributed by Dial Corp [326−1]; Notice.(ntf) (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 377 REPLY by defendant The Dial Corp. in support of its motion in limine to exclude evidenceof disciplinary records unrelated to allegations of sexual harassment [346−1]; Notice (cdy)(Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 378 REPLY by defendant in support of its motion in limine to exclude evidence of newspaperarticle regarding Aurora Moose Lodge incident [324−1] (cdy) (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 379 REPLY by defendant in support if its motion in limine to exclude evidence regardingunreported acts of coworker sexual harassment [347−1] (cdy) (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 380 REPLY by defendant in support of its motion in limine to exclude witnesses from testifyingabout allegations for which they have no personal knowledge [349−1] (cdy) (Entered:03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 381 REPLY by defendant in support of its motion to admit evidence pursuant to Federal Rule ofEvidence 412 (RESTRICTED) (cdy) (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/28/2003 382 REPLY by defendant in support of its motion in limine to exclude evidence of sexuallyexplicit materials never seen by class members during their employment [350−1](RESTRICTED) (cdy) (Entered: 03/31/2003)

03/31/2003 391 MINUTE ORDER of 3/31/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion in limine tobar EEOC's newly identified expert witness is granted [323−1], to the extend that EEOCmay not present Jerome Lipman as a witness in the plaintiff's case in chief. EnteredMemorandum and Order on Defendant's Motion in Limine to Bar EEOC's Newly IdentifiedExpert Witness. Mailed notice by judge's staff (emd) (Entered: 04/04/2003)

04/01/2003 389 MINUTE ORDER of 4/1/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion in limine toexclude evidence regarding unreported acts of coworker sexual harassment is denied[337−1], [347−1]. Entered Memorandum and Order on Defendant's Motion in Limine toExclude Evidence Regarding Unreported Acts of CoWorker Sexual Harassment. Mailednotice by judge's staff (emd) (Entered: 04/04/2003)

04/01/2003 390 MINUTE ORDER of 4/1/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion in limine toexclude evidence of disciplinary records to allegations of sexual harassment is denied[340−1], [346−1]. Entered Memorandum and Order on Defendant's Motion in Limine to
















Exclude Evidence of Disciplinary Records Unrelated to Allegations of Sexual Harassment.Mailed notice by judge's staff (emd) (Entered: 04/04/2003)

04/01/2003 392 MINUTE ORDER of 4/1/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion in limine toexclude evidence of sexually explicit materials never seen by class members during theiremployment is denied [338−1], [350−1]. Entered Memorandum and Order on Defendant'sMotion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Sexually Explicit Materials Never Seen by ClassMembers During Their Employment. Mailed notice by judge's staff (emd) (Entered:04/04/2003)

04/01/2003 393 MINUTE ORDER of 4/1/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion in limine toexclude EEOC form informing the Jury about the identity or number of class members isgranted with respect to Phase I of the trial [339−1], [345−1]. Entered Memorandum andOrder on Defendant's Motions in Limine to Exclude EEOC from Informing the Jury aboutthe Identity or Number of Class Members. Mailed notice by judge's staff (emd) (Entered:04/04/2003)

04/01/2003 394 MINUTE ORDER of 4/1/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion in limine toexclude evidence regarding the claims of a former manager at Dial's Omaha Plant is granted[335−1], [348−1]. Entered Memorandum and Order on Defendant's Motion in Limine toExclude Evidence Regarding the Claims of a Former Manager at Dial's Omaha Plant.Mailed notice by judge's staff (emd) (Entered: 04/04/2003)

04/01/2003 395 MINUTE ORDER of 4/1/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion in limine toexclude witnesses form testifying about allegations for which they have no personalknowledge is denied [336−1], [349−1]. Entered Memorandum Opinion Order onDefendant's Motion in Limine To Exclude Witnesses From Testifying About AllegationsFor Which They Have No Personal Knowledge. Mailed notice by judge's staff (emd)Modified on 04/04/2003 (Entered: 04/04/2003)

04/01/2003 397 MINUTE ORDER of 4/1/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: Defendant's motion in limine toexclude EEOC's determination letter is denied [325−1]. (Entered Memorandum and Orderon defendant's motion in limine to exclude EEOC's determination letter.) Notices mailed byjudge's staff (rmm) (Entered: 04/08/2003)

04/01/2003 398 MINUTE ORDER of 4/1/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion to excludeevidence of newspaper article regarding Aurora Moose Lodge incident is granted [324−1].(Entered Memorandum and Order on defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence ofnewspaper article regarding Aurora Moose Lodge incident.) Notices mailed by judge's staff(rmm) (Entered: 04/08/2003)

04/02/2003 396 MINUTE ORDER of 4/2/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion forreconsideration of the court's denial of its motion in limine to exclude evidence of allegedharassment before 1991 and, alternatively, to exclude evidence that is not relevantbackground evidence is granted in part and denied in part [341−1], [344−1], [344−2].Entered Memorandum and Order on Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court'sdenial of its Motion in Limine to exclude evidence of alleged harassment before 1991 and,alternatively, to exclude evidence that is not relevant background evidence. Mailed notice(emd) Modified on 04/04/2003 (Entered: 04/04/2003)

04/07/2003 SCHEDULE set on 4/3/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Pretrial conference held. No notice(sct) (Entered: 04/07/2003)

04/10/2003 399 MOTION by defendant for reconsideration of this court's 2/14/03 ruling regardingbifurcated trial procedures ; Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice (rmm)(Entered: 04/11/2003)

04/10/2003 400 OBJECTIONS by EEOC to Dial's deposition designations with counter−designations(Attachments); Notice (rmm) (Entered: 04/11/2003)

04/10/2003 400 COUNTER−DESIGNATIONS by EEOC with objections (Attachments); Notice (rmm)(Entered: 04/11/2003)

04/10/2003 401 MINUTE ORDER of 4/10/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : EEOC's motion to exclude inlimine policies and training materials not limited to sexual harrassment and/or distributed byDial Corp is denied [326−1]. (Entered Memorandum and Order on EEOC's Motion ToExclude In Limine Policies And Training Materials Not Limited To Sexual HarassmentAnd/Or Distributed By Dial Corp.) Mailed notice by judge's staff (lc) (Entered: 04/15/2003)












04/11/2003 402 MINUTE ORDER of 4/11/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff is given to 04/18/03 torespond to defendant's motion for reconsideration of this Court's 2/14/03 ruling regardingbifurcated trial procedures [399−1]/ and the defendant may reply on or before 4/23/03.(Entered Briefing Schedule.) Mailed notice by judge's staff (lc) (Entered: 04/15/2003)

04/14/2003 403 DEPOSITION of Kimberly Branch−Woolfolk taken on the following date(s): 03/01/00;Notice. (lc) (Entered: 04/15/2003)

04/14/2003 404 OBJECTIONS by defendant to plaintiff's deposition counterdesignation (RESTRICTED)(lc) (Entered: 04/15/2003)

04/14/2003 405 OBJECTIONS by defendant to plaintiff's deposition designations with Counterdesignations(RESTRICTED) (lc) (Entered: 04/15/2003)

04/14/2003 405 COUNTERDESIGNATIONS by defendant to plaintiff's deposition designation withObjections (RESTRICTED). (lc) (Entered: 04/15/2003)

04/15/2003 407 MINUTE ORDER of 4/15/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The defendant's motion in limineto exclude EEOC from asking Witnesses to offer opinion testimony on the ultimate issue forthe jury, is granted, to the extend that law witnesses shall not be permitted to expressopinions of whether particular conduct met the witness' definition of sexual harassment, orto define sexual harassment, but to the extent that the motion seeks to prevent managers ofthe Dial Corp. from testifying to their understanding of sexual harassment for the purpose ofshowing what they understood to be their responsibilities under Dial's policies, the motion isdenied. (Entered Memornadum and Order) Mailed notice by judge's staff (eav) (Entered:04/18/2003)

04/16/2003 408 MINUTE ORDER of 4/16/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : The opinions expressed in Dr.Gutek's report concerning the Sexual Experiences questionnaire may be received intoevidence to rebut the testimony of Dr. Fitzgerald to the extent that Dr. Fitzgerald's testimonybased upon research that employed the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire. The EEOC'smotion in limine to bar testimony of Dial's expert Barbara Gutek is otherwise granted[331−1]. Entered Memorandum and Order. Mailed notice by judge's staff (jmp) (Entered:04/21/2003)

04/16/2003 410 MINUTE ORDER of 4/16/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: EEOC's motion in limine to barevidence of any human resource−related actions or efforts of Dial Corp is denied [327−1].(Entered Order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

04/17/2003 406 MOTION by defendant Dial Corp to amend the parties' final pretrial order ; Notice of filing(eav) (Entered: 04/18/2003)

04/17/2003 411 MINUTE ORDER of 4/17/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: The order on defendant'sobjections to the court's First Version of preliminary jury instruction reflects, I belief, theeffect of the plaintiff's objections to defendant's proposed jury instructions. Insofar aschanges have been made in the Second Revised Version of preliminary instructions−PhaseI, the plaintiff's objections are denied. (Entered Order on Plaintiff's Objections toDefendant's Porposed Jury Instructions) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered:04/22/2003)

04/18/2003 409 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to Dial's motion for reconsideration of Court's02/14/03 order regarding trial procedures for punitive damages; Notice. (jmp) (Entered:04/21/2003)

04/18/2003 412 RESPONSE by plaintiff to defendant's objections and plaintiff's objections to the court'sfirst revised version of preliminary jury instructions; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

04/18/2003 413 MINUTE ORDER of 4/18/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: EEOC's motion in limine toexclude class members releases, asking that Phase I and II not be permitted to revealtestimony or exhibits which relate to releases by EEOC's class members, is granted [328−1].(Entered Order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

04/18/2003 414 MINUTE ORDER of 4/18/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: Defendant's motion in limine toexclude EEOC from informing the jury about the identity or number of class members,filing 339 and 345, is granted with respect to Phase II of the trial. (Entered Order). Noticesmailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 04/22/2003)












04/18/2003 417 MOTION by plaintiff for modification of the court's 4/2/03 order excluding pre−1986evidence of harassment and the court's 9/17/02 order on defendant's motion in limine toexclude evidence of alleged harassment before 1994, or alternatively, before 1991 .(RESTRICTED) (cem) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

04/18/2003 418 MINUTE ORDER of 4/18/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : (Entered Order on Defendant'sProposed Jury Instructions). Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf) (Entered: 04/25/2003)

04/21/2003 415 REPLY brief by defendant in support of its motion for reconsideration of this court's2/13/03 ruling regarding bifurcated trial procedures [399−1]. (vmj) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

04/21/2003 416 FIRST revised verion of preliminary instructions. (vmj) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

04/21/2003 419 MINUTE ORDER of 4/21/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Plaintiff's motion in limine to barevidence or argument regarding the charge of discrimination underlying this litigation[330−1] is granted. (Entered Memorandum and Order on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to BarEvidence or Argument Regarding the Change of Discrimination Underlying this Litigation).Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf) (Entered: 04/25/2003)

04/21/2003 420 MINUTE ORDER of 4/21/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: (Entered Order on Defendant'sand Plaintiff's Objections to the Court's First Revised Version of Preliminary JuryInstructions). Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf) (Entered: 04/25/2003)

04/22/2003 421 MINUTE ORDER of 4/22/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion forreconsideration of this court's 2/14/03 ruling bifurcated trial procedures [399−1] is denied.The trial shall be conducted essentially in the manner set out in the foregoing memorandum,subject to alterations that may come to be needed. (Memorandum and Order on Defendant'sMotion for Reconsideration of this Court's 02/14/03 Ruling Regarding Bifurcated TrialProcedures) Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf) (Entered: 04/25/2003)

04/22/2003 422 MINUTE ORDER of 4/22/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Defendant's motion to admitevidence pursuant to Rule 412 of the Federal Rules of Evidence [334−1], and EEOC'smotion to exclude evidence pursuant to Rule 412 [329−1] are denied in part and held inabeyance until a hearing can be held as required by Rule 412(c)(2). (Entered Memorandumand Order on Defendant's Motion to Admit Evidence Pursuant to Rule 412 of Federal Rulesof Evidence) Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf) (Entered: 04/25/2003)

04/22/2003 423 MINUTE ORDER of 4/22/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : EEOC's motion in limine toexclude evidence pursuant to Rule 412 is denied [329−1]. (Memorandum and Order onEEOC'S Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Pursuant to Rule 412) Notice mailed byjudge's staff (ntf) (Entered: 04/25/2003)

04/22/2003 432 SECOND REVISED version of preliminary instructions−Phase I. (yp) (Entered:06/25/2003)

04/23/2003 424 FINAL PRE−TRIAL ORDER (Attachments). (ntf) (Entered: 04/25/2003)

04/24/2003 425 ADDITIONAL deposition designations for unavailable witnesses by plaintiff EEOC;Notice, (vmj) (Entered: 04/29/2003)

04/25/2003 427 MINUTE ORDER of 4/25/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: Enter Memorandum and Order ondefendant's objections to plaintiff's deposition designations: The defendant's objections tothe plaintiff's deposition designations are sustained in part as set forth in the memorandumaccompanying this order. (Entered Memorandum and Order On Defendant's Objections toPlaintiff's Deposition Designations.) Notice mailed by judge's staff (air) (Entered:05/07/2003)

04/28/2003 426 MINUTE ORDER of 4/28/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: Trial reset for 04/29/03 at 9:00a.m. Parties are assessed jury costs in the total amount of $1,550.00 for 31 unused jurors on04/28/03. Parties to make said payment to the Clerk, U.S. District Court. Telephoned notice(cdy) (Entered: 04/29/2003)

04/29/2003 428 MINUTE ORDER of 4/29/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Joint motion for entry of consentdecree is granted. Enter Consent Decree. All pending motions are moot. [406−1] [417−1]Are scheduled events are also moot. (Entered Consent Decree) terminating case Mailednotice (hp) (Entered: 05/09/2003)

04/29/2003 429 JOINT MOTION by parties for entry of consent decree (hp) (Entered: 05/09/2003)

















05/22/2003 430 NOTIFICATION by defendant of Dial's consent decree monitor appointee; Notice. (air)(Entered: 05/23/2003)

05/28/2003 431 NOTIFICATION of the parties' appointment of the consent decree monitor chairperson;Notice. (gcy) (Entered: 05/29/2003)

09/18/2003 433 NOMINATION by plaintiff for appointment of Special Master Robin Potter pursuant toconsent decree; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 09/19/2003)

09/22/2003 434 MINUTE ORDER of 9/22/03 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Robin Potter is appointedSpecial Master pursuant to the Consent Decree entered on 04/09/03. (Entered Approval ofNomination for Appointment of Special Master.) Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 09/25/2003)

12/03/2003 435 WITHDRAWAL by plaintiff of appearance of attorney Noelle C. Brennan ; Notice (hp)(Entered: 12/05/2003)

01/08/2004 436 FINAL settlement distribution list and copies of signed release by plaintiff; Notice.(RESTRICTED) (emd) (Entered: 01/09/2004)

01/26/2004 437 MINUTE ORDER of 1/26/04 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom : Enter order that the allocation ofthe settlement fund as set forth in the Final Settlement Distribution List, filed 01/08/04, isapproved. (Entered Order on Plaintiff EEOC's Motion for the Court's Approval of theAllocation of Settlement Fund Among Eligible Claimants.) Notices mailed by judge's staff(hp) (Entered: 01/30/2004)

02/13/2004 438 MOTION by plaintiff withdrawal of appearance of John A. Knight ; Notice (hp) (Entered:02/17/2004)

05/26/2004 439 ONE−YEAR REPORT by the consent decree monitors to the parties and the Court byattorneys George F. Galland, Jr. Reginald E. Jones, Nancy B. Kreiter; Notice. (hp) (Entered:05/27/2004)

09/10/2004 440 MINUTE ORDER of 9/10/04 by Hon. Warren K. Urbom: Plaintiffs' motions to withdrawthe appearances of Noelle C. Brennan and John A. Knight are granted [435−1] and [438−1].(Entered Order) Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) (Entered: 09/14/2004)

05/24/2005 441 SECOND−YEAR REPORT by George F. Galland, Jr., Reginald E. Jones, Nancy B. Kreiteras to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Dial Corporation; Notice of filing. (hp, )(Entered: 05/31/2005)

10/27/2005 442 Final Report of the Consent Decree Monitors to the parties and the Court (Galland, George)Modified on 10/28/2005 (rbf, ). (Entered: 10/27/2005)

07/29/2008 443 MINUTE entry before the Honorable James F. Holderman:The parties in this case are givento August 12, 2008 to remove all documents filed under seal with the Clerk of Court. Partiesare to contact the Clerk of Court with respect to instructions on how to retrieve saiddocuments. The Clerk of Court is given authority to destroy all under seal documents in hispossession if they are not retrieved by the close of business August 12, 2008.Mailed notice(sct, ) (Entered: 07/29/2008)

08/01/2008 444 ACKNOWLEDGMENT by Dial Corporation of Receipt of SealedDocuments:122,128,132,143,147,162,168,169,190,191,192,206,233,234,235,236,254,255,256, 245,257,292,334,335,336,337,338,339,340,341,387,388,381,382,404,405. (ep, )(Entered: 08/04/2008)

08/27/2008 SEALED/RESTRICTED documents149,125,126,127,121,120,119,150,148,146,142,165,417,364,365,366,367,368,161,160,156,155,164,436 176(2Vols)destroyed per court order dated 7/29/08. (dlc, ) Modified on6/19/2009 (dlc, ). (Entered: 05/26/2009)













