Top Banner
33

Lecture 3

Jan 14, 2016

Download

Documents

kesia

Lecture 3. Ionisation techniques Gas Phase Ionisation Techniques : Chemical Ionisation. At the end of this lecture you should be able:. To explain how chemical ionisation works To instruct a MS operator about the type of chemical ionisation reagent gas required for your experiment. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Lecture 3
Page 2: Lecture 3

Lecture 3

Ionisation techniques

Gas Phase Ionisation Techniques :Chemical Ionisation

Page 3: Lecture 3

At the end of this lecture you should be able:

• To explain how chemical ionisation works

• To instruct a MS operator about the type of chemical ionisation reagent gas required for your experiment

Page 4: Lecture 3

Ionisation Techniques: Overview

Gas-Phase Methods• Electron Impact (EI)• Chemical Ionization (CI)Desorption Methods• Secondary Ion MS (SIMS) and Liquid SIMS• Fast Atom Bombardment (FAB)• Laser Desorption/Ionization (LDI)• Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI)

Spray Methods• Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization (APCI)• Electrospray (ESI)

Page 5: Lecture 3

EI: electron ionisation: recap• 1st step: sample must be in gas phase

• 2nd step: bombarded by electron beam

• Generates high-energy analyte ions, which can fragment

• Analyte ions are always odd-electron

• Advantages: Simple to use, provides library-searchable fingerprint data

• Disadvantages: – Applicable only to volatile (i.e. small) and thermally stable

compounds– Extensive fragmentation, can be difficult to detect molecular

ion

Page 6: Lecture 3

Chemical ionisation• Introduced by Munson and Field 1966• Ion source similar to that for EI• Suitable for small, volatile molecules• Higher pressures: ca. 1 Torr for ionisation, 10-4 Torr for

injection into mass analyser• Generates less energetic, more stable ions• CI yields even-electron ions: more stable• Mainly molecular ion• Simple spectra – But: fragmentation not straightforward• Good for mixtures and quantitation• Routinely used in gas chromatography (GC-MS)

Page 7: Lecture 3

Chemical ionisation - details• Step 1: “Reagent gas” R, present in large excess (10 to

100 fold higher partial pressure) over analyte, is ionised (leading to R+●) at 0.1-1 Torr by electron beam of 200-500 eV e.g.: CH4 → CH4

+● → CH3+, CH2

+●

• Step 2: Stable reagent ions are generated via ion-molecule interaction e.g.: CH4

+● + CH4 → CH5+ + CH3

CH3+ + CH4 → C2H5

+ + H2

CH2+● + CH4 → C2H3

+ + H2 + H●

C2H3 + CH4 → C3H5+ + H2

• Step 3: Ion-molecule interactions generate [M+H]+ of analyte (see next slide)

Page 8: Lecture 3

Mechanisms of chemical ionisation:Ion-molecule interactions between

reagent gas and analyte• Most important: Proton transfer

– Reagent gases generate Brønsted acids, e.g. CH5

+, C2H5+, H3

+

– Gas-phase acid-base reactions, e.g.:M + C2H5

+ → MH+ + C2H4

• Other mechanisms:

– Adduct formation: M + C2H5+ → [M+C2H5]+

– Anion abstraction: M + C2H5+ → [M-H]+ + C2H6

Page 9: Lecture 3

Selective fragmentation after proton transfer

• Parent ion, e.g. MH+, can fragment• Extent of fragmentation is proportional to transferred energy during

ion-molecule interaction• Transferred energy depends on exothermicity of reaction• Exothermicity is function of proton affinities (PA) of reagent gas (R)

and analyte (M)

R + H+ → [R+H]+ PA(R) = -H (of this reaction)

M + H+ → [M+H]+ PA(M) = -H (of this reaction)

M + [R+H]+ → [M+H]+ + R

H0 = – [PA(M) – PA(R)]

• Exothermic (H0<0) if PA(M)>PA(R)

Page 10: Lecture 3

Proton affinities of common reagent gases (kJ/mole)

• Methane, CH4 423• Ammonia, NH3 854• Iso-butane, (CH3)3CH 819• Ethane 601• Water 697• Methanol 761• Hydrogen 423• Acetone 823• Methylamine 882

Page 11: Lecture 3

Example: selective fragmentation

81

95109

123

137

CH4

100 200

214 M+NH4+

197

137

NH3

197 MH+

137

8195

109123

Iso-butane

Lavanduyl acetate (MW 196)PA = 840 kJ/mole

137

O

HO+

PA=423 kJ/mole

PA=819 kJ/mole

PA=854 kJ/mole

Page 12: Lecture 3

Other modes of CI

• Charge-Exchange Chemical Ionisation: with toluene, benzene, NO, CS2, COS, Xe, CO2, CO, N2, Ar, He as reagent gas:– M + X+● → M+● + X (creates radical cations)

– Can use mixtures to generate both kinds of ions (conventional CI and CE-CI)

• Negative CI: electron capture

Page 13: Lecture 3

Self-assessment questions

• Q1 Describe chemical ionisation mass spectrometry. How does it work, what is the nature of the reagent gas, what function(s) does the gas serve, and what type of mass spectra are generated from the analyte species ?

• Q2 Compare and contrast EI and CI

• Q3 Explain why EI and CI are not applicable to large non-volatile samples.

• Q4 Explain how the choice of reagent gas (eg NH3 or CH4) affects the appearance of the mass spectra in chemical ionisation with respect to ionisation by proton transfer.

Page 14: Lecture 3

Lecture 4

Condensed phase ionisation techniques (1):

Desorption methods

Page 15: Lecture 3

At the end of this lecture you should be able to:

• describe the differences and similarities of SIMS, LSIMS and FAB

• explain how laser desorption works • describe MALDI and preparation of samples

Page 16: Lecture 3

Condensed phase ionisation techniques (1): solid state samples

• Field desorption (FD)• Plasma desorption (PD)• Secondary-ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS)• Fast Atom Bombardment (FAB)• Laser Desorption/Ionisation (LDI)• MALDI

Page 17: Lecture 3

Field ionisation/field desorption• Developed in 1969 by Beckey• No primary beam to bombard sample• Field ionisation: Volatile samples brought into gas phase e.g.

by heating• Field desorption: Non-volatile sample is applied to “whiskers”

which are grown on thin metallic wire filament (“emitter”)

• FD: Suitable for non-volatile and thermally labile samples, e.g. peptides, sugars, polymers, organometallics, carbohydrates

Page 18: Lecture 3

Field ionisation/ field desorption• Ionisation is induced by

high electric field gradient (108 V/cm)

• Distorts electron cloud around atoms and facilitates electron tunnelling from sample molecules to emitter electrode

• Yields M+● , then [M+H]+

• Hardly any fragmentation

+ -

8 keV

emittercathode

+

++

+

+

+

- +

++

+

+

+

-+

++

+

+

+emitter to cathode

M adsorbed on emitter electron tunnels M+● is desorbed

Page 19: Lecture 3

Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS)• Mainly for surface analysis• Beam of Ar+ (or Xe+) ions with energy of 5-15 keV

bombards solid surface• Secondary ions from surface are sputtered• Used for:

– Mass analysis– Chemical composition of material

• Drawback: Rapid damage to surface: rapid decrease in signal

http://www.whoi.edu/science/GG/people/acohen/research/hurricanes_slide9.html

Page 20: Lecture 3

Variations of SIMS:Fast atom bombardment (FAB)

and Liquid SIMS• FAB: Developed in 1980 by Barber et al.• Improved version of SIMS• Sample is dissolved in inert liquid matrix • Common Matrix: Glycerol (amongst others). Protects

sample from destruction and helps ionisation and desorption

• FAB: Bombardment with high-energy ATOMS (e.g. Xe)• LSIMS: Similar, but bombardment with IONS (e.g. Cs+

at 25-40 keV) instead of ATOMS• Mass limits: 7 kDa standard, 24 kDa possible• Often used in conjunction with magnetic sector mass

analysers

Page 21: Lecture 3

FAB schematic

probe

Atom gun

Slow Xe0

Fast Xeo

Extraction and focusing

Sample ion beam

Sample

1. Ionisation slow Xe+

2. Acceleration of Xe+ ions3. Neutralisation by collision and charge exchange with slow atoms: Xe+(fast) + Xe(slow)→ Xe(fast) + Xe+(slow)

[M+H]+

Primary beam

Page 22: Lecture 3

Laser Desorption/Ionisation (LDI)

• Solid sample• Laser beam with UV, Vis, or

IR wavelength• Sample required to absorb

at laser wavelength• Applied in surface and

cluster analysis• Drawbacks:

– Difficult to control– Thermal degradation– No or low molecular ion– Only useful for < 1kDa

++

+

+

Laser beam

Desorbed ions and neutral species

Page 23: Lecture 3

Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionisation (MALDI)

• Nobel Prize in 2002 • Soft ionisation technique• Generates low-energy ions• Lasers: UV or IR• Most frequently combined with

TOF mass analyser• Can work for

up to 1 MDa

+

Matrix molecules

Analyte molecule/ion

Laser beam

Page 24: Lecture 3

Analyte ionisation in MALDI

• Step 1: Laser beam generates reactive/ excited matrix ionic species

• Matrix ions can be protonated, deprotonated, sodiated, or

radical cations • Step 2: In-plume ion-molecule charge transfer reactions

between matrix ions and neutral analyte molecules• Reactions: Proton transfer,

cation transfer, electrontransfer, electron capture

+

Plume:Ions and molecule in gas phase

Page 25: Lecture 3

MALDI – sample preparation

• Sample/matrix mix (1:10,000 molar excess) in volatile solvent

• Requires only pico- to femtomoles of analyte• Matrices: Solid organic, liquid organic, ionic liquids,

inorganic materials

80x magnification of dried sample/matrix drop on target

Sample target

Drying

Page 26: Lecture 3

Instrumentation

Most common combination: MALDI-TOF Instrument: MALDI generates pulses of ions, TOF works with pulses of ions

Insertion of target into instrument

Page 27: Lecture 3

OHCN

COOH

OH

OH COOH

OH

MeO

OMe

COOH

Most common: Organic solids, e.g.:

MALDI matrices

3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (sinapinic acid; C11H12O5)

-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (4-HCCA; C10H7O3N)

2,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid (gentisic acid; C7H6O4)

Page 28: Lecture 3

MALDI matrix

• absorbs photon energy and transfers it to analyte• minimises aggregation between analyte molecules

• Matrix must – Absorb strongly at Laser wavelength – Have low sublimation temperature– Have good mixing and solvent compatibility

with analyte– Have ability to participate in photochemical

reaction

Page 29: Lecture 3

Absorbance

Wavelength (nm)

matrix

analyte

Common lasers; N2 (337 nm), ArF excimer (193), Nd-YAG frequency tripled (355 nm) and quadrupled (266 nm)

Matrices and analytes: desired photochemical characteristics

Laser

200 500

Page 30: Lecture 3

Applications:Mass determination of intact proteins

www.membrane.unsw.edu.au/alumni/robert.htm

• MALDI-TOF spectrum of a protein mixture• Predominantly M+ ions (singly charged)

Page 31: Lecture 3

Applications: Molecular weight distribution of polymers

www.arkat-usa.org/?VIEW=MANUSCRIPT&MSID=869

poly(dimethyl)siloxane 2.25 kD

Page 32: Lecture 3

Summary - MALDI

Disadvantages

• MALDI matrix cluster ions obscure low m/z (<600) range

• Analyte must have very low vapor pressure

• Pulsed nature of source limits compatibility with many mass analyzers

• Coupling MALDI with chromatography is very difficult

• Analytes that absorb laser light can be problematic

Advantages

• Relatively gentle ionization technique

• Very high MW species can be ionized

• Molecule need not be volatile• Very easy to get femtomole

sensitivity• Usually 1-3 charge states, even for

very high MW species• Positive or negative ions from

same spot

Page 33: Lecture 3

Self-assessment questions

• Q1 Describe SIMS, LSIMS and FAB• Q2 In FAB, how is the fast atom beam produced and why is a

fast atom beam used instead of the ion beam for the production of the secondary ions?

• Q3 How does Laser Desorption/Ionisation work? • Q4 Why is LDI not being used with high molecular weight

molecules?• Q5 Describe MALDI and sample preparation for MALDI• Q6 Explain why time-of-flight is suitable for mass detection in

MALDI. Given the choice between a sector instrument and a TOF instrument, which one would you use to detect MALDI produced ions of 100 kDa and why ?