8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
1/22
Lecture 12
Conflicts and cultural differences
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
2/22
The nature of conflict
Definition: A conflict appears when people with differing needs or
goals are preventedor perceive that they are being preventedby
others in achieving these needs or goals
Realistic group conflict theory: source of inter-group conflict is struggle
over (limited) structural resources, not personal characteristics
Social identity theory: conflict between groups is seen to be the result
of perceived identities
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
3/22
Conflict and (cultural) groups
Ting-Toomey (1999):
(cross-cultural) conflict involves:
(cultural) groups protecting their own self-image
intercultural perceptions coloured by ethnocentrism andstereotypes
not just the situation but also communicative behaviours, which are
profoundly shaped by the way individuals in a culture
conceptualize the sense of self
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
4/22
Concept of self-construal
How people perceive themselves
Ting-Toomey distinguishes between
Those with anindependent sense of selfwelcome communication in
the conflict process, if both parties are open: this may bring tangible,
creative solutions Those with an interdependent sense of selfsee conflict as negative
and unproductive, particularly if the other party is assertive/not
properly address relational feelings
Independent self-concepts found more often in individualist cultures;
interdependent self-concepts more prevalent in collectivistic cultures
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
5/22
A model of conflict styles
A persons conflict style: patterned responses or clusters of behavior
that people use in conflict
Thomas and Kilmann model (1974) based on two factors in a persons
conflict style: assertiveness:the degree to which a person is concerned with his
or her own interests
cooperativeness: the degree to which a person is concerned with
the interests of others
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
6/22
Two-dimensional taxonomy of conflict handling modesSource:Thomas and Kilman (1974), p. 11 (adapted)
Conflict handling modes
Concern for
self
Assert iveness
H
I
G
H
Competing
Collaborating
Compromising
L
O
W
Avoiding Accommodating
LOW HIGH
Concern for other
Co-operativeness
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
7/22
A model for intercultural conflict management :
Why the need?
Can such a dual concern model handle the increasing complexity of
modern-day disputes?
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
8/22
Relationship
Leung, K. et al.(2002) propose the introduction of harmonyinto the
model: concerns itself with the relationshipbetween the self and the
other
Harmony: focus on using a conflict-free relationship to achieve a goal
Reason to include this aspect is made in the light of their investigation
into conflict avoidance which is:
a feature common in East Asia, and one associated with collectivistic
cultures
can cause equal harm in a more subtle manner: replacing genuine
problem-solving with superficial harmony
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
9/22
Emotions
Kumar (2004) uses the individualist/collectivist cultural dimension. He
distinguishes between:
Ego-focused emotions such as anger, pride and guilt, linked to thenon-fulfilment of individual goals
Other-focused emotions such as shame, anxiety and fear, relatedto the (in-)ability to promote the interdependent self
Individualist, ego-focused emotions can cause individuals to try harder
to reach their goals
Collectivist, other-focused emotions can cause individuals to repair the
damage done to relations
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
10/22
Emotions
In negotiation conflict:
those with negative ego-focused feelings will put pressure on theiropponents to make concessions
those experiencing other-focused may adjust their expectations to
get an agreement Emotions could drive them even further apart, with one side
attempting to force a resolution and the other withdrawing from any
interaction
Emotions can exacerbate the in-group/out-group distinction and
make any resolution of the conflict even more difficult
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
11/22
Intercultural approach to conflict
Ting-Toomey et al.(2000) advocate the inclusion of emotional
expression in Thomas-Kilmanns model to account for the many
subtleties in conflict management
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
12/22
An eight-style conflict grid: An intercultural approachSource:Ting-Toomey and Oetzel (2002), p. 160
Intercultural approach to conflict
Obliging
Dominating
Neglect
(Passive-
Aggressive)
Integrating
Emotional
expression
Third-PartyHelp
Compromising
Avoiding
Other face concern
HIGHLOW
L
O
W
H
I
G
H
S
e
l
f
-
f
a
c
e
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
Responses that side-step
conflict and cause
indirect reaction from
the other party
Use an outsider who is
acceptable to both sides
to act as mediator
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
13/22
Emotional expression: A study
Adam et al (2010):
How the emotions of anger affect negotiations across cultures,
particularly between Europeans/Americans and (American) Asians
Showing anger produced larger concessions from European/American
negotiators but smaller concessions from Asian and Asian Americannegotiators
Adam, H., Shirako, A. and Maddux, W.W. (2010) Cultural variance in the interpersonal effects of anger
in negotiations, Psychological Science, 21, 882-889
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
14/22
Mediation
In Asia-Pacific: the mediator deals with concerns of group as a whole;legitimacy rests on
their social status within the group
their knowledge of traditions, personal characteristics
In West: the mediators task is tightly focused: authority defined more interms of their expertise and experience
The mediator can:
reframe the content and process issues of both parties
transform the whole conflict in terms of the attitudes and behaviour
of those involved
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
15/22
Management of conflict
The way conflicts are addressed can vary considerably from culture toculture. These differences relate to:
the degree to which disagreement is acceptable and therefore the
extent to which conflict is tolerated
the strategies to be adopted when dealing with conflicts
when the manager needs to intervene and the way s/he intervenes
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
16/22
Tinsley (1998):
Japanese managers: status power model where conflict are
resolved by higher authority
German managers: regulations model where conflict are resolved
using pre-existing procedures or rules
US managers: interest model where conflicts are resolved by
resolving underlying concerns of the other party to make it
worthwhile to reach an agreement
Management of conflict
Tinsley, C (1998) Models of conflict resolution in Japanese, German and American cultures,
Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 316-323
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
17/22
Mindfulness
Ting-Toomey (1999) suggests that skills to do with mindfulness can
enhance conflict management:
mindful reframing
translate (non-)verbal messages from the context of the others
cultural viewpoint re-set priorities after mindfully observing and listening to the
viewpoints and expectations of their opponents
collaborative dialogue
grasp the cultural and personal elements involved
get the others to talk about expectations, face issues
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
18/22
Examples
Managing conflict in the Asia-Pacific region
Malaysia (Mansor, 1998)
Thailand (Roongrengsuke & Chansuthus, 1998)
Korea (Cho & Park, 1998)
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
19/22
Managing conflict in Malaysia
Core values: durability of personal relations, even if a strong
divergence of opinion results in conflict
concern for face : across all ethnic groups
concern for others: generosity, respect, honesty and sincerity, beingupright and caring
respect for seniority: in some conflicts a third person, a neutral
senior clarifies key issues
subordinates will never confront their superior, will be
uncooperative and eventually resign themselves to the way theirboss behaves
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
20/22
Managing conflict in Thailand
The name Thailand The Land of Smiles reflects the social
harmony in this country. A Thai smiles in pleasant andstress-filled
situations
Smile hides feelings in public: self-discipline to maintain status,
prestige and face: concept of jai yen (cool heart) derived fromBuddhism
Individualism quite predominant, but Thais are more relationship-
oriented than results-oriented
Conflict is rarely regarded as either positive or negative: if a conflict
arises, a third party (traditionally a respected elder) is called upon tomediate
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
21/22
Case example: A Grim Silence
A British manager, upset about the continued unauthorised borrowing ofequipment between departments, burst in on a meeting being held by his
Thai subordinates and loudly berated the responsible person in front of
his peers.
Unwilling to dignify the insulting behaviour with a response, the Thaisremained silent, smiling grimly, until the offending manager left.
The incident was followed, however, by a work slowdown and a spate of
resignations of key personnel.
8/10/2019 Lecture 12 - Culture Conflict
22/22
Managing conflict in (South) Korea
Korea reflects in a way the differences and similarities between
western and eastern attitudes to conflict
Koreans prefer a non-competitive (or non-dominating) strategy in
face-to-face conflict situation
Prefer to use a superior or authoritarian personality to resolve conflict
Differentiate between in-group and out-group situations: when dealing
with out-groups, strategy is comparable to Western competitive
approach