Top Banner

of 23

Lecture 1-MP

Apr 08, 2018

Download

Documents

Umut Açıkel
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    1/23

    Monopoly

    Lecture 1 - Connan Snider

    Econ 101

    March 28 2011

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    2/23

    Monopoly

    A Monopoly is a single supplier of a market

    How can a monopoly persist in the long run?

    Recall the long run supply in the competitive model Suppose there is one firm in the short run Assume for now that the firm behaves competitively in the

    sense of price taking (well show this isnt the way an actual

    monopolist would behave soon) Industry supply is then just the marginal cost curve of the firm

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    3/23

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    4/23

    Monopoly

    What do we expect to happen in the long run?

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    5/23

    Monopoly

    What do we expect to happen in the long run?

    Other firms see there are positive profits to be had and enterthe market

    New firms will enter until profits are driven to zero,i.e. price =minimum ATC = MC.

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    6/23

    Monopoly

    A Monopoly is a single supplier of a market

    How can a monopoly persist in the long run?

    Barriers to Entry are the source of all monopoly power

    There are two general types of barriers to entry:

    1. Technical barriers

    2. Legal barriers

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    7/23

    Technical Barriers to Entry

    Technical barriers to entry arise because production mayexhibit decreasing marginal and average costs over a widerange of output

    Economies of Scale

    In some industries, large fixed costs mean that the large scaleproducers are the low cost producers

    E.g. A cable company has to make a huge upfront investmentto serve any customers but after the investment is made themarginal cost of an additional customer is small

    This situation is known as Natural Monopoly

    Once monopoly is established entry of new firms is difficult

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    8/23

    Technical Barriers to Entry

    Technical barriers can take many forms, the simplest is the

    high fixed cost, low marginal cost as in the cable companyexample

    Another common example: Network externalities in high techindustries

    Why did the Blu-Ray/HD DVD battle have to have a winner? Why did Microsoft have a monopoly on operating systems?

    Network externalities means a product is more valuable to mewhen a lot of other people also buy the product.

    If half of all titles are only on Blu-Ray and half are on HDDVD, I might only be able to get a fraction of the movies Iwant if I dont buy both types of player.

    Other examples of technical barriers to entry?

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    9/23

    Legal Barriers to Entry

    Often monopolies are created as a matter of law Patents and copyrights assign a monopoly for a (long) period

    of time to the discoverer/creator of a product

    Governments may want to limit competition and thus award afirm an exclusive franchise to serve a market: toll roads?

    Examples?

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    10/23

    Monopoly Pricing

    In either case, a firm is choosing output to maximize profits:

    (q) = R(q) C(q) = qP(q) C(q) (1)

    The optimal output is found from the first order condition:

    d

    dq=

    dR

    dq

    dC

    dq= 0 (2)

    MR(q) = qP(q) + P(q) = MC(q) (3)

    In the competitive case P(q) = 0 (i.e. the inverse demand

    curve is flat) so P= MC(q), but for the monopolist P

    (q) < 0

    P(q) is the revenue a monopolist earns from selling to themarginal customer, qP(q) is the amount the monopolist loseson the inframarginal customers from lowering price to attract

    the marginal customer

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    11/23

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    12/23

    The Inverse Elasticity Rule

    A firms markup- The gap between its price and marginalcost- is inversely related to the price elasticity of demandfacing the firm.

    PMC

    P=

    1

    eQ,P(4)

    or

    P =

    MC

    1 + 1/eQ,P (5) Exercise: Derive this relationship using the definition of

    elasticity and the condition for firm optimization

    The more sensitive consumers are to price, the less themonopolist will choose to mark up above cost.

    The condition implies firm will never choose output on theinelastic part of the demand curve since

    eQ,P < 1 PMC> P MC< 0

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    13/23

    Example: Linear Demand and Constant AC-MC

    Assume:

    P(Q) = a bQ (6)

    C(Q) = cQ (7)

    Then

    TR = PQ= aQ bQ2 (8)

    MR = a 2bQ (9)

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    14/23

    Example: Linear Demand and Constant AC-MC

    Profit maximization requires:

    MR= a 2bQ = c= MC (10)

    Or

    Q =

    a c

    2b (11)

    Plugging back into the inverse demand function

    P = a bQ (12)

    = a (a

    c)2

    (13)

    =a + c

    2(14)

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    15/23

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    16/23

    Example: Constant Elasticity Demand and ConstantMarginal Cost

    Suppose demand is given by: Q= aPe

    eQ,P =dQ

    dP

    P

    Q(15)

    = aePe1P

    Q(16)

    = e (17)

    We could solve this directly by solving the profit maximizationproblem of a monopolist or we could use the inverse elasticityrule.

    E l C El i i D d d C

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    17/23

    Example: Constant Elasticity Demand and ConstantMarginal Cost

    From the markup equation we derived earlier we know:

    P =MC

    1 + 1/eQ,P(18)

    SoP = e

    e+ 1c (19)

    Plugging into the demand equation

    Q

    = a ee+ 1c

    e

    (20)

    Exercise: Verify this by solving the monopolists problem(hint: use the same tricks as you do in deriving the markup

    relationship)

    I M l G d B d?

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    18/23

    Is Monopoly Good or Bad?

    U.S. Antitrust laws (and competition laws in other countries)are designed to keep firms from scheming themselves into amonopoly

    Monopoly is bad?

    Intellectual property laws grant monopolies to inventors andartists

    Monopoly is good?

    What is going on here?

    I M l G d B d?

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    19/23

    Is Monopoly Good or Bad?

    U.S. Antitrust laws (and competition laws in other countries)

    are designed to keep firms from scheming themselves into amonopoly Monopoly is bad?

    Intellectual property laws grant monopolies to inventors and

    artists Monopoly is good?

    Balancing static versus dynamic considerations:

    Monopolies distort market allocations away from the efficientallocations if we think only about the world right now, i.e.prices are too high today

    The promise of future monopoly profits give incentive toinvest, e.g. Im not going to sit in my lab/studio for 16 hours aday unless I can get rich

    M l d ( t ti ) R All ti

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    20/23

    Monopoly and (static) Resource Allocation

    Compare a monopoly to a benchmark perfectly competitiveeconomy

    Assume firms have identical constant cost technology so thelong run supply curve in the perfectly competitive world isinfinitely elastic with price equal to both marginal and averagecost

    Later we will think about dynamic incentives

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    21/23

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    22/23

  • 8/7/2019 Lecture 1-MP

    23/23