1.0 INTRODUCTION In the study of leadership, the influence of leadership is crucial in determining successful of the organization. Leaders can influence and efficiency leads an organization towards excellence. Therefore, an organization such as schools, the influence of principal leadership and efficiency is important in determining a school’s success under his leadership. A leaders who have different personalities and various honor usually lead effectively. (Kirkpatrick and Locke, 1991). The role of principals in dealing with various problems involving either employees under his leadership, the community in or walk around the school, or business at the top affect school performance. Therefore the school is said to be the institution where the level of implementation policies, education and innovation policies play an important role. Any policy or educational innovation implemented at the school level effects on teachers behavior. Such circumstances and constraints put pressure on the job determinant of teacher effectiveness. Despite all this tension is said to occur in many commercial and industrial areas but other areas such as education could not escape from it. Leadership processes in schools today requires a paradigm shift from principals to teachers even it cannot be implemented in a short time. (Nathan, 2001). Almost the same principals position with middle managers under pressure from many parties. They also act as shock absorbers in the system education requirements as a result of 1
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In the study of leadership, the influence of leadership is crucial in determining successful of
the organization. Leaders can influence and efficiency leads an organization towards
excellence. Therefore, an organization such as schools, the influence of principal leadership
and efficiency is important in determining a school’s success under his leadership. A leaders
who have different personalities and various honor usually lead effectively. (Kirkpatrick and
Locke, 1991). The role of principals in dealing with various problems involving either
employees under his leadership, the community in or walk around the school, or business at
the top affect school performance.
Therefore the school is said to be the institution where the level of implementation
policies, education and innovation policies play an important role. Any policy or educational
innovation implemented at the school level effects on teachers behavior. Such circumstances
and constraints put pressure on the job determinant of teacher effectiveness. Despite all
this tension is said to occur in many commercial and industrial areas but other areas such
as education could not escape from it. Leadership processes in schools today requires a
paradigm shift from principals to teachers even it cannot be implemented in a short time.
(Nathan, 2001).
Almost the same principals position with middle managers under pressure from
many parties. They also act as shock absorbers in the system education requirements as a
result of opposition from all levels (Moser 1974). Principals considered as the heart of a
school where the event leadership patterns can give satisfaction to all its employees
consisting of teachers and non teachers will be creating a work environment fun and
indirectly the performance of teachers and staff will be increased.
1
2.0 DEFINITION AND CONCEPT
Leadership has some of definition that can be used to describe this words based on someone’s
understanding. According to Kamus Dewan (1989), leaderships can be defined as someone’s
ability in order to being a leader. While, Certo (1997) had described leadership as one process
of directing someone’s behavior to ensure the main objective has fulfill completely. Directing
means individual will take some action according to certain way or something like policy,
organization and work’s description. Kamus Dewan (2004), mention that leadership is the
ability to lead.
As there are so many definitions of leaderships that can be acceptable, so in generally
there is one definition that easy to understand by anyone. Leadership referred to the process
of influence people or some organization to achieve one same goal that had been decided.
Leaderships were connected to the leaders. Leaders can be differentiate by the type their
belongings. Based on Haris and Muijs (2005), there are two concept that build up the
characteristic of teacher leadership which is roles and responsibilities and cooperation. There
are many types of leaders which is democracy, Laissez-faire, and autocratic. These 3 types of
leaders always had been practice by individual to manage their organization (Abdul Ghani
Abdullah, 2009). In addition, there are some leaders that manage organization by following
the orientation of work or orientation of people. These types of leaders usually practice by big
organization.
The different types of leader bring to the different results. A leader’s personality is
one of the important factors in leadership. (Stodgill, 1948) People or leaders that choose
autocratic leadership will force their followers to do something that they want without
consider their follower’s needed. This autocratic leader does not concern to the follower’s
feeling, so all the leaders that using this type of leadership will be hated by their workers.
Many of workers will doing their work based on motivation of fear. They were doing their
work just because the feeling of fear to their leaders. They does not want to be punished or
fired by their employer if they doing something wrong. This situation will gives them
pressure to work and there are no friendly environments in this workplace. If the workers are
feeling bad and tension with this situation, it will effect to their performance of works and it
will caused to the unproductive result.
While democratic leaders referred to employer that taking decision or some action
after he or she had been discussed with their workers. That means, all of them are playing the
important function and doing some work together without any different between the
2
employer and workers. The workers will be motivated to do their work as they feel that the
company had given appreciation to them. The Laissez-faire leaders will give freedoms or
power to the workers so that they can take any actions or decision as they want. This type of
leaders will cause many problems as the employers did not participate to handle their
workers. This will bring a big trouble in the workplace. In conclusion, the best type of leader
is democratic and it should be practice by all leaders or employer so that the goal can be
achieved.
Meanwhile, organization had been defined as one group of people ( two or more ),
which formally joined in a partnership to achieve the purpose that already set. Organizations
have a connected to the leadership as both will decide the achievement they want. If the
organizations want to fulfill their objective, they must have a good leadership to conduct this
part of organization. Example of organization is education system in Malaysia. We will
describe the organization of the school to give more understanding.
Organizations of school includes all aspects like the ideals of the school, standard of
education, social usefulness of the school, discipline and control and the system of work in
the office. Almost all of the school had been practiced the types of democracy leadership. In a
democratic system, the school organization serves as a means of achieving the ideals of
democratic thought. In this system, each individual is taught that he has to develop himself
and do his duty to the society.
There are 3 elements that have been regarded as an importance in the organization of
the school. First, organization must have the planning and outlining of each activity in the
school. Second, the organization should implement the plan on the basic of the outline that
had been given. Lastly, an assessment of the results of the implemented plan. These elements
will determine either the organization had achieved their objectives or not. This is also
regarding to the problems that may occurred to the organization.
The problem likes the number of children in schools that has been increased also
gives many works to the school organization. The school needs to arrange the numerous co-
curricular activities and new subjects in the syllabus. At this time, the good organization will
take effort. In an ideal school organization, the child should be provided with an environment
which is in accordance with his abilities. It is necessary to have a good organization and
leadership to encourage the success. In a democracy school in Malaysia, management is not
controlled by one person or a chosen few. It requires the co-operation of teachers and the
public. This co-operation is the basis of school management.
3
In conclusion, the organization and leadership has relationship between each other.
Without effective leadership, the organization will not come out with the success.
3.0 LEADERSHIP STYLE
Leadership style can be the best way in creating an excellent student, both in curriculum and
curriculum. The methods how a leader is going to lead also known as leadership
style. (Smith, 1989 in Mahawa binti Pilus’s article). The selection of the leadership styles by
principals and teachers need to be match with their personalities and situation
nowadays. Leadership style should be selected base on strengths in certain aspects. It is
important so that the governance and organization of a school can be implemented
smoothly. Way of thinking, attitudes and behaviour of a person is defined as a style of
leadership. (Ainon, 2005 in Tinah Bt Naim’s thesis). A leader must also set a good example
to those who led.
According to Leithwood, Tomlinson and Genge (1997), in Abdul Ghani Abdullah’s
article, transformational leadership style give a positive impact on job satisfaction,
commitment to the organization and performance of teachers. Diversity of leadership styles
on display will be able to produce different school organizations. Leaders wisdom in
choosing the leadership of the relevant rules will established a close relationship with the
community led. This thing will be able to create a good learning environment and organized
in the school.
Through the leadership styles shown, we will be able to recognize the character of
the person. As a leader, he should be practicing wise leadership style chosen. It is important
to maintain a good relationship between subordinates. In one class, the teacher should wisely
choose the appropriate leadership style to adopt. This is so because each student has a
different character, by the leadership style should be shown also different. Generally, there
are various types of leadership styles that can be practiced. However, typically only three
type of leadership that always has been used which is autocratic, democratic and laisser-faire.
These three styles of leadership have different advantages and disadvantages. Any mistaken
in choosing leadership style will give a bad impact on school organization and the student.
3.1 Autocratic leadership
According to the Kamus Dewan (2005), the word autocracy itself bring the meaning of
constitutes the rule by the person or persons with full powers. This means the leader has full
4
authority in determining the organizational of a school. All orders made by teachers who
adopt this style should be implemented without the need reason. Not only that, students also
will not have any freedom to decide a matter. This will create a passive interaction between
the school, teachers and students. This leadership style will also lead to a tense school
climate. Community led will start thinking negatively of the individual who led the event of a
decision in the context of school organization that is made is not accurate. This situation can
cause an adverse impact on the reputation and performance of the school.
In addition, if a teachers use this kind of leadership style, it will cause students to
lose interest and enthusiasm for learning. However, from the other aspects, it will be able to
control the situation within a class. For example, when the teachers give punishment to
students who come late to school, then it will influence other students to not repeat the same
thing. This situation would also establish discipline among students. Therefore, it can be
regarded as something positive. Not only that, it is also suitable leadership style practiced in
facing critical situations. In the face of this situation, the decision must be done with a short
time. Therefore, the consent of the other person is not required. For example, in solving
certain cases like criminal case, a quickly action should be taken immediately. However, this
style is not usually liked by everyone and it is also deemed to be dangerous in an organization
that is led.
3.2 Democratic leadership
This type of leadership style shows the attitude of teachers as leaders who encourage their
students to involve actively in the learning process. Students will be given the opportunity to
voice their ideas or suggestions during the process of teaching and learning. In addition,
teachers who adopt this leadership will be more open and the view conveyed by the students
received positively. This style of practicing teachers will lead students to feel that they are
valued and trusted. Therefore, the governance of the organization of schools will be able to
run smoothly. In addition, teachers also play an active role in giving their views and ideas
when planning an activity.
Leadership also requires that the leaders which is principal to share power with other
teachers. This mean that all teachers have their right to give any opinion before a decision is
reached. Such attitude of teachers was also very conscious of common interest instead of self
interest. Problem that exists in the school organization be resolved with cooperation of all
teachers. This situation can create a conducive learning environment where students will feel
5
comfortable and satisfied with the leadership shown by the leaders. In addition, the close
relationship between teacher and student can also be created through this kind of leadership
style. When a love feeling occur for a job, he or she will feel satisfied when doing that job.
(Razali Mat Zin, 1999). This mean that, when a student love their teacher, they will show a
positive attitude.
In facing student behavior issues such as involved in gangsters, drugs, etc., action
from all teachers is needed to resolve this matter. A leader which is principals would have to
speak with other teachers to find effective solutions to overcome this situation. Therefore,
any mistaken in making decision can be avoided. Teachers can also let their students to
actively participate during the learning process is conducted through question and answer
session. This thing not only will make students to understand in a topic but it also will
improve their performance in academics. According to Marzono (2003) in Kirsten Miller’s
article, the actions of a person in the classroom will bring multiple outcomes in student
achievement than school regulations on curriculum, assessment of cooperation between
teachers and the involvement of many communities. Democratic leadership styles can also
produce students who are patient and tolerant. Therefore, students' behaviour can be
controlled and discipline problem can be decreased.
3.3 Laissez-fair
The next style is the style of leadership is Laissez-fair style. In this style, the nature of one's
leadership will not be noticed. In class, the students were given full freedom to make
decisions. This kind of teacher does not take any part in the planning of an activity. A teacher
who practices this kind of leadership is said that they give a little contribution and did not
show any initiative to the activities in class. (Abdul Ghani Abdullah and Abdul. Rahman
Abd. Aziz, 2009). Behaviors exhibited by the student will not be evaluated by teachers who
adopt this style.
This style will give a poor impact toward student’s academic performance. Among
them is that it limits the communication between students and teachers. Sometimes, things
will cause students to be afraid and no interest to ask teacher any problems. As such, they
will choose to remain silent. Therefore, a free communication such as gossiping and talking
nuisance which is out of the learning contexts will happen because of lack of regulation. This
thing would create problems related to discipline problem. This situation will definitely affect
the teaching and learning process. Academic climate in the classroom and effective teaching
6
is a discipline in classroom because it can prevent students from involve with discipline
problem. (Burden, 2003). This style will certainly give negatively impact the learning
process.
In some cases, this kind of leadership style that applied in students is said can build
up their creativity especially in academic aspect. However, this type of leadership style is not
appropriate for students in primary and secondary schools. This is so because the thinking
level of student is still low and requires a lot of guidance and support from teachers in the
learning process. At the university level, this leadership style may be trying to use to
encourage student to think creatively in all aspect.
3.4 The differences of three leadership style
The three styles of leadership exhibited by the teacher will produce students who are
different. In autocratic leadership, the students will tend to show two types of response which
is to be aggressive and attitude 'why not'. Students will work hard in front of autocratic
teacher, although this job rate will decline rapidly after the teacher out of class. These
students are also highly dependent on the teacher and always want attention.
This is contrary to the instruction given by the teacher of democracy. Attitude shown
by the students is that they will continue to work even if the teacher was out of class. Attitude
of cooperation and tolerance practices are observed among these students. For students who
receive a teacher with laissez-faire leadership, they will ask questions and seek more
information from the teacher. After the teacher out of class, students found that the work hard
rate is high, compared with autocratic and democratic leadership.
Overall, the leadership style played by teachers significantly influences the learning
process. As a competent teacher, they must be smart and creative in choose the style to be
adopted. Ubben and Hughes (1992) in Ariffin Bin Che Yahya’s thesis said that effective and
excellent schools have a creative leader .The environment and character of students is an
important element in determining the selection of the ideal leadership style. So that, student
will be able to adopt with the leadership style shown by teacher. After that, their study
performance will become better.
4.0 SCHOOL ORGANIZATION
7
School is social organizations which have common features as a social organization. As a
social organization, the school has specific goals to be achieved, the structure of the task and
interpersonal interaction between members of the organization. In Malaysia, the school's aims
are to promote, improve, enhance and ensure teaching and learning activities of students in
the smooth running and able to meet the needs of the community. The goal was to ensure
students acquire the knowledge and all the necessary skills to enable them to face the
challenges of life after school. In addition, the school also aims to create unity among
students of various ethnic groups in Malaysian society to ensure the existence of a united,
democratic, liberal and dynamic.
Task structure refers to the various levels of the organization of the upper level,
intermediate level and lower level. Upper level consists of a row of administrators who work
in directing the organization through planned management strategy plan. Intermediate level
refers to those who monitor the implementation of management strategies, while the lower
level is the implementation of the strategy set.
At school level, the administrative structure consists of a principal, three Senior
Assistant Teacher, four senior subject teachers, subject teachers, some support staff, general
staff and pupils. Principals are at the highest level and have full or absolute power to direct all
teachers, support staff and pupils. Position of other members including teachers, support staff
and general workers are based on the responsibilities distributed according to the
qualifications, experience and specialization, respectively. Outline the rights and position of
their power, thus determining the duties and responsibilities that must be implemented.
In addition, there are other elements that affect interpersonal interaction, behavior
and the role of principals as school managers. Among the elements are like skills, knowledge
and experience. The principals who have the knowledge and experience will be more
confident in managing the school. The experiences that they get will make them to be more
creative in solving any kind of problem. The new principals are feeling less confident and
may make mistakes in dealing with the same crisis. Personality differences influence the
creativity of the principal as a manager. In addition, it can also affect the behavior of the
principal as a manager. High expectations of teachers and students the ability to give
confidence and motivation to the entire school community to achieve something better, while
the low expectations which in turn will produce the output.
The structure of an important task is to ensure that all school staff knows the duties,
responsibilities and authorities respectively. The structure also facilitates the principal task of
8
moving the organization to achieve its goals and objectives of the school management. Figure
1 shows the structure of a schools organization management in Malaysia
Figure 1: The Structure of an Organization's Management in Schools
Source: Obtained from http://images.vertex42.com/ExcelTemplates/orgcharts/school-
organizational-chart.gif at 9 March 2012
There are two existing interpersonal interaction in school organizations. There are
two dimensions that influence the interaction and behavior of individuals in an organization.
Dimension and the dimension are called namotetik idiographic. Namotetik dimensions
determine the roles and expectations that enable organizational goals achieved, while
idiographic is determined by the individual in the organization, such as personality and its
own needs (Chaube, S.P. et al., 1995).
Trust and understanding of the principals of the task also determine the behavior and
their role in discharging their duties. Principals believe that school is an educational
institution and understand her duty is to enhance students' learning process will serve as
instructional managers. School today is a shrinking organization in a larger organization, but
at the same time educational organizations play a more important role to ensure that he is not