Top Banner
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015
27

Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Dec 24, 2015

Download

Documents

Carol Lang
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Leader & Teacher SLTs

2014 – 2015

Page 2: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Component Evaluation for Teachers Evaluation for School Leaders

Setting Goals Teachers set two SLTs in collaboration with evaluator

Leaders set two SLTs in collaboration with evaluator

Focusing on Practice Uses NIET / TAP Rubric to help prioritize instructional activities that will increase student outcomes and identify teacher strengths and areas for development

Uses three domains that help prioritize leadership activities that will increase student outcomes and identify leaders strengths and areas for development

Formal Feedback Cycles Minimum two observations Minimum two site visits

Evaluation Measures Weighted 50% Professional Practice and 50% Student Outcomes

Weighted 50% Professional Practice and 50% Student Outcomes

Final Evaluations Based on five-point scale to be entered into CODE (converted to four point scale)

Based on four-point scale to be entered into HCIS

The Teacher and Leader Evaluations work together to increase educator effectiveness and student outcomes.

Page 3: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Goals for school leaders should set a vision for what students should be able to

accomplish by the year’s end.

Goals for school leaders should:

• Tie into your district-wide goals• Drive a leader’s daily work• Align to teachers’ goals• Help students be college and

career ready

Page 4: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

District Goals• Increase the percentage of students scoring proficient on iLEAP/LEAP to 63%

(grades 3 – 8).• Decrease the percentage of students in grades 1 – 3 who are intensive on Dibels

to 10%.• Increase the percentage of students scoring Good or Excellent on EOC tests to

58%.• Increase the percentage of students scoring 18 or higher on the ACT to 50%.• Increase the opportunities for Middle School Students to earn a minimum of 3

Carnegie Units• Measure of Professional Practice: NIET Rubric- Increase the consistency of

scoring of Teacher Evaluations across the district• SLT’s: Increase the rigor and consistency of Leader and Teacher SLT’s across the

district aligned to resources that will improve student mastery• Measure of Student Outcomes: Student Growth Measures-Increase the

performance of students across the district

Page 5: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

LEADER SLTS

Page 6: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

General Format for SLTs

_____% of students will score ________

(however proficient is defined: Basic or above, Good or Excellent, 80% or higher, etc.)

____% of students who scored below proficient will improve one achievement level.

(however achievement levels are defined)

Page 7: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Grades K-2 schools (examples for C school):

• Option 1:– One based on percentage of students who score Basic

or above on the End of Year District Benchmark Test in ELA.• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test

in ELA, 69% of the students will score Basic or above.

– One based on percentage of students who score Basic or above on the End of Year District Benchmark Test in mathematics.• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test

in mathematics, 56% of the students will score Basic or above.

Page 8: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Grades K-2 schools (examples for C school):

• Option 2:– One based on percentage of students who score Basic or

above on the End of Year District Benchmark Test in ELA and mathematics.• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in ELA

and mathematics, 63% of the students will score Basic or above.

– One based on percentage of students who were below Basic on Test 1 who increase their percent correct by 25% or more on the District Benchmark Test 3 in ELA and mathematics.• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Tests in ELA

and mathematics, 50% of the students who were below Basic will increase their percentage correct by 25% or more from Benchmark Test 1 to Test 3.

Page 9: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Options for Assistants in K-2

• Divide goals by grade and/or subject• One could have all ELA and the other all math• One could have all of one or two grades (both ELA and

math)

• Divide by whole school goal and intervention goal (50% or more).

• Divide the whole school goal with one on ELA and the other on math• Divide the intervention goal with one on ELA and the

other on math.

Page 10: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Grades 3-8 schools (examples for C school):

• Option 1:– One based on percentage of students who score Basic or

above on the ELA and math District Benchmark Test.• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in

ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.

– One based on percentage of students who score Basic or above on the Science and Social Studies Leap or iLeap test. • Example: On the Spring 2014 Leap and/or iLeap tests in

science and social studies, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.

Page 11: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Grades 3-8 schools (examples for C school):

• Option 2:– One based on percentage of students who score Basic or above

on the ELA and math District Benchmark Test and the Science and Social Studies Leap/iLeap.• Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test in ELA and

math and the Spring 2014 Leap/iLeap tests in science and social studies, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.

– One based on percentage of students below Basic who improve one achievement level on the district benchmark test or Leap/iLeap test from the previous year. • Example: On the End of the Year District Benchmark Tests in ELA and

mathematics and the Leap/iLeap in social studies and science 50% or more of the students who were below Basic will move up one achievement level from their previous year’s level.

Page 12: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Options for Assistants in 3-8

• Divide goals by grade and/or subject• One could have all ELA and social studies and the other

all math and science.• One could have all of one or two grades (all subjects)

• Divide by whole school goal and intervention goal (50% or more).

• Divide the whole school goal with one on ELA and social studies and the other on math and science. • Divide the intervention goal with one on ELA and social

studies and the other on math and science.

Page 13: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grades K-5 in ELA and math, 61% of the students will score Basic or above.

Principal

On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grades 3-5 in ELA and math, 60% of the students will score Basic or above.

On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grades K-2 in ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.

Assistant 1 Assistant 2

5th Grade Teacher

On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grade 5 in ELA and math, 63% of the students will score Basic or above.

Kindergarten Teacher

On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for Kindergarten in ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.

1st Grade Teacher

On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grade 1 in ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.

2nd Grade Teacher

On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grade 2 in ELA and math, 62% of the students will score Basic or above.

3rd Grade Teacher

On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grade 3 in ELA and math, 57% of the students will score Basic or above.

4th Grade Teacher

On the End of the Year District Benchmark Test for grade 4 in ELA and math, 60% of the students will score Basic or above.

Example

Page 14: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Grades 9-12 Schools(examples for C Schools)

– One must be based on percentage of students scoring Good or Excellent on all of the EOC tested subjects.• Example: On the Spring 2014 EOC tests, 53% of the

students will score good or excellent. – One must be based on having a certain percentage

of Seniors score 18 or higher on the ACT by April 2014.• Example: By April of 2014 53% of seniors will have a

score of 18 or higher on the ACT.

Page 15: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

9-12 Options for Assistants

• Goals around the 4 parts of the SPS– Graduation index

• AP, IB, IBC, dual enrollment, etc. – Graduation rate

• On track graduation rate, credit recovery, etc. – EOC

• Could be divided by subject clusters (use rates for each subject from the charts)

– ACT• Could be divided by component scores• Could focus on improvement from Explore, Plan, and ACT

(progress points – should use 30% or more for goal)

Page 16: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

School Leaders and Teachers will set their Student Learning Target Goals using District created charts based on previous year’s data (when available)

See charts on upcoming slides.

Page 17: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Guidance for Setting SLTs in Grades K-2

% Scoring Basic of Above

ELA K 1st 2ndA Schools 89 89 89B Schools 79 79 79C Schools* 69 69 69D Schools 59 59 59

% Scoring Basic of Above

Math K 1st 2ndA Schools 76 76 76B Schools 66 66 66

C Schools* 56 56 56D Schools 46 46 46

* District AverageK and 1 are predicted scores. This may change after the results are in.

Guidance for Setting SLTs in Grades Pre-K

% Scoring Average or Above

ELA Pre-KC Schools 80D Schools 70

% Scoring 80% or above

Math Pre-KC Schools 70D Schools 60

Page 18: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Guidance for Setting SLTs in Grades 3 - 8

% Scoring Basic or AboveELA 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th TotalA Schools 76 83 85 87 88 82 83.5B Schools 66 73 75 77 78 72 73.5C Schools* 56 63 65 67 68 62 63.5D Schools 46 53 55 57 58 52 53.5

*District AverageTotal used for school leaders

% Scoring Basic or AboveMath 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th TotalA Schools 78 77 80 84 87 81 81.2B Schools 68 67 70 74 77 71 71.2C Schools* 58 57 60 64 67 61 61.2D Schools 48 47 50 54 57 51 51.2

*District AverageTotal used for school leaders

Page 19: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Guidance for Setting SLTs in Grades 3 - 8

% Scoring Basic or Above

Science 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th TotalA Schools 74 76 81 82 85 80 79.7B Schools 64 66 71 72 75 70 69.7C Schools* 54 56 61 62 65 60 59.7D Schools 44 46 51 52 55 50 49.7

*District AverageTotal used for school leaders

% Scoring Basic or Above

S.S. 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th TotalA Schools 75 78 85 85 92 83 83.0B Schools 65 68 75 75 82 73 73.0C Schools* 55 58 65 65 72 63 63.0D Schools 45 48 55 55 62 53 53.0

*District AverageTotal used for school leaders

Page 20: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Guidance for Setting SLT Goals for Grades 9 - 12

EOC% of Students Scoring Good or Excellent

Algebra I English II GeometryBiology English IIIUS History Total

A Schools 72 85 65 73 69 72 73

B Schools 62 75 55

63 59 62 63C Schools* 52 65 45 53 49 52 53D Schools 42 55 35 43 39 42 43

*District Average*Total would be used for Leaders

District EAGLE Test% of Students Scoring 50% or higher

CivicsWorld Geo. Chemisty Env. Sci.

World History

Phy. Science Physics

A Schools 76 81 64 69 78 71 73

B Schools 66 71 54

59 68 61 63C Schools* 56 61 44 49 58 51 53D Schools 46 51 34 39 48 41 43

*District Average

Page 21: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Guidance for Setting SLT Goals for Grades 9 - 12

District Benchmark Test% of Students Scoring 50% or higher

English I English IV Algebra II Adv. MathA Schools 66 65 68 66

B Schools 56 55 58 56 C Schools* 46 45 48 46*D Schools 36 35 38 36

Advanced Math score is a predicted score based on the other scores. Adjustments can be made.

ACT

% of seniors scoring 18+A Schools 73%B Schools 63%C Schools* 53%D Schools 43%

*District Average

Page 22: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Suggested Scale for other non-tested grades and subjects

Percent of students who score “proficient”• D or F schools: 70%• C schools: 80%• B schools: 90%• A schools: 100%

*based on the idea that A schools are expected to have 100% of their students proficient. Adjustments can be made based on academic and non-academic courses and baseline data. When there are no proficiency levels assigned, proficient will be defined as 80% or higher.

Page 23: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Formula for Achievement Rangeswith 70% as the Goal

Insufficient Attainment is any result below Partial Attainment. (1 point)Below 54%Partial Attainment is a range from 15% below the target to just below

the actual SLT. (2 points)54%-69%START HERE: Full Attainment is a range from the actual SLT up to 15%

above the target. (3 points)70% - 85%Exceptional Attainment is any result above the Full Attainment range.

This range should represent more than a year’s worth of growth. (4 points)

Above 85%

Page 24: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Example Scoring Range with 53% as the goal. (student population 1,200)

less than 37% (455 or less students) score Basic or above.

37% - 52% (456-635 students) score Basic or above

53% - 68% (636-816 students) score Basic or above

69% or more (817 or more students) score Basic or above

-15% from goal +15% from goal

• For goals that are 70% or higher, spilt the difference between Full and Exceptional.

• Include number and percent in goals.

Page 25: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Teacher SLTs• Step 1: The school leader sets goals and provides

guidance to teachers regarding assessments and goals to use.• Goals should be set using district recommended assessments

when available and/or using the same assessments that the leader used to set their goals. •When district or state created assessments are not available or

the leader goals do not include the content of the course (i.e. physical education), goals must be set using the most rigorous and reliable assessments available. • A teacher made test should not be used as the posttest when

other assessments are available (see assessment chart). •When possible, one goal should be for all of the students a

teacher teachers and the other goal should focus on moving lower performing students to proficient (Basic or Good).

Page 26: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Student Learning TargetsDue Dates

September 19: Principal Deadline for approval

October 17: Draft due to evaluatorOctober 31: Teacher Deadline for entering into CIS and being approved by evaluator

Page 27: Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – 2015. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.

Resources

District SLT website (C&I Webpage):http://www.tangischools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=17531