Top Banner
LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory
79

LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Jared Riley
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

LAT

Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010

A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and

satisfactory

Page 2: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

2011

Page 3: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

2010

Page 4: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

2011

Page 5: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

2010

Page 6: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

2011

Page 7: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 8: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

2011

Page 9: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 10: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

2011

Page 11: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 12: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

2011

Page 13: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 14: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

2011

Page 15: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 16: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

A2 achievement 2009/2010

• 1030 value added means that every student has at least one grade higher than predicted in one subject

• Chenderit gained 1021 : Top 10%

• All subjects within the tolerance shading.

• AS only one subject outside tolerance shading

Page 17: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

A2 Achievment 2011

• Value added has almost doubled for A2 achievement and for the majority of applied subjects .

• This means that CVA must be above 1021 which we achieved last year

Page 18: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Outstanding :above average VA

• The following subjects have outstanding VA

Page 19: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

2011Biology

Page 20: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Physics

Page 21: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Maths

Page 22: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Further Maths

Page 23: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Business Studies

Page 24: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Geography

Page 25: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

History

Page 26: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Psychology

Page 27: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Sociology

Page 28: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

English

Page 29: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Media

Page 30: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

French

Page 31: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

PE

Page 32: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Health and Social Care

Page 33: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Health and Social Care

Page 34: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

ICT

Page 35: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Good

Page 36: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Drama

Page 37: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Economics

Page 38: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Fine Art

Page 39: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Textiles

Page 40: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Chemistry

Page 41: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Satisfactory

Page 42: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Product Design

Page 43: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Philosophy

Page 44: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

RE

Page 45: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Photography 2011

Page 46: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Outstanding 2010

Page 47: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 48: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 49: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 50: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 51: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 52: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 53: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 54: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 55: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 56: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 57: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 58: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 59: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Good

Page 60: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 61: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 62: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 63: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 64: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 65: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 66: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 67: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 68: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 69: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 70: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 71: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 72: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 73: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.

Satisfactory

Page 74: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 75: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 76: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 77: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 78: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.
Page 79: LAT Comparing overall 2011 performance with 2010 A2 subjects 2011 followed by 2010: separated into outstanding, good and satisfactory.