LaSalle UNITS 1 AND 2 UFSAR, REVISION 22 AND FIRE PROTECTION REPORT (FPR), REVISION 7 THE SECURITY SENSITIVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN REDACTED FROM THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. THIS DOCUMENT PROVIDES THE REDACTED VERSION. THE REDACTED INFORMATION WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT IS INDICATED BY SOLID BLACKEDOUT REGIONS.
71
Embed
LaSalle UNITS 1 AND 2 UFSAR, REVISION 22 AND FIRE … · 2016. 9. 16. · lasalle units 1 and 2 ufsar, revision 22 and fire protection report (fpr), revision 7 the security sensitive
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
LaSalle UNITS 1 AND 2
UFSAR, REVISION 22
AND
FIRE PROTECTION REPORT (FPR), REVISION 7
THE SECURITY SENSITIVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN REDACTED
FROM THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT.
THIS DOCUMENT PROVIDES THE REDACTED VERSION.
THE REDACTED INFORMATION WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT
IS INDICATED BY SOLID BLACKEDOUT REGIONS.
•
•
SCALEo 40 Miles~I5_~;;;;;j.iiiiIb 50 Kilometers~ H
SITEo
.....
•LA SALLE COUNTY STATION
UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-1
LOCATION OF THE SITE WITHINTHE STATE OF ILLINOIS
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
•
•
Township
LA SALLE COUNTY
0. __ 8 16 24
Scale in Miles
¥
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-2
LOCATION OF THE SITE WITH RESPECT TOLA SALLE COUNTY AND BROOKFIELD TOWNSHIP
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
MAJOR STRUCTURES,ANT) Sll'J~ lAYOUT
LASALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANAI...YSIS REJ)O_R_T__~
. FIGURE 2.1 ..3
tr-. .M !fO 1000,.. -9SCAlf II 'rr,
\
I.
•
•
•I..ASALLE COUNTY STATION
UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-4
f:XCLUSION AREA
··v·-[J-·-0-···0···I I
" " " II
Interstate Hi.ghways
U.S. Highways
State Highwoys
County Hi ghways
Railroads
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.1-5
TRANSPORTATION ROUTESIN THE SITE VICINITY
REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
N
s
FIGURE 2.1-6
0-10 MILE INSE T
1970 AND PROJECTED POPULATIONSWITHIN 50 MILES
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
EAST SECTOR1970- 639941980- 691911990- 759642000- 837462010- 923282020-101794
Silty clay or clayey silt ______________________ Silty clay or clayey silt with interspersed sand and gravel, some thin sand and gravel pockets
Ground water occurs predominantly in thin sand and gravel pockets within the glacial drift. Yields are quite variable and typically low, suitable only for domestic and farm purposes. Wells or cisterns that intersect the more permeable zones may exhibit high, short-term yields. The glacial drift aquitard locally overlies the buried bedrock valley aquifers.
Wedron Formation
QU
AR
TE
RN
AR
Y
Pleistocene
Buried Bedrock Valley Aquifers
Sand and gravel, some silt
The buried bedrock valley aquifers consist of sand and gravel deposited in channels cut into the underlying Pennsylvanian strata. Ground water occurs under water table conditions. Where the glaciofluvial deposits are clean and well-sorted, yields of 100 gpm or more can be sustained.
Missourian Modesto Formation Carbondale Formation
Desmoinesian Spoon Formation
PE
NN
SY
LV
AN
IAN
Atokan Abott Formation
Pennsylvanian Aquitard
Principally shale, with some interbedded under-clay, sandstone, lime-stone, and coal
Ground water occurs primarily in thin sandstone beds and occasionally in joints in thin limestone beds. Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions. The high proportion of shales make the Pennsylvanian strata generally unfavorable as aquifers. Yields are low and are suitable only for domestic and farm purposes.
Galena Group Platteville Group
Galena- Platteville dolomites
Dolomite and limestone, locally cherty, sandy at base, shale partings
Champlainian
Ancell Group
Glenwood- St. Peter sandstone
Sandstone, shale at top, little dolomite, locally cherty at base
Prairie du Chien, Eminence, Potosi, and Franconia dolomites
Sandy dolomite, dolomitic sandstone, cherty at top, inter-bedded shale in lower part
Ironton Sandstone Galesville Sandstone
Ironton- Galesville sandstone
Cam
bria
n-O
rdov
icia
n A
quif
er
Sandstone, upper part dolomite
Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions in the sandstones and in joints in the dolomites. Yields are variable and depend upon which units are open to the well. In terms of the total yield of a well penetrating the entire thickness of the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer, the Glenwood-St. Peter sandstone supplies about 15 percent, the Prairie du Chien, Eminence, Potosi, and Franconia dolomites collectively supply about 35 percent, and the Ironton-Galesville sandstone supplies about 50 percent.
Eau Claire Aquitard (upper and middle beds)
Shales, dolomites, and shaly dolomitic sandstone
Insignificant amounts of ground water may occur in joints. These beds act as a confining layer between the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer and the Mt. Simon Aquifer.
Eau Claire Formation
CA
MB
RIA
N
Croixan
Mt. Simon Sandstone
Mt. Simon Aquifer Sandstone
Ground water occurs under leaky artesian conditions. Ground water in this aquifer is too highly mineralized for most purposes. Adequate supplies for municipal and industrial use are more easily obtained from shallower aquifers.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATION NOTE UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS
REPORT 1. Modified from Willman et al., 1975; Hoover and
Schicht, 1967, p. 4; and Csallany, 1966, p. 4 FIGURE 2.4-17
SITE STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS AND THEIR HYDROGEOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS
5 0 5 10••1::11-11::1*'-=====::1.__iii'Scole in Miles
ContDur interval is 50 feet.
Ground water within the area of diversion flowstoward pumping centers aloug the Illinois River.
Elevation of Illinois River at Marseilles Damis 483.25 feet MSL.
2.
3. Datum is mean sea level.
5.
4.
NOTESJ. Modified from Hoover and Schichf,1967,p.l6, Figure 24.
LEGEND__ 450 _ Potentiometric surface contour,
Cambrian - Ordovician Aquifer, Fall, 1963.
_ ______.. Boundary of area of diversion due toground water withdrawals.
T38N
T39N
T37N
1 T32N
I T36N
I R 5EI R4EI R2E I R3EI R IEI RH E
I ~
LA SALLE /Sit~\ !i/~ /
I \K500
1 '---I R2W T --R-'-W- I -R-'-E- -I R 2 E r-R-3-E-"&--- I R 5 E
I RfOEI R9E---..r--
I RaE
BUREAU450 -_---r""I
T21N I
I R8E
T22N I
Tt8N
TI7N
Tl6N
T20N J
TI9N
T'5N
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-18
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THECAMBRJAN-ORDOVICIAN AQUIFER, FALL 1963
REV~ 0 - APRIL 1984
5 0 5 10• •• ,J
Scate in Miles
~
Datum is mean sea level.
Elevation of Illinois River at Marseilles DamIs 483.25 feet MSL.
Contour Intervol Is 5Of••t.
Ground water east of the ground water
divide flows to the 80St - southeast toward(or98 cones of depressIon developed In thegreater metropolifan region around Ch!cogo;west of the divide J ground water flows to thesouth,and locally to the north, toward pumping
centers located along the Illinois River.
Modified from Sosman et 01. f 1973)p.21, Figure 10.
I R8 E IRE I R ICE I RilE I R I E I R 2 E I R3 E I R4 E I R 5 E
T22N ILEE - - ~vr-"J_ - - --
T21N
Tj5N
T16N
Tl7N
Tl9N
T20N I
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-19
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THECAMBRIAN-OROOVICIAN AQUIFER, OCTOBER 1971
REV. 0 - APRIL !IN
'. i H ',11
LEGEND.' Domestic water well
:-beep well installed for La SalleCounty Station
• CoteQory ( 5 tructure
o Coolin~ toke.-- ... - Property line
NOTES
I. Domestic wen dato are presented inTo bl e 2.4 - t 5 according to well num-bars.
2. Base maps modified from USGS15 minute series (topographic) t
Odell Quadrangle, Illinois, 1958, and
USGS 7.5- minute series (topographic),
Marseilles Quodran9te, tllinois, 1970.
3. Data for the water wells installed for
La SoUe County Station are presented
tn Tobte 2.4- II •
4. Contour interval is 10 feet.
1000 0 1000 2000.-. ' 1
Scale in Fetf
LA SALLE COUNTY STATfONJPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-20
DOMESTIC WELL INVENTORY, INCLUDINGLSCS WATER WELLS
R,EV ~ 0 .- AJ?l~,IIJ
•, ,
'I
--~
c ,'._
....:-.....~
\.1
«.\~;'" <;....
40-12
F, ~~'~c_
l ... - ~
~)
~~ -~
"tS--·;6'0
\ "
...... '~--"':::"'<'-
//' t.'_:~_~~_~:_:~~~;-"'-;
,
"~""
"\
• i'~Z!-O-OlH.[:
n1"1 /._, ,
-;//
NOTES ?O{X) 0--=-~~-=-
Scolo In ...,
2000
•.. Ptezometer instolled May 28, 1970
thr_ October 30, 1973.
• Observation weB, instoUed DecemberJ 1974.
----Property line
~ Category I Structure
CooII09 Ioke
l. Dates of piezometer installation andfrequency of measurement are gil/enin Table 2.4 - 16.
2. Dotes of water level measurement oreshown in TabJe 2.4-17 .
3. Water level fluctuations in se lectedpiezometers are shown in Figure 2.4-22'}addft ianel unplatted pj ezometer dataare pr e s en ted in Table 2.4 - 18,
4 - W0 t er Ieve Iffuc tua t10nsin, theobservation wells are shown InFigure 2.4-23~
~), Contour interva I is 10 feet.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
I. Locations of observation weJls are shown in Figure 2.4-21.
2. Surface elevations of the observation wells are given inTable 2.4 -17.
3. Observation weJls were installed during December 1 1974.The average depth is 25 ft.; granular backfill was placedaround the lower 8 ft. of each obser/offon well. All ob-servation wells are installed in the glacial drift oquitordi
1975
4. Dates of woter JIve' rneosuremenfs are shownin Table 2.4-17; potentiometric Jevels are in-ferred between dof.1 of mealuremen t,
5. Precipitation doto wlr. recorded at the MarseillesLock, 41°2'-N., 88°4e'W.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-23DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONSOF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS
I.. Locations of observation wefts are shown in Figure 2 .. 4-21.
2. Surface elevations of the observation wells are given inTable 2 ..4-17.
3. Observation wells were installed during December t 1974.The average depth is 25 ft .. ; granular backfill was placedaround the lower 8 ft. of each observation well. AI t ob-servation wells are installed in the glacial drift aquitard.
4.. Dates of V«1ter !eveI measurements ore shownin Tobie 2.4 -17; potentiometric leve Is are in-fe rred between dotes of meo su rement .
5.. Precipitation data were recorded ot the MarseillesLock ,41°21 r N., 88045 t W..
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-23DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONSOF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS
L Locations of observation wells are shown in Figure 2.4-21.
2. Surface elevations of the observation wells are given inTobIe 2.4 -17.
3. Observation wells were installed during December, 1974.The average depth is 25 ft.; granular backfiU was placedaround the lower 8 ft. of each observation well. All ob-servation welfs are installed in the glacial dr j ft aquitard.
5.
1975
Dates of water level measurements ore shownin Table 2.4 -17; potentiomefric levels are in-ferred between dates of measuremen t.
Precipitation data were recorded ot the MarseillesLock, 410 21
I
N., 88°45·W.
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-23DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONSOF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS
(SHEET 3 of 4)REV. 0 - APRIL 1984
:J 700U):E..-'+-
+ 690
.2~
+-Q)
E.S!.-c:Q)....o0...
JANUARYe '0 ns 20 2:5
FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL J () L .~. AUGiJ )'., . ..,. ~ t() l~
.~1j~:T"'T-"~-
~~ ~-~t··~1 ;I ~ :
."- t ~:
<:.!P'T£MB£f.I. OCTOBER Deep...10 U. ao •• 740
730
720
710
700
690
680
670
660
650
640
630
.sc.Q4-
~.9-()<Vl.-e..
NOTESL Locations of observation wells ore shown in Figure 2 .4-21.
2. Surface elevations of the observation welts ore given in"T'obte 2.4-17.
3. Observation wells were installed during December, 1974.The averoQe depth is 25 ft.; granular backfill was placedaround the lowe r 8 f 1. of each observation we J I. A" ob-servation wells ore instof led in the glaciol drift aquitard ..
1975
4. Dotes of water level measurements ore shownin Tobie 2 ..4-17; potentiometric levels are in-ferred between dates of measurement.
5. Water level meolur.ments in weB no. f8 ofterJuly 21,1975, may be affected by a broken cap.
6. Pr~cipitation data were recorded at the Marseif lesL(,~kJ 41 0 21
1
N. t 88°45' W.
........,..,.",...,..,..."..~~4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
LA SALLE COUNTY STATIONUPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
FIGURE 2.4-23DAILY PRECIPITATION AND FLUCTUATIONSOF WATER LEVELS IN OBSERVATION WELLS