Lakewood - Budget Study Session 06-11-13

7/28/2019 Lakewood - Budget Study Session 06-11-13

1/102

FY 2013-2014 Budget


2/102

FY 2013-2014 Budget

Economic Review and Forecast

State & Local Overview

Operating Budget

Impacts to the General Fund

Citywide Projects


3/102

National Economic

Forecast2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

GDP Growth -2.4% 2.4% 1.8% 2.2% 2.0% 2.1% - 3.5%

Personal Consumption -0.6% 1.8% 2.5% 1.9% 2.4% 2.1%

Business Investment -17.8% 0.7% 8.6% 8.0% 4.6% 5.7%

Residential Investment -20.5% -3.7% -1.4% 12.1% 14.8% 20.6%

Inflation (CPI) -0.3% 1.6% 3.1% 2.1% 1.6% 2.0%

Unemployment 9.3% 9.6% 8.9% 8.1% 7.6% 7.3%

ConsumerConfidence

45 55 61 65 76

Estimated Projected
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg


4/102

National Deficit & Government Stabilizers

Shadow Banking, Securitization & Dark Pools

Income, Net Worth & Wealth

Housing, Stock Market, Industry & Employment

Equity, Confidence & Credit

Affordable Care Act

The Nation


5/102

The Deficit

Total government spending federal, state and local, adjusted forpopulation growth and inflation, has recently been falling at a rate not seen

since the demobilization that followed the Korean War.


6/102

Government Stabilizers


7/102


In 2012, government stabilizers added $386 billion to the deficit


8/102


Block-Grants are often proposed and implemented to rein in thecost of automatic stabilizers.

Block grants are typically structured to have fixed funding andallows for state flexibility.

This structure works well in

good times, in difficult times itcan leave certain groupsvulnerable.

TANFs Failure to adequately

respond during the recessionhighlights the limitations ofblock grants in getting fundsinto the market.


9/102

Securitization, ShadowBanking & Dark Pools

Financial weapons of mass destruction Warren Buffett


10/102

Shadow Banking

Shadow banks:

Finance companies Asset-backed commercial paper(ABCP) Hedge funds Money Market Funds (MMF)

Securities lenders Credit Default Swaps (CDS)


11/102

Securitization

Assets, such as auto or home loans, are pooledand securities representing the pool are sold

Short-term maturity, so issuer must renew continually

Any slow down by purchasers can cause a serious

liquidity crunch for the issuer Liquidity and credit enhancements were a prerequisite

to receive top credit grades

Enhancements were provided by private sources

Because many of these securitized products were rated AAA,assuming risk mitigation through diversification, they were perceivedas the safest of the safe. This sent broker-dealers into overdrive,producing more of these securities and fueling a flood of credit.


12/102

Dark Pools

Dark pools: in 2007 theSecurity and ExchangeCommission cut back onthe governments

regulatory role, andallowing just about anyoneto start a dark pool. Withina year, 16% of all stock

trading was done in darkpools. By last March, thathad grown to 36%.


13/102

The distinguishing characteristic between

banking and shadow banking remains

the absence of explicit public sectorbackstops, leaving shadow intermediationactivities susceptible to runs. NY Fed

Securitization, ShadowBanking & Dark Pools


14/102

Income

2010 Census: 99% of households

VisualizingEconomics.com


15/102

Income of the Top 0.01%

Hedge Fund

Speculative Fund

Ponzi Fund

Its a slippery

slope



16/102

Income of the Top 0.01%

Annual incomeranges from $5million to justunder $5 billion




17/102

Income & Net Worth


18/102

Wealth Perceptions & Reality

Actual

Perceived

Desired

Top 10%

Top 1%

http://www.marketplace.org/topics/wealth-poverty/surprise-viral-hit-income-inequality-movie


19/102


20/102

Industrial Production


21/102


22/102

Loans

Cash


23/102

Confidence & Credit


24/102

Cost of individual plans willincrease substantially for younghealthy adults, seniors should seea savings

Employment in call centers andmedical centers expected toincrease

Many businesses report beingprepared for 2014, and now arereviewing the scheduled excise taximplementation in 2018

Affordable Care ActDependents up to age 26 covered by their parents

January 2014: Cost of employer pooled PPO type plans are not expected to

increase beyond normal levels


25/102

State Budget & Fiscal Condition

California Housing

Surplus

Federal Sequester Redevelopment Dissolution


26/102

Housing Prices and Sales


27/102

State SURPLUS

The states

econom ic recovery,

pr ior budget cuts,

and the tempo rary

taxes prov ided byPropos it ion 30 have

combined to br ing

Cal i fornia to a

promis ing moment :

the possib le end of

a decade of acute

state budget

chal lenges. - LAOLao.ca.gov


28/102

Sequester - Cuts facing California

$150.5 million in education funding for primary, secondary andspecial-education (1,980 teacher and aide jobs).

Thousands of college students will not receive financial aid or getwork-study jobs, 8,200 children will be excluded from Head Start and

Early Head Start services.

$15.9 million in grants that support law enforcement, courts and anti-crime programs, prevent and treat substance abuse, clean water, airquality and anti-pollution programs, and fish and wildlife protection.

$15.2 million for various social services programs.

64,000 civilian Department of Defense employees are likely to befurloughed.


29/102

Dissolution of Redevelopment

2012-2013

FY 2012-2013:$3.2 billion fromlocal agencies

to the State

FY 2013-2014:Projected RDA

Dissolution FundsReduced by 1/3rd,a total of $1.6billion

Lao.ca.gov


30/102

Local Government Spending


31/102

Lakewood Area

Property values & Property Taxes

Retail Sector & Sales Tax

Local employment Local revenue


32/102

Lakewood Property & HomesTaxable Property Value

MedianHome Value

Propertyassessedvalueincreasedby 1.6%

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

5,810,418,810

6,414,880,074

6,977,720,934

7,269,335,521

7,007,717,290

7,032,247,827

7,168,922,218

$-

$100,000

$200,000

$300,000

$400,000

$500,000

$600,000

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2012 Median

single familyhome soldfor about$352,780


33/102

Lakewood Property Tax

Property Tax Revenue

Property taxreceipts areprojected to

remain flat.

May takethree yearsto match FY2008 peak.

$2,000,000

$2,500,000

$3,000,000

$3,500,000

$4,000,000

$4,500,000


34/102

LakewoodRetail &

Sales Taxes

Sales Tax Revenue

Lakewood Sales Tax Composition State Sales Tax Composition

Sales tax receiptsare projected toincrease by 4.5%

$9,500,000

$10,500,000

$11,500,000

$12,500,000

$13,500,000

58%

13%

7%

2%2%

5%13%

General ConsumerGoods

Restaurants &Hotels

Autos &

Transportation

Building &Construction

Business &Industry

Food & Drugs

Fuel & Service

Stations

30%

12%

14%8%

16%

7%13%


35/102

ADMITTING REP

CENTRAL SUPPLY TECH

CENTRAL SUPPLY TECH

CLINICAL DOCMENTATION

CNA -12HR - 2E TELE-

CNA -12HR - 2S MED/SURG

CNA -12HR - 3W MED/SURG

CNA -12HR - 3W MED/SURG

DIRECTOR OF SURGICAL

DIRECTOR, CARDIAC

DIRECTOR, THERAPY

EMT - ER

LEAD PRE-REGISTRATION

ORTHOPEDIC

PHARMACIST

PHYSICAL THERAPIST

PHYSICAL THERAPIST

RESPIRATORY THERAPIST

RESPIRATORY THERAPIST

RN - CHARGE - CCU

RN - RADIOLOGY

RN - RADIOLOGY

RN - RADIOLOGY

STAFF RN - 2S MED/SURGSTAFF RN - 2S PCI UNIT

STAFF RN - 2S PCI UNIT



STAFF RN - 2W TELE

STAFF RN - 3E MED/SURG

STAFF RN - 3W MED/SURG

STAFF RN - CCU

STAFF RN - CCU

STAFF RN - ER - FT

STAFF RN - ER

STAFF RN - ER

STAFF RN - ER

STAFF RN - ER

STAFF RN - ER

STAFF RN - ER

STAFF RN - ER

STAFF RN - ER

STAFF RN - ER

STAFF RN - ER

STAFF RN - ICU

STAFF RN- CATH LAB

STAFFING COORDINATOR

UNIT SECRETARY - 2W TELE

UNIT SECRETARY - ER

Local Employment

Boeing Job Search Location

Systems Engineer 5\6 Anaheim, CA

Test & Evaluation Engineer 1 El Segundo, CA

Test & Evaluation Engineer 1\2 El Segundo, CA

Materials Process & Physics Manager K El Segundo, CA

Maintenance Technician Sr El Segundo, CA

Experienced Analog and Digital Circuit Design Engineer Huntington Beach, CA

Industrial Security Specialist 3\4 Huntington Beach, CA

Information Technology Manager K Huntington Beach, CA

Procurement Analyst 1\2 Huntington Beach, CA

Software Engineer 1\2 Huntington Beach, CAStructural Analysis Engineer 1\2 Huntington Beach, CA

Design and Analysis Engineer 1\2 Long Beach, CA

Aircraft Structural Analysis Engineer (P5\P6) Long Beach, CA

Aircraft Structural Analysis Engineer P1\P2 Long Beach, CA

Systems and Data Analyst 1\2 Long Beach, CA

Software Engineer 3\4 Long Beach, CA

System & Data Analyst 1\2 Seal Beach, CA

Senior Manager Business Systems Domain Architecture Design Seal Beach, CA

Software Engineer 1 (Applications Developer) Seal Beach, CA

0

1.1

2.2

3.3

4.4

5.5

6.67.7

8.8

9.9

Los Angeles

Long Beach

International Container TrafficMillions TEUs


36/102

Lakewood Employment

Lakewood Unemployment Rate

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

1990-2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 YTD

National 5.4% 5.8% 9.3% 9.6% 9.0% 8.1% 7.7%California 6.7% 7.2% 11.3% 12.3% 11.8% 10.5% 8.5%

Los Angeles Region 6.3% 6.9% 10.9% 11.8% 11.4% 10.1% 8.4%

Lakewood 4.2% 4.8% 7.5% 8.2% 8.0% 7.1% 6.3%


37/102

PROPOSED BUDGET 2013-2014


38/102

City of LakewoodAll Funds Summary

REVENUES EXPENSES

Sales tax 19% 13,233,850$ Public Safety 20% 13,965,410$

Water service charges 15% 10,223,535$ Culture and Leisure 17% 11,554,155$

Other agencies (includes VLF 11% 7,304,901$ Water Utility 15% 9,962,534$

Other tax (includes UUT) 9% 6,013,491$ General Government 11% 7,165,363$

Refuse service charges 7% 5,095,227$ Community Development 8% 5,167,073$Transit tax 7% 4,931,510$ Water Capital Improvements 8% 5,166,751$

Water capital reserves 7% 4,722,750$ Capital Improvements 7% 4,942,309$

Property tax 6% 3,895,979$ Refuse Collection & Disposa 7% 4,880,351$

Other agencies - restricted 5% 3,603,034$ Transportation 6% 4,209,137$

Other service charges 4% 2,960,854$ Legislative 2% 1,219,468$

Other agencies - restricted ca 4% 2,648,734$ 68,232,551$

Use of money & property 2% 1,426,198$Capital reserves 0% 786,510$

Fines 1% 743,300$

License & permits 1% 642,678$

68,232,551$


39/102

Revenues

$68,232,551

Sales tax19%

Water servicecharges

15%

Other agencies(includes VLF)

11%Other tax(includes UUT)

9%

Refuse servicecharges

8%

Transit tax7%

Water capitalreserves

7%

Property tax6%

Other agencies -restricted

5%

Other servicecharges

4%

Other agencies -restricted capital

4%

Use of money &

property2%

Capital reserves1%

Fines1%

License &permits

1%


40/102

Appropriations

$68,232,551

Public Safety,20%

Culture andLeisure, 17%

Water Utility,15%

GeneralGovernment,

11%

Community

Development,8%

Water CapitalImprovements

, 8%

CapitalImprovements

, 7%

RefuseCollection &Disposal, 7%

Transportation, 6%

Legislative,2%


41/102

Appropriations

$68,282,551

EmployeeServices, 33%

ContractServices, 34%

OperationalExpenses,

17%

Equipment,1%

CapitalImprovements

, 15%


42/102

Appropriations - Operations

$58,123,491

EmployeeServices, 39%

ContractServices, 40%

OperationalExpenses,

20%

Equipment,2%


43/102

Lakewood Revenues

Rank Description Total % of total

1 Sales tax / ERAF 13,223,850 22%

2 Water utility service charges 10,083,535 16.8%

3 Motor vehicle in lieu / ERAF 7,019,901 11.7%

4 Refuse service charges 5,095,227 8.5%5 Property tax 3,895,979 6.5%

6 Utility users tax 3,616,171 6%

7 Gas tax 2,428,601 4%

8 Franchise fees 1,627,320 2.7%9 Building Permits & Fees 1,474,929 2.5%

10 Prop A Transit 1,368,103 2.3%

TOTAL 46,979,069 83%


44/102

General Fund OperationsRevenues and Expenditures

$20,000,000

$25,000,000

$30,000,000

$35,000,000

$40,000,000

$45,000,000

Revenues

Expenditures


45/102

Top Contract Services

Rank Description Total % of

Total

1 Law Enforcement $ 9,792,917 42%

2 Refuse Collection/Disposal 4,454,796 19%

3 Street Lighting 668,000 3%

4 Street Sweeping 636,000 3%

5 Tree Maintenance 530,000 2%

6 IT Services 495,000 2%

7 Sky Knight 321,000 1.5%

8 Animal Control 320,237 1.5%

9 Building Inspection 318,000 1.5%

10 Engineering Services 282,000 1%

$ 17,817,950 77%


46/102

City Operations Level of Service

$-

$2,000,000

$4,000,000

$6,000,000

$8,000,000

$10,000,000

$12,000,000

$14,000,0002009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014


47/102

5-year Average

Conservative budgeting:Typically results in actual expenditures being less thanbudgeted.

This occurs because of conservative budget assumptions Employee positions budgeted as filled for the full year Operations are budgeted on actual past trends Operations include funds for what ifs A contingency of $100,000 is maintained

$-

$2,000,000

$4,000,000

$6,000,000

$8,000,000

$10,000,000

$12,000,000

$14,000,0002009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014


48/102

Future Possible Impacts

to the General Fund

Department of Finance decisionsDDR - original balance (3,486,857)$

City Loan 2011 7,849,061$

City Loan 2012 3,339,521$ROPS II DDR Non-housing Requirements 1,362,997$

ROPS III DDR Non-housing Requirements 3,208,135$

ROPS II Available Funding from the County (1,818,980)$

ROPS III Funded by City Loan (1,120,989)$

DOF Balance 9,332,888$

Oversight Board Approvedlitigation of the $7.8 million


49/102

Future Possible Impacts

to the General Fund

PERS Rates

Change in Discount rate (FY 2013) Change in Methodology (FY 2015)

Change in Demographics

Change in Investment rate


50/102

Citywide Projects

CIPS

Edco / R.F. Dickson Proposal

60th Anniversary

Storm-water Permit Requirements


51/102

FY 2012-2013 CIP Budget

Street and Transit Projects

Parks and Facilities Projects Water Resources Projects


52/102

FY 2013-2014 Capital Projects

$10,109,060Sources and Uses

of funds:

GeneralFund 9.7%

CDBG1.8%Prop A

0.6%

River ParkGrant14.2%

TDA-Article 3

0.5%

Prop C

13.8%

Measure R8.2%

WaterFund51.1%

Paving,Hardscape& Transit

41.0%

Facilities2.8%

Parks 5.1%

Wells22.8%

Water

Meters

WaterMains12.0% Water

Facilities &Equip

14.4%

SOURCES OF FUNDS USES OF FUNDS


53/102

Parks & Facilities Projects


54/102

CentreProjects


55/102

FY 2012-2013 Centre Projects

Underway (costs are estimated):

Refurbish Second Floor Restrooms ($10,000)

Refurbish/Restore Ballroom Bar Paneling ($15,000)

Exterior Landscape Replacement ($20,000)

Replace carpet ($21,000)


56/102

Maple RoomPatio Fencing

BallroomDivider

Centre Projects

Lighting Improvements

Landscaping


57/102


Proposed (costs are estimated):

Lighting Improvements ($125,000)

Recover Ballroom Divider ($20,000) Maple Room Patio Fencing ($20,000)

Council Chambers Refurbishment ($75,000)

Replace Ceiling Tiles Meeting Rooms ($15,000)


58/102


Estimated FY 2012-2013 spending at$101,600

Carry over balance of $196,600 into FY

2013-2014 to complete planned projects New allocation of $103,400 budgeted for

proposed projects


59/102

Annually BudgetedFacility Projects


60/102

Continuing Projects Budgeted Annually:

Fire & Security Systems ($25,000) Includes burglar & fire alarms, video cameras

Planning Civic Center CCTV upgrade

Will carry over FY12-13 funds

Park Hardscape Improvements ($50,000) Previously worked on Bolivar Park

For FY 13-14, propose completion of Bolivar andthe picnic shelters at San Martin

Park Fence improvements to be determined

Hiatus on sports lighting FY13-14

Major Facility Projects


61/102


West San Gabriel River Parkway Trail Ph. 3


62/102

FY 2012-2013 Major Facility ProjectsUnderway:

West San Gabriel River Trail Phase 3

Advertise for bids scheduled for Fall 2013

Residents notified to remove encroachments

by 9/4/13

Funded primarily with Resources Agency grantfor $1,446,203 plus local match

Includes native landscape, irrigation, trail,fencing and access



63/102


Palms Park Activity Building Improvements


64/102

FY 2013-2014 Major Facility ProjectNew:

Palms Park Activity Building Renovation

Combination of CDBG & Prop A funding

Prop A funding used to revise DASH Office($60,000)

Additional funding for CDBG Program to beplaced in this project ($185,740 total)

Staff presently evaluating possiblesupplemental improvements in 5-year plan

Includes replacement of lobby planter,windows, storefront, VCT tile replacement

64


65/102


Mayfair ParkHVAC Project

FY 2012 2013 M j F ilit P j t


66/102

FY 2012-2013 Major Facility ProjectsUnderway:

Mayfair Park Activity Building HVACProject

Design is complete, plan check complete

Replaces all AC and exhaust fan equipment

Cost estimate not final yet

Will request an additional appropriation when

project is awarded on June 25, 2013


67/102

Smaller FY 2013-2014 Projects:

Civic Center Parking Lot Slurry Seal ($50,000) Mayfair Tennis Court surfacing ($30,000)

Mayfair Parking Lot Repairs ($30,000)

Rynerson Park Electrical Restoration ($35,000) Awaiting response from Little League

Insurance Company

Nixon Yard Metal Building Roof & Paint ($40,000)

Focus on Purchasing/Warehouse


68/102

Street and Transit Projects


69/102

Public Right-

of-WayProjects


70/102

FY 2013-2014 Proposed Projects:

Woodruff Resurfacing ($1,200,000) Carson to Del Amo

Local Street Projects ($800,000)

Industry, Bixby, Pixie, Kessler

ADA Public ROW (SB821) ($50,988)

Will be included with Local Street Project

Hardscape Repair ($200,000)

Will be included with Local Street Project

Candlewood Repairs ($200,000)

Traffic Management Center ($25,000)


71/102

Water Resources Projects


72/102

Water System Projects


73/102


Well #22 Treatment Plant ($2,192,648) Casing liner installed FY2012 reduced capacity but

increased predicted well life and improved waterquality.

Full treatment plant no longer required. Currently redesigning water treatment process.

Downsize project to upgrade treatment equipmentand install more efficient pump and motor. ($500K)

Project to bid in FY 2013-2014.


74/102


Water Main Replacement Design (FY2013-$63K)

Tetra Tech finishing final phase of currentagreement for five phases of water main design.

Arbor Yard Solar Project Phase 2 (FY2013-$106K)

Completed summer 2012 Provides energy to DWR Office, Meter/Print Shop

and Water Operations Workshops

W t S t P j t


75/102

Plant #13 Rehabilitation ($1,070,266) Feasibility Study complete Project in design ($188K) Construction planned for FY 2013-2014

SCADA System Upgrade (FY2013- $67.5K) Replace 20-year old PLCs at water facilities Well #10 completed May 2013 Well #15 and #8 scheduled for installation by June

30, 2013


W t S t P j t


76/102

Water Main Replacement Project ($1.08M) Completed February 2013

Hydraulic Model Update & Calibration ($38K) Hydraulic model updated & currently finalizing

calibration Scheduled for completion June 30, 2013


W t S t P j t


77/102

Water System Projects Water Conservation Garden ($226,454)

Project carried over from FY 2011-2012

Need suitable site

CNG Compressor ($90K) Project removed from CIP Existing system repaired

Proposed FY2013-2014 Water System


78/102

Proposed FY2013-2014 Water SystemProjects

SCADA System Upgrade (FY2013- $67.5K) Replace 20-year old PLCs at water wells,

Proposed $30,000 in FY 2013-2014 for PLCreplacement at Well #13A, Well #6 and central

SCADA controls Final year of a multi-year project

Water Main Project Design ($400K) Design for next five water main replacement

projects

Proposed FY 2013-2014 Water


79/102

Proposed FY 2013 2014 WaterSystem Projects

Water Main Replacement Project ($1,053,600) Currently being designed by Tetra Tech

Includes portions of Centralia St., Fairman St.,Levelside Dr., Downey Ave., Hayter Ave., Elsa St.and Pimenta Ave. south of Delamo Blvd. and westof Lakewood Blvd.

Includes 3 transmission main valves



80/102


Meter Rotation Program ($275K) Install at least 422 replacement water meters

Implement pilot project to test ORION SE datacollection system.

Proposed system can store up to 90 days of hourlywater usage.



81/102


Field Data Work Order System (CIP- $22,300,Total Budget- $41,800)

Project links supervisory personnel to field staff

Integrates water hydraulic model and GIS Data gathering and work dissemination via tablets and

smart phones

Subscription for software use and cloud storage


82/102

Proposal to incorporateStreet Sweeping into

Solid Waste Contract


83/102

Street Sweeping Services

Proposal to incorporate StreetSweeping into Solid Waste Contract

Concept developed by staff and contract

service providersConcept reviewed and recommended byEnvironmental Management Committee

EDCO has provided formal proposal

RF Dickson has agreed to assignment oftheir contract to EDCO

Relieves fiscal burden from GF83

P l P i t


84/102

Proposal Points

EDCO will hire RF Dickson assubcontractor to provide streetsweeping services

City would have rights approve anyother service provider

EDCO will absorb cost of streetsweeping program over 3 year

transition period Includes a 2 part supplemental increaseover three years

84


85/102

Proposal Points

EDCO will be granted add-on increasein addition to contractual escalationformula for each of three years:

July 1, 2013 Contract formula + 1.684%residential or 2% commercial

(Effective Rate of 2.9% for both)

July 1, 2014 Contract formula + 2.4%

July 1, 2015 Contract Formula + 2.9%

Add-on applies to both residential andcommercial rates

85

P l P i t


86/102

Proposal Points

Each year during the transition,EDCO will assume 1/3 more of thecost of the street sweeping program:

July 1, 2013 EDCO assumes 1/3 andCity reduces to 2/3 of program costs

July 1, 2014 EDCO assumes 2/3 andCity reduces to 1/3 of program costs

July 1, 2015 EDCO assumes 100% ofprogram costs

Program cost set at $612,000 on 7/1/1386


87/102

Cost Component Details

FY13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16Add-onadjustment:

Residential Incr. BER* + 1.684% BER + 2.4% BER + 2.9%

Comm. Incr. CPI + 2% CPI + 2.4% CPI + 2.9%

Program costtransition:

SS Prog Cost: $612,000 $612,000 $612,000

City: 2/3 1/3 0

Annual Cost: $408,000 $204,000 $0EDCO: 1/3 2/3 All

Annual Respon: 204,000 $408,000 $612,000

87

*BER - Blended Escalation Rate for residential contract 2/3 CPI, 1/3 Tipping fees


88/102

Proposal Points

EDCOs annually renewing termwould be extended to 8.5 year min

If City gives EDCO notice to end

annually renewing term, they wouldno longer be required to providestreet sweeping services

Cumulative add-on increases would bebacked out of monthly payment forresidential services and commercialrates

88


89/102

Proposal Points

EDCO would be responsible fordirecting the disposal/recycling ofstreet sweeping debris

Payment for tipping fees is includedEDCO would be permitted to stop

sending tonnage to SERRF once SH

facility has full sorting lineEDCO must still achieve state mandateddiversion goals

89


90/102

Proposal Points

All operations would remain the sameNo changes would be noticeable in field

Staff would continue to interact directly

with RF Dickson Implemented successfully in La Mirada

Contractual Changes June 25, 2013:

Amendment to EDCO Agreement3-party Assignment agreement

City, EDCO, RF Dickson

90


91/102

Customer Bills

Notice was provided to SFRcustomers in water bills for trash rateincrease of 3.9%

Monthly bill increases from $18.22 to$18.93

Commercial customers to be notifiedof rate increase directly by EDCO

3 yard bin 1X per week increases from$116.48 to $119.86 per month

Survey shows rates at middle of pack 91


92/102

Recommendation

The Environmental ManagementCommittee has reviewed andapproved the proposal for Councilconsideration.

Proceed with incorporating the StreetSweeping program into the solid

waste contractPresent agreements to affect change atJune 25th council meeting

92

Proposed Projects


93/102

Proposed Projects

The Citys 60th AnniversaryCelebration

The Community Promotions Committee

has reviewed and approved the plan forCouncil consideration.

Recommend approving the allocation offunds to plan, promote and carry out the

community events proposed.

60 Years of Success


94/102

NPDES MS4 Update


95/102

New MS4 Permit

Last Briefing on February 26, 2013 New NPDES MS4 Permit

Adopted November 28, 2012

Effective December 28, 2012

Three Choices for ComplianceMinimum Control measures Implement

permit and meet numerical limitsWMP Watershed Management Plan

EWMP Enhanced Watershed Mgmt Plan


96/102

Lakewoods Watersheds

Lakewood belongs to 3 watersheds Los Cerritos Channel 28.06% of watershed

Coyote Creek/SGR 2.5% of watershed

Lower Los Angeles River 0.33% of watershed All three include TMDLs and Implementation

Plans

Lakewood also part of Dominguez

Channel/Harbor Toxics TMDL Due to being in the Los Cerritos Channel WS

We may appeal this designation


97/102

The Path Forward

All three watersheds of which we are a parthave chosen the WMP path Why not EWMP?

Watersheds were reluctant to be committed to

building a project prior to studyWatershed groups are keeping the option open

to change to a EWMP by listing a possibleproject or projects

Minimum control measures are notfeasible because we would be immediatelyout of compliance with the permit numericlimits


98/102

Approaching Deadlines

The next deadline is June 28, 2013Must submit Notice of Intent to prepare a WMP

and CIMP with other cities in the 3 watersheds.

Each watershed is approaching the NOIdifferently

Must also present draft LID Ordinance andGreen Street Policy to Council prior to 6/28/13

Planned for June 25, 2013 Draft LID Ordinance will be similar to initial draft of

LA Countys Ordinance

I iti l C t E ti t


99/102

Initial Cost Estimates

Each watershed will hire consultants toprepare their WMP, CIMP and ReasonableAssurance modeling

Los Cerritos ChannelEstimate is $116,180 per $500,000 of expense(28.06% of all costs)

Coyote Creek/ Lower San Gabriel RiverEstimate is $21,987 per $685,000 of expense

(2.5% of all costs) Lower Los Angeles River Reach 1Estimate is $15,000 per $660,000 of expense

(0.33% of all costs)

Time Frames


100/102

Time Frames

Each WMP will likely qualify for the 18 monthtime frame Must have 50% or more of the watershed members

adopt Green Street Policy and LID Ordinance

Draft CIMP is due June 28, 2014

Draft WMP is due June 28, 2014

MOUs for each watershed will be presented toCouncil July or August, 2013

Appropriations will be requested with MOUs Ultimately, we must have a supplemental stormwater funding source County Fee? City Fee?

Budget Focus Areas


101/102

Budget Focus Areas

1. Budget for Sustainability

2. Keep Lakewood Safe

3. Preserve the Neighborhood Quality of Life

4. Foster a Sense of Community

5. Promote Economic Vitality

6. Support a Caring Community

7. Secure Fiscal Resources

8. Highlight Governmental Transparency

9. Hold on to Local Authority

10. Protect the Environment


102/102

FY 2013-2014 Budget

Lakewood - Budget Study Session 06-11-13

Documents