Korea Politics & Economy after 1945
Mar 31, 2015
KoreaPolitics & Economy after 1945
Outline
1945 End of Japan Rule
Brief Political History
The 38th Parallel & The Korean War
Rhee: Government Led Development
Park: The Five Year Plans
Korea Today
Chaebols
Korea up to 1945
1905 – Russo-Japanese war ended, Korea protectorate of Japan
1910 – Japan-Korea Annexation treaty Colonial Mercantilism – Japan provided modern
infrastructure, ports, factories, hospitals, schools, rail, mines, etc
Land seizure, cultural repression & little opportunity for Koreans to obtain higher education
1945 – End of 35 year colonial Japanese Rule
The 38th Parallel
1896 - first suggested as a dividing line for Korea by Russia
1945 (Aug) - US State-War Navy Coordinating Committee establishes 38th Parallel
1948 - became the boundary between the newly independent countries of North and South Korea
1953 - demarcation line established through the middle of the DMZ
The Korean War (1950 – 1953)
Japan settled as fort to prevent soviet influence
Japan is the region’s stabilized government &
economy
US heavily invested in Japan’s economic development
Special procurements amounted to 27% of Japan’s total export trade
Cooperation of manufacturers, suppliers, distributors and banks is
what led to the keiretsu and enterprise unions
Brief Political History
Kim II Sung
Syngman Rhee (1945-1960)
Park Chung Hee (1961-1979)
Chun Doo Hwan (1981-1988) Roh Tae Woo
(1988-1993)
1945
Kim Young-sam (1993-1998)
1994
Korea’s Economic Development
Government Led Development
Land Reform June 1949 – 1 million share croppers became land owners Dissolved landlord class
Shift to entrepreneurial opportunities for past landlords Accelerated urbanization of Korea
11.6 % in 1940 24.4 % in 1955 28.3 % in 1960
Education opportunities extensively expanded after WWII Empowered Koreans with opportunity for upward mobility Primary education universal for both boys & girls by 1960 75% Universities established by private foundations
Under Rhee:
Investment in Human Capital
Government Led Development
Under Park: “Miracle on the Han”
Government led initiatives in economic development.Main Goals: Establish self reliant industrial economy Nationalize bank to facilitate direct control all over business community Create hybrid approach between import substitution and export driven growth
Korea’s Economic Development
Five Year PlansTransition from import substitution industrialization to export driven growth
First Five-Year Economic Development Plan (1962-66) Self Sufficient Structure
The Second Five-Year Economic Development Plan (1967- 71) Modernizing the industrial structure building import substitution industries
The Third Five-Year Economic Development Plan (1972-76) “Big Push”(1992-96) Development of export-oriented structure
Under Park:
Korea’s Economic Development
The Fourth Five-Year Economic Development Plan (1977-81) Development of industries to compete effectively with
world’s industrial export markets The Fifth Five-Year Economic and Social
Development Plan (1982-86) Shifting industry focus to Technology-intensive industries
The Sixth Five-Year Economic and Social Development Plan (1987-91) Phasing out of direct assistance from government, refocus
to training workforce to meet the needs of all industries. The Seventh Five-Year Economic and Social
Development Plan (1992-96) Development of high-technology fields
Latter Five Year Plans
Korea’s Economic Development
Chaebols 'octopus with many tentacles'
Massive conglomerates
Comparative to Japan’s keiretsu and zaibatsu
Spawned from leftover Japanese assets
Majority controlled by families
Government provided support to aid growth
Key part of Korea’s fast development
Korea’s Economic Development
Chaebols
Korea’s Economic Development
Chaebols down arrows
Stagnates innovation
Prevents foreign investment
Hides losses within the unit
Daewoo bankruptcy—$80B in losses
Corruption is prevalent
Samsung—tax evasion, Hyundai—stealing funds, SK—fraud
Too reliant on the government’s protection
Asian Financial crisis
Conclusion
History played a significant role during Japanese rule over Korea as it propelled Koreans into full economic development
Using a model similar to Japan’s Meiji era, Korea’s government and industry were able to institute policies that allowed for rapid growth
Chaebols were crucial for Korea’s development but are not necessarily beneficial in today’s environment
Takeaways
Questions ?
Korean Unification Flag