Top Banner
Kodak versus Fuji The Case
26
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Kodak Vs Fuji

Kodak versus Fuji

The Case

Page 2: Kodak Vs Fuji

What were the forces transforming the market for

Kodak / Fuji ?

Page 3: Kodak Vs Fuji

Forces Transforming the Market• Acceptance of foreign brands by

Americans.• Rise of Fuji• Retail revolution, with focus on price• Trend towards digital cameras

Page 4: Kodak Vs Fuji

Differences• Kodak sold directly to

retailers and photo studios.

• After nearly two and one half years of court rulings, the World Trade Organization in Geneva issued a “sweeping rejection of Kodak’s complaints” about the film market in Japan.

• Fuji sold through distributors.

• Fuji made profits only in Japan.

• Fuji’s worldwide output per employee is $285,000, while Kodak’s--even after the massive layoffs-- is $155,000.

Page 6: Kodak Vs Fuji

In the restructuring of Kodak, four main segments have emerged:1. The Consumer Imaging Segment:Traditional films, papers, processing, photofinishing, photographic chemicals, cameras(including one-time use), and the Advanced Photo System2. The Kodak Professional Segment:Traditional films, papers, digital cameras, printers, scanners, and chemicals3. The Health Imaging Segment:Medical films, chemical and processing equipment as well as services4. Other (Digital and Applied Imaging) Imaging Segment:Motion pictures, audiovisual equipment, certain digital cameras and printers, microfilmproducts, application software, scanners and other equipment

Page 7: Kodak Vs Fuji

Kodak

Consumer Digital• Digital cameras• Accessories• Digital Picture frames• Video cameras

Graphic Communications• Printers & Presses• Flexographic• Unified work flow• Computer to plate• Color & Screening• Proofing• Scanners• Security Solutions• Enterprise

Page 8: Kodak Vs Fuji

1934

1960

1980

1985

2006

Page 9: Kodak Vs Fuji

   

Business Products FUJI Consumer Products FUJI

Digital Cameras3D Image ProductsFilms & CamerasSupplies

Medical SystemsLife Science SystemsGraphic SystesPhotofinishing productsMotion Picture FilmsRecording MediaOffice & Industry

Page 10: Kodak Vs Fuji

Graphically depict the market.

Analyse the market shares of the 2 brands.

Page 11: Kodak Vs Fuji

Table 1: 1997 Amateur Photo Market $14.2 Billion DollarsSegment Percentage DollarsPhotoprocessing 43.50% $6,177,000,000.00Film Sales 20.00% $2,840,000,000.00Conventional Cameras 9.70% $1,377,400,000.00Digital Imaging 6.40% $908,800,000.00Portrait Studios 5.50% $781,000,000.00Frames 3.30% $468,600,000.00Photo Accessories 3.20% $454,400,000.00Albums 2.50% $355,000,000.00Camera Repair 1.00% $142,000,000.00Consumables 0.90% $127,800,000.00Video Camcorders 0.70% $99,400,000.00Video Accessories 0.50% $71,000,000.00Other 2.80% $397,600,000.00 100.00% $14,200,000,000.00Source: 1997 Photo Marketing Association (PMA) Figures

Page 12: Kodak Vs Fuji
Page 13: Kodak Vs Fuji

One-time Use Camera sales up by 23%

Page 14: Kodak Vs Fuji

What should the competitive strategies be ?

Page 15: Kodak Vs Fuji

Market Shares• Global shares – Kodak 44% and Fuji 33%.• Eastman Kodak has a commanding, yet

declining, 70 percent U.S. market share.• Fujifilm has approximately 17 percent U.S.

market share. • Other minor players in the U.S. market include

private-label brands, which constitute 7 percent, Agfa of German and Konica of Japan each have less than 2 percent market share.

• Fuji had 17% ms in Japan, but Kodak had 7-9% in Japanese market.

Page 16: Kodak Vs Fuji
Page 17: Kodak Vs Fuji

The War

• 1996, Fuji cut prices on film by 10 to 15 percent after Costco Wholesalers decided to go exclusively with Kodak.

• Fuji had excess inventory of 2.5 millions rolls of film – dumping market.

• “I would not call it a price war, however; it is really just sharpening prices. Our average price did not go down that much, but we did get more

aggressive to protect market share.”

Page 18: Kodak Vs Fuji

Kodak’s ambush marketing

• U.S. Olympic games, sponsored by Fuji.• While Fuji was a worldwide sponsor of the

Olympics, its competitor, Kodak, became a “sponsor” of ABC television’s broadcasts of the games and the ‘official film’ supplier to the U.S. track team.

Page 19: Kodak Vs Fuji
Page 20: Kodak Vs Fuji

Kodak• Kodak realizes that for all of their historical

success’ throughout the world, they must now increasingly include digital technology into the mix to stay at the forefront of the “photographic and imaging” industry.

• Profits and sales at Kodak have been eroding throughout the 90’s

• Kodak posted a net profit for the first quarter of 1999, bolstered by steady film sales growth in China and Brazil, as well as, low-end digital cameras in the U.S.,

Page 21: Kodak Vs Fuji

Fuji• 7 percent of sales on research and development to

maintain a competitive advantage.• Relationship with distributors.• In 1986, Fuji was the first to introduce one-time use

cameras, and by the time Kodak caught up with the technology, Fuji established a lead in one-time use cameras that Kodak never experienced with traditional film.

• “Globalization through localization”• In 1987, Fuji produced just 3.5% of its goods outside of

Japan; today the figure is roughly 40 percent,

Page 22: Kodak Vs Fuji

Fuji Photo Film has three core business systems:1. Imaging System:Color films, motion picture film, cameras, magnetic audiovisual media, electronicimaging, and equipment2. Photofinishing System:Photofinishing equipment, paper, and chemicals3. Information Systems:Graphic systems, Medical diagnostic systems, office automation systems, industrialmaterials, and data recording media

Page 23: Kodak Vs Fuji

Kodak is the world’s foremost imaging innovator.  With sales of $10.7 billion in 2006, the company is committed to a digitally oriented growth strategy focused on helping people better use meaningful images and information in their life and work. Consumers use Kodak’s system of digital and traditional products and services to take, print and share their pictures anytime, anywhere; Businesses effectively communicate with customers worldwide using KODAK solutions for prepress, conventional and digital printing and document imaging; and Creative Professionals rely on KODAK technology to uniquely tell their story through moving or still images

Page 24: Kodak Vs Fuji

Fuji

The focus is really on solutions and promoting our band-width of imaging and information products. We see trends of consumer usage and behaviour towards Digital Printing really taking-hold, especially in-store and on-line photo-finishing. We will continue to work closely with our Retailers to keep pace with the new technologies and media, as it relates to all aspects of shooting, storing, printing and presenting consumer memories.

Page 25: Kodak Vs Fuji

Fuji

FUJIFILM Corporation (NASDAQ:FUJI) brings continuous innovation and leading-edge products to a broad spectrum of industries, including electronic imaging, photofinishing equipment, medical systems, life sciences, graphic arts, flat panel display materials, and office products, based on a vast portfolio of digital, optical, fine chemical and thin film coating technologies.

Page 26: Kodak Vs Fuji

Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, was established on January 30, 1934

The company is  also known under the name FUJIFILM and is one of the world's leading suppliers and manufacturers of photographic film and paper, cameras, and other imaging equipment.