Key Priorities for the Better Together Programme Harry Capron Programme Director
Dec 14, 2015
Our Shared Commitment to:
A vision
A set of partnership principles and behaviour
A transformation plan
Better Together
“It’s not rocket science”
How do we plan to change?Key areas:
1. Responding to initial demand for help.“a co-ordinated front end”
2. Improving the effectiveness of our services and teams
3. Integrated planning and buying of services / commissioning
4. Integrating the delivery of services by multidisciplinary teams
5. Shared delivery of services provided by Bournemouth, Poole and Dorset local authorities
1: Responding to demand
A co-ordinated front end
• Information and advice• Reablement and intermediate care• Leaving hospital support, access to
advice on finances and services• Urgent Care• Independent Living Support
2: Improving Effectiveness
• Person centred, co-ordinated approaches
• Cultural change to respond to what help people are asking for and what they want to achieve – design against demand
• Changing the way we work such as developing pathways of support across services
• Information shared and shared ICT
3: Integrated Commissioning
• Joint planning
• Pooled resources and budgets
• Sharing quality and performance information and management
• Working with independent and voluntary sector providers to plan for the demands we face
• Workforce planning, “the perfect system but no one to work in it”
4: Integrating Service Delivery
• To support closer working at a GP locality level
• To support closer working with acute and community hospitals
• To develop a new model of care which is tested against benefits and costs
5: Shared Local Authority Services
• To improve efficiency and effectiveness by sharing directly provided services across Bournemouth, Poole and Dorset
Who will this apply to first?
• Frail older people with significant long-term health and care support needs
Question 1:Which of these areas do you think will have the most impact?
Vote Now
1. Responding to demand29.6%
2. Improving effectiveness15.6%
3. Integrated commissioning19.3%
4. Integrated service delivery32.6%
5. Shared local authority service3.0%
Question 2:What would have the least impact?
Vote Now
1. Responding to demand7%
2. Improving effectiveness8%
3. Integrated commissioning11%
4. Integrated service delivery1%
5. Shared local authority service73%
Question 3:Which one would you most likely want to make a contribution to?
Vote Now
1. Responding to demand26.3%
2. Improving effectiveness23.3%
3. Integrated commissioning15.8%
4. Integrated service delivery29.3%
5. Shared local authority service5.3%