Top Banner
Kano Model Erica Lynn Farmer CMQ/OE, CSSBB, MBB
23
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Kano (1)

Kano Model

Erica Lynn Farmer

CMQ/OE, CSSBB, MBB

Page 2: Kano (1)

Objectives

Origins Purpose Process Model Key Elements Methodology Application Examples

Page 3: Kano (1)

Origins of the Kano Model

Noriaki Kano Professor at Tokyo Rika University International ConsultantReceived individual Demming Prize in 1997

Page 4: Kano (1)

Origins of the Kano Model

Noriaki Kano Developed foundation for an approach on “Attractive Quality

Creation” commonly referred to as the “Kano Model” Challenged traditional Customer Satisfaction Models that More

is better, i.e. the more you perform on each service attribute the more satisfied the customers will be.

Proposed new Customer Satisfaction model (Kano Model) Performance on product and service attributes is not equal in the

eyes of the customers Performance on certain categories attributes produces higher levels

of satisfaction than others.

Page 5: Kano (1)

When to use the Kano Model

Project SelectionLean Six SigmaDesign for Six Sigma

New Product Development New Service Development Determine Market Strategies

Page 6: Kano (1)

Key Elements Identify the Voice of the Customer Translate Voice of the Customer into

Critical to Quality Characteristics (CTQs) Rank the CTQs into three categories:

Dissatisfier - Must be’s – Cost of EntrySatisfier – More is better – Competitive Delighter – Latent Need – Differentiator

Evaluate Current Performance

Page 7: Kano (1)

Kano Model

DelightersExcited Quality

DissatisfierMust-be

Expected Quality

“Didn’t know I wanted it but I

like it.”

“Cannot increase my satisfaction, but

can decrease.”

Dissatisfaction

Satisfaction

Service Performance

Service Performance

SatisfierOne DimensionalDesired Quality

Page 8: Kano (1)

Kano Model Process

Analyze & Brainstorm

Analyze & BrainstormResearchResearch Plot &

Diagram

Plot & Diagram Strategize Strategize

•Research available data sources

•Determine data collection strategy

•Design data collection instruments

•Collect and summarize data

•Analyze results from data collection

•Brainstorm list of features and functionality

•Develop Functional and Dysfunctional Questionnaire

•Distribute Questionnaire

•Develop Customer Requirement Matrix

•Record Questionnaire results in Matrix and Summarize

•Plot results on Kano Model

•Determine Project selection

•Product Development•Service Development•Identify Marketing Strategy

Page 9: Kano (1)

Research

Must Be’s - Focus Groups, Lawsuits and Regulations, Buzz on Internet

Satisfiers - Competitive Analysis, Interviews, Surveys, Search Logs, Usablity Testing, Customer Forums

Delighters - Field Research, Marketing/Branding Vision, Industrial Design, Packaging, Call Center Data, Site Logs

Page 10: Kano (1)

Analyze & Brainstorm

Analyze data from available sources Brainstorm list of features and functionality Determine type of requirements:

Output Requirements Service Requirements

Kano Model Requirements Survey User Survey

“Functional form” vs. “Dysfunctional Form” “How would you feel if the product had feature X?” “How would you feel if the product didn’t have feature X?”

Kano Questionnaire Answers: I like it. I expect it. I’m neutral. I can tolerate it. I dislike it.

Page 11: Kano (1)

Example: Requirements Survey

Page 12: Kano (1)

Example: Requirements Questionnaire

Page 13: Kano (1)

Functional vs. Dysfunctional Comparison

Page 14: Kano (1)

Evaluation Customer Requirements

C.R. A E O R Q I Total Grade

1 3 6 14 23 O

2 5 6 11 1 23 O

3 6 1 4 1 11 23 I

4 13 10 23 E

5 11 1 2 9 23 A

Customer Requirement is:

A: Attractive R: Reverse Q: Questionable ResultE: Expected O: One Dimensional I: Indifferent

Page 15: Kano (1)

Plot & Diagram

DelightersAttractive

Excited Quality

DissatisfierMust Be

Expected Quality

SatisfierOne DimensionalDesired Quality

Dissatisfaction

Satisfaction

Service Performance

Service Performance

Page 16: Kano (1)

Kano Model & QFD

Page 17: Kano (1)

Strategize

Project SelectionLean Six SigmaDesign for Six Sigma

Organizational StrategyDissatisfier – Must be’s – Cost of EntrySatisfier – More is better – Competitive Delighter – Latent Need – Differentiator

Page 18: Kano (1)

Application

Break into Teams Select Team Leader Select Scribe Select Presenter Scenario – You work for a Hotel chain and your company is trying to

identify Voice of the Customer information to improve Hotel performance.

Instructions: Brainstorm important characteristics you expect when staying at a Hotel Identify whether they are a Must be, Expected or a Delighter from a

Business Client perspective and from a vacationer perspective Add in what the current performance is for the Hotel

Page 19: Kano (1)

Example Results

Page 20: Kano (1)

Debrief

Analysis Strategy Recommendations

Page 21: Kano (1)

Summary of Kano Model

Analyze and rank the voice of the customer data

Develop into CategoriesDissatisfier – Must be’s – Cost of EntrySatisfier – More is better – Competitive Delighter – Latent Need – Differentiator

Identify and implement strategy

Page 22: Kano (1)

Questions

?

Page 23: Kano (1)

References

Walder, D., (1993). Kano’s model for understanding customer-defined quality. Center For Quality of Management Journal, 39, 65 – 69.

Jacobs, R., (1997). Evaluating customer satisfaction with media products and services. European Media Management Journal, 32, 11 – 18.

Ungvari, S., (1999). Adding the third dimension to auqlity. Triz Journal, 40, 31 – 35.

Sauerwein, E., Bailom, F., Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. (1996). The kano model: How to delight your customers. International Working Seminar on Production Economics, 19, 313 - 327

Zultner, R.E. & Mazur, G. H. ( 2006). The Kano Model: Recent Developments. The eighteenth symposium on Quality Function Deployment.