M/S. BELLFIELD POWER INCEPTION PRIVATE LIMITED EIA/EMP & RA/DMP FOR 23 MW POWER PLANT AT NAIKA VILLAGE OF KHEDA DISTRICT, GUJARAT APRIL, 2018 ACCREDITATION DETAILS NABET Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1316/RA 004 valid from 04-10-2013 up to 18-09-2016; Accreditation Extension Letter extending the validity up to 04-04-2017 in response to KEC’s application dated 15-09-2016; NABET Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1619/RA 0042, Issued on 28-03-2017, Valid up to 26-05-2019. Kadam Environmental Consultants www.kadamenviro.com Environment f or Development
22
Embed
Kadam - Gujarat Pollution Control Board · 2018-06-02 · environment friendly technology AFBC boilers. Blending of fuel namely rice husk and imported coal, is being resorted to,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
M/S. BELLFIELD POWER INCEPTION PRIVATE LIMITED
EIA/EMP & RA/DMP FOR 23 MW
POWER PLANT AT NAIKA VILLAGE OF
KHEDA DISTRICT, GUJARAT
APRIL, 2018
ACCREDITATION DETAILS
NABET Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1316/RA 004 valid from 04-10-2013 up to 18-09-2016;
Accreditation Extension Letter extending the validity up to 04-04-2017 in response to KEC’s application dated 15-09-2016;
NABET Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1619/RA 0042, Issued on 28-03-2017, Valid up to 26-05-2019.
Kadam Environmental Consultants w w w . ka d a m en v i r o . c o m
M/S. BPIPL EIA FOR 23 MW POWER PLANT 11. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
This executive summary summarizes the findings of the EIA study undertaken as per SEIAA’s ToR
dated 30th April, 2017 in accordance with the EIA guidelines. The summary is intended to provide an
overview of the key environmental issues and also list the measures recommended to attenuate the
impacts and manage the mitigating measures.
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1.1 Company and Project Proponent
M/s. Bellfield Power Inception Private Limited is the project proponent. It is promoted by Mr. Kailash
Agrawal and Mr. Jitendra Agrawal.
Mr. Kailash Agrawal is the key founder of the company. He is successfully running textile units at
Narol & Vatva. His experience in business management runs more than 30 years, giving maturity to
the group. His vision and his principles lay the foundation for this company. He is on the panel of
various leading business organizations.
Mr. Jitendra Agrawal has been involved in various projects for product conceptualization, brand
perception & positioning. He is an active member of various reputed committees. He helps in
formulating the company’s sales and marketing strategy as well as overseas operations.
1.1.2 Proposed Project
The proposed project is for a greenfield power plant of 23 MW, It will be based on state-of-the-art,
environment friendly technology AFBC boilers. Blending of fuel namely rice husk and imported coal, is
being resorted to, so as to utilize locally available fuel and reduce coal consumption.
Air cooled condenser are proposed to reduce water demand.
The proposed project falls under 1(d), Thermal Power Plant ‘Project or Activities’ listed within the
Category to the EIA Notification dated September 14th, 2006 (amended till date). This project is
classified as Category “B” project.
1.1.3 Location of the Project
Proposed project is located at Survey No. 1382/1, 1382/2, 1383/1, 1383/2 & 1413/1P, Village: Naika,
Taluka & Dist: Kheda in Gujarat.
1.1.4 Project Cost
The project is estimated to be ~INR 73.9 Crores.
1.1.5 Raw Materials & Source
Details of Raw materials are provided in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1: Details of Main Raw Material Quantity and Means of Storage
S. No.
Name of Fuel Consumption
MTPD
Physical State
Source Means of
Transportation
1 Imported Coal (Indonesian)
400 Solid Local Supplier Trucks
2 Rice Husk 165 Solid Local Rice Mill
Suppliers Tractors (2 Tons)
3 Limestone 45 Solid Open Market Trucks
4 HSD 400 LPH Liquid Local -
M/S. BPIPL EIA FOR 23 MW POWER PLANT 11. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1.1.6 Utilities
Power: Auxiliary Power requirement if ~1.5 MW will be sourced from DG Sets/ UGVCL and will be
used as standby back-up supply for emergency conditions & safe shutdown of power plant in case of
main power failure.
Raw Materials/Fuel Requirement: For start-up purposes, HSD will be used as fuel. During
operation phase, Rice Husk based on availability & imported coal and will be used. Details of fuel
along with the quantity and means of storage is given in Table 1-2.
Table 1-2: Details of Raw Material Quantity and Means of Storage
S. No.
Name of Fuel Consumption
MTPD
Physical State
Source Means of
Transportation
1 Imported Coal (Indonesian)
400 Solid Local Supplier Trucks
2 Rice Husk 165 Solid Local Rice Mill
Suppliers Tractors (2 Tons)
3 Limestone 45 Solid Open Market Trucks
4 HSD 400 LPH Liquid Local -
Water: - Total water requirement of proposed power plant will be estimated about 566 KLD after
recycling of RO Water. CGWA application has been carried out to abstract of ground water from bore
well. Acknowledgement copy for CGWA application is given in Annexure 1.
Manpower: - During the construction phase around 100 workers will be hired. During operation
phase, project will generate direct employment for more than 50 people and indirect employment for
approximately 25 people. They may be hired locally. First preference shall be given to skilled, semi-
skilled work force of local community, i.e. for people of Kheda District.
1.1.7 Process Description
The Imported Coal (4,200 GCV) & Rice Husk (3,000 GCV) will be fed to furnace of the AFBC Boilers (2
x 55 TPH) through from the Coal Bunker & Rice husk storage. The fuel mix (Ratio 70:30) will be fired
in the furnace by means of FD-Fan air. The saturated steam is generated in the Boiler drum and
passed to the Primary, Secondary & In-bed super heaters to get the superheated steam @ 510°C &
89 kg/cm2 from the Boilers. The superheated steam is fed to the Steam Turbine and it rotates the
steam Turbine at the speed of ~7,000 rpm. The Steam Turbine is coupled with Reduction gears and
Alternators. The power of 23 MW will be generated in the alternators and distributed to the nearby
industries and textile units. Flue gas shall meet the statutory norms. Outlet of the ESPs will conform
to GPCB/CPCB norms.
1.1.8 Waste Water Generation
The effluent generated from the various areas are:
Domestic sewage
Utility Blow downs
Wastewater generated from the domestic use will be disposed into soak pit and septic tank.
Effluent generated from industrial use like cooling tower blow downs, boiler blow downs and primary
RO reject will be sent to recycling RO followed by Sprinkler. Zero liquid discharge facility will be
proposed to treat industrial effluent.
1.1.9 Air Emissions
Due to the proposed project following types of air emissions are envisaged:
Point Source: SPM, SO2 & NOX;
M/S. BPIPL EIA FOR 23 MW POWER PLANT 11. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Area Source: SPM emissions from coal stock piles;
Line Source: Vehicular emissions like SPM, CO & HC’s from exhaust of the vehicles;
Fugitive emissions from coal handling and storage are envisaged.
1.1.10 Hazardous & Other Solid Waste
The following solid/hazardous wastes will be generated during operations:
Hazardous Waste: Used Oil & Oil stained cloth;
Non Hazardous waste: Fly Ash;
Domestic Solid Waste: Food Waste.
These will be managed as per the applicable Rules, mainly Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling,
storage and Transboundary) Rules, 2016, as amended till date.
1.2 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
1.2.1 Study Period & Area
Baseline monitoring study and survey of the study area has been carried out for three months from
15th March, 2017 to 14th June, 2017.
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring was conducted at Eight (8) locations within the study area. Noise
measurement was carried out at Five (5) locations. Surface water samples were collected from Nine
(9) locations, (including Five (5) river water samples, Two (2) Pond water samples. Ground water
collected from Eight (8) locations and soil samples were collected from Eight (8) locations.
1.2.2 Land Use and Land Cover Distribution
Land use of study area is classified as Agricultural land (~74.03%), Vegetation cover (~12.68%),
Water bodies (~3.61%), Waste land (~3.21%), Build-up Land & Habitation (~4.15 %) & Others
(~2.31%).
1.2.3 Meteorology
Based on the long-term climatological table (1981-2010) by Indian Meteorological Department (IMD),
for Ahmedabad (Station ID: 42647), during the summer season, mean daily maximum and minimum
temperature remains between 19.5 oC – 41.6oC. Relative humidity during morning and evening
remains between 50 – 65% and 20 – 25% respectively. First predominant wind direction is from NW
Direction (30.2%), second predominant wind direction is from W (25.2%) and third predominant wind
direction is from SW Direction (15.7%). Calm condition contributes to 8.8%.
1.2.4 Ambient Air Quality
It is noted from Table 1-3 that all the results are within the permissible limits of NAAQS.
Table 1-3: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results
Station Code
Sampling Location
Units Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3)
Parameters PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX Hg HC CO
NAAQS, 2009
100 60 80 80 NS NS 2
Duration [24 Hours] [8 Hours]
AAQ001 At Project
Site
Maximum 93 38 10.8 19.4 < 1.0 1,179 0.905
Minimum 46 15 3.8 6.7 < 1.0 969 0.752
Average 68 24 7.8 13.2 < 1.0 1,059 0.824
AAQ002 Naika Village
Maximum 98 48 12.9 20.8 < 1.0 1,791 0.970
Minimum 45 12 4.3 7.7 < 1.0 968 0.734
M/S. BPIPL EIA FOR 23 MW POWER PLANT 11. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Station Code
Sampling Location
Units Pollutant Concentration (All units are in µg/m3 except CO in mg/m3)
Parameters PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX Hg HC CO
NAAQS, 2009
100 60 80 80 NS NS 2
Duration [24 Hours] [8 Hours]
Average 65 24 8.2 13.6 < 1.0 1,141 0.817
AAQ003 Bherai Village
Maximum 84 48 10.7 20.1 < 1.0 1,052 0.844
Minimum 43 34 3.8 8.4 < 1.0 998 0.659
Average 61 42 7.0 14.9 < 1.0 1,021 0.743
AAQ004 Shetra Village
Maximum 73 39 9.6 17.9 < 1.0 1,049 0.885
Minimum 41 20 4.1 8.4 < 1.0 985 0.660
Average 57 27 6.6 14.4 < 1.0 1,023 0.753
AAQ005 Kaloli Village
Maximum 84 33 13.4 21.2 < 1.0 1,103 0.927
Minimum 55 17 3.8 9.1 < 1.0 978 0.659
Average 66 24 7.0 15.1 < 1.0 1,025 0.802
AAQ006 Chitrasar Village
Maximum 79 37 9.9 18.1 < 1.0 1,365 0.992
Minimum 38 13 3.8 6.9 < 1.0 1,008 0.763
Average 53 20 7.0 13.8 < 1.0 1,184 0.893
AAQ007 Dharoda Village
Maximum 68 29 9.4 20.1 < 1.0 1,252 0.969
Minimum 41 14 3.8 7.1 < 1.0 987 0.755
Average 54 19 6.4 14.7 < 1.0 1,114 0.838
AAQ008 Navagam Village
Maximum 61 27 10.0 17.4 < 1.0 1,262 0.914
Minimum 38 12 3.8 7.9 < 1.0 1,034 0.678
Average 48 18 6.4 13.2 < 1.0 1,150 0.795
1.2.5 Traffic Survey
Traffic Survey was carried out on SH – 140 in N direction of the proposed site on 07th June, 2017. It is
the road which connects site to Naika & Bareja. Width of this road is 14 feet (4.5 meters), which is a
2 Lane (Two Way) Collector Road1.
1.2.6 Noise Levels
Based on the noise monitoring results given in Table 1-4, it is observed that:
Noise level during day time & night time, in Industrial area, were within the CPCB standards i.e.
Industrial area (75 dBA (d) & 70 dBA (n)).
Noise level during day & night time, in Naika and Shreeji Pura area, were slightly higher than the
CPCB standards which is due to vehicular movements on nearby state highway.
Noise levels at distance 150 m from site boundary during night time are also higher due to vicinity
of site from this locations. Hence controls may be considered at sources within plant and other
noise muffling.
Table 1-4: Noise Level Monitoring Results
Location Code
Location Date Category
CPCB Limits in
dB (A) Average Noise levels in dB (A)
Day Time Night Time Day Time Night Time
NL1 At
Project Site
12.06.17 Industrial 75.0 70.0 65.5 63.7
1 As per The Indian Road Congress - Guideline for capacity of roads in urban Area. (IRC:106-1990), Table-2, Recommended Design Service Volumes, page – 11.
M/S. BPIPL EIA FOR 23 MW POWER PLANT 11. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Location Code
Location Date Category
CPCB Limits in
dB (A) Average Noise levels in dB (A)
Day Time Night Time Day Time Night Time
NL2
150 m away from
project boundary
(East)
09.06.17 Residential 55.0 45.0 62.7 49.4
NL3 Chalindra
Village 08.06.17 Residential 55.0 45.0 55.0 44.8
NL4 Naika Village
08.06.17 Residential 55.0 45.0 54.7 46.0
NL5 Shreeji Pura
09.06.17 Residential 55.0 45.0 55.4 46.6
1.2.7 Surface Water and Ground Water Quality
Surface Water Quality
Based on the results mentioned in Table 1-7 & Table 1-8, surface water quality of the study area is
summarized in Table 1-5.
Table 1-5: Surface water quality in study area
Code Location Source Date of
Sampling Distance from Site
(in Km) Direction w.r.t Site
SW 1 Dholka Rd Nr.Saoda River 21.04.17 ~ 9.48 NNW
SW 2 Near Chitrasar River 21.04.17 ~ 3.65 W
SW 3 Near Rasikpura River 21.04.17 ~ 8.87 SSW
SW 4 Nr. Wasna Bujarg River 21.04.17 ~ 8.87 SE
SW 5 Nr.Sarsa NH-8 River 21.04.17 ~ 9.40 NE
SW 6 Navagam Village Pond 21.04.17 ~ 3.48 N
SW 7 Naika Village Pond 21.04.17 ~ 1.66 S
Ground Water Quality
Based on the results mentioned in Table 1-9, ground water quality of the study area is summarized
in Table 1-6 .
Table 1-6: Ground water quality in study area
Code Location Source Date of
Sampling
Distance from Site (in Km)
Direction w.r.t Site
Reason for selection location
GW 1 Madhavpura Borewell 12.06.17 ~ 0.40 E To check Groundwater
quality in nearest habitation w.r.t to project site
GW 2 Chitrasar Borewell 12.06.17 ~ 3.47 W To check Groundwater in
left bank of Sabarmati river
GW 3 Sathal Village Borewell 12.06.17 ~ 7.66 SW To check Groundwater in Right bank of Sabarmati
river Downstream
GW 4 Naika Borewell 12.06.17 ~ 1.55 S To check Groundwater
quality in nearest habitation w.r.t to project site
GW 5 Govindpura Borewell 12.06.17 ~ 4.81 SE To check Groundwater
quality in nearest habitation w.r.t to project site
M/S. BPIPL EIA FOR 23 MW POWER PLANT 11. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Code Location Source Date of
Sampling
Distance from Site (in Km)
Direction w.r.t Site
Reason for selection location
GW 6 Pansoli Borewell 12.06.17 ~ 2.98 NE To check Groundwater near
Khari Canal
GW 7 Mahijda Borewell 12.06.17 ~ 7.36 NW To check Groundwater in upstream Sabarmati river
Downstream
GW 8 Radhu Borewell 12.06.17 ~ 7.28 SSE To check Groundwater near
Vatrak river downstream
1.2.8 Soil Quality
It is observed from the Table 1-10Error! Reference source not found. That at different locations:
The porosity ranged from 49 - 59 % and WHC varied from 47- 63 %;
The soil permeability ranged from 13.3 - 30.7 mm/hr.
The Electric Conductivity (0.233 - 0.949 dS/m) and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (<0.01 -
1.68).
The pH ranged from7.42 - 7.70, indicating that soils are non-saline and non-alkaline as EC <1.0
dS/m and pH < 8.5.
The highest porosity and WHC and the moderately low permeability was on account of sandy
loam to SANDY clay loam texture of soils.
Among water soluble cations predominance of Na was seen followed by Mg ,Ca and K.
M/S. BPIPL EIA FOR 23 MW POWER PLANT SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS